NF in organic solvent/water mixtures: Role of preferential solvation

Journal of Membrane Science

Volumn 444, Issue , 2013, Pages 101-115

  Marchetti, Patrizia ^a,b   Butté, Alessandro ^a   Livingston, Andrew G ^b  

^a Imperial College ^*

^b IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Ceramic membranes; Molecular affinity; Nanofiltration; Negative rejection; Preferential solvation

Indexed keywords

MOLECULAR AFFINITY; NANOFILTRATION PERFORMANCE; NEGATIVE REJECTION; ORGANIC SOLVENT NANOFILTRATION; PREFERENTIAL SOLVATION; SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCES; SMALL ORGANIC MOLECULES; STRUCTURES AND PROPERTIES;

CERAMIC MEMBRANES; HYDROPHILICITY; IONS; NANOFILTRATION; ORGANIC SOLVENTS; SALTS; SOLVATION; ULTRAFILTRATION;

SOLVENTS;

ALUMINUM OXIDE; CHLORIDE; FLUORIDE SODIUM; HYDROCHLORIC ACID; HYDROGEN; LITHIUM CHLORIDE; ORGANIC SOLVENT; PEPTIDE; POTASSIUM CHLORIDE; SODIUM; SODIUM CHLORIDE; SODIUM IODIDE; SOLVENT; TITANIUM DIOXIDE; TRIFLUOROACETIC ACID; WATER;

AQUEOUS SOLUTION; ARTICLE; BINDING AFFINITY; CERAMICS; CHEMICAL COMPOSITION; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CONTROLLED STUDY; HYDROPHILICITY; ION TRANSPORT; MEMBRANE BINDING; MEMBRANE BIOLOGY; MEMBRANE PERMEABILITY; NANOFILTRATION; POROSITY; PREFERENTIAL SOLVATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SALINITY; SOLUTE; SOLVATION; ULTRAFILTRATION; WATER RETENTION;

EID: 84878776789     PISSN: 03767388     EISSN: 18733123     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2013.04.069     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Zhao Y., Yuan Q. A comparison of nanofiltration with aqueous and organic solvents. J. Membr. Sci. 2006, 279:453-458.
2. Bhanushali D., Kloos S., Bhattacharayya D. Solute transport in solvent-resistant nanofiltration membranes for non-aqueous systems. experimental results and the role of solute-solvent coupling. J. Membr. Sci. 2002, 208:343-359.
3. Darvishmanesh S., Degréve J., Van der Bruggen B. Mechanisms of solute rejection in solvent resistant nanofiltration. the effect of solvent on solute rejection. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2010, 12:13333-13342.
4. Whu J.A., Baltzis B.C., Sirkar K.K. Nanofiltration studies of larger organic microsolutes in methanol solutions. J. Membr. Sci. 2000, 170:159-172.
5. Yang X.J., Livingston A.G., Freitas dos Santos L. Experimental observations of nanofiltration with organic solvents. J. Membr. Sci. 2001, 190:45-55.
6. Bowen W., Welfoot J. Modelling the performance of membrane nanofiltration critical assessment and model development. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2002, 57:1121-1137.
7. Geens J., Peeters K., Van der Bruggen B., Vandecasteele C. Polymeric nanofiltration of binary water-alcohol mixtures. influence of feed composition and membrane properties on permeability and rejection. J. Membr. Sci. 2005, 255:255-264.
8. Marchetti P., Butté A., Livingston A. An improved phenomenological model for prediction of solvent permeation through ceramic NF and UF membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2012, 415-416:444-458.
9. 1H NOESY NMR spectroscopy. Chem. Eur. J. 1999, 5:1291-1300.
10. Marcus Y. Preferential solvation of ions in mixed solvents. 5. The alkali metal, silver and thallium(i) cations in aqueous organic solvents according to the inverse Kirkwood-Buff integral (IKBI) approach. J. Solution Chem. 2007, 36:1385-1399.
11. Marcus Y. Preferential solvation of ions in mixed solvents. 6. Univalent anions in aqueous organic solvents according to the inverse Kirkwood-Buff integral (IKBI) approach. J. Chem. Thermodyn. 2007, 39:1338-1345.
12. Marcus Y. Preferential solvation of ions in mixed solvents 2. The solvent composition near the ion. J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans. 1988, 1(84):1465-1473.
13. Wakisaka A., Takahashi S., Nishi N. Preferential solvation controlled by clustering conditions of acetonitrile-water mixtures. J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans. 1995, 91:4063-4069.
14. Gekko K., Ohmae E., Kameyama K., Takagi T. Acetonitrile-protein interactions. amino acid solubility and preferential solvation. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1998, 1387:195-205.
15. Moelbert S., Normand B., De Los Rios P. Kosmotropes and chaotropes: modelling preferential exclusion, binding and aggregate stability. Biophys. Chem. 2004, 112(1):45-57.
16. Van der Bruggen B., Geens J., Vandecasteele C. Fluxes and rejections for nanofiltration with solvent stable polymeric membranes in water, ethanol and n-hexane. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2002, 57:2511-2518.
17. Tsuru T., Sudoh T., Yoshioka T., Saeda M. Nanofitration in non-aqueous solutions by porous silica-zirconia membranes. J. Membr. Sci 2001, 185:253-261.
18. A.N. Zhukov, Integrated investigations of the electrosurface properties of nonaqueous disperse and capillary systems, Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 134-135 (2007) 330-345.
19. S.M. Melnikov, A. Hoeltzel, A. Seidel-Morgenstern, U. Tallarek, Adsorption of water-acetonitrile mixtures to model silica surfaces, J. Phys. Chem. C 117 (13) (2013) 6620-6631.
20. Kosmulski M. The effect of the nature of the organic cosolvent on surface charge density of silica in mixed solvents. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 1996, 179:128-135.
21. Zhang Y., Xu T., Liu Z. Streaming potential across a porous charged membrane in organic - aqueous solutions. Desalination 2008, 212:183.
22. Matsuura T., Sourirajan S. Reverse osmosis separation of phenols in aqueous-solutions using porous cellulose-acetate membranes. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 1972, 16:2531.
23. Burghoff H.G., Lee K.L., Pusch W. Characterization of transport across cellulose acetate membranes in the presence of strong solute-membrane interactions. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 1980, 25:323.
24. G. Koops, S. Yamada, S. Nakao, Separation of linear hydrocarbons and carboxylic acids from ethanol and hexane solutions by reverse osmosis, J. Membr. Sci. 189 241-254.
25. Zeidler S., Kaetzel U., Kreis P. Systematic investigation on the influence of solutes on the separation behavior of a pdms membrane in organic solvent nanofiltration. J. Membr. Sci. 2013, 429:295.
26. Marcus Y. Preferential solvation of ions in mixed solvents. 4. Comparison of the Kirkwood-Buff and quasi-lattice quasi-chemical approaches. J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans. 1989, 1(85):3019-3032.
27. Ben Naim A. Molecular Theory of Solutions 2006, 19. Oxford University Press.
28. Bouranene S., Szymczyk A., Fievet P., Vidonne A. Effects of salts on the retention of polyethylenglycol by a nanofiltration ceramic membrane. Desalination 2009, 240:94-98.
29. Gu Y., Shih P.H. Salt-induced phase separation can effectively remove the acetonitrile from the protein sample after the preparative RP-HPLC. Enzyme Microbial Technol. 2004, 35:592-597.
30. Reichardt C. Solvents and Solvent Effects in Organic Chemistry 2003, Wiley-VCH Verlag & GmbH Co. KGaA, Weinheim. 3rd ed.
31. Collins K.D. Ions from the hofmeister series and osmolytes. effects on proteins in solution and in the crystallization process. Methods 2004, 34:300-311.
32. Parmar A.S., Muschol M. Hydration and hydrodynamic interactions of lysozyme. effects of chaotropic versus kosmotropic ions. Biophys. J. 2009, 97:590-598.
33. LoBrutto R., Jones A., Kazakevich Y.V. Effect of counter-anion concentration on retention in high performance liquid chromatography of protonated basic analytes. J. Chromatography A 2001, 913:189-196.
34. 2 from adsorption and electrokinetic measurements. Colloid J. 2010, 72(6):749-755.
35. Wang W.Y., Ku Y. Effects of solution ph and uv irradiation on the streaming potential of the titanium dioxide membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2006, 282:342-350.
36. Marcus Y. Gibbs energies of transfer of anions from water to mixed aqueous organic solvents. Chem. Rev. 2007, 107:3880-3897.
37. Kalidas C., Hefter G., Marcus Y. Gibbs energies of transfer of cations from water to mixed aqueous organic solvents. Chem. Rev. 2000, 100:819-852.
38. Marcus Y. On the preferential solvation of drugs and PAHs in binary solvent mixtures. J. Mol. Liq. 2008, 140:61-67.
39. Mehdizadeh H., Dickson J.M. Modeling of reverse osmosis in the presence of strong solute-membrane affinity. AIChE J. 1999, 39:434-445.
40. Israelachvili J. Intermolecular and Surface Forces 1985, Academic Press Inc.
41. Tay J.H., Liu J., Sun D.D. Water Res. 2002, 36:585-598.
42. Kinart C., Kinart W., Kolasisnki A. Acetonitrile-water binary mixtures and their assumed international structures. Phys. Chem. Liq. 1998, 35:201-208.
43. Hansen C. Hansen Solubility Parameters. A User's Handbook 2007, CRC Press. 2nd ed.
44. Marcus Y. Preferential solvation. 3. Binary solvent mixtures. J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans. 1989, 1(85):381-388.
45. Barbosa J., Barrón D., Bergés R., Sanz-Nebot V., Toro I. Prefential solvation in acetonitrile-water mixtures. J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans. 1997, 93:1915-1920.