Sequencing of Candidate Chromosome Instability Genes in Endometrial Cancers Reveals Somatic Mutations in ESCO1, CHTF18, and MRE11A

PLoS ONE

Volumn 8, Issue 6, 2013, Pages

  Price, Jessica C ^a   Pollock, Lana M ^a   Rudd, Meghan L ^a   Fogoros, Sarah K ^a   Mohamed, Hassan ^a   Hanigan, Christin L ^a   Le Gallo, Matthieu ^a   Zhang, Suiyuan ^a   Cruz, Pedro ^a   Cherukuri, Praveen F ^a   Hansen, Nancy F ^a   McManus, Kirk J ^c   Godwin, Andrew K ^d,e   Sgroi, Dennis C ^f   Mullikin, James C ^a,b   Merino, Maria J ^g   Hieter, Philip ^h   Bell, Daphne W ^a  

^a NATIONAL HUMAN GENOME RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MANITOBA   (Canada)

^d UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS CANCER CENTER   (United States)

^f MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

^g NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

^h UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GENOMIC DNA; ACYLTRANSFERASE; CARRIER PROTEIN; CHTF18 PROTEIN, HUMAN; DNA BINDING PROTEIN; ESCO1 PROTEIN, HUMAN; MRE11A PROTEIN, HUMAN; NUCLEAR PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; CANCER TISSUE; CARCINOGENESIS; CHROMOSOMAL INSTABILITY; CHTF18 GENE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENDOMETRIUM CANCER; ENDOMETRIUM TUMOR; ESCO1 GENE; EXON; FEMALE; GENE; GENETIC ASSOCIATION; GENETIC VARIABILITY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MICROSATELLITE INSTABILITY; MRE11A GENE; MUTATIONAL ANALYSIS; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PROTEIN FUNCTION; REVERSE TRANSCRIPTION POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; SISTER CHROMATID EXCHANGE; SOMATIC MUTATION; GENETIC PREDISPOSITION; GENETICS; MUTATION; TUMOR CELL LINE;

ACETYLTRANSFERASES; CARRIER PROTEINS; CELL LINE, TUMOR; CHROMOSOMAL INSTABILITY; DNA MUTATIONAL ANALYSIS; DNA-BINDING PROTEINS; ENDOMETRIAL NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; GENETIC ASSOCIATION STUDIES; GENETIC PREDISPOSITION TO DISEASE; HUMANS; MUTATION; NUCLEAR PROTEINS;

EID: 84878658349     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0063313     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. American Cancer Society (2013) Cancer Facts and Figures. American Cancer Society 1: 1-60.
2. Sherman ME, (2000) Theories of endometrial carcinogenesis: a multidisciplinary approach. Mod Pathol 13: 295-308.
3. Hecht JL, Mutter GL, (2006) Molecular and pathologic aspects of endometrial carcinogenesis. J Clin Oncol 24: 4783-4791.
4. Ries LAG, Young JL, Keel GE, Eisner MP, Lin YD, et al. (2007) SEER Survival Monograph: Cancer Survival Among Adults: U.S. SEER Program, 1988-2001. Patient and Tumor Characteristics. National Cancer Institute, SEER Program, NIH Pub No 07-6215, Bethesda, MD, 2007.
5. Hamilton CA, Cheung MK, Osann K, Chen L, Teng NN, et al. (2006) Uterine papillary serous and clear cell carcinomas predict for poorer survival compared to grade 3 endometrioid corpus cancers. Br J Cancer 94: 642-646.
6. Burks RT, Kessis TD, Cho KR, Hedrick L, (1994) Microsatellite instability in endometrial carcinoma. Oncogene 9: 1163-1166.
7. Duggan BD, Felix JC, Muderspach LI, Tourgeman D, Zheng J, et al. (1994) Microsatellite instability in sporadic endometrial carcinoma. J Natl Cancer Inst 86: 1216-1221.
8. Kobayashi K, Sagae S, Kudo R, Saito H, Koi S, et al. (1995) Microsatellite instability in endometrial carcinomas: frequent replication errors in tumors of early onset and/or of poorly differentiated type. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 14: 128-132.
9. Esteller M, Catasus L, Matias-Guiu X, Mutter GL, Prat J, et al. (1999) hMLH1 promoter hypermethylation is an early event in human endometrial tumorigenesis. Am J Pathol 155: 1767-1772.
10. Goodfellow PJ, Buttin BM, Herzog TJ, Rader JS, Gibb RK, et al. (2003) Prevalence of defective DNA mismatch repair and MSH6 mutation in an unselected series of endometrial cancers. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100: 5908-5913.
11. Micci F, Teixeira MR, Haugom L, Kristensen G, Abeler VM, et al. (2004) Genomic aberrations in carcinomas of the uterine corpus. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 40: 229-246.
12. Konski AA, Domenico D, Irving D, Tyrkus M, Neisler J, et al. (1996) Clinicopathologic correlation of DNA flow cytometric content analysis (DFCA), surgical staging, and estrogen/progesterone receptor status in endometrial adenocarcinoma. Am J Clin Oncol 19: 164-168.
13. Newbury R, Schuerch C, Goodspeed N, Fanning J, Glidewell O, et al. (1990) DNA content as a prognostic factor in endometrial carcinoma. Obstet Gynecol 76: 251-257.
14. Pradhan M, Abeler VM, Danielsen HE, Trope CG, Risberg BA, (2006) Image cytometry DNA ploidy correlates with histological subtypes in endometrial carcinomas. Mod Pathol 19: 1227-1235.
15. Prat J, Oliva E, Lerma E, Vaquero M, Matias-Guiu X, (1994) Uterine papillary serous adenocarcinoma. A 10-case study of p53 and c-erbB-2 expression and DNA content. Cancer 74: 1778-1783.
16. Rosenberg P, Wingren S, Simonsen E, Stal O, Risberg B, et al. (1989) Flow cytometric measurements of DNA index and S-phase on paraffin-embedded early stage endometrial cancer: an important prognostic indicator. Gynecol Oncol 35: 50-54.
17. Pere H, Tapper J, Wahlstrom T, Knuutila S, Butzow R, (1998) Distinct chromosomal imbalances in uterine serous and endometrioid carcinomas. Cancer Res 58: 892-895.
18. Kunkel TA, Erie DA, (2005) DNA mismatch repair. Annu Rev Biochem 74: 681-710.
19. O'Hara AJ, Bell DW, (2012) The genomics and genetics of endometrial cancer. Adv Genomics Genet 2012: 33-47.
20. Thompson SL, Compton DA, (2010) Proliferation of aneuploid human cells is limited by a p53-dependent mechanism. J Cell Biol 188: 369-381.
21. Mayer ML, Gygi SP, Aebersold R, Hieter P, (2001) Identification of RFC(Ctf18p, Ctf8p, Dcc1p): an alternative RFC complex required for sister chromatid cohesion in S. cerevisiae. Mol Cell 7: 959-970.
22. Tanaka K, Yonekawa T, Kawasaki Y, Kai M, Furuya K, et al. (2000) Fission yeast Eso1p is required for establishing sister chromatid cohesion during S phase. Mol Cell Biol 20: 3459-3469.
23. Guacci V, Koshland D, Strunnikov A, (1997) A direct link between sister chromatid cohesion and chromosome condensation revealed through the analysis of MCD1 in S. cerevisiae. Cell 91: 47-57.
24. Michaelis C, Ciosk R, Nasmyth K, (1997) Cohesins: chromosomal proteins that prevent premature separation of sister chromatids. Cell 91: 35-45.
25. Ciosk R, Shirayama M, Shevchenko A, Tanaka T, Toth A, et al. (2000) Cohesin's binding to chromosomes depends on a separate complex consisting of Scc2 and Scc4 proteins. Mol Cell 5: 243-254.
26. Zhang J, Shi X, Li Y, Kim BJ, Jia J, et al. (2008) Acetylation of Smc3 by Eco1 is required for S phase sister chromatid cohesion in both human and yeast. Mol Cell 31: 143-151.
27. Rolef Ben-Shahar T, Heeger S, Lehane C, East P, Flynn H, et al. (2008) Eco1-dependent cohesin acetylation during establishment of sister chromatid cohesion. Science 321: 563-566.
28. Toth A, Ciosk R, Uhlmann F, Galova M, Schleiffer A, et al. (1999) Yeast cohesin complex requires a conserved protein, Eco1p(Ctf7), to establish cohesion between sister chromatids during DNA replication. Genes Dev 13: 320-333.
29. Skibbens RV, (2004) Chl1p, a DNA helicase-like protein in budding yeast, functions in sister-chromatid cohesion. Genetics 166: 33-42.
30. Sutani T, Kawaguchi T, Kanno R, Itoh T, Shirahige K, (2009) Budding yeast Wpl1(Rad61)-Pds5 complex counteracts sister chromatid cohesion-establishing reaction. Curr Biol 19: 492-497.
31. Maradeo ME, Skibbens RV, (2010) Replication factor C complexes play unique pro- and anti-establishment roles in sister chromatid cohesion. PLoS One 5: e15381.
32. Nasmyth K, (2011) Cohesin: a catenase with separate entry and exit gates? Nat Cell Biol 13: 1170-1177.
33. Hou F, Zou H, (2005) Two human orthologues of Eco1/Ctf7 acetyltransferases are both required for proper sister-chromatid cohesion. Mol Biol Cell 16: 3908-3918.
34. Terret ME, Sherwood R, Rahman S, Qin J, Jallepalli PV, (2009) Cohesin acetylation speeds the replication fork. Nature 462: 231-234.
35. Parish JL, Rosa J, Wang X, Lahti JM, Doxsey SJ, et al. (2006) The DNA helicase ChlR1 is required for sister chromatid cohesion in mammalian cells. J Cell Sci 119: 4857-4865.
36. Farina A, Shin JH, Kim DH, Bermudez VP, Kelman Z, et al. (2008) Studies with the human cohesin establishment factor, ChlR1. Association of ChlR1 with Ctf18-RFC and Fen1. J Biol Chem 283: 20925-20936.
37. Barber TD, McManus K, Yuen KW, Reis M, Parmigiani G, et al. (2008) Chromatid cohesion defects may underlie chromosome instability in human colorectal cancers. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105: 3443-3448.
38. Cahill DP, Lengauer C, Yu J, Riggins GJ, Willson JK, et al. (1998) Mutations of mitotic checkpoint genes in human cancers. Nature 392: 300-303.
39. Rajagopalan H, Jallepalli PV, Rago C, Velculescu VE, Kinzler KW, et al. (2004) Inactivation of hCDC4 can cause chromosomal instability. Nature 428: 77-81.
40. Wang Z, Cummins JM, Shen D, Cahill DP, Jallepalli PV, et al. (2004) Three classes of genes mutated in colorectal cancers with chromosomal instability. Cancer Res 64: 2998-3001.
41. Solomon DA, Kim T, Diaz-Martinez LA, Fair J, Elkahloun AG, et al. (2011) Mutational inactivation of STAG2 causes aneuploidy in human cancer. Science 333: 1039-1043.
42. Welch JS, Ley TJ, Link DC, Miller CA, Larson DE, et al. (2012) The origin and evolution of mutations in acute myeloid leukemia. Cell 150: 264-278.
43. Rocquain J, Gelsi-Boyer V, Adelaide J, Murati A, Carbuccia N, et al. (2010) Alteration of cohesin genes in myeloid diseases. Am J Hematol 85: 717-719.
44. Bell DW, Sikdar N, Lee KY, Price JC, Chatterjee R, et al. (2011) Predisposition to cancer caused by genetic and functional defects of mammalian Atad5. PLoS Genetics 7: e1002245.
45. Parnas O, Zipin-Roitman A, Mazor Y, Liefshitz B, Ben-Aroya S, et al. (2009) The ELG1 clamp loader plays a role in sister chromatid cohesion. PLoS One 4: e5497.
46. Maradeo ME, Skibbens RV, (2009) The Elg1-RFC clamp-loading complex performs a role in sister chromatid cohesion. PLoS One 4: e4707.
47. Chines P, Swift A, Bonnycastle LL, Erdos MR, Mullikin J, et al. (2005) PrimerTile: designing overlapping PCR primers for resequencing. Am J Hum Genet 77: 1257.
48. Ewing B, Green P, (1998) Base-calling of automated sequencer traces using phred. II. Error probabilities. Genome Res 8: 186-194.
49. Ewing B, Hillier L, Wendl MC, Green P, (1998) Base-calling of automated sequencer traces using phred. I. Accuracy assessment. Genome Res 8: 175-185.
50. Gordon D, Abajian C, Green P, (1998) Consed: a graphical tool for sequence finishing. Genome Res 8: 195-202.
51. Bhangale TR, Stephens M, Nickerson DA, (2006) Automating resequencing-based detection of insertion-deletion polymorphisms. Nat Genet 38: 1457-1462.
52. Le Gallo M, O'Hara AJ, Rudd ML, Urick ME, Hansen NF, et al. (2012) Exome sequencing of serous endometrial tumors identifies recurrent somatic mutations in chromatin-remodeling and ubiquitin ligase complex genes. Nat Genet 44: 1310-1315.
53. Urick ME, Rudd ML, Godwin AK, Sgroi D, Merino M, et al. (2011) PIK3R1 (p85alpha) is somatically mutated at high frequency in primary endometrial cancer. Cancer Res 71: 4061-4067.
54. Rudd ML, Price JC, Fogoros S, Godwin AK, Sgroi DC, et al. (2011) A unique spectrum of somatic PIK3CA (p110alpha) mutations within primary endometrial carcinomas. Clin Cancer Res 17: 1331-1340.
55. Shiomi Y, Masutani C, Hanaoka F, Kimura H, Tsurimoto T, (2007) A second proliferating cell nuclear antigen loader complex, Ctf18-replication factor C, stimulates DNA polymerase eta activity. J Biol Chem 282: 20906-20914.
56. Ogi T, Limsirichaikul S, Overmeer RM, Volker M, Takenaka K, et al. (2010) Three DNA polymerases, recruited by different mechanisms, carry out NER repair synthesis in human cells. Mol Cell 37: 714-727.
57. Murakami T, Takano R, Takeo S, Taniguchi R, Ogawa K, et al. (2010) Stable interaction between the human proliferating cell nuclear antigen loader complex Ctf18-replication factor C (RFC) and DNA polymerase {epsilon} is mediated by the cohesion-specific subunits, Ctf18, Dcc1, and Ctf8. J Biol Chem 285: 34608-34615.
58. Forbes SA, Bhamra G, Bamford S, Dawson E, Kok C, et al. (2008) The Catalogue of Somatic Mutations in Cancer (COSMIC). Curr Protoc Hum Genet Chapter 10: Unit 10 11.
59. Stracker TH, Petrini JH, (2011) The MRE11 complex: starting from the ends. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 12: 90-103.
60. Zhong H, Bryson A, Eckersdorff M, Ferguson DO, (2005) Rad50 depletion impacts upon ATR-dependent DNA damage responses. Hum Mol Genet 14: 2685-2693.
61. Moreau S, Ferguson JR, Symington LS, (1999) The nuclease activity of Mre11 is required for meiosis but not for mating type switching, end joining, or telomere maintenance. Mol Cell Bio 19: 556-566.
62. Giannini G, Rinaldi C, Ristori E, Ambrosini MI, Cerignoli F, et al. (2004) Mutations of an intronic repeat induce impaired MRE11 expression in primary human cancer with microsatellite instability. Oncogene 23: 2640-2647.
63. Bilbao C, Ramirez R, Rodriguez G, Falcon O, Leon L, et al. (2010) Double strand break repair components are frequent targets of microsatellite instability in endometrial cancer. Eur J Cancer 46: 2821-2827.
64. Giannini G, Ristori E, Cerignoli F, Rinaldi C, Zani M, et al. (2002) Human MRE11 is inactivated in mismatch repair-deficient cancers. EMBO Rep 3: 248-254.
65. Berkowitz KM, Kaestner KH, Jongens TA, (2008) Germline expression of mammalian CTF18, an evolutionarily conserved protein required for germ cell proliferation in the fly and sister chromatid cohesion in yeast. Mol Hum Reprod 14: 143-150.
66. Park YB, Chae J, Kim YC, Cho Y, (2011) Crystal structure of human Mre11: understanding tumorigenic mutations. Structure 19: 1591-1602.
67. Williams GJ, Williams RS, Williams JS, Moncalian G, Arvai AS, et al. (2011) ABC ATPase signature helices in Rad50 link nucleotide state to Mre11 interface for DNA repair. Nat Struct Mol Biol 18: 423-431.