Survival of self-etch adhesive Class II composite restorations using ART and conventional cavity preparations in primary molars

American Journal of Dentistry

Volumn 19, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 359-363

  Eden, Ece ^b   Topaloglu Ak, Asli ^b   Frencken, Jo E ^a   Van't Hof, Martin ^a  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b EGE UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BISPHENOL A BIS(2 HYDROXYPROPYL) ETHER DIMETHACRYLATE; PERTAC HYBRID; PROMPT L POP; PROMPT L-POP; RESIN; RESIN CEMENT; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; CHILD; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECIDUOUS TOOTH; DENTAL ACID ETCHING; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL SURGERY; DENTIN; DOUBLE BLIND PROCEDURE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; MOLAR TOOTH; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ACID ETCHING, DENTAL; BISPHENOL A-GLYCIDYL METHACRYLATE; CHILD; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL CAVITY PREPARATION; DENTAL RESTORATION FAILURE; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; DENTIN; DOUBLE-BLIND METHOD; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MOLAR; RESIN CEMENTS; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, MINIMALLY INVASIVE; TOOTH, DECIDUOUS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 33846181947     PISSN: 08948275     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Frencken JE, Pilot T, Songpaisan Y, Phantumvanit P. Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART): Rationale, technique and development. J Public Health Dent 1996;56: 135-140.
2. Ewoldsen N, Covey D, Lavin M. The physical and adhesive properties of dental cements used for the atraumatic restorative treatment. Spec Care Dent 1997;17: 19-24.
3. Kanellis MJ. Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (A.R.T.). J South Soc Pediat Dent 1998;4: 22-23.
4. Ho TFT, Smales RJ, Fang DKS. A 2-year clinical study of two glass ionomer cements used in the atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) technique. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1999;27: 195-201.
5. Ziraps A, Honkala E. Clinical trial of a new glass ionomer for an atraumatic restorative treatment technique in Class I restorations placed in Latvian school children. Med Principles Pract 2002;11: 44-47.
6. Honkala S, Honkala E. Atraumatic dental treatment among Finnish elderly persons. J Oral Rehabil 2002;29:435-440.
7. Honkala E, Behbehani J, Ibricevic H, Kerosuo E, Al-Jame G. The atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) approach to restoring primary teeth in a standard dental clinic. Int J Paediatr Dent 2003;13:172-179.
8. Rahimtoola S, Van Amerongen E, Maher R, Grohen E. Pain related to different ways of minimal intervention in the treatment of small caries lesions. J Dent Child 2000;67: 123-127.
9. Schriks MCM, van Amerongen WE. Atraumatic perspective of ART. Psychological and physiological aspects of treatment with and without rotary instruments. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2003; 31: 15-20.
10. Seale SN, Casamassimo PS. Access to dental care for children in the United States. A survey of general practitioners. J Am Dent Assoc 2003; 134: 1630-1640.
11. Burke FJ, McHugh S, Shaw L, Hosey MT, Macpherson L, Delargy S, Dopheide B. UK dentists' attitudes and behaviour towards Atraumatic Restorative Treatment for primary teeth. Br Dent J 2005; 199: 365-369.
12. Frencken JE, Holmgren CJ. ART: A minimal intervention approach to manage dental caries. Dent Update 2004; 31: 295-301.
13. Lo ECM, Luo Y, Fan MW, Wei SHY. Clinical investigation of two glass-ionomer restoratives used with the Atraumatic Restorative Treatment approach in China: Two-year results. Caries Res 2001; 35: 458-463.
14. Taifour D, Frencken JE, Beiruti N, van 't Hof MA, Truin GJ. Effectiveness of glass-ionomer (ART) and amalgam restorations in the deciduous dentition. Results after 3 years. Caries Res 2002; 36: 437-444.
15. Yu C, Gao X-J, Deng D-M, Yip H-K, Smales RJ. Survival of glass ionomer restorations placed in primary molars using atruamatic restorative treatment (ART) and conventional cavity preparations: 2-year results. Int Dent J 2004; 54: 42-46.
16. Attin T, Vataschki M, Hellwig E. Properties of resin-modified glass-ionomer restorative materials and two polyacid-modified resin composite materials. Quintessence Int 1996; 27: 203-209.
17. Mount GJ. Glass Ionomers: A review of their current status. Oper Dent 1999; 24: 115-124.
18. Mjör IA, Dahl JE, Moorhead JE. Placement and replacement of restorations in primary teeth. Acta Odontol Scand 2002; 60: 25-28.
19. Kilpatrick NM. Durability of restorations in primary molars. J Dent 1993; 21: 67-73.
20. Papathanassiou AG, Curzon MEJ, Fairpo CG. The influence of restorative material on the survival rate of restorations in primary molars. Pediatr Dent 2000; 22: 479-485.
21. Issa MH, Silikas N, Watts DC. Strength of a 'no-bottle' adhesive system bonded to enamel and dentine. Dent Update 2000; 27: 484-487.
22. World Health Organization. Oral health surveys. Basic methods. Geneva: WHO, 1997.
23. Mount GJ, Hume WR. A revised classification of carious lesions by site and size. Quintessence Int 1997; 28: 301-303.
24. Ryge G. Clinical criteria. Int Dent J 1980; 30: 347-358.
25. Altman DG. Practical statistics for medical research. Boca Raton: CRC Press LLC, 1999; 379.
26. Effron B. Bootstrap methods: Another look at the jackknife. Annals Statistics 1979; 7: 1-26.
27. Östlund J, Möller K, Koch G. Amalgam, composite resin and glass ionomer cement in Class II restorations in primary molars - A three year clinical evaluation. Swed Dent J 1992; 16: 81-86.
28. Attin T, Opatowski A, Meyer C, Zingg-Meyer B, Monting JS. Class II restorations with a polyacid-modified composite resin in primary molars placed in a dental practice: Results of a two-year clinical evaluation. Oper Dent 2000;25:259-264.
29. Da Silva Telles PD, Aparecida M, Machado M, Nör JE. SEM study of a self-etching primer adhesive system used for dentin bonding in primary and permanent teeth. Pediatr Dent 2001;23:315-20
30. Brackett WW, Covey DA, St Germain HA. One-year clinical performance of a self-etching adhesive in class V resin composites cured by two methods. Oper Dent 2002;27: 218-222.
31. Venker DJ, Kuthy RA, Qian F, Kanellis MJ. Twelve-month sealant retention in a school-based program using a self-etching primer/ adhesive. J Pub Health Dent 2004;64: 191-197.
32. Van Dijken JW. Durability of three symplified adhesive systems in Class V non-carious cervical dental lesions. Am J Dent 2004;17:27-32.
33. Ernst C, Streicher S, Willershausen B. Marginal adaptation of self-etching adhesives in class II cavities. J Adhes Dent 2002;4: 223-231.