An improved phenomenological model for prediction of solvent permeation through ceramic NF and UF membranes

Journal of Membrane Science

Volumn 415-416, Issue , 2012, Pages 444-458

  Marchetti, Patrizia ^a,b   Butté, Alessandro ^a   Livingston, Andrew G ^b  

^a LONZA AG   (Switzerland)

^b IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Ceramic membranes; Modelling; Nano filtration; Organic solvent; Solvent mixtures

Indexed keywords

ANOMALOUS BEHAVIOR; CORRECTION FACTORS; CORRECTION TERMS; EFFECTIVE RADIUS; HAGEN-POISEUILLE EQUATION; INFLUENCING PARAMETERS; MIXTURE VISCOSITY; NF MEMBRANES; PHENOMENOLOGICAL MODELS; PHYSICAL PARAMETERS; PREDICTIVE CAPABILITIES; PREDICTIVE MODELS; PURE SOLVENTS; SINGLE SOLVENTS; SOLVENT MIXTURES; SOLVENT PERMEATION; STERIC HINDRANCES; SURFACE INTERACTIONS; UF MEMBRANES; ULTRA-FILTRATION MEMBRANES;

CERAMIC MATERIALS; CERAMIC MEMBRANES; MICROFILTRATION; MIXTURES; MODELS; NANOTUBES; ORGANIC SOLVENTS; SOLVENTS; WATER FILTRATION;

PERMEATION;

ACETONITRILE; NANOTUBE; ORGANIC SOLVENT; SOLVENT; WATER;

ARTICLE; NANOFILTRATION; PHENOMENOLOGY; PHYSICAL PARAMETERS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SURFACE PROPERTY; ULTRAFILTRATION; VISCOSITY;

EID: 84864763156     PISSN: 03767388     EISSN: 18733123     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2012.05.030     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Bhanushali D., Kloos S., Kurth C., Bhattacharayya D. Performance of solvent-resistant membranes for non-aqueous systems: solvent permeation results and modeling. J. Membr. Sci. 2001, 189:1-21.
2. Machado D.R., Hasson D., Semiar R. Effect of solvent properties on permeate flow through nanofiltration membranes. Part II. Transport model. J. Membr. Sci. 2000, 166:63-69.
3. Darvishmanesh S., Buekenhoudt A., Degréve J., Van der Bruggen B. Coupled series-parallel resistance model for transport of solvent through inorganic nanofiltration membranes. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2009, 70:46-52.
4. Darvishmanesh S., Buekenhoudt A., Degréve J., Van der Bruggen B. General model for prediction of solvent permeation through organic and inorganic solvent resistant nanofiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2009, 334:43-49.
5. Geens J., Van der Bruggen B., Vandecastleele C. Transport model of solvent permeation through nanofiltration membranes. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2006, 48:255-263.
6. Silva P., Han S., Livingston A.G. Solvent transport in organic solvent nanofiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2005, 262:49-59.
7. Geens J., Peeters K., Van der Bruggen B., Vandecastleele C. Polymeric nanofiltration of binary water-alcohol mixtures: influence of feed composition and membrane properties on permeability and rejection. J. Membr. Sci. 2005, 255:255-264.
8. Santos J.L.C., Hidalgo A., Oliveira R., Velizarov S., Crespo J. Analysis of solvent flux through nanofiltration membranes by mechanistic, chemometric and hybrid modelling. J. Membr. Sci. 2007, 300:191-204.
9. Wijmans J.G., Baker R.W. The solution diffusion model: a review. J. Membr. Sci. 1995, 107:1-21.
10. Bowen W.R., Welfoot J.S. Modelling the performance of membrane nanofiltration critical assessment and model development. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2002, 57:1121-1137.
11. Vandezande P., Gevers L.E.M., Vankelecom I. Solvent resistant nanofiltration: separating on a molecular level. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2008, 37:365-405.
12. Jonsson G., Boesen C.E. Water and solute transport through cellulose acetate reverse osmosis membranes. Desalination 1975, 17:145-165.
13. Tsuru T., Miyawaki M., Kondo H., Yoshioka T., Asaeda M. Inorganic porous membranes for nanofiltration of nonaqueous solutions. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2003, 32:105.
14. Hu G., Li D. Multiscale phenomena in microfluidics and nanofluidics. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2007, 62:3443-3454.
15. Abgrall P., Nguyen N.T. Nanofluidic devices and their applications. Anal. Chem. 2008, 80:2326-2341.
16. Dimitrov D.I., Milchev A., Binder K. Capillary rise in nanopores: molecular dynamics evidence for the Lucas-Washburn equation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2007, 99:1-4.
17. Dimitrov D.I., Milchev A., Binder K. Forced imbibition-a tool for separate determination of Laplace pressure and drag force in capillary filling experiments. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2008, 10:1867-1869.
18. Carré A. Polar interactions at liquid/polymer interfaces. J. Adhes. Sci. Technol. 2007, 21:961-981.
19. Giovambattista N., Debenedetti P.G., Rossky P.J. Effect of surface polarity on water contact angle and interfacial hydration structure. J. Phys. Chem. B 2007, 111:9581-9587.
20. Owens D.K., Wendt R.C. Estimation of the surface free energy of polymers. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 1969, 13:1741-1747.
21. Coleman T.F., Li Y. An interior trust region approach for nonlinear minimization subject to bounds. SIAM J. Optim. 1996, 6:418-445.
22. Perry R.H., Green D.M., Maloney J.O. Perrys Chemical Engineers Handbook 1984, McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York.
23. Smallwood I.M. Handbook of Organic Solvent Properties 1996, Elsevier.
24. Zheng F., Zhang Z., Li C., Yuan Q. A comparative study of suitability on different molecular size descriptors with the consideration of molecular geometry in nanofiltration. J. Membr. Sci. 2009, 332:13-23.
25. Rébiscoul D., Broussous L., Puyrenier W., Rouessac V., Ayral A. Impact of solvent and low k material surface characteristics on pore sealing efficiency and porosity measurement. J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 2009, 152:1-8.
26. B.E. Poling, J.M. Prausnitz, J.P. O'Connel, Properties of Gases and Liquids, fifth ed., McGraw-Hill, New York, 2001.
27. 2 membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2010, 346:344-352.
28. 2O. J. Sol. Chem. 2001, 30:623-640.
29. Moreau C., Douhéret G. Thermodynamic behavior of water-acetonitrile mixtures. Thermochim. Acta 1975, 13:385-392.
30. Saha N., Das B., Hazra D.K. Viscosities and excess molar volumes for acetonitrile+methanol at 298.15, 308.15, and 318.15K. J. Chem. Eng. Data 1995, 40:1264-1266.
31. Ritzoulis G., Papadopoulos N., Jannakoudakis D. Densities, viscosities, and dielectric constants of acetonitrile+toluene at 15, 25 and 35°C. J. Chem. Eng. Data 1986, 31:146-148.
32. Tsierkezos N., Filippou A.C. Thermodynamic investigation of n,n-dimethylformamide/toluene binary mixtures in the temperature range from 278.15 to 293.15K. J. Chem. Thermodyn. 2006, 38:952-961.
33. Kinart C.M., Kinart W.J., Kolasisnki A. Acetonitrile-water binary mixtures and their assumed international structures. Phys. Chem. Liq. 1998, 35:201-208.