Systematic investigation on the influence of solutes on the separation behavior of a PDMS membrane in organic solvent nanofiltration

Journal of Membrane Science

Volumn 429, Issue , 2013, Pages 295-303

  Zeidler, Stefanie ^a,b   Kätzel, Uwe ^a   Kreis, Peter ^c  

^a MERCK KGAA   (Germany)

^b TU DORTMUND UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^c EVONIK INDUSTRIES AG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Functional groups; Organic solvent nanofiltration; OSN; PDMS; Solubility parameter; SRNF

Indexed keywords

ORGANIC SOLVENT NANOFILTRATION; OSN; PDMS; SOLUBILITY PARAMETERS; SRNF;

CLARIFICATION; DESIGN OF EXPERIMENTS; ETHANOL; FLUORINE; FUNCTIONAL GROUPS; HEPTANE; INDUSTRIAL APPLICATIONS; MEMBRANES; MICROCHANNELS; MOLECULES; NANOFILTRATION; SOLUBILITY; SOLVENTS;

ORGANIC SOLVENTS;

ACETIC ACID ETHYL ESTER; ACETONE; ALCOHOL; HEPTANE; PDMS; PROPANOL; SOLVENT; TETRAHYDROFURAN; TOLUENE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; WATER;

ARTICLE; CHEMICAL ANALYSIS; CHEMICAL INTERACTION; CHEMICAL REACTION; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; FLUORINATION; MEMBRANE; MEMBRANE PERMEABILITY; NANOFILTRATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SOLUBILITY; SOLUTE; SYNTHESIS;

EID: 84871565883     PISSN: 03767388     EISSN: 18733123     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2012.11.056     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Peshev D., Peeva L.G., Peev G., Baptista I.I.R., Boam A.T. Application of organic solvent nanofiltration for concentration of antioxidant extracts of rosemary (Rosmarinus officiallis L.). Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 2011, 89:318-327.
2. Priske M., Wiese K.D., Drews A., Kraume M., Baumgarten G. Reaction integrated separation of homogenous catalysts in the hydroformylation of higher olefins by means of organophilic nanofiltration. J. Membr. Sci. 2010, 360:77-83.
3. Cano-Odena A., Vandezande P., Fournier D., Van Camp W., Du Prez F.E., Vankelecom I.F.J. Solvent-resistant nanofiltration for product purification and catalyst recovery in click chemistry reactions. Chem.-A Eur. J. 2010, 16:1061-1067.
4. Livingston A., Peeva L., Han S., Nair D., Luthra S.S., White L.S., Freitas Dos Santos L.M. Membrane separation in green chemical processing: solvent nanofiltration in liquid phase organic synthesis reactions. Ann. NY. Acad. Sci. 2003, 984:123-141.
5. Lin J.C.T., Livingston A.G. Nanofiltration membrane cascade for continuous solvent exchange. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2007, 62:2728-2736.
6. Othman R., Mohammad A.W., Ismail M., Salimon J. Application of polymeric solvent resistant nanofiltration membranes for biodiesel production. J. Membr. Sci. 2010, 348:287-297.
7. White L.S., Wildemuth C.R. Aromatics enrichment in refinery streams using hyperfiltration. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2006, 45:9136-9143.
8. Ferry J.D. Statistical evaluation of sieve constants in ultrafiltration. J. Gen. Physiol. 1936, 20:95-104.
9. Lonsdale H.K., Merten U., Riley R.L. Transport properties of cellulose acetate osmotic membranes. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 1965, 9:1341-1362.
10. Spiegler K.S., Kedem O. Thermodynamics of hyperfiltration (reverse osmosis): criteria for efficient membranes. Desalination 1966, 1:311-326.
11. Sherwood T.K., Brian P.L.T., Fisher R.E. Desalination by Reverse osmosis. Ind. Eng. Chem. Fundam. 1967, 6:2-12.
12. Mason E.A., Lonsdale H.K. Statistical-mechanical theory of membrane transport. J. Membr. Sci. 1990, 51:1-81.
13. Robinson J.P., Tarleton E.S., Millington C.R., Nijmeijer A. Solvent flux through dense polymeric nanofiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2004, 230:29-37.
14. Silva P., Han S., Livingston A.G. Solvent transport in organic solvent nanofiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2005, 262:49-59.
15. Dijkstra M.F.J., Bach S., Ebert K. A transport model for organophilic nanofiltration. J. Membr. Sci. 2006, 286:60-68.
16. Machado D.R., Hasson D., Semiat R. Effect of solvent properties on permeate flow through nanofiltration membranes: part II. Transport model. J. Membr. Sci. 2000, 166:63-69.
17. Machado D.R., Hasson D., Semiat R. Effect of solvent properties on permeate flow through nanofiltration membranes. Part I: investigation of parameters affecting solvent flux. J. Memb. Sci. 1999, 163:93-102.
18. Geens J., Van Der Bruggen B., Vandecasteele C. Transport model for solvent permeation through nanofiltration membranes. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2006, 48:255-263.
19. Yang X.J., Livingston A.G., Freitas Dos Santos L. Experimental observations of nanofiltration with organic solvents. J. Membr. Sci. 2001, 190:45-55.
20. Whu J.A., Baltzis B.C., Sirkar K.K. Nanofiltration studies of larger organic microsolutes in methanol solutions. J. Membr. Sci. 2000, 170:159-172.
21. Bhanushali D., Kloos S., Kurth C., Bhattacharyya D. Performance of solvent-resistant membranes for non-aqueous systems: solvent permeation results and modeling. J. Memb. Sci. 2001, 189:1-21.
22. Tarleton E.S., Robinson J.P., Millington C.R., Nijmeijer A., Taylor M.L. The influence of polarity on flux and rejection behaviour in solvent resistant nanofiltration-experimental observations. J. Membr. Sci. 2006, 278:318-327.
23. Robinson J.P., Tarleton E.S., Ebert K., Millington C.R., Nijmeijer A. Influence of cross-linking and process parameters on the separation performance of poly(dimethylsiloxane) nanofiltration membranes. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2005, 44:3238-3248.
24. Tarleton E.S., Robinson J.P., Salman M. Solvent-induced swelling of membranes-Measurements and influence in nanofiltration. J. Memb. Sci. 2006, 280:442-451.
25. Darvishmanesh S., Degrève J., Van Der Bruggen B. Mechanisms of solute rejection in solvent resistant nanofiltration: the effect of solvent on solute rejection. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2010, 12:13333-13342.
26. Darvishmanesh S., Vanneste J., Tocci E., Jansen J., Tasseli F., Degrève J., Drioli E., Van Der Bruggen B. Physicochemical characterization of solute retention in solvent resistant nanofiltration: the effect of solute size, polarity, dipole moment, and solubility parameter. J. Phys. Chem. B 2011, 115:14507-14517.
27. Van Krevelen D.W., Nijenhuis K. Properties of Polymers: Their Correlation with Chemical Structure; Their Numerical Estimation and Prediction from Additive Group Contributions 2009, Elsevier.
28. Hansen C.M. Hansen Solubility Parameters: A User's Handbook 2000, CRC Press.
29. Smallwood I.M. Handbook of Organic Solvent Properties 1996, Elsevier.
30. Barton A.F.M. Crc Handbook of Solubility Parameters and Other Cohesion Parameters 1983, CRC Press.
31. Tarleton E.S., Robinson J.P., Smith S.J., Na J.J.W. New experimental measurements of solvent induced swelling in nanofiltration membranes. J. Memb. Sci. 2005, 261:129-135.
32. Lee J.N., Park C., Whitesides G.M. Solvent compatibility of poly(dimethylsiloxane)-based microfluidic devices. Anal. Chem. 2003, 75:6544-6554.
33. Mohammadi T., Aroujalian A., Bakhshi A. Pervaporation of dilute alcoholic mixtures using PDMS membrane. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2005, 60:1875-1880.
34. Favre E. Swelling of crosslinked polydimethylsiloxane networks by pure solvents: influence of temperature. Eur. Polym. J. 1996, 32:1183-1188.
35. Fedors R.F. A method for estimating both the solubility parameters and molar volumes of liquids supplement. Polym. Eng. Sci. 1974, 14. 472-472.
36. Soravia S., Orth A. Design of Experiments, in: Ullmann's Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry 2000, Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA.
37. Eriksson L. Design of Experiments: Principles and Applications. Umetrics Academy 2008.