Benign and malignant breast lesions: Diagnosis with multiparametric MR imaging

Radiology

Volumn 229, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 225-232

  Jacobs, Michael A ^a   Barker, Peter B ^a,b   Bluemke, David A ^a   Maranto, Cindy ^a   Arnold, Cheryl ^a   Herskovits, Edward H ^a   Bhujwalla, Zaver ^a  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b KENNEDY KRIEGER INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Breast neoplasms; Cancer screening Computers; Diagnostic aid Magnetic resonance (MR); MR; Tissue characterization

Indexed keywords

GADODIAMIDE;

ADIPOSE TISSUE; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST BIOPSY; BREAST CANCER; BREAST TUMOR; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; MAMMOGRAPHY; MASTECTOMY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIOLOGICAL PARAMETERS; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

NON-PROGRAMMATIC;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ALGORITHMS; BREAST; BREAST DISEASES; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CARCINOMA; CONTRAST MEDIA; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; FEMALE; GADOLINIUM DTPA; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MIDDLE AGED; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 0141629556     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2291020333     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Heywang SH, Bassermann R, Fenzl G, et al. MRI of the breast: histopathologic correlation. Eur J Radiol 1987; 7:175-182.
2. Gilles R, Guinebretiere JM, Shapeero LG, et al. Assessment of breast cancer recurrence with contrast-enhanced subtraction MR imaging: preliminary results in 26 patients. Radiology 1993; 188:473-478.
3. Fischer U, Kopka L, Brinck U, Korabiowska M, Schauer A, Grabbe E. Prognostic value of contrast-enhanced MR mammography in patients with breast cancer. Eur Radiol 1997; 7:1002-1005.
4. Kelcz F, Santyr GE, Cron GO, Mongin SJ. Application of a quantitative model to differentiate benign from malignant breast lesions detected by dynamic, gadolinium-enhanced MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 1996; 6:743-752.
5. Kuhl CK, Mielcareck P, Klaschik S, et al. Dynamic breast MR imaging: are signal intensity time course data useful for differential diagnosis of enhancing lesions? Radiology 1999; 211:101-110.
6. Orel SG. High-resolution MR imaging for the detection, diagnosis, and staging of breast cancer. RadioGraphics 1998; 18:903-912.
7. Kuhl CK. MRI of breast tumors. Eur Radiol 2000; 10:46-58.
8. Weinreb JC, Newstead G. MR imaging of the breast. Radiology 1995; 196:593-610.
9. Heywang SH, Hahn D, Schmidt H, et al. MR imaging of the breast using gadolinium-DTPA. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1986; 10:199-204.
10. Kerslake RW, Carleton PJ, Fox JN, et al. Dynamic gradient-echo and fat-suppressed spin-echo contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast. Clin Radiol 1995; 50:440-454.
11. Heywang-Kobrunner SH, Haustein J, Pohl C, et al. Contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast: comparison of two different doses of gadopentetate dimeglumine. Radiology 1994; 191:639-646.
12. Gribbestad IS, Nilsen G, Fjosne HE, Kvinnsland S, Haugen OA, Rinck PA. Comparative signal intensity measurements in dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR mammography. J Magn Reson Imaging 1994; 4:477-480.
13. Orel SG, Schnall MD, LiVolsi VA, Troupin RH. Suspicious breast lesions: MR imaging with radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiology 1994; 190:485-493.
14. Weinstein D, Strano S, Cohen P, Fields S, Gomori JM, Degani H. Breast fibroadenoma: mapping of pathophysiologic features with three-time-point, contrastenhanced MR imaging-pilot study. Radiology 1999; 210:233-240.
15. Adams AH, Brookeman JR, Merickel MB. Breast lesion discrimination using statistical analysis and shape measures on magnetic resonance imagery. Comput Med Imaging Graph 1991; 15:339-349.
16. Lucas-Quesada FA, Sinha U, Sinha S. Segmentation strategies for breast tumors from dynamic MR images. J Magn Reson Imaging 1996; 6:753-763.
17. Gilhuijs KGA, Giger ML, Bick U. Computerized analysis of breast lesions in three dimensions using dynamic magnetic-resonance imaging. Med Phys 1998; 25:1647-1654.
18. Orel SG. Differentiating benign from malignant enhancing lesions identified at MR imaging of the breast: are time-signal intensity curves an accurate predictor? Radiology 1999; 211:5-7.
19. Sinha S, Lucas-Quesada FA, DeBruhl ND, et al. Multifeature analysis of Gd-enhanced MR images of breast lesions. J Magn Reson Imaging 1997; 7:1016-1026.
20. Lucht RE, Knopp MV, Brix G. Classification of signal-time curves from dynamic MR mammography by neural networks. Magn Reson Imaging 2001; 19:51-57.
21. Degani H, Gusis V, Weinstein D, Fields S, Strano S. Mapping pathophysiological features of breast tumors by MRI at high spatial resolution. Nat Med 1997; 3:780-782.
22. Ball G, Hall D. ISODATA, a novel method of data analysis and pattern classification. Technical Report no. 4. Menlo Park, Calif: Stanford Research Institute, April 1965.
23. Jacobs MA, Knight RA, Soltanian-Zadeh H, et al. Unsupervised segmentation of multiparameter MRI in experimental cerebral ischemia with comparison to T2, diffusion, and ADC MRI parameters and histopathological validation. J Magn Reson Imaging 2000; 11:425-437.
24. Kacl GM, Liu P, Debatin JF, Garzoli E, Caduff RF, Krestin GP. Detection of breast cancer with conventional mammography and contrast-enhanced MR imaging. Eur Radiol 1998; 8:194-200.
25. Jacobs MA, Knight RA, Windham JP, et al. Identification of cerebral ischemic lesions in rat using eigenimage filtered magnetic resonance imaging. Brain Res 1999; 837:83-94.
26. Peck D, Windham J, Emery L, Soltanian-Zadeh H, Hearshen D, Mikkelsen T. Cerebral tumor volume calculations using planimetric and eigenimage analysis. Med Phys 1996; 23:2035-2042.
27. Soltanian-Zadeh H, Windham J, Peck D, Yagle A. A comparative analysis of several transformations for enhancement and segmentation of magnetic resonance image scene sequence. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1992; 11:302-318.
28. Windham JP, Abd-Allah MA, Reimann DA, Froelich JW, Haggar AM. Eigenimage filtering in MR imaging. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1988; 12:1-9.
29. Soltanian-Zadeh H, Windham JP. A multiresolution approach for contour extraction from brain images. Med Phys 1997; 24:1844-1853.
30. Jacobs MA, Windham J, Soltanian-Zadeh H, Peck D, Knight R. Registration and warping of magnetic resonance images to histological sections. Med Phys 1999; 26:1568-1578.
31. Soltanian-Zadeh H, Windham JP, Yagle AE. A multidimensional nonlinear edge-preserving filter for magnetic resonance image restoration. IEEE Trans Image Processing 1995; 4:147-161.
32. Jacobs MA, Bluemke DB, Bhujwalla Z, Marano C, Barker PB. A model to differentiate benign from malignant breast tumors using multiparametric MRI with histological correlates (abstr). In: Proceedings of the ninth meeting of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. Berkeley, Calif: International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 2001; 563.
33. Tou J, Gonzales R. Pattern recognition principles. Reading, Mass: Addison-Wesley, 1974.
34. Theodoridis S, Koutroumbas K. Pattern recognition. Vol 1. San Diego, Calif: Academic Press, 1999.
35. Kuhl CK, Klaschik S, Mielcarek P, Gieseke J, Wardelmann E, Schild HH. Do T2-weighted pulse sequences help with the differential diagnosis of enhancing lesions in dynamic breast MRI? J Magn Reson Imaging 1999; 9:187-196.
36. Orel SG, Schnall MD. MR imaging of the breast for the detection, diagnosis, and staging of breast cancer. Radiology 2001; 220:13-30.
37. Merchant TE, Thelissen GR, de Graaf PW, Nieuwenhuizen CW, Kievit HC, Den Otter W. Application of a mixed imaging sequence for MR imaging characterization of human breast disease. Acta Radiol 1993; 34:356-361.
38. McSweeney MB, Small WC, Cerny V, Sewell W, Powell RW, Goldstein JH. Magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of breast disease: use of transverse relaxation times. Radiology 1984; 153:741-744.
39. Boetes C, Barentsz JO, Mus RD, et al. MR characterization of suspicious breast lesions with a gadolinium-enhanced TurboFLASH subtraction technique. Radiology 1994; 193:777-781.
40. Gilles R, Guinebretiere JM, Lucidarme O, et al. Nonpalpable breast tumors: diagnosis with contrast-enhanced subtraction dynamic MR imaging. Radiology 1994; 191:625-631.
41. Harms SE, Flamig DP, Hesley KL, et al. MR imaging of the breast with rotating delivery of excitation off-resonance: clinical experience with pathological correlation. Radiology 1993; 187:493-501.
42. Heiberg EV, Perman WH, Herrmann VM, Janney CG. Dynamic sequential 3D gadolinium-enhanced MRI of the whole breast. Magn Reson Imaging 1996; 14:337-348.
43. Daniel BL, Yen YF, Glover GH, et al. Breast disease: dynamic spiral MR imaging. Radiology 1998; 209:499-509.
44. Nunes LW, Schnall MD, Orel SG. Update of breast MR imaging architectural interpretation model. Radiology 2001; 219:484-494.
45. Ouwerkerk R, Jacobs MA, Bottomley PA, Fajardo LL. A method for quantifying tissue sodium in breast tumors with short echo time 23NA MRI (abstr). In: Proceedings of the tenth meeting of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. Berkeley, Calif: International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 2002; 2060.