Political communication -old and new media relationships

Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science

Volumn 625, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 164-181

  Gurevitch, Michael ^a   Coleman, Stephen ^b   Blumler, Jay G ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Democracy; Internet; New media; Politics; Television

Indexed keywords

EID: 70349152961     PISSN: 00027162     EISSN: 15523349     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0002716209339345     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Bimber, B. 2003. Information and American democracy: Technology in the evolution of political power. New York: Cambridge University Press.
2. Blumler, J. G. 1970. The Effects of Political Television in The Effects of Television, ed. J. D. Halloran. London: Panther.
3. Blumler, J. G., and S. Coleman. 2001. Realising democracy online: A civic commons in cyberspace. London: Institute of Public Policy Research.
4. Blumler, J. G. and McQuail, D. 1968. Television in politics: Its uses and influence. London: Faber and Faber.
5. Bucy, E., and A. Gregson. 2001. Media participation: A legitimizing mechanism of mass democracy. New Media & Society 3 (3): 357-80.
6. Cappella, J., and K. H. Jamieson. 1997. Spiral of cynicism: The press and the public good. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
7. Chaffee, S., and S. Frank. 1996. How Americans get political information: print versus broadcast news. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 546:48-58.
8. Coleman, S., and J. G. Blumler. 2008. The Internet and democratic citizenship: Theory; practice; policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9. Coleman, S., and G. Moss. 2008. Governing at a distance-Politicians in the blogosphere. Information Polity 13 (1/2): 7-20.
10. Coleman, S., D. Morrison, and M. Svennevig. 2008. New media and political efficacy. International Journal of Communication 2: 771-791.
11. Coleman, S., and K. Ross. 2009. Them and us: How the media frame the public. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
12. Couldry, N., and A. Langer. 2005. Media consumption and public connection: Toward a typology of the dispersed citizen. Communication Review 8 (2): 237-57.
13. Dayan, D., and E. Katz. 1992. Media events: The live broadcasting of history. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
14. Dunleavy, P., Margetts, H., Bartholomeou, P., Bastow, S., Escher, T., Pearce, O., Tinkler, J. and Broughton, H. 2007. Government on the internet: progress in delivering information and services online. London: National Audit Office.
15. Dutton, W. 2007. Through the network (of networks)-The fifth estate. Inaugural lecture, University of Oxford Examination Halls, October 15.
16. Dutton, W., S. E. Gillett, L. W. McKnight, and M. Peltu. 2004. Bridging broadband Internet divides: Reconfiguring access to enhance communicative power. Journal of Information Technology 19:28-38.
17. Dutton, W., and A. Shepherd. 2006. Trust in the Internet as an experience technology. Information, Communication & Society 9 (4): 433-51.
18. Entman, R. 1989. Democracy without citizens: Media and the decay of American politics. New York: Oxford University Press.
19. Feldman, L. and Price, V. 2008. Confusion or Enlightenment? How Exposure to Disagreement Moderates the Effects of Political Discussion and Media Use on Candidate Knowledge. Communication Research, 35 (1):61-87
20. Graber, D. 1990. Seeing is remembering: How visuals contribute to learning from television news. Journal of Communication 40 (3): 134-56.
21. Groombridge, B. 1972. Television and the people: a programme for democratic participation. Penguin: Harmondsworth.
22. Jamieson, K. H. 1993. Dirty politics: Deception, distraction and democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
23. Jerit, J., J. Barabas, and T. Bolsen. 2006. Citizens, knowledge, and the information environment. American Journal of Political Science 50 (2): 266-82.
24. Johnson, T., and B. Kaye. 2003. A boost or bust for democracy? How the Web influenced political attitudes and behaviors in the 1996 and 2000 presidential elections. Harvard International Journal of Press Politics 8 (3): 9-34.
25. Kenski, K., and N. Stroud. 2006. Connections between Internet use and political efficacy, knowledge, and participation. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media 50 (2): 173-92.
26. Livingstone, S. 2004a. The challenge of changing audiences. European Journal of Communication 19 (1): 75-86.
27. Livingstone, S. 2004b. Media literacy and the challenge of new information and communication technologies. Communication Review 7 (1): 3-14.
28. Lowrey, W. 2006. Mapping the journalism-blogging relationship. Journalism 7 (4): 477-500.
29. Meyrowitz, J. 1985. No sense of place: The impact of electronic media on social behavior. New York: Oxford University Press.
30. Moy, P., and M. Pfau. 2000. Malice toward all? The media and public confidence in democratic institutions. Westport, CT: Greenwood.
31. Muhlberger, P. 2003. Political values, political attitudes, and attitude polarization in Internet political discussion: Political transformation or politics as usual? Communications 28 (2): 107-34.
32. Mutz, D. C. 2006. Hearing the other side: Deliberative versus participatory democracy. NY Cambridge University Press.
33. Pattie, C., P. Seyd, and P. Whiteley. 2003. Civic attitudes and engagement in modern Britain. Parliamentary Affairs 56 (4): 616-33.
34. Pew Research Center for People and the Press. 2008. Internet now major source of campaign news: Continuing partisan divide in cable TV news audiences. October 31. http://pewresearch.org/pubs/1017/internet-now-major-source-of-campaign-news.
35. Reith, J. 1949. Into the wind. London: Hodder and Stoughton.
36. Sanders, D., and N. Gavin. 2004. Television news, economic perceptions and political preferences in Britain, 1997-2001. Journal of Politics 66 (4): 1245-66.
37. Scannell, P. 2000. For anyone-as-someone structures. Media, Culture & Society 22 (1): 5-24.
38. Scupham, J. 1967. Broadcasting and the community london; New Thinker's Library. London: C.A. Watts.
39. Shah, D., J. Cho, W. Eveland, and N. Kwak. 2005. Information and expression in a digital age: Modeling Internet effects on civic participation. Communication Research 32 (5): 531-65.
40. Shah, D., N. Kwak, and L. Holbert. 2001. Connecting and disconnecting with civic life: Patterns of internet use and the production of social capital. Political Communication 18:141-62.
41. Shah, D., D. McLeod, L. Friedland, and M. Nelson. 2007. The politics of consumption/the consumption of politics. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 611 (1): 6-15.
42. Silverstone, R. 1994. Television and everyday life. London: Routledge.
43. Smith, A. 1979. Television and political life: Studies in six European countries. London: Macmillan.
44. Sunstein, C. 2001. Republic.com. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
45. Syvertsen, T. 2004. Citizens, audiences, customers and players: A conceptual discussion of the relationship between broadcasters and their publics. European Journal of Cultural Studies 7 (3): 363-80.
46. Trenaman, J. and McQuail, D. 1961. Television and the political image. London: Methuen.
47. Uslaner, E. 2004. Trust, civic engagement and the Internet. Political Communication 21 (2): 223-42.
48. Welch, E., C. Hinnant, and M. Moon. 2005. Linking citizen satisfaction with e-government and trust in government. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 15 (3): 371-91.
49. Xenos, M., and P. Moy. 2007. Direct and differential effects of the Internet on political and civic engagement. Journal of Communication 57 (4): 704-18.