Efficacy of Armeo®Spring during the chronic phase of stroke. Study in mild to moderate cases of hemiparesis;Eficacia del sistema Armeo®Spring en la fase crónica del ictus. Estudio en hemiparesias leves-moderadas

Neurologia

Volumn 28, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 261-267

  Colomer, C ^a   Baldovi A ^a   Torrome S ^a   Navarro, M D ^a   Moliner, B ^a   Ferri, J ^a   Noe E ^a  

^a Hospital NISA Valencia al Mar y NISA Sevilla Aljarafe   (Spain)

Author keywords

Armeo; Disability and Health; International Classification of Functioning; Rehabilitation; Robotic Systems; Stroke; Upper limb

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARM MOVEMENT; ARTICLE; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; CHRONICITY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; FEMALE; HEMIPARESIS; HUMAN; MALE; MUSCLE TONE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; REHABILITATION EQUIPMENT;

AGED; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CHRONIC DISEASE; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTRACRANIAL HEMORRHAGES; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOTOR ACTIVITY; MOVEMENT; PARESIS; PHYSICAL THERAPY MODALITIES; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; STROKE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UPPER EXTREMITY; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 84878474796     PISSN: 02134853     EISSN: 15781968     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.nrl.2012.04.017     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Boian R., Sharma A., Han C., Merians A., Burdea G., Adamovich S., et al. Virtual reality-based post-stroke hand rehabilitation. Stud Health Technol Inform 2002, 85:64-70.
2. Brokaw EBMT, Nef T, Lum PS. Retraining of interjoint arm coordination after stroke using robot-assisted time-independent functional training. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2011;48:299-316.
3. Liao W.W., Wu C.Y., Hsieh Y.W., Lin K.C., Chang W.Y. Effects of robot-assisted upper limb rehabilitation on daily function and real-world arm activity in patients with chronic stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil 2011, 26:111-120.
4. Carey L.M., Matyas T.A. Frequency of discriminative sensory loss in the hand after stroke in a rehabilitation setting. J Rehabil Med 2011, 43:257-263.
5. Patel A.T., Duncan P.W., Lai S.M., Studenski S. The relation between impairments and functional outcomes poststroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2000, 81:1357-1363.
6. Butefisch C., Hummelsheim H., Denzler P., Mauritz K.H. Repetitive training of isolated movements improves the outcome of motor rehabilitation of the centrally paretic hand. J Neurol Sci 1995, 130:59-68.
7. Wolf S.L., Winstein C.J., Miller J.P., Taub E., Uswatte G., Morris D., et al. Effect of constraint-induced movement therapy on upper extremity function 3 to 9 months after stroke: the EXCITE randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2006, 296:2095-2104.
8. Knutson J.S., Hisel T.Z., Harley M.Y., Chae J. A novel functional electrical stimulation treatment for recovery of hand function in hemiplegia: 12-week pilot study. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2009, 23:17-25.
9. Saposnik G., Levin M. Virtual reality in stroke rehabilitation: a meta-analysis and implications for clinicians. Stroke 2011, 42:1380-1386.
10. Masiero S., Armani M., Rosati G. Upper-limb robot-assisted therapy in rehabilitation of acute stroke patients: focused review and results of new randomized controlled trial. J Rehabil Res Dev 2011, 48:355-366.
11. Balasubramanian S., Klein J., Burdet E. Robot-assisted rehabilitation of hand function. Curr Opin Neurol 2010, 23:661-670.
12. Fasoli S.E., Krebs H.I., Hogan N. Robotic technology and stroke rehabilitation: translating research into practice. Top Stroke Rehabil 2004, 11:11-19.
13. Kwakkel G., Kollen B.J., Krebs H.I. Effects of robot-assisted therapy on upper limb recovery after stroke: a systematic review. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2008, 22:111-121.
14. Reinkensmeyer D.J., Emken J.L., Cramer S.C. Robotics, motor learning, and neurologic recovery. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 2004, 6:497-525.
15. Kahn L.E., Zygman M.L., Rymer W.Z., Reinkensmeyer D.J. Robot-assisted reaching exercise promotes arm movement recovery in chronic hemiparetic stroke: a randomized controlled pilot study. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2006, 3:12.
16. Takahashi C.D., Der-Yeghiaian L., Le V., Motiwala R.R., Cramer S.C. Robot-based hand motor therapy after stroke. Brain 2008, 131:425-437.
17. Lo A.C., Guarino P.D., Richards L.G., Haselkorn J.K., Wittenberg G.F., Federman D.G., et al. Robot-assisted therapy for long-term upper-limb impairment after stroke. N Engl J Med 2010, 362:1772-1783.
18. Posteraro F., Mazzoleni S., Aliboni S., Cesqui B., Battaglia A., Dario P., et al. Robot-mediated therapy for paretic upper limb of chronic patients following neurological injury. J Rehabil Med 2009, 41:976-980.
19. Lum P.S., Burgar C.G., Van der Loos M., Shor P.C., Majmundar M., Yap R. MIME robotic device for upper-limb neurorehabilitation in subacute stroke subjects: A follow-up study. J Rehabil Res Dev 2006, 43:631-642.
20. Huang V.S., Krakauer J.W. Robotic neurorehabilitation: a computational motor learning perspective. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2009, 6:5.
21. Stein J., Krebs H.I., Frontera W.R., Fasoli S.E., Hughes R., Hogan N. Comparison of two techniques of robot-aided upper limb exercise training after stroke. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2004, 83:720-728.
22. Casadio M., Giannoni P., Masia L., Morasso P., Sandini G., Sanguineti V., et al. Robot therapy of the upper limb in stroke patients: preliminary experiences for the principle-based use of this technology. Funct Neurol 2009, 24:195-202.
23. Dromerick A.W., Lum P.S., Hidler J. Activity-based therapies. NeuroRx 2006, 3:428-438.
24. Kaelin-Lang A., Sawaki L., Cohen L.G. Role of voluntary drive in encoding an elementary motor memory. J Neurophysiol 2005, 93:1099-1103.
25. Kahn L.E., Lum P.S., Rymer W.Z., Reinkensmeyer D.J. Robot-assisted movement training for the stroke-impaired arm: Does it matter what the robot does. J Rehabil Res Dev 2006, 43:619-630.
26. Lotze M., Braun C., Birbaumer N., Anders S., Cohen L.G. Motor learning elicited by voluntary drive. Brain 2003, 126:866-872.
27. Fasoli S.E., Krebs H.I., Stein J., Frontera W.R., Hogan N. Effects of robotic therapy on motor impairment and recovery in chronic stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2003, 84:477-482.
28. Merians A.S., Tunik E., Fluet G.G., Qiu Q., Adamovich S.V. Innovative approaches to the rehabilitation of upper extremity hemiparesis using virtual environments. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med 2009, 45:123-133.
29. Ziherl J., Novak D., Olensek A., Mihelj M., Munih M. Evaluation of upper extremity robot-assistances in subacute and chronic stroke subjects. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2010, 7:52.
30. Zollo L., Gallotta E., Guglielmelli E., Sterzi S. Robotic technologies and rehabilitation: new tools for upper-limb therapy and assessment in chronic stroke. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med 2011, 47:223-236.
31. Uhlmann R.F., Larson E.B., Buchner D.M. Correlations of Mini-Mental State and modified Dementia Rating Scale to measures of transitional health status in dementia. J Gerontol 1987, 42:33-36.
32. Romero M, Sánchez A, Marín C., Navarro M.D., Ferri J., Noé E. Utilidad clínica de la versión en castellano del Mississippi Aphasia Screening Test (MASTsp): validación en pacientes con ictus. Neurología. 2011;27:216-224.
33. Sloan R.L., Sinclair E., Thompson J., Taylor S., Pentland B. Inter-rater reliability of the modified Ashworth Scale for spasticity in hemiplegic patients. Int J Rehabil Res 1992, 15:158-161.
34. Paternostro-Sluga T., Grim-Stieger M., Posch M., Schuhfried O., Vacariu G., Mittermaier C., et al. Reliability and validity of the Medical Research Council (MRC) scale and a modified scale for testing muscle strength in patients with radial palsy. J Rehabil Med 2008, 40:665-671.
35. Cameron D., Bohannon R.W. Criterion validity of lower extremity Motricity Index scores. Clin Rehabil 2000, 14:208-211.
36. Duncan P.W., Propst M., Nelson S.G. Reliability of the Fugl-Meyer assessment of sensorimotor recovery following cerebrovascular accident. Phys Ther 1983, 63:1606-1610.
37. Bohls C., Heise K.F., Glogauer C., Scherfer E. [Authorized German translation of the Motor Assessment Scale (MAS)]. Rehabilitation (Stuttg) 2008, 47:172-177.
38. Miyamoto S., Kondo T., Suzukamo Y., Michimata A., Izumi S. Reliability and validity of the Manual Function Test in patients with stroke. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2009, 88:247-255.
39. Woodbury M., Velozo C.A., Thompson P.A., Light K., Uswatte G., Taub E., et al. Measurement structure of the Wolf Motor Function Test: implications for motor control theory. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2010, 24:791-801.
40. Wolf S.L., Catlin P.A., Ellis M., Archer A.L., Morgan B., Piacentino A. Assessing Wolf motor function test as outcome measure for research in patients after stroke. Stroke 2001, 32:1635-1639.
41. Wagner J.M., Rhodes J.A., Patten C. Reproducibility and minimal detectable change of three-dimensional kinematic analysis of reaching tasks in people with hemiparesis after stroke. Phys Ther 2008, 88:652-663.
42. Morris D.M., Uswatte G., Crago J.E., Cook E.W., Taub E. The reliability of the wolf motor function test for assessing upper extremity function after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2001, 82:750-755.
43. Nakamura R., Moriyama S., Yamada Y., Seki K. Recovery of impaired motor function of the upper extremity after stroke. Tohoku J Exp Med 1992, 168:11-20.
44. Lum P.S., Burgar C.G., Shor P.C., Majmundar M., Van der Loos M. Robot-assisted movement training compared with conventional therapy techniques for the rehabilitation of upper-limb motor function after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002, 83:952-959.
45. Brokaw EB, Murray T, Nef T, Lum PS. Retraining of interjoint arm coordination after stroke using robot-assisted time-independent functional training. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2011;48:299-316.
46. Scott SH, Dukelow SP. Potential of robots as next-generation technology for clinical assessment of neurological disorders and upper-limb therapy. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2011;48:335-53.
47. Bovolenta F., Goldoni M., Clerici P., Agosti M., Franceschini M. Robot therapy for functional recovery of the upper limbs: a pilot study on patients after stroke. J Rehabil Med 2009, 41:971-975.
48. Fasoli S.E., Krebs H.I., Stein J., Frontera W.R., Hughes R., Hogan N. Robotic therapy for chronic motor impairments after stroke: follow-up results. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004, 85:1106-1111.
49. Mehrholz J., Platz T., Kugler J., Pohl M. Electromechanical and robot-assisted arm training for improving arm function and activities of daily living after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2008, CD006876.
50. Michaelsen S.M., Dannenbaum R., Levin M.F. Task-specific training with trunk restraint on arm recovery in stroke: randomized control trial. Stroke 2006, 37:186-192.