Behavioural effects of attitudes toward constraint in CASE: The impact of development task and project phase

Information Systems Journal

Volumn 10, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 151-163

  Day, Donald L ^a,b,c  

^a TOWSON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b AMERICAN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

CASE; Constraint; Life cycle; Task; User behaviour

Indexed keywords

EID: 0034384586     PISSN: 13501917     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2575.2000.00073.x     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Akin, O. (1994) Creativity in design. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 7, 9-21.
2. Chin, J., Diehl, V. & Norman, K. (1988) Development of an instrument measuring user satisfaction of the human-computer interface. In: Human Factors in Computing Systems. Soloway, E., Frye, D. & Sheppard, S. (eds), pp. 213-218. Proceedings of the 1988 SIGCHI Annual Meeting. ACM, New York.
3. Darses, F. (1990) Constraints in design: towards a methodology of psychological analysis based on Al formalisms. In: Human-Computer Interaction - INTERACT '90. Diaper, D. et al. (eds), pp. 135-139. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
4. Darses, F. (1991) The constraint satisfaction approach to design: a psychological investigation. Acta Psychologica, 78, 307-325.
5. Day, D. (1994) Behavioral and perceptual responses to the constraints of computer-mediated design. In: Human-Machine Communication for Educational Systems Design. Brouwer-Janse, M. & Harrington, T. (eds), pp. 99-106. ASI Series F, Vol. 129. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
6. Day, D. (1995) User Responses to Constraints in Computerized Design Tools. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, UMI 95-44905. Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY.
7. Day, D. (1996) User responses to constraints in computerized design tools: an extended abstract. Software Engineering Notes, 21, 47-50.
8. Day, D., Ahuja, M. & Scott, L. (1997) Constraints in design engineering: problem solving with CASE tools. In: Proceedings of the Eighth Australian Conference on Information Systems, 29 Sept.-2 Oct, pp. 509-516. University of South Australia, Adelaide. Available online: http://business.city.unisa.edu.au/acis97/
9. DeVellis, R. (1991) Scale Development: Theory and Applications. Applied Social Research Methods Series, Vol. 26. Sage Publishers, Newbury Park, CA.
10. Fishbein, M. & Ajzen, I. (1975) Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: an Introduction to Theory and Research. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
11. Jankowski, D. (1997) Computer-aided systems engineering methodology support and its effect on the output of structured analysis. Empirical Software Engineering, 2, 11-38.
12. Laurel, B. (1991) Computers as Theatre. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
13. Orlikowski, W. (1989) Division among the ranks: the social implications of CASE tools for system developers. In: Proceedings, Tenth International Conference on Information Systems, Boston, 4-6 December, pp. 199-210.
14. Orlikowski, W. (1991a) Integrated information environment or matrix of control? The contradictory implications of information technology. Account, Management and Information Technology, 1, 9-42.
15. Orlikowski, W. (1991b) Radical and Incremental Innovations in Systems Development: An Empirical Investigation of CASE Tools. Center for Information Systems Research Working Paper 221. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
16. Parchkova, M. & Day, D. (1998) Negotiating Constraints in Computerised Design Tools: A Taxonomy of User Behaviour. Revision under consideration by Behaviour & Information Technology.
17. Scott, L., Horvath, L. & Day, D. (2000) Characterising CASE constraints. Communications of the ACM (in press).
18. Sheridan, T. (1980) Computer control and human alienation. Technology Review, 83, 65-730.
19. Silver, M. (1988) On the restrictiveness of decision support systems. In: Organizational Decision Support Systems. Lee, R., McCosh, A. & Migliarese, P. (eds), pp. 259-270. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
20. Silver, M. (1991) Systems That Support Decision Makers. Wiley, Chichester, UK.
21. Venkatesh, M. (1995) Critique of 'User responses to constraints in computerized design tools' (personal communication). School of Information Studies, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY.
22. Vessey, I., Jarvenpaa, S. & Tractinsky, N. (1992) Evaluation of vendor products: CASE tools as methodology companions. Communications of the ACM, 35, 90-105.