Using independent component analysis to remove artifacts in visual cortex responses elicited by electrical stimulation of the optic nerve

Journal of Neural Engineering

Volumn 9, Issue 2, 2012, Pages

  Lu, Yiliang ^a   Cao, Pengjia ^a   Sun, Jingjing ^a   Wang, Jing ^a   Li, Liming ^a   Ren, Qiushi ^b   Chen, Yao ^a   Chai, Xinyu ^a  

^a SHANGHAI JIAO TONG UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b PEKING UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACTION POTENTIALS; BIPHASIC; BRAIN TISSUE; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; CORTICAL POTENTIALS; CURRENT PULSE; ELECTRICAL STIMULATIONS; LONG DURATION; MULTI-CHANNEL; NEURAL RESPONSE; OPTIC NERVE; POTENTIAL APPLICATIONS; VISUAL CORTEXES; VISUAL PROSTHESIS; WAVE FORMS;

BIOELECTRIC POTENTIALS; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; EYE PROTECTION; INDEPENDENT COMPONENT ANALYSIS;

PROSTHETICS;

LIDOCAINE; LOCAL ANESTHETIC AGENT;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; ARTIFACT REDUCTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTROSTIMULATION; EVOKED VISUAL RESPONSE; IMAGE PROCESSING; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; INDEPENDENT COMPONENT ANALYSIS; NONHUMAN; OPTIC NERVE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RABBIT; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; VISUAL CORTEX; VISUAL PROSTHESIS; VISUAL STIMULATION; WAVEFORM; ALGORITHM; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMAL; ARTIFACT; ELECTRODE; EVOKED RESPONSE; PHYSIOLOGY; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; REPRODUCIBILITY; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STEREOTACTIC PROCEDURE;

ORYCTOLAGUS CUNICULUS;

ALGORITHMS; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANESTHETICS, LOCAL; ANIMALS; ARTIFACTS; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; ELECTRIC STIMULATION; ELECTRODES, IMPLANTED; EVOKED POTENTIALS; EVOKED POTENTIALS, VISUAL; LIDOCAINE; OPTIC NERVE; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; RABBITS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; STEREOTAXIC TECHNIQUES; VISUAL CORTEX;

EID: 84863242858     PISSN: 17412560     EISSN: 17412552     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1088/1741-2560/9/2/026002     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Brindley G S and Lewin W S 1968 The sensations produced by electrical stimulation of the visual cortex J. Physiol. 196 479-93 PMID: 4871047
2. Dobelle W H, Mladejovsky M G and Girvin J P 1974 Artificial vision for the blind: electrical stimulation of visual cortex offers hope for a functional prosthesis Science 183 440-4
3. Schmidt E M, Bak M J, Hambrecht F T, Kufta C V, O'Rourke D K and Vallabhanath P 1996 Feasibility of a visual prosthesis for the blind based on intracortical micro stimulation of the visual cortex Brain 119 507-22 (Pubitemid 26149365)
4. Chow A Y, Pardue M T, Chow V Y, Peyman G A, Liang C, Perlman J I and Peachey N S 2001 Implantation of silicon chip microphotodiode arrays into the cat subretinal space IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng. 9 86-95 (Pubitemid 32721121)
5. Humayun M S, De Juan E Jr, Weiland J D, Dagnelie G, Katona S, Greenberg R and Suzuki S 1999 Pattern electrical stimulation of the human retina Vis. Res. 39 2569-76 (Pubitemid 29197302)
6. Rizzo J F III and and Wyatt J 1997 Prospects for a visual prosthesis Neuroscientist 3 251-62 (Pubitemid 127532813)
7. Zrenner E et al 1997 The development of subretinal microphotodiodes for replacement of degenerated photoreceptors Ophthalm. Res. 29 269-80 (Pubitemid 27427360)
8. Fang X et al 2005 Direct stimulation of optic nerve by electrodes implanted in optic disc of rabbit eyes Graefes. Arch. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. 243 49-56
9. Veraart C, Raftopoulos C, Mortimer J T, Delbeke J, Pins D, Michaux G, Vanlierde A, Parrini S and Wanet-Defalque M C 1998 Visual sensations produced by optic nerve stimulation using an implanted self-sizing spiral cuff electrode Brain Res. 813 181-6 (Pubitemid 29012533)
10. Veraart C, Wanet-Defalque M C, Gerard B, Vanlierde A and Delbeke J 2003 Pattern recognition with the optic nerve visual prosthesis Artif. Organ 27 996-1004 (Pubitemid 37414238)
11. Brelen M E, Duret F, Gerard B, Delbeke J and Veraart C 2005 Creating a meaningful visual perception in blind volunteers by optic nerve stimulation J. Neural Eng. 2 S22-8 (Pubitemid 41238006)
12. Cai C S, LiL M, Li X L, Chai X Y, Sun J J, Lu Y L, Sui X H, Chen P P and Ren Q S 2008 Response properties of electrically evoked potential elicited by multi-channel penetrative optic nerve stimulation in rabbits Doc. Ophthalmol. 118 191-204
13. Chai X Y, Li L M, Wu K J, Zhou C Q, Cao P J and Ren Q S 2008 C-Sight visual prostheses for the blind IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. 27 20-8
14. Li L M, Cao P J, Sun M J, Chai X Y, Wu K J, Xu X, Li X X and Ren Q S 2009 Intraorbital optic nerve stimulation with penetrating electrodes: in vivo electrophysiology study in rabbits Graefes. Arch. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. 247 349-61
15. Sun J J, Lu Y L, Cao P J, Li X L, Cai C S, Chai X Y, Ren Q S and Li L M 2011 Spatiotemporal properties of multipeaked electrically evoked potentials elicited by penetrative optic nerve stimulation in rabbits Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 52 146-54
16. Nagel J 1995 Biopotential amplifiers The Biomedical Engineering Handbook (Hartford, CT: IEEE Press) p 1189
17. Miller C, Abbas P, Robinson B, Rubinstein J and Matsuoka A Electrically evoked single-fiber action potentials from cat: responses to monopolar, monophasic stimulation Hear. Res. 130 197-218
18. Zhang F, Miller C, Robinson B, Abbas P and Hu N 2007 Changes across time in spike rate and spike amplitude of auditory nerve fibers stimulated by electric pulse trains J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. 8 356-72 (Pubitemid 47222433)
19. Wagenaar D and Potter S 2002 Real-time multi-channel stimulus artifact suppression by local curve fitting J. Neurosci. Methods 120 113-20 (Pubitemid 35251906)
20. Gilley P M, Sharma A, Dorman M, Finley C C, Panch A S and Martin K 2006 Minimization of cochlear implant stimulus artifact in cortical auditory evoked potentials Clin. Neurophysiol. 117 1772-82 (Pubitemid 44094250)
21. Lendra F and Terence P 2010 A method for removing cochlear implant artifact Hear. Res. 259 95-106
22. Heffer L F and Fallon J B 2008 A novel stimulus artifact removal technique for high-rate electrical stimulation J. Neurosci. Methods 170 277-84
23. Comon P 1994 Independent component analysis, a new concept? Signal Process. 36 287-314
24. James C J and and Gibson O J 2003 Temporally constrained ICA: an application to artifact rejection in electromagnetic brain signal analysis IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 50 1108-16 (Pubitemid 37047560)
25. Jung T P, Makeig S, Humphries C, Lee T W, McKeown M J, Iragui V and Sejnowski T J 2000 Removing electroencephalographic artifacts by blind source separation Psychophysiology 37 163-78 (Pubitemid 30140282)
26. Srivastava G, Crottaz-Herbette S, Lau K M, Glover G H and Menon V 2005 ICA-based procedures for removing ballistocardiogram artifacts from EEG data acquired in the MRI scanner Neuroimage 24 50-60 (Pubitemid 39611025)
27. Tong S, Bezerianos A, Paul J, Zhu Y and Thakor N 2001 Removal of ECG interference from the EEG recordings in small animals using independent component analysis J. Neurosci. Methods 108 11-7 (Pubitemid 32664037)
28. Vigario R, Sarela J, Jousmaki V, Hamalainen M and Oja E 2000 Independent component approach to the analysis of EEG and MEG recordings IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 47 589-93
29. Vigário R N 1997 Extraction of ocular artefacts from EEG using independent component analysis Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 103 395-404 (Pubitemid 27382150)
30. Debener S, Hine J, Bleeck S and Eyles J 2008 Source localization of auditory evoked potentials after cochlear implantation Psychophysiology 45 20-4 PMID: 17910729 (Pubitemid 350233279)
31. Hyvarinen A and Oja E 1997 A fast fixed-point algorithm for independent component analysis Neural Comput. 9 1483-92 (Pubitemid 127462801)
32. Hyvarinen A 1999 Survey on independent component analysis Neural Comput. Surv. 2 94-128
33. Djuwari D, Kumar Kumar D and Palaniswami M 2005 Limitations of ICA for artefact removal Conf. Proc. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc. pp 4685-8 PMID: 17281286