Turn a blind eye if you care: Impacts of attitude consistency, importance, and credibility on seeking of political information and implications for attitudes

Journal of Communication

Volumn 63, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 432-453

  Westerwick, Axel ^a   Kleinman, Steven B ^a   Knobloch Westerwick, Silvia ^a  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

INFORMATION; INTERNET; MASS MEDIA; POLITICS;

EID: 84878709629     PISSN: 00219916     EISSN: 14602466     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/jcom.12028     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Bennett, W. & Iyengar, S. (2008). A new era of minimal effects? The changing foundations of political communication. Journal of Communication, 58(4), 707-731. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.00410.x
2. Brock, T. C. & Balloun, J. L. (1967). Behavioral receptivity to dissonant information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 6(4), 413-428. doi: 10.1037/h0021225
3. Canon, L. K. (1964). Self-confidence and selective exposure to information. In L. Festinger (Ed.), Conflict, decision, and dissonance (pp. 83-96). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
4. Donsbach, W. (2009). Cognitive dissonance theory - A roller coaster career. How communication research adapted the theory of cognitive dissonance. In T. Hartmann (Ed.), Media choice: A theoretical and empirical overview (pp. 128-149). New York, NY: Routledge.
5. Eagly, A. H., Kulesa, P., Brannon, L. A., Shaw, K. & Hutson-Comeaux, S. (2000). Why counterattitudinal messages are as memorable as proattitudinal messages: The importance of active defense against attack. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26(11), 1392-1408. doi: 10.1177/0146167200263007
6. Fazio, R. H. (1995). Attitudes as object-evaluation associations: Determinants, consequences, and correlates of attitude accessibility. In R. E. Petty & J. A. Krosnick (Eds.), Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences (pp. 247-282). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
7. Fazio, R. H. (2007). Attitudes as object-evaluation associations of varying strength. Social Cognition, 25, 603-637. doi: 10.1521/soco.2007.25.5.603
8. Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
9. Festinger, L. (1964). Conflict, decision, and dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
10. Flanagin, A. J. & Metzger, M. J. (2007). The role of site features, user attributes, and information verification behaviors on the perceived credibility of web-based information. New Media & Society, 9(2), 319-342. doi: 10.1177/1461444807075015
11. Freedman, J. L. (1965). Confidence, utility, and selective exposure: A partial replication. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2, 778-780. doi: 10.1037/h0022670
12. Frey, D. (1986). Recent research on selective exposure to information. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 19, pp. 41-80). New York, NY: Academic Press.
13. Garrett, R. K. (2009a). Politically motivated reinforcement seeking: Reframing the selective exposure debate. Journal of Communication, 59(4), 676-699. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2009.01452.x
14. Garrett, R. K. (2009b). Echo chambers online? Politically motivated selective exposure among Internet news users. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14(2), 265-285. doi: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2009b.01440.x
15. Gerhards, J. & Schäfer, M. S. (2010). Is the Internet a better public sphere? Comparing old and new media in the USA and Germany. New Media & Society, 12(1), 143-160. doi: 10.1177/1461444809341444
16. Goldman, S. K. & Mutz, D. C. (2011). The friendly media phenomenon: A cross-national analysis of cross-cutting exposure. Political Communication, 28(1), 42-66. doi: 10.1080/10584609.2010.544280
17. Gurevitch, M., Coleman, S. & Blumler, J. G. (2009). Political communication: Old and new media relationships. Annals of the American Academy of Political Science, 625, 164-181. doi: 10.1177/0002716209339345
18. Hart, W., Albarracin, D., Eagly, A. H., Brechan, I., Lindberg, M. J. & Merrill, L. (2009). Feeling validated versus being correct: A meta-analysis of selective exposure to information. Psychological Bulletin, 135(4), 555-588. doi: 10.1037/a0015701
19. Holbrook, A. L., Berent, M. K., Krosnick, J. A., Visser, P. S. & Boninger, D. S. (2005). Attitude importance and the accumulation of attitude-relevant knowledge in memory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(5), 749-769. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.88.5.749
20. Hovland, C. I. & Weiss, W. (1951). The influence of source credibility on communication effectiveness. Public Opinion Quarterly, 15, 635-650. doi: 10.1086/266350
21. Iyengar, S. & Hahn, K. (2009). Red media, blue media: Evidence of ideological selectivity in media use. Journal of Communication, 59(1), 19-39. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.01402.x
22. Iyengar, S., Hahn, K. S., Krosnick, J. A. & Walker, J. (2008). Selective exposure to campaign communication: The role of anticipated agreement and issue public membership. Journal of Politics, 70(1), 186-200. doi: 10.1017/S002238160708013
23. Johnson, T. J., Zhang, W. & Bichard, S. L. (2011). Voices of convergence or conflict? A path analysis investigation of selective exposure to political websites. Social Science Computer Review, 29(4), 449-469. doi: 10.1177/0894439310379962
24. Jonas, E., Schulz-Hardt, S., Frey, D. & Thelen, N. (2001). Confirmation bias in sequential information search after preliminary decisions: An expansion of dissonance theoretical research on selective exposure to information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 557-571. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.80.4.557
25. Keeter, S., Horowitz, J., & Tyson, A. (2008). Young voters in the 2008 election. Pew Research Center for the People & the Press. Retrieved April 3, 2012, from http://pewresearch.org/pubs/1031/young-voters-in-the-2008-election
26. Kleinhesselink, R. R. & Edwards, R. E. (1975). Seeking and avoiding belief-discrepant information as a function of its perceived refutability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31(5), 787-790. doi: 10.1037/h0076702
27. Knobloch, S., Hastall, M., Zillmann, D. & Callison, C. (2003). Imagery effects on the selective reading of Internet newsmagazines: A cross-cultural examination. Communication Research, 30(1), 3-29. doi: 10.11770093650202239023
28. Knobloch-Westerwick, S. (2007). Kognitive Dissonanz 'Revisited': Selektive Zuwendung zu einstellungskonsistenten und -inkonsistenten politischen Informationen [Cognitive dissonance revisited: Selective exposure to attitude-consistent and counter-attitudinal political information]. Publizistik, 52, 51-62. doi: 10.1007/s11616-007-0005-2
29. Knobloch-Westerwick, S. & Johnson, B. K. (2013). Selective exposure for better or worse: Its mediating role for online news' impact on political participation. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication.
30. Knobloch-Westerwick, S. & Kleinman, S. (2012). Preelection selective exposure: Confirmation bias versus informational utility. Communication Research, 39, 170-193. doi: 10.1177/0093650211400597
31. Knobloch-Westerwick, S. & Meng, J. (2009). Looking the other way: Selective exposure to attitude-consistent and counter-attitudinal political information. Communication Research, 36(3), 426-448. doi: 10.1177/0093650209333030
32. Knobloch-Westerwick, S. & Meng, J. (2011). Reinforcement of the political self through selective exposure to political messages. Journal of Communication, 61(2), 349-368. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01543.x
33. Knobloch-Westerwick, S., Johnson, B. K., & Westerwick, A. (in press). To your health: Self-regulation of health behavior through selective exposure to online health messages. Journal of Communication.
34. Kobayashi, T. & Ikeda, K. (2009). Selective exposure in political web browsing. Information, Communication & Society, 12(6), 929-953. doi: 10.1080/13691180802158490
35. Kohut, A., Doherty, C., Dimock, M. & Keeter, S. (2008). Internet's broader role in campaign 2008: Social networking and online videos take off. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center.
36. Lowin, A. (1967). Approach and avoidance: Alternate modes of selective exposure to information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 6(1), 1-9. doi: 10.1037/h0024531
37. Lowin, A. (1969). Further evidence for an approach-avoidance interpretation of selective exposure. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 5(3), 265-271. doi: 10.1016/0022-1031(69)90052-3
38. Miller, J. M. & Krosnick, J. A. (2000). News media impact on the ingredients of presidential evaluations: Politically knowledgeable citizens are guided by a trusted source. American Journal of Political Science, 44, 301-315. doi: 10.2307/2669312
39. Moody, K. E. (2011). Credibility or convenience? Political information choices in a media-saturated environment. Media International Australia, 140, 35-64.
40. Nie, N. H., Miller, D. W., III, Golde, S., Butler, D. M. & Winneg, K. (2010). The World Wide Web and the U.S. political news market. American Journal of Political Science, 54(2), 428-439. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2010.00439.x
41. Roskos-Ewoldsen, D. R., Roskos-Ewoldsen, B. B. & Carpentier, F. D. (2009). Media priming: An updated synthesis. In J. Bryant & M. B. Oliver (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (pp. 74-93). New York, NY: Routledge.
42. Sears, D. O. & Freedman, J. L. (1967). Selective exposure to information: A critical review. Public Opinion Quarterly, 31(2), 194-213. doi: 10.1086/267513
43. Stroud, N. (2008). Media use and political predispositions: Revisiting the concept of selective exposure. Political Behavior, 30(3), 341-366. doi: 10.1007/s11109-007-9050-9
44. Sundar, S. S. (2008). The MAIN model: A heuristic approach to understanding technology effects on credibility. In M. Metzger & A. Flanagin (Eds.), Digital media, youth, and credibility (pp. 73-100). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
45. Sunstein, C. R. (2001). Republic.com. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
46. Taber, C. S. & Lodge, M. (2006). Motivated skepticism in the evaluation of political beliefs. American Journal of Political Science, 50(3), 755-769. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00214.x
47. Tewksbury, D. (2005). The seeds of audience fragmentation: Specialization in the use of online news sites. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 49(3), 332-348. doi: 10.1207/s15506878jobem4903_5
48. Westerwick, A. (2013). Effects of sponsorship, web site design, and Google ranking on the credibility of online information. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 18(2), 80-97. doi: 10.1111/jcc4.12006.
49. Westerwick, A., Kleinman, S. B., & Knobloch-Westerwick, S. (2012, May). Crafting credible confirmation contexts: Impacts of consistency and credibility on selective exposure and reinforcement. Paper presented at the 62nd annual conference of the International Communication Association, Phoenix, AZ.
50. Zillmann, D. & Bryant, J. (Eds.) (1985). Selective exposure to communication. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
51. Zillmann, D., Knobloch, S. & Yu, H.-S. (2001). Effects of photographs on the selective reading of news reports. Media Psychology, 3(4), 301-324. doi: 10.1207/S1532785XMEP0304_01