Towards integrating acceptance and resistance research: Evidence from a telecare case study

European Journal of Information Systems

Volumn 22, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 434-454

  Van Offenbeek, Marjolein ^a   Boonstra, Albert ^a   Seo, DongBack ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

acceptance; adoption; IS implementation; resistance; support; use behaviour

Indexed keywords

ELECTRIC RESISTANCE; INFORMATION SYSTEMS; SUPPORTS;

ACCEPTANCE; ADOPTION; IMPLEMENTATION PROJECTS; IS ADOPTION; IS IMPLEMENTATION; ON-RESISTANCE; TWO-DIMENSION; USE BEHAVIOUR;

EID: 84878914667     PISSN: 0960085X     EISSN: 14769344     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1057/ejis.2012.29     Document Type: Article

References (80)

1. ADAMS JS (1963) Towards an understanding of inequity. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 67(5), 422-436.
2. AJZEN I (1985) From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. In Action Control: From Cognition to Behavior (KUHI J and BECKMANN J, Eds), pp 11-39, Springer, Heidelberg.
3. AJZEN I and FISHBEIN M (1980) Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behaviour. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs.
4. BARLOW J, BAYER S and CURRY R (2006) Implementing complex innovations in fluid multi-stakeholder environments: Experiences of telecare. Technovation 26(3), 396-406.
5. BEAUDRY A and PINSONNEAULT A (2005) Understanding user responses to information technology: A coping model of user adaptation. MIS Quarterly 29(3), 493-524.
6. BEAUDRY A and PINSONNEAULT A (2010) The other side of acceptance: Studying the direct and indirect effects of emotions on information technology use. MIS Quarterly 34(4), 689-714.
7. BHATTACHERJEE A and HIKMET N (2007) Physicians' resistance toward healthcare information technology: A theoretical model and empirical test. European Journal of Information Systems 16(6), 725-737.
8. BOONSTRA A, BODDY D and BELL S (2008) Stakeholder management in IOS projects: Analysis of an attempt to implement an electronic patients file. European Journal of Information Systems 17(2), 100-111.
9. BOUDREAU MC and ROBEY D (2005) Enacting integrated information technology: A human agency perspective. Organization Science 16(1), 3-18.
10. BROWN SA, MASSEY AP, MONTOYA-WEISS MM and BURKMAN JR (2002) Do I really have tö User acceptance of mandated technology. European Journal of Information Systems 11(4), 283-295.
11. BURKE J, MACKENZIE SB and PODSAKOFF PM (2003) A critical review of construct indicators and measurement model misspecification in marketing and consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research 30(2), 199-218.
12. BURTON-JONES A and GALLIVAN MJ (2007) Toward a deeper understanding of system usage in organizations: A multilevel perspective. MIS Quarterly 31(4), 657-680.
13. BURTON-JONES A and STRAUB D (2006) Reconceptualizing system usage: An approach and empirical test. Information Systems Research 17(3), 228-246.
14. CENFETELLI RT (2004) Inhibitors and enablers as dual factors concepts in technology usage. Journal of the Association of Information Systems 5(11-12), 472-492.
15. CHAE B and POOLE MS (2005) Mandates and technology acceptance: A tale of two enterprise technologies. Journal of Strategic Information Systems 14(2), 147-166.
16. CHIN WW, JOHNSON N and SCWARZ A (2008) A fast form approach to measuring technology acceptance and other constructs. MIS Quarterly 32(4), 687-703.
17. COETSEE LD (1999) From resistance to commitment. Public Administration Quarterly 23(2), 204-222.
18. COMPEAU DR and HIGGINS CA (1995) Computer self-efficacy: Development of a measure and initial test. MIS Quarterly 19(2), 189-222.
19. CRONBACH LJ (1984) Essentials of Psychological Testing. Harpert & Row, New York.
20. DAVIS FD (1989) Perceived usefulness, perceived ease-of-use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly 13(3), 319-340.
21. DAVIS FD, BAGOZZI RP and WARSHAW PR (1992) Extrinsic and intrinsic motivation to use computers in the workplace. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 22(14), 1111-1132.
22. DAY DL (2000) Behavioural effects of attitudes toward constraint in CASE: The impact of development task and project phase. Information Systems Journal 10(2), 151-163.
23. DENT EB and GOLDBERG SG (1999) Challenging 'resistance to change'. Journal of Applied Behavioural Science 35(1), 25-41.
24. DEUTSCH M and GERARD HB (1955) A study of normative and informational social influences upon individual judgment. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 51(3), 629-636.
25. DEY B, NEWMAN D and PRENDERGAST R (2011) Analysing appropriation and usability in social and occupational lives: An investigation of Bangladeshi farmers' use of mobile telephony. Information, Technology & People 24(1), 46-63.
26. EDWARDS JR (2001) Multidimensional constructs in organizational behaviour research: An integrative analytical framework. Organizational Research Methods 4(2), 144-192.
27. EDWARDS JR (2011) The fallacy of formative measurement. Organizational Research Methods 14(2), 370-388.
28. EISENHARDT KM and BOURGEOIS LJ (1988) Politics of strategic decision making in high-velocity environments: Toward a midrange theory. Academy of Management Journal 31(4), 737-770.
29. FISHBEIN M and AJZEN I (1975) Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behaviour: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Addison-Wesley, Reading, M.A.
30. FLEENOR JW, FLEENOR JB and GROSSNICKLE WF (1996) Inter-rater reliability and agreement of performance ratings: A methodological comparison. Journal of Business and Psychology 10(3), 367-380.
31. HEBERT MA, KORABEK B and SCOTT RE (2006) Moving research into practice: A decision framework for integrating home telehealth into chronic illness care. International Journal of Medical Informatics 75(12), 786-794.
32. HERZBERG F (1964) The motivation-hygiene concept and problems of manpower. Personnel Administration 27(1), 3-7.
33. JIANG JJ, MUHANNA WA and KLEIN G (2000) User resistance and strategies for promoting acceptance across system types. Information & Management 37(1), 25-36.
34. JOSHI K (1990) An investigation of equity as a determinate of user information satisfaction. Decision Sciences 21(4), 786-807.
35. JOSHI K (1991) A model of users' perspective on change: The case of information technology implementation. MIS Quarterly 15(2), 229-240.
36. JUDSON AS (1991) Changing Behavior in Organizations: Minimizing Resistance to Change. Blackwell, Cambridge, M.A.
37. KAPPOS A and RIVARD S (2008) A three-perspective model of culture, information, and their development and use. MIS Quarterly 32(3), 601-634.
38. KARAHANNA E, STRAUB DW and CHERVANY NL (1999) Information technology adoption across time: A cross-sectional comparison of preadoption and post-adoption beliefs. MIS Quarterly 23(2), 183-213.
39. KELLEY RE (1992) The Power of Followership. Currency and Doubleday, New York.
40. KELLY R and BARSADE SG (2001) Mood and emotions in small groups and work teams. Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes 86(1), 99-130.
41. KIM HW and KANKANHALLI A (2009) Investigating user resistance to information systems implementation: A status quo bias perspective. MIS Quarterly 33(3), 567-582.
42. KING WR and HE JJ (2006) A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model. Information & Management 43(6), 740-755.
43. KLAUS T and BLANTON JE (2010) User resistance determinants and the psychological contract in enterprise system implementations. European Journal of Information Systems 19(6), 625-637.
44. KNIGHTS D and MURRAY F (1992) Politics and pain in managing information technology: A case study from insurance. Organization Studies 13(2), 211-228.
45. KNOWLES S and LINN JA (Eds) (2004) Approach-avoidance model of persuasion: Alpha and omega strategies for change. In Resistance and Persuasion, pp 117-148, Erlbaum, Mahwah, N.J.
46. KOSSEK EE, YOUNG W, GASH DC and NICHOL V (1994) Waiting for innovation in the human resources department: Godot implements a human resource information system. Human Resource Management 33(1), 135-159.
47. LAPOINTE L and RIVARD S (2005) A multilevel model of resistance to information technology implementation. MIS Quarterly 29(3), 461-491.
48. LAPOINTE L and RIVARD S (2007) A triple take on information system implementation. Organization Science 18(1), 89-107.
49. LEE HG and CLARK TH (1997) Market process reengineering through electronic market systems: Opportunities and challenges. Journal of Management Information Systems 13(3), 113-136.
50. LEONARDI I and BARLEY SR (2010) What's under construction here? Social action, materiality, and power in constructivist studies of technology and organizing. Academy of Management Annals 4(1), 1-51.
51. LEWIN K (1947) Frontiers in group dynamics: Concept, method, and reality in social sciences, social equilibria, and social change. Human Relations 1(1), 5-41.
52. LEWIS MW and GRIMES AJ (1999) Metatriangulation: Building theory from multiple paradigms. Academy of Management Review 24(4), 672-690.
53. LIANG H and XUE Y (2009) Avoidance of information technology threats: A theoretical perspective. MIS Quarterly 33(1), 71-90.
54. MANTZANA V, THEMISTOCLEOUS M, IRANI Z and MORABITO V (2007) Identifying healthcare actors involved in the adoption of information systems. European Journal of Information Systems 16(1), 91-102.
55. MARAKAS GM and HORNIK S (1996) Passive resistance misuse: Overt support and covert recalcitrance in MIS implementation. European Journal of Information Systems 5(3), 208-220.
56. MARKUS ML (1983) Power, politics and MIS implementation. Communications of the ACM 26(6), 430-444.
57. MARTINKO MJ, HENRY JW and ZMUD RW (1996) An attributional explanation of individual resistance to the introduction of information technologies in the workplace. Behaviour & Information Technology 15(5), 313-330.
58. MAXWELL JA (1992) The Logic of Qualitative Research. Harvard University, Cambridge, M.A.
59. MEISSONIER R and HOUZé E (2010) Toward an 'IT conflict-resistance theory': Action research during it pre-implementation. European Journal of Information Systems 15(5), 540-561.
60. MILES MB and HUBERMAN AM (1994) Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. Sage, Thousand Oaks.
61. MINGERS J (2001) Combining IS research methods: Towards a pluralist methodology. Information Systems Research 12(3), 240-259.
62. MOORE GC and BENBASAT I (1991) Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation. Information Systems Research 2(3), 192-222.
63. OKHUYSEN GA and BONARDI JP (2011) The challenges of theory building through the combination of lenses. Academy of Management Review 36(1), 6-11.
64. PEETERS JM, BOSS JT and FRANCKE AL (2008) Monitor videonetwerken, Peiling najaar 2007. Nivel, Utrecht.
65. PRAMATARI K and THEOTOKIS A (2009) Consumer acceptance of RFIDenabled services: A model of multiple attitudes, perceived system characteristics and individual traits. European Journal of Information Systems 18(6), 541-553.
66. RUSSELL JA and CARROLL JM (1999) On the bipolarity of positive and negative affect. Psychological Bulletin 15(1), 3-30.
67. SABHERWAL R and ROBEY D (1995) Reconciling variance and process strategies for studying information system development. Information Systems Research 6(4), 303-327.
68. SAMUELSON W and ZECKHAUSER R (1988) Status quo bias in decision making. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 1(1), 7-59.
69. SCHEPERS JJL and WETZELS M (2007) A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model: Investigating subjective norm and moderation effects. Information & Management 44(1), 90-103.
70. SEEMAN E and GIBSON S (2009) Predicting acceptance of electronic medical records: Is the technology acceptance model enough? SAM Advanced Management Journal 74(4), 21-26.
71. SILVA L (2007) Post positivist review of technology acceptance model. Journal of the Association of Information Systems 8(4), 255-266.
72. SMITH ACT and GRAETZ FM (2011) Philosophies or Organizational Change. Edward Elger, Gloucester.
73. SPIGGLE S (1994) Analysis and interpretation of qualitative data in consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research 21(3), 491-503.
74. TYRE M and ORLIKOWSKI WJ (1994) Windows of opportunity: Temporal patterns of technological adaptation in organizations. Organization Science 5(1), 98-118.
75. VENKATESH V, BROWN SA, MARUPING KM and BALA H (2008) Predicting different conceptualizations of system use: The competing roles of behavioural intention, facilitating conditions and behavioural expectation. MIS Quarterly 32(3), 483-502.
76. VENKATESH V and DAVIS FD (2000) A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science 46(2), 186-204.
77. VENKATESH V, MORRIS MG, DAVIS GB and DAVIS FD (2003) User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly 27(3), 425-478.
78. WADDELL D and SOHAL AS (1998) Resistance: A constructive tool for change management. Management Decision 36(8), 543-548.
79. WU J and LEDERER A (2009) A meta-analysis of the role of environmentbased voluntariness in information technology acceptance. MIS Quarterly 33(2), 419-432.
80. ZUBOFF S (1988) In the Age of the Smart Machine: The Future of Work and Power. Basic Books, New York.\