Electrically elicited visual evoked potentials in argus II retinal implant wearers

Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science

Volumn 54, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 3891-3901

  Christiaan Stronks, H ^a,b   Barry, Michael P ^c   Dagnelie, Gislin ^a  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b CSIRO   (Australia)

^c Johns Hopkins University   (United States)

Author keywords

Psychophysics; Retinal implant; Visual evoked potential; Visual prosthesis

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BRIGHTNESS; CASE REPORT; CELL POLARITY; ELECTRODE; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; EVOKED VISUAL RESPONSE; HUMAN; IMPEDANCE; LATENT PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PULSE RATE; RETINAL IMPLANT; RETINITIS PIGMENTOSA; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; VISION; VISUAL STIMULATION; WAVEFORM;

PSYCHOPHYSICS; RETINAL IMPLANT; VISUAL EVOKED POTENTIAL; VISUAL PROSTHESIS;

ADULT; ELECTRIC STIMULATION; ELECTRODES, IMPLANTED; EVOKED POTENTIALS, VISUAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; LIGHT; MALE; PHOSPHENES; PHOTIC STIMULATION; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RETINA; RETINAL NEURONS; SENSORY THRESHOLDS; SIGNAL-TO-NOISE RATIO; VISUAL PERCEPTION; VISUAL PROSTHESIS;

EID: 84878794870     PISSN: 01460404     EISSN: 15525783     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.13-11594     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Ahuja AK, Dorn JD, Caspi A, et al. Blind subjects implanted with the Argus II retinal prosthesis are able to improve performance in a spatial-motor task. Br J Ophthalmol. 2011; 95:539-543.
2. Humayun MS, Dorn JD, Da Cruz L, et al. Interim results from the International Trial of Second Sight's Visual Prosthesis. Ophthalmology. 2012;119:779-788.
3. Zeng FG. Auditory prostheses: past, present, and future. In: Zeng, FG, Popper, AN Fay, RR, eds. Cochlear Implants Auditory Prostheses and Electric Hearing. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag; 2004.
4. Van Wermeskerken GK, Van Olphen AF, Van Zanten GA. A comparison of intra- versus post-operatively acquired electrically evoked compound action potentials. Int J Audiol. 2006; 45:589-594.
5. Smoorenburg GF, Willeboer C, Van Dijk JE. Speech perception in nucleus CI24M cochlear implant users with processor settings based on electrically evoked compound action potential thresholds. Audiol Neurootol. 2002;7:335-347.
6. Shivdasani MN, Luu CD, Cicione R, et al. Evaluation of stimulus parameters and electrode geometry for an effective suprachoroidal retinal prosthesis. J Neural Eng. 2010;7:036008.
7. Yamauchi Y, Franco LM, Jackson DJ, et al. Comparison of electrically evoked cortical potential thresholds generated with subretinal or suprachoroidal placement of a microelectrode array in the rabbit. J Neural Eng. 2005;2:S48-S56.
8. Sachs HG, Gekeler F, Schwahn H, et al. Implantation of stimulation electrodes in the subretinal space to demonstrate cortical responses in Yucatan minipig in the course of visual prosthesis development. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2005;15:493-499.
9. Nadig MN. Development of a silicon retinal implant: cortical evoked potentials following focal stimulation of the rabbit retina with light and electricity. Clin Neurophysiol. 1999;110: 1545-1553.
10. Wong YT, Chen SC, Seo JM, et al. Focal activation of the feline retina via a suprachoroidal electrode array. Vision Res. 2009; 49:825-833.
11. Wong YT, Chen SC, Kerdraon YA, et al. Efficacy of suprachoroidal, bipolar, electrical stimulation in a vision prosthesis. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2008;2008:1789-1792.
12. Zhou JA, Woo SJ, Park SI, et al. A suprachoroidal electrical retinal stimulator design for long-term animal experiments and in vivo assessment of its feasibility and biocompatibility in rabbits. J Biomed Biotechnol. 2008;2008:547428.
13. Siu TL, Morley JW. Visual cortical potentials of the mouse evoked by electrical stimulation of the retina. Brain Res Bull. 2008;75:115-118.
14. Wang K, Li XX, Jiang YR, Dong JQ. Influential factors of thresholds for electrically evoked potentials elicited by intraorbital electrical stimulation of the optic nerve in rabbit eyes. Vision Res. 2007;47:3012-3024.
15. Sun J, Lu Y, Cao P, et al. Spatiotemporal properties of multipeaked electrically evoked potentials elicited by penetrative optic nerve stimulation in rabbits. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52:146-154.
16. Lu Y, Cao P, Sun J, et al. Using independent component analysis to remove artifacts in visual cortex responses elicited by electrical stimulation of the optic nerve. J Neural Eng. 2012;9:026002.
17. Cai C, Li L, Li X, et al. Response properties of electrically evoked potential elicited by multi-channel penetrative optic nerve stimulation in rabbits. Doc Ophthalmol. 2009;118:191-204.
18. Chelvanayagam DK, Vickery RM, Kirkcaldie MT, Coroneo MT, Morley JW. Multichannel surface recordings on the visual cortex: implications for a neuroprosthesis. J Neural Eng. 2008;5:125-132.
19. Nishida K, Kamei M, Kondo M, et al. Efficacy of suprachoroidal- transretinal stimulation in a rabbit model of retinal degeneration. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010;51:2263-2268.
20. Siu T, Morley J. Implantation of episcleral electrodes via anterior orbitotomy for stimulation of the retina with induced photoreceptor degeneration: an in vivo feasibility study on a conceptual visual prosthesis. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2008; 150:477-485, discussion 485.
21. Siu TL, Morley JW. In vivo evaluation of an episcleral multielectrode array for stimulation of the retina with reduced retinal ganglion cell mass. J Clin Neurosci. 2008;15:552-558.
22. Chen SJ, Mahadevappa M, Roizenblatt R, Weiland J, Humayun M. Neural responses elicited by electrical stimulation of the retina. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 2006;104:252-259.
23. Humayun MS, Weiland JD, Fujii GY, et al. Visual perception in a blind subject with a chronic microelectronic retinal prosthesis. Vision Res. 2003;43:2573-2581.
24. Brelen ME, Vince V, Gerard B, Veraart C, Delbeke J. Measurement of evoked potentials after electrical stimulation of the human optic nerve. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010; 51:5351-5355.
25. Quian Quiroga R, Sakowitz OW, Basar E, Schurmann M. Wavelet transform in the analysis of the frequency composition of evoked potentials. Brain Res Brain Res Protoc. 2001;8: 16-24.
26. Johnstone LM, Silverman BW. Wavelet threshold estimators for data with correlated noise. J R Statist Soc B. 1997;59:319-351.
27. Salmanpour A, Brown LJ, Shoemaker JK. Performance analysis of stationary and discrete wavelet transform for action potential detection from sympathetic nerve recordings in humans. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2008;2008:2932-2935.
28. Brychta RJ, Tuntrakool S, Appalsamy M, et al. Wavelet methods for spike detection in mouse renal sympathetic nerve activity. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2007;54:82-93.
29. Klistorner AI, Graham SL. Electroencephalogram-based scaling of multifocal visual evoked potentials: effect on intersubject amplitude variability. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2001;42: 2145-2152.
30. Brigell MG. The visual evoked potential. In: Fishman GA, Birch DG, Holder DE, Brigell MG, eds. Electrophysiological Testing in Disorders of the Retina, Optic Nerve, and Visual Pathway, 2nd ed. San Francisco, CA: The Foundation of the American Academy of Ophthalmology; 2001:1-155.
31. Weiland JD, Humayun MS. Visual prosthesis. Proc IEEE. 2008; 96:1076-1084.
32. Rattay F. The basic mechanism for the electrical stimulation of the nervous system. Neuroscience. 1999;89:335-346.
33. Jensen RJ, Ziv OR, Rizzo JF III. Thresholds for activation of rabbit retinal ganglion cells with relatively large, extracellular microelectrodes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005;46:1486-1496.
34. Margalit E, Thoreson WB. Inner retinal mechanisms engaged by retinal electrical stimulation. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006;47:2606-2612.
35. Sekirnjak C, Hottowy P, Sher A, et al. Electrical stimulation of mammalian retinal ganglion cells with multielectrode arrays. J Neurophysiol. 2006;95:3311-3327.
36. Margalit E, Babai N, Luo J, Thoreson WB. Inner and outer retinal mechanisms engaged by epiretinal stimulation in normal and rd mice. Vis Neurosci. 2011;28:145-154.
37. Stett A, Barth W, Weiss S, Haemmerle H, Zrenner E. Electrical multisite stimulation of the isolated chicken retina. Vision Res. 2000;40:1785-1795.
38. Fried SI, Hsueh HA, Werblin FS. A method for generating precise temporal patterns of retinal spiking using prosthetic stimulation. J Neurophysiol. 2006;95:970-978.
39. Laube T, Schanze T, Brockmann C, et al. Chronically implanted epidural electrodes in Gottinger minipigs allow function tests of epiretinal implants. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2003;241:1013-1019.
40. Weitz AC, Behrend MR, Humayun MS, Chow RH, Weiland JD. Interphase gap decreases electrical stimulation threshold of retinal ganglion cells. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2011; 2011:6725-6728.
41. Odom JV, Bach M, Brigell M, et al. ISCEV standard for clinical visual evoked potentials (2009 update). Doc Ophthalmol. 2009;120:111-119.
42. Pérez Fornos A, Sommerhalder J, Da Cruz L, et al. Temporal properties of visual perception on electrical stimulation of the retina. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012;53:2720-2731.