Mitral Prosthetic Valve Assessment by Echocardiographic Guidelines

Cardiology Clinics

Volumn 31, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 287-309

  Hahn, Rebecca T ^a  

^a Department of Medicine   (United States)

Author keywords

Echocardiography; Effective orifice area; Mitral valve replacement; Prosthetic heart valves

Indexed keywords

BLOOD PRESSURE MEASUREMENT; CALCIFICATION; CARDIOVASCULAR FUNCTION; CARDIOVASCULAR PARAMETERS; DOPPLER ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; FALSE ANEURYSM; HEART RATE; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE DISPLAY; MEDICAL INFORMATION; MEDICAL PRACTICE; MITRAL VALVE PROSTHESIS; MITRAL VALVE REGURGITATION; MITRAL VALVE REPLACEMENT; NONHUMAN; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTHETIC VALVE DYSFUNCTION; PROSTHETIC VALVE ENDOCARDITIS; PROSTHETIC VALVE THROMBOSIS; REVIEW; STRESS ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; THREE DIMENSIONAL ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; TRANSESOPHAGEAL ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; TRANSTHORACIC ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; TWO DIMENSIONAL ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; BIOPROSTHESIS; ECHOGRAPHY; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS; MITRAL VALVE; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PROSTHESIS;

BIOPROSTHESIS; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY, DOPPLER; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY, TRANSESOPHAGEAL; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; MITRAL VALVE; PROSTHESIS DESIGN;

EID: 84878665438     PISSN: 07338651     EISSN: 15582264     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ccl.2013.03.004     Document Type: Review

References (87)

1. Bonow R.O., Carabello B.A., Kanu C., et al. ACC/AHA 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to revise the 1998 Guidelines for the Management of Patients with Valvular Heart Disease): developed in collaboration with the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists: endorsed by the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Circulation 2006, 114(5):e84-e231.
2. Bonow R.O., Carabello B.A., Chatterjee K., et al. 2008 focused update incorporated into the ACC/AHA 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to revise the 1998 Guidelines for the Management of Patients with Valvular Heart Disease). Endorsed by the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008, 52(13):e1-e142.
3. Vahanian A., Alfieri O., Andreotti F., et al. Guidelines on the management of valvular heart disease (version 2012): the Joint Task Force on the Management of Valvular Heart Disease of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2012, 42(4):S1-S44.
4. Zoghbi W.A., Chambers J.B., Dumesnil J.G., et al. Recommendations for evaluation of prosthetic valves with echocardiography and Doppler ultrasound: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography's Guidelines and Standards Committee and the Task Force on Prosthetic Valves, developed in conjunction with the American College of Cardiology Cardiovascular Imaging Committee, Cardiac Imaging Committee of the American Heart Association, the European Association of Echocardiography, a registered branch of the European Society of Cardiology, the Japanese Society of Echocardiography and the Canadian Society of Echocardiography, endorsed by the American College of Cardiology Foundation, American Heart Association, European Association of Echocardiography, a registered branch of the European Society of Cardiology, the Japanese Society of Echocardiography, and Canadian Society of Echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2009, 22(9):975-1014. [quiz: 82-4].
5. Lang R.M., Badano L.P., Tsang W., et al. EAE/ASE recommendations for image acquisition and display using three-dimensional echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2012, 25(1):3-46.
6. Hixson C.S., Smith M.D., Mattson M.D., et al. Comparison of transesophageal color flow Doppler imaging of normal mitral regurgitant jets in St. Jude Medical and Medtronic Hall cardiac prostheses. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 1992, 5(1):57-62.
7. Lange H.W., Olson J.D., Pedersen W.R., et al. Transesophageal color Doppler echocardiography of the normal St. Jude Medical mitral valve prosthesis. Am Heart J 1991, 122(2):489-494.
8. Frater R.W. Stentless mitral valves. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2007, 133(4):861-864.
9. Chauvaud S., Waldmann T., d'Attellis N., et al. Homograft replacement of the mitral valve in young recipients: mid-term results. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2003, 23(4):560-566.
10. Timek T.A., Lai D.T., Tibayan F.A., et al. Hemodynamic performance of an unstented xenograft mitral valve substitute. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2002, 124(3):541-552.
11. Deac R.F., Simionescu D., Deac D. New evolution in mitral physiology and surgery: mitral stentless pericardial valve. Ann Thorac Surg 1995, 60(Suppl 2):S433-S438.
12. Frater R.W., Sussman M., Middlemost S., et al. Quattro valve trial at mid-term: December 1996 to November 2004. J Heart Valve Dis 2006, 15(2):230-237. [discussion: 7].
13. Navia J.L., Doi K., Atik F.A., et al. Acute in vivo evaluation of a new stentless mitral valve. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2007, 133(4):986-994.
14. Kasegawa H., Iwasaki K., Kusunose S., et al. Assessment of a novel stentless mitral valve using a pulsatile mitral valve simulator. J Heart Valve Dis 2012, 21(1):71-75.
15. Magne J., Mathieu P., Dumesnil J.G., et al. Impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch on survival after mitral valve replacement. Circulation 2007, 115(11):1417-1425.
16. Blauwet L.A., Malouf J.F., Connolly H.M., et al. Doppler echocardiography of 240 normal Carpentier-Edwards Duraflex porcine mitral bioprostheses: a comprehensive assessment including time velocity integral ratio and prosthesis performance index. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2009, 22(4):388-393.
17. Blauwet L.A., Malouf J.F., Connolly H.M., et al. Comprehensive hemodynamic assessment of 305 normal CarboMedics mitral valve prostheses based on early postimplantation echocardiographic studies. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2012, 25(2):173-181.
18. Blauwet L.A., Malouf J.F., Connolly H.M., et al. Comprehensive echocardiographic assessment of normal mitral Medtronic Hancock II, Medtronic Mosaic, and Carpentier-Edwards Perimount bioprostheses early after implantation. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2010, 23(6):656-666.
19. Rosenhek R., Binder T., Maurer G., et al. Normal values for Doppler echocardiographic assessment of heart valve prostheses. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2003, 16(11):1116-1127.
20. Pibarot P., Dumesnil J.G. Prosthetic heart valves: selection of the optimal prosthesis and long-term management. Circulation 2009, 119(7):1034-1048.
21. Jamieson W.R., Cartier P.C., Allard M., et al. Surgical management of valvular heart disease 2004. Can J Cardiol 2004, 20(Suppl E):7E-120E.
22. Douglas P.S., Garcia M.J., Haines D.E., et al. ACCF/ASE/AHA/ASNC/HFSA/HRS/SCAI/SCCM/SCCT/SCMR 2011 appropriate use criteria for echocardiography. A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, American Society of Echocardiography, American Heart Association, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, Heart Failure Society of America, Heart Rhythm Society, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Critical Care Medicine, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, and Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance endorsed by the American College of Chest Physicians. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011, 57(9):1126-1166.
23. Zoghbi W.A., Enriquez-Sarano M., Foster E., et al. Recommendations for evaluation of the severity of native valvular regurgitation with two-dimensional and Doppler echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2003, 16(7):777-802.
24. Baumgartner H., Hung J., Bermejo J., et al. Echocardiographic assessment of valve stenosis: EAE/ASE recommendations for clinical practice. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2009, 22(1):1-23. [quiz: 101-2].
25. Hatle L., Angelsen B., Tromsdal A. Noninvasive assessment of atrioventricular pressure half-time by Doppler ultrasound. Circulation 1979, 60(5):1096-1104.
26. Dumesnil J.G., Honos G.N., Lemieux M., et al. Validation and applications of mitral prosthetic valvular areas calculated by Doppler echocardiography. Am J Cardiol 1990, 65(22):1443-1448.
27. Dumesnil J.G., Yoganathan A.P. Valve prosthesis hemodynamics and the problem of high transprosthetic pressure gradients. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1992, 6(Suppl 1):S34-S37. [discussion: S8].
28. Bitar J.N., Lechin M.E., Salazar G., et al. Doppler echocardiographic assessment with the continuity equation of St. Jude Medical mechanical prostheses in the mitral valve position. Am J Cardiol 1995, 76(4):287-293.
29. Gadhinglajkar S., Namboodiri N., Pillai V., et al. Double-envelope continuous-wave Doppler flow profile across a tilting-disc mitral prosthesis: intraoperative significance. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2011, 25(3):491-494.
30. Fernandes V., Olmos L., Nagueh S.F., et al. Peak early diastolic velocity rather than pressure half-time is the best index of mechanical prosthetic mitral valve function. Am J Cardiol 2002, 89(6):704-710.
31. Rudski L.G., Lai W.W., Afilalo J., et al. Guidelines for the echocardiographic assessment of the right heart in adults: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography endorsed by the European Association of Echocardiography, a registered branch of the European Society of Cardiology, and the Canadian Society of Echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2010, 23(7):685-713. [quiz: 86-8].
32. Milan A., Magnino C., Veglio F. Echocardiographic indexes for the non-invasive evaluation of pulmonary hemodynamics. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2010, 23(3):225-239. [quiz: 332-4].
33. Aduen J.F., Castello R., Daniels J.T., et al. Accuracy and precision of three echocardiographic methods for estimating mean pulmonary artery pressure. Chest 2011, 139(2):347-352.
34. Bossone E., D'Andrea A., D'Alto M., et al. Echocardiography in pulmonary arterial hypertension: from diagnosis to prognosis. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2013, 26(1):1-14.
35. Pop G., Sutherland G.R., Roelandt J., et al. What is the ideal orientation of a mitral disc prosthesis? An in vivo haemodynamic study based on colour flow imaging and continuous wave Doppler. Eur Heart J 1989, 10(4):346-353.
36. Akins C.W., Miller D.C., Turina M.I., et al. Guidelines for reporting mortality and morbidity after cardiac valve interventions. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2008, 135(4):732-738.
37. Olmos L., Salazar G., Barbetseas J., et al. Usefulness of transthoracic echocardiography in detecting significant prosthetic mitral valve regurgitation. Am J Cardiol 1999, 83(2):199-205.
38. Ruddox V., Mathisen M., Baekkevar M., et al. Is 3D echocardiography superior to 2D echocardiography in general practice?: a systematic review of studies published between 2007 and 2012. Int J Cardiol 2013, [Epub ahead of print].
39. Dorosz J.L., Lezotte D.C., Weitzenkamp D.A., et al. Performance of 3-dimensional echocardiography in measuring left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012, 59(20):1799-1808.
40. Krim S.R., Vivo R.P., Patel A., et al. Direct assessment of normal mechanical mitral valve orifice area by real-time 3D echocardiography. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2012, 5(5):478-483.
41. Singh P., Manda J., Hsiung M.C., et al. Live/real time three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiographic evaluation of mitral and aortic valve prosthetic paravalvular regurgitation. Echocardiography 2009, 26(8):980-987.
42. Zamorano J.L., Badano L.P., Bruce C., et al. EAE/ASE recommendations for the use of echocardiography in new transcatheter interventions for valvular heart disease. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2011, 24(9):937-965.
43. Biner S., Kar S., Siegel R.J., et al. Value of color Doppler three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography in the percutaneous closure of mitral prosthesis paravalvular leak. Am J Cardiol 2010, 105(7):984-989.
44. Reis G., Motta M.S., Barbosa M.M., et al. Dobutamine stress echocardiography for noninvasive assessment and risk stratification of patients with rheumatic mitral stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004, 43(3):393-401.
45. Garcia M.J., Vandervoort P., Stewart W.J., et al. Mechanisms of hemolysis with mitral prosthetic regurgitation. Study using transesophageal echocardiography and fluid dynamic simulation. J Am Coll Cardiol 1996, 27(2):399-406.
46. David T.E., Burns R.J., Bacchus C.M., et al. Mitral valve replacement for mitral regurgitation with and without preservation of chordae tendineae. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1984, 88(5 Pt 1):718-725.
47. David T.E. Mitral valve replacement with preservation of chordae tendinae: rationale and technical considerations. Ann Thorac Surg 1986, 41(6):680-682.
48. Spencer F.C., Galloway A.C., Colvin S.B. A clinical evaluation of the hypothesis that rupture of the left ventricle following mitral valve replacement can be prevented by preservation of the chordae of the mural leaflet. Ann Surg 1985, 202(6):673-680.
49. Miki S., Kusuhara K., Ueda Y., et al. Mitral valve replacement with preservation of chordae tendineae and papillary muscles. Ann Thorac Surg 1988, 45(1):28-34.
50. Come P.C., Riley M.F., Weintraub R.M., et al. Dynamic left ventricular outflow tract obstruction when the anterior leaflet is retained at prosthetic mitral valve replacement. Ann Thorac Surg 1987, 43(5):561-563.
51. Waggoner A.D., Perez J.E., Barzilai B., et al. Left ventricular outflow obstruction resulting from insertion of mitral prostheses leaving the native leaflets intact: adverse clinical outcome in seven patients. Am Heart J 1991, 122(2):483-488.
52. Rosenzweig M.S., Nanda N.C. Two-dimensional echocardiographic detection of left ventricular wall impaction by mitral prosthesis. Am Heart J 1983, 106(5 Pt 1):1069-1076.
53. Freedberg R.S., Kronzon I., Gindea A.J., et al. Noninvasive diagnosis of left ventricular outflow tract obstruction caused by a porcine mitral prosthesis. J Am Coll Cardiol 1987, 9(3):698-700.
54. Head S.J., Mokhles M.M., Osnabrugge R.L., et al. The impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch on long-term survival after aortic valve replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 34 observational studies comprising 27 186 patients with 133 141 patient-years. Eur Heart J 2012, 33(12):1518-1529.
55. Li M., Dumesnil J.G., Mathieu P., et al. Impact of valve prosthesis-patient mismatch on pulmonary arterial pressure after mitral valve replacement. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005, 45(7):1034-1040.
56. Lam B.K., Chan V., Hendry P., et al. The impact of patient-prosthesis mismatch on late outcomes after mitral valve replacement. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2007, 133(6):1464-1473.
57. Bouchard D., Vanden Eynden F., Demers P., et al. Patient-prosthesis mismatch in the mitral position affects midterm survival and functional status. Can J Cardiol 2010, 26(10):532-536.
58. Bleiziffer S., Eichinger W.B., Hettich I., et al. Prediction of valve prosthesis-patient mismatch prior to aortic valve replacement: which is the best method?. Heart 2007, 93(5):615-620.
59. Muneretto C., Bisleri G., Negri A., et al. The concept of patient-prosthesis mismatch. J Heart Valve Dis 2004, 13(Suppl 1):S59-S62.
60. Piazza N., Bleiziffer S., Brockmann G., et al. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation for failing surgical aortic bioprosthetic valve: from concept to clinical application and evaluation (part 1). JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2011, 4(7):721-732.
61. Piazza N., Bleiziffer S., Brockmann G., et al. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation for failing surgical aortic bioprosthetic valve: from concept to clinical application and evaluation (part 2). JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2011, 4(7):733-742.
62. Roudaut R., Serri K., Lafitte S. Thrombosis of prosthetic heart valves: diagnosis and therapeutic considerations. Heart 2007, 93(1):137-142.
63. Tong A.T., Roudaut R., Ozkan M., et al. Transesophageal echocardiography improves risk assessment of thrombolysis of prosthetic valve thrombosis: results of the international PRO-TEE registry. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004, 43(1):77-84.
64. Barbetseas J., Nagueh S.F., Pitsavos C., et al. Differentiating thrombus from pannus formation in obstructed mechanical prosthetic valves: an evaluation of clinical, transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiographic parameters. J Am Coll Cardiol 1998, 32(5):1410-1417.
65. Lin S.S., Tiong I.Y., Asher C.R., et al. Prediction of thrombus-related mechanical prosthetic valve dysfunction using transesophageal echocardiography. Am J Cardiol 2000, 86(10):1097-1101.
66. Zabalgoitia M. Echocardiographic assessment of prosthetic heart valves. Curr Probl Cardiol 2000, 25(3):157-218.
67. Laplace G., Lafitte S., Labeque J.N., et al. Clinical significance of early thrombosis after prosthetic mitral valve replacement: a postoperative monocentric study of 680 patients. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004, 43(7):1283-1290.
68. Calderwood S.B., Swinski L.A., Karchmer A.W., et al. Prosthetic valve endocarditis. Analysis of factors affecting outcome of therapy. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1986, 92(4):776-783.
69. Habib G., Tribouilloy C., Thuny F., et al. Prosthetic valve endocarditis: who needs surgery? A multicentre study of 104 cases. Heart 2005, 91(7):954-959.
70. Tornos P., Iung B., Permanyer-Miralda G., et al. Infective endocarditis in Europe: lessons from the Euro heart survey. Heart 2005, 91(5):571-575.
71. Baddour L.M., Wilson W.R., Bayer A.S., et al. Infective endomanagementcarditis: diagnosis, antimicrobial therapy, and management of complications: a statement for healthcare professionals from the Committee on Rheumatic Fever, Endocarditis, and Kawasaki Disease, Council on Cardiovascular Disease in the Young, and the Councils on Clinical Cardiology, Stroke, and Cardiovascular Surgery and Anesthesia, American Heart Association: endorsed by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Circulation 2005, 111(23):e394-e434.
72. Murdoch D.R., Corey G.R., Hoen B., et al. Clinical presentation, etiology, and outcome of infective endocarditis in the 21st century: the International Collaboration on Endocarditis-Prospective Cohort Study. Arch Intern Med 2009, 169(5):463-473.
73. Ivert T.S., Dismukes W.E., Cobbs C.G., et al. Prosthetic valve endocarditis. Circulation 1984, 69(2):223-232.
74. Lytle B.W., Priest B.P., Taylor P.C., et al. Surgical treatment of prosthetic valve endocarditis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1996, 111(1):198-207. [discussion: 10].
75. Vlessis A.A., Khaki A., Grunkemeier G.L., et al. Risk, diagnosis and management of prosthetic valve endocarditis: a review. J Heart Valve Dis 1997, 6(5):443-465.
76. Durack D.T., Lukes A.S., Bright D.K. New criteria for diagnosis of infective endocarditis: utilization of specific echocardiographic findings. Duke Endocarditis Service. Am J Med 1994, 96(3):200-209.
77. Tleyjeh I.M., Kashour T., Zimmerman V., et al. The role of valve surgery in infective endocarditis management: a systematic review of observational studies that included propensity score analysis. Am Heart J 2008, 156(5):901-909.
78. Hill E.E., Herregods M.C., Vanderschueren S., et al. Management of prosthetic valve infective endocarditis. Am J Cardiol 2008, 101(8):1174-1178.
79. Manne M.B., Shrestha N.K., Lytle B.W., et al. Outcomes after surgical treatment of native and prosthetic valve infective endocarditis. Ann Thorac Surg 2012, 93(2):489-493.
80. Sudhakar S., Sewani A., Agrawal M., et al. Pseudoaneurysm of the mitral-aortic intervalvular fibrosa (MAIVF): a comprehensive review. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2010, 23(10):1009-1018. [quiz: 112].
81. Shively B.K., Gurule F.T., Roldan C.A., et al. Diagnostic value of transesophageal compared with transthoracic echocardiography in infective endocarditis. J Am Coll Cardiol 1991, 18(2):391-397.
82. Daniel W.G., Mugge A., Grote J., et al. Comparison of transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography for detection of abnormalities of prosthetic and bioprosthetic valves in the mitral and aortic positions. Am J Cardiol 1993, 71(2):210-215.
83. Kini V., Logani S., Ky B., et al. Transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography for the indication of suspected infective endocarditis: vegetations, blood cultures and imaging. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2010, 23(4):396-402.
84. Daniel W.G., Mugge A., Martin R.P., et al. Improvement in the diagnosis of abscesses associated with endocarditis by transesophageal echocardiography. N Engl J Med 1991, 324(12):795-800.
85. Choussat R., Thomas D., Isnard R., et al. Perivalvular abscesses associated with endocarditis; clinical features and prognostic factors of overall survival in a series of 233 cases. Perivalvular Abscesses French Multicentre Study. Eur Heart J 1999, 20(3):232-241.
86. Hill E.E., Herijgers P., Claus P., et al. Abscess in infective endocarditis: the value of transesophageal echocardiography and outcome: a 5-year study. Am Heart J 2007, 154(5):923-928.
87. Cheitlin M.D., Armstrong W.F., Aurigemma G.P., et al. ACC/AHA/ASE 2003 guideline update for the clinical application of echocardiography: summary article. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (ACC/AHA/ASE Committee to Update the 1997 Guidelines for the Clinical Application of Echocardiography). J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2003, 16(10):1091-1110.