The friendly media phenomenon: A cross-national analysis of cross-cutting exposure

Political Communication

Volumn 28, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 42-66

  Goldman, Seth K ^a   Mutz, Diana C ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Cross cutting exposure; Hostile media; Media systems; Political communication; Selective exposure

Indexed keywords

EID: 79751481887     PISSN: 10584609     EISSN: 10917675     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10584609.2010.544280     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Baek, M. (2009). A comparative analysis of political communication systems and voter turnout. American Journal of Political Science, 53, 376-393.
2. Barber, B. (1984). Strong democracy: Participatory politics of a new age. Berkeley: University of California Press.
3. Blais, A., Gidengil, E., Nadeau, R., & Nevitte, N. (2001). Measuring party identification: Britain, Canada, and the United States. Political Behavior, 23, 5-22.
4. Calhoun, C. (1988). Populist politics, communications media and large scale societal integration. Sociological Theory, 6, 219-241.
5. Cotton, J. L. (1985). Cognitive dissonance in selective exposure. In D. Zillmann & J. Bryant (Eds.), Selective exposure to communication (pp. 11-33). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
6. Dalton, R. J., Beck, P. A., & Huckfeldt, R. (1998). Partisan cues and the media: Information flows in the 1992 presidential election. American Political Science Review, 92, 111-126.
7. Emerson, T. (1970). The system of freedom of expression. New York, NY: Vintage.
8. Eveland, W. P., Jr., & Shah, D. (2003). The impact of individual and interpersonal factors on perceived news media bias. Political Psychology, 24, 101-117.
9. Frey, D. (1986). Recent research on selective exposure to information. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 19, pp. 41-80). New York, NY: Academic Press.
10. Gunther, A. C. (1992). Biased press or biased public? Attitudes toward media coverage of social groups. Public Opinion Quarterly, 56, 147-167.
11. Gunther, A. C., & Christen, C. T. (2002). Projection or persuasive press? Contrary effects of personal opinion and perceived news coverage on estimates of public opinion. Journal of Communication, 52, 177-195.
12. Hallin, D. C. (2006). The passing of the high modernism of American journalism: Revisited. Political Communication Reports, 16, 1. Retrieved from http://frank.mtsu.edu/pcr/1601_2005_winter/commentary_hallin.htm
13. Hallin, D. C. (2009). Not the end of journalism history. Journalism, 10, 332-334.
14. Hallin, D. C., & Mancini, P. (2004). Comparing media systems. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
15. Huckfeldt, R., & Sprague, J. (1995). Citizens, politics, and social communication: Information and influence in an election campaign. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
16. Iyengar, S., & Hahn, K. S. (2009). Red media, blue media: Evidence of ideological selectivity in media use. Journal of Communication, 59, 19-39.
17. Iyengar, S., Hahn, K. S., Krosnick, J. A., & Walker, J. (2008). Selective exposure to campaign communication: The role of anticipated agreement and issue public membership. Journal of Politics, 70, 186-200.
18. Johnston, R. (2006). Party identification: Unmoved mover or sum of preferences? Annual Review of Political Science, 9, 329-351.
19. Katz, E. (1996). And deliver us from segmentation. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 546, 22-33.
20. Lazarsfeld, P. F., Berelson, B., & Gaudet, M. (1944). The people's choice. New York, NY: Duell, Sloan, and Pearce.
21. Lippmann, W. (1939, August). The indispensable opposition. Atlantic Monthly, 186.
22. Meffert, M. F., Chung, S., Joiner, A. J., Waks, L., & Garst, J. (2006). The effects of negativity and motivated information processing during a political campaign. Journal of Communication, 56, 27-51.
23. Meiklejohn, A. (1965). Free speech and its relation to self-government. New York, NY: Harper & Brothers.
24. Mill, J. S. (1956). On liberty (C. V. Shields, Ed.). Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merril. (Original work published 1859)
25. Mutz, D. C. (2002a). The consequences of cross-cutting networks for political participation. American Journal of Political Science, 46, 838-855.
26. Mutz, D. C. (2002b). Cross-cutting social networks: Testing democratic theory in practice. American Political Science Review, 96, 111-126.
27. Mutz, D. C. (2006). Hearing the other side: Deliberative versus participatory democracy. NewYork, NY: Cambridge University Press.
28. Mutz, D. C., & Martin, P. S. (2001). Facilitating communication across lines of political difference: The role of mass media. American Political Science Review, 95, 97-114.
29. Price, V., & Zaller, J. (1993). Who gets the news? Alternative measures of news reception and their implications for research. Public Opinion Quarterly, 57, 133-164.
30. Schudson, M. (1981). Discovering the news. New York, NY: Basic Books.
31. Sears, D. O., & Freedman, J. L. (1967). Selective exposure to information: A critical review. Public Opinion Quarterly, 31, 194-213.
32. Seymour-Ure, C. (1974). The political impact of mass media. London, England: Constable.
33. Turow, J. (1997). Breaking up America. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
34. Vallone, R. P., Ross, L., & Lepper, M. R. (1985). The hostile media phenomenon: Biased perception and perceptions of media bias in coverage of the Beirut massacre. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 577-585.
35. van Kempen, H. (2007). Media-party parallelism and its effects: A cross-national comparative study. Political Communication, 24, 303-320.
36. Webster, J. G. (2005). Beneath the veneer of fragmentation: Television audience polarization in a multichannel world. Journal of Communication, 55, 366-382.
37. Young, I. M. (1996). Communication and the Other: Beyond deliberative democracy. In S. Benhabib (Ed.), Democracy and difference (pp. 120-136). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
38. Zaller, J. (2002). The statistical power of election studies to detect media exposure effects in political campaigns. Electoral Studies, 21, 297-329.