A comparison of intra- versus post-operatively acquired electrically evoked compound action potentials

International Journal of Audiology

Volumn 45, Issue 10, 2006, Pages 589-594

  Van Wermeskerken, Gijs K A ^a   Van Olphen, A F ^a   Van Zanten, G A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Cochlear implant; Evoked potentials; Neural response telemetry; Speech processor fitting

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTRIC POTENTIAL; ELECTRODE; EVOKED AUDITORY RESPONSE; FEMALE; HEARING IMPAIRMENT; HUMAN; MALE; OPERATION DURATION; PEROPERATIVE CARE; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ACTION POTENTIALS; ADULT; AGED; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; COCHLEAR IMPLANTATION; COCHLEAR IMPLANTS; ELECTRIC STIMULATION; FEMALE; HEARING LOSS, SENSORINEURAL; HUMANS; INTRAOPERATIVE PERIOD; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MONITORING, INTRAOPERATIVE; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 33750424722     PISSN: 14992027     EISSN: 17088186     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/14992020600833189     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Abbas, P.J., Brown, C.J., Shallop, J.K., Firszt, J.B., Hughes, M.L., et al. 1999. Summary of results using the Nucleus CI24M implant to record the electrically evoked compound action potential. Ear Hear, 20, 45-59.
2. Brown, C.J., Hughes, M.L., Luk, B., Abbas, P.J., Wolaver, A., et al. 2000. The relationship between EAP and EABR thresholds and levels used to program the Nucleus 24 speech processor: Data from adults [see comments]. Ear Hear, 21, 151-163.
3. Cafarelli, D.D., Dillier, N., Lai, W.K., von, W.E., van, D.B., et al. 2005. Normative findings of electrically evoked compound action potential measurements using the neural response telemetry of the Nucleus CI24M cochlear implant system. Audiol Neurootol, 10, 105-116.
4. Dillier, N., Lai, W.K., Almqvist, B., Frohne, C., Muller-Deile, J., et al. 2002. Measurement of the electrically evoked compound action potential via a neural response telemetry system. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol, 111, 407-414.
5. Hughes, M.L., Van der Werff, K.R., Brown, C.J., Abbas, P.J., Kelsay, D.M., et al. 2001. A longitudinal study of electrode impedance, the electrically evoked compound action potential, and behavioural measures in Nucleus 24 cochlear implant users. Ear Hear, 22, 471-486.
6. Kawano, A., Seldon, H.L., Clark, G.M., Ramsden, R.T. & Raine, C.H. 1998. Intracochlear factors contributing to psychophysical percepts following cochlear implantation. Acta Otolaryngol, 118, 313-326.
7. Killian, M.J., Klis, S.F. & Smoorenburg, G.F. 1994. Adaptation in the compound action potential response of the guinea pig VIIIth nerve to electric stimulation. Hear Res, 81, 66-82.
8. Lai, W.K., Aksit, M., Akdas, F. & Dillier, N. 2004. Longitudinal behaviour of neural response telemetry (NRT) data and clinical implications. Int J Audiol, 43, 252-263.
9. Lai, W.K., Dillier, N., Laszig, R. & Fisch, U. 1997. Results from a pilot study using the Nucleus CI24M/SP5 cochlear implant system. Am J Otol, 18(Suppl), S35-S36.
10. Li, L., Parkins, C.W. & Webster, D.B. 1999. Does electrical stimulation of deaf cochleae prevent spiral ganglion degeneration? Hear Res, 133, 27-39.
11. Pfingst, B.E. 1990. Changes over time in thresholds for electrical stimulation of the cochlea. Hear Res, 50, 225-236.
12. Seyle, K. & Brown, C.J. 2002. Speech perception using maps based on neural response telemetry measures. Ear Hear, 23(Suppl), 72S-79S.
13. Smoorenburg, G.F., Willeboer, C. & van Dijk, J.E. 2002. Speech perception in Nucleus CI24M cochlear implant users, with processor settings based on electrically evoked compound action potential thresholds. Audiol Neurootol, 7, 335-347.
14. Thai-Van, H., Chanal, J.M., Coudert, C., Veuillet, E., Truy, E., et al. 2001. Relationship between NRT measurements and behavioral levels in children with the Nucleus 24 cochlear implant may change over time: Preliminary report. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol, 58, 153-162.
15. Walsh, S.M. & Leake-Jones, P.A. 1982. Chronic electrical stimulation of auditory nerve in cat: Physiological and histological results. Hear Res, 7, 281-304.