Authorised German translation of the Motor Assessment Scale (MAS);Autorisierte deutsche Übersetzung der Motor-Assessment-Scale (MAS)

Rehabilitation

Volumn 47, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 172-177

  Bohls, C ^a   Heise, K F ^b   Glogauer, C ^c   Scherfer, E ^d  

^a Stadtisches Krankenhaus Dresden Neustadt   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER HAMBURG EPPENDORF   (Germany)

^c Dr Horst Schmidt Kliniken GmbH

^d Bildungswerk Physio Akademie des ZVK Ggmbh

Author keywords

Motor skills; Outcome measure; Stroke; Translation

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CULTURAL FACTOR; DISABILITY; GERMANY; HUMAN; LANGUAGE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; REPRODUCIBILITY; STATISTICS; STROKE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; WALKING DIFFICULTY;

CROSS-CULTURAL COMPARISON; DISABILITY EVALUATION; GERMANY; GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; HUMANS; LANGUAGE; MOBILITY LIMITATION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; STROKE; TRANSLATING; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 47149092366     PISSN: 00343536     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-2008-1076701     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Can JH, Shepherd RB (Hrsg). Stroke rehabilitation. Guidelines for exercise and training to optimize motor skill. London: Butterworth Heinemann 2003; 25
2. Lexow BD. Einführung von Assessmentverfahren für die Physiotherapie in der Neurologie: Chancen, Probleme, Lösungsansätze. Zeitschrift für Physiotherapeuten 2004; 56: 812-828
3. Carr JH, Shepherd RB, Nordholm L, Lynne D. Investigation of a new motor assessment scale for stroke patients. Physical Therapy 1985; 65: 175-179
4. Malouin F, Pichard L, Bonneau C, Durand A, Corriveau D. Evaluating motor recovery early after stroke: Comparison of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment and the Motor Assessment Scale. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 1994; 75: 1206-1212
5. Can JH, Shepherd RB. Neurologic rehabilitation: Optimizing motor performance. Boston: Butterworth Heinemann 1998
6. Poole JL, Whitney SL. Motor Assessment Scale for stroke patients: Concurrent validity and interrater reliability. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 1988; 69: 195-197
7. Ada L, O'Dwyer N, O'Neill E. Relation between spasticity, weakness and contracture of the elbow flexors and upper limb activity after stroke: an observational study. Disability and Rehabilitation 2006; 28: 891-897
8. Tyson SF, DeSouza LH. Reliability and validity of functional balance tests post stroke. Clinical Rehabilitation 2004; 18: 916-923
9. Langhammer B, Stanghelle JK. Bobath or motor relearning programme? A comparison of two different approaches of physiotherapy in stroke rehabilitation: a randomized controlled study. Clinical Rehabilitation 2000; 14: 361-369
10. Lannin NA. Reliability, validity and factor structure of the upper limb subscale of the Motor Assessment Scale (UL-MAS) in adults following stroke. Disability and Rehabilitation 2004; 26: 109-115
11. Sabari JS, Lim AL, Velozo CA, Lehman L, Kieran O, Lai JS. Assessing arm and hand function after stroke: A validity test of the hierarchical scoring system used in the Motor Assessment Scale for stroke. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2005; 86: 1609-1615
12. English CK, Hillier SL, Stiller K, Warden-Flood A. The sensitivity of three commonly used outcome measures to detect change amongst patients receiving inpatient rehabilitation following stroke. Clinical Rehabilitation 2006; 20: 52-55
13. Brock KA, Goldie PA, Greenwood KM. Evaluating the effectiveness of stroke rehabilitation: Choosing a discriminative measure. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2002; 83: 92-99
14. Hsueh I-P, Hsieh C-L. Responsiveness of two upper extremity function instruments for stroke inpatients receiving rehabilitation. Clinical Rehabilitation 2002; 16: 617-624
15. Horst R. Neuroreha: aufgabenorientierte Physiotherapie. Physiopraxis 2005; (11-12): 24-27
16. Beaton D, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB. Recommendations for the cross-cultural adaptation of health status measures. Illinois, USA, Toronto, Canada: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons & Institute for Work and Health 2002, verfügbar unter: www.dash.iwh.on.ca/assets/images/ pdfs/xculture2002.pdf
17. Physio-Akademie des Deutschen Verbandes für Physiotherapie - Zen-tralverband der Physiotherapeuten/Krankengymnasten (ZVK). Handbuch standardisierte Ergebnismessung in der Physiotherapie. Wremen: Physio-Akademie 2006