Moral trust & scientific collaboration

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A

Volumn 44, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 301-310

  Frost Arnold, Karen ^a  

^a HOBART AND WILLIAM SMITH COLLEGES   (United States)

Author keywords

Authorship; Collaboration; Industrial science; Self interest; Social epistemology; Trust

Indexed keywords

EID: 84878196028     PISSN: 00393681     EISSN: 18792510     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.shpsa.2013.04.002     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Adler J. Testimony, trust, knowing. Journal of Philosophy 1994, 91:264-275.
2. Anderson E. Democracy, public policy, and lay assessments of scientific testimony. Episteme 2011, 8:144-164.
3. Anderson M., Ronning E., De Vries R., Martinson B. The perverse effects of competition on scientists' work and relationships. Science and Engineering Ethics 2007, 13:437-461.
4. Baier A. Moral prejudices 1994, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
5. Barber B. Trust in science. Minerva 1987, 25:123-134.
6. Batson C.D. Addressing the altruism question experimentally. Altruism and altruistic love: Science, philosophy, and religion in dialogue 2002, 89-105. Oxford University Press, New York. S.G. Post, L.G. Underwood, J.P. Schloss, W.B. Hurlbut (Eds.).
7. Blais M. Epistemic tit for tat. Journal of Philosophy 1987, 84:363-375.
8. Campbell E.G., Clarridge B.R., Gokhale M., Birenbaum L., Hilgartner S., Holtzman N.A., et al. Data withholding in academic genetics. Journal of the American Medical Association 2002, 287:473-480.
9. Code L. Ecological thinking: The politics of epistemic location 2006, Oxford University Press, New York.
10. Committee on Publication Ethics. Changes in authorship: (d) Request for removal of author after publication. (2008). Accessed 24 August 2012.
11. Fagen A., Wells K. The 2000 national doctoral program survey. Paths to the professoriate 2004, 74-91. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco. D. Wulff, A. Austin (Eds.).
12. Fallis D. The epistemic costs and benefits of collaboration. The Southern Journal of Philosophy 2006, 44:197-208.
13. Faulkner P. Knowledge on trust 2011, Oxford University Press, New York.
14. Flanigan A., Carey L.A., Fontanarosa P.B., Phillips S.G., Pace B.P., Lundberg G.D., et al. Prevalence of articles with honorary authors and ghost authors in peer-reviewed medical journals. The Journal of the American Medical Association 1998, 280:222-224.
15. Fricker E. Trusting others in the sciences: A priori or empirical warrant?. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 2002, 33:373-383.
16. Frost-Arnold, K. (2012). The cognitive attitude of rational trust. Synthese, 1-18. Available at http://10.1007/s11229-012-0151-6.
17. Gadlin H., Jessar K. Preempting discord: Prenuptial agreements for scientists. The NIH Catalyst 2002, 10:12.
18. Giddens A. The consequences of modernity 1990, Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA.
19. Golde, C. & Dore, T. (2001a). At cross purposes: What the experiences of doctoral students reveal about doctoral education. Philadelphia: A Report for The Pew Charitable Trusts. <> Accessed 24 August 2012. http://www.phd-survey.org/report%20final.pdf.
20. Golde, C. & Dore, T. (2001b). Quotes from students. <> Accessed 24 August 2012. http://www.phd-survey.org/advice/List%20of%20disciplines.htm.
21. Goldman A., Shaked M. An economic model of scientific activity and truth acquisition. Philosophical Studies 1991, 63:31-55.
22. Grasswick H. Scientific and lay communities: Earning epistemic trust through knowledge sharing. Synthese 2010, 177:387-409.
23. Hardin R. Trust and trustworthiness 2002, Russell Sage Foundation, New York.
24. Hardwig J. Epistemic dependence. Journal of Philosophy 1985, 82:335-349.
25. Hardwig J. The role of trust in knowledge. Journal of Philosophy 1991, 88:693-708.
26. Hobbes T. Leviathan 1994, Hackett, Indianapolis, (First published 1651).
27. Holton R. Deciding to trust, coming to believe. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 1994, 72:63-76.
28. Hull D. Science as a process 1988, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
29. Hull D. What's wrong with invisible-hand explanations?. Philosophy of Science 1997, 64:S117-S126. (Proceedings).
30. Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals 2010, International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE), International Committee of Medical Journal Editors, Philadelphia, PA.
31. Jones K. Trust and terror. Moral psychology: Feminist ethics and social theory 2004, 3-18. Rowman & Littlefield, New York. P. DesAutels, M.U. Walker (Eds.).
32. Kitcher P. The advancement of science: Science without legend, objectivity without illusions 1993, Oxford University Press, New York.
33. Kwok L.S. The white bull effect: Abusive coauthorship and publication parasitism. Journal of Medical Ethics 2005, 31:554-556.
34. Ledford H. Collaborations: With all good intentions. Nature 2008, 452:682-684.
35. Longino H. The fate of knowledge 2002, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
36. Lovitts B. Leaving the ivory tower: The causes and consequences of departure from doctoral study 2001, Rowman & Littlefield, Lanham, MD.
37. Mainous A.G., Bowman M.A., Zoller J.S. The importance of interpersonal relationship factors in decisions regarding authorship. Family Medicine 2002, 34:462-467.
38. McGeer V. Trust, hope and empowerment. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 2008, 86:1-18.
39. Merton R.K. The normative structure of science. The sociology of science 1973, 267-278. Chicago University Press, Chicago. R.K. Merton, N.W. Storer (Eds.).
40. Merton R.K. The Matthew effect in science. The sociology of science 1973, 439-459. Chicago University Press, Chicago. R.K. Merton, N.W. Storer (Eds.).
41. O'Neill O. A question of trust 2002, Cambridge University Press, New York.
42. Ostrom E. Policies that crowd out reciprocity and collective action. Moral sentiments and material interests 2005, 253-275. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. H. Gintis, S. Bowles, R. Boyd, E. Fehr (Eds.).
43. Pettit P. The cunning of trust. Philosophy & Public Affairs 1995, 24:202-225.
44. Railton P. Truth, reason, and the regulation of belief. Philosophical Issues 1994, 5:71-93.
45. Rennie D. How much fraud? Let's do an experimental audit. The AAAS Observer 1989, 3:4.
46. Rescher N. Cognitive economy: An inquiry into the economic dimension of the theory of knowledge 1989, University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh, PA.
47. Rolin K. Gender and trust in science. Hypatia 2002, 4:95-118.
48. Scheman N. Epistemology resuscitated: Objectivity as trustworthiness. Engendering rationalities 2001, 23-52. State University of New York Press, Albany, NY. N. Tuana, S. Morgen (Eds.).
49. Shamoo A., Resnik D. Responsible conduct of research 2003, Oxford University Press, New York.
50. Shapin S. A social history of truth 1994, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
51. Shapin S. The scientific life 2008, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
52. Sober E., Wilson D.S. Unto others: The evolution and psychology of unselfish behavior 1998, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
53. Strange K. Authorship: Why not just toss a coin?. American Journal of Physiology-Cell Physiology 2008, 295:C567-C575.
54. Strevens M. The role of the Matthew effect in science. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 2006, 37:159-170.
55. Strevens M. Economic approaches to understanding scientific norms. Episteme 2011, 8:184-200.
56. Sztompka P. Trust in science. Journal of Classical Sociology 2007, 7:211-220.
57. Thagard P. Collaborative knowledge. NoÛs 1997, 31:242-261.
58. Thagard P. How to collaborate: Procedural knowledge in the cooperative development of science. Southern Journal of Philosophy 2006, 44:177-196.
59. Tollefsen D. Group deliberation, social cohesion, and scientific teamwork: Is there room for dissent?. Episteme 2006, 3:37-51.
60. Wagena E.J. The scandal of unfair behaviour of senior faculty. Journal of Medical Ethics 2005, 31:308.
61. Whitbeck C. Truth and trustworthiness in research. Science and Engineering Ethics 1995, 1:403-416.
62. Wilholt T. Bias and values in scientific research. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 2009, 40:92-101.
63. Woolston, C. (2002). When a mentor becomes a thief. Science Careers. <> Accessed 24 August 2012. http://sciencecareers.sciencemag.org/career_magazine/previous_issues/articles/2002_05_24/nodoi.14515965162592937960.
64. Wray K.B. Invisible hands and the success of science. Philosophy of Science 2000, 67:163-175.
65. Wray K.B. The epistemic significance of collaborative research. Philosophy of Science 2002, 69:150-168.
66. Wray K.B. Scientific authorship in the age of collaborative research. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 2006, 37:505-514.
67. Wray K.B. Evaluating scientists: Examining the effects of sexism and nepotism. Value-free science: Ideal and illusions? 2007, Oxford University Press, Oxford, (pp. 87-106). H. Kincaid, J. Dupré, A. Wylie (Eds.).