The epistemic costs and benefits of collaboration

Southern Journal of Philosophy

Volumn 44, Issue SUPPL, 2006, Pages 197-208

  Fallis, Don ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 36248963937     PISSN: 00384283     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.2041-6962.2006.tb00039.x     Document Type: Review

References (29)

1. Bhopal, Raj, Judith Rankin, Elaine McColl, Lois Thomas, Eileen Kaner, Rosie Stacy, Pauline Pearson, Brian Vernon, and Helen Rodgers. 1997. The vexed question of authorship: Views of researchers in a British medical faculty. British Medical Journal 314:1009-12.
2. Craig, Edward, ed. 1998. Routledge encyclopedia of philosophy. London: Routledge.
3. De Millo, Richard, Richard Lipton, and Alan Perlis. 1979. Social processes and proofs of theorems and programs. Communications of the Association for Computing Machinery 22:271-80.
4. Descartes, René. 1996. Meditations on first philosophy, ed. John Cottingham. Cambridge: Cambridge.
5. Diamond, Jared. 1997. Guns, germs, and steel. New York: W. W. Norton.
6. Fallis, Don. 1997. The epistemic status of probabilistic proof. Journal of Philosophy 94:165-86.
7. -. 2002. What do mathematicians want? Probabilistic proofs and the epistemic goals of mathematicians. Logique et Analyse 45:373-88.
8. -. 2004. Epistemic value theory and information ethics. Minds and Machines 14:101-17.
9. Fallis, Don, and Martin Frické. 2002. Indicators of accuracy of consumer health information on the Internet. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 9:73-9.
10. Fallis, Don, and Gerrard Liddell. 2002. Further results on inquiry and truth possession. Statistics and Probability Letters 60:169-82.
11. Frické, Martin, Kay Mathiesen, and Don Fallis. 2000. The ethical presuppositions behind the library bill of rights. Library Quarterly 70:468-91.
12. Garfield, E. 1972. Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation. Science 178:471-9.
13. Goldman, Alvin I. 1987. Foundations of social epistemics. Synthese 73:109-44.
14. -. 1999. Knowledge in a social world. New York: Oxford.
15. Grossman, Jerrold W., and Patrick D. F. Ion. 1995. On a portion of the well-known collaboration graph. Congressus Numerantium 108: 129-31.
16. Kitcher, Philip. 1981. Explanatory unification. Philosophy of Science 48:507-31.
17. Kuhn, Thomas S. 1977. Objectivity, value judgment, and theory choice. In The Essential Tension, 320-39. Chicago: University of Chicago.
18. Lee, Kirby P., Marieka Schotland, Peter Bacchetti, and Lisa A. Bero. 2002. Association of journal quality indicators with methodological quality of clinical research articles. JAMA 287:2805-08.
19. Maddy, Penelope. 1997. Naturalism in mathematics. New York: Oxford.
20. Maher, Patrick. 1993. Betting on theories. New York: Cambridge.
21. McDonald, Kim A. 1995. Too many co-authors? Chronicle of Higher Education 41(33): 35-6.
22. Merton, Robert K., and Harriet Zuckerman. 1973. Age, aging, and age structure in science. In The Sociology of Science, 497-559. Chicago: University of Chicago.
23. Paterson, R. W. K. 1979. Towards an axiology of knowledge. Journal of Philosophy of Education 13:91-100.
24. Shapiro, Carl, and Hal R. Varian. 1999. Information Rules. Boston: Harvard Business School.
25. Stanley, Jason, and Timothy Williamson. 2001. Knowing how. Journal of Philosophy 98:411-44.
26. Thagard, Paul. 1997. Collaborative knowledge. Nous 31:242-61.
27. Winograd, Terry, and Fernando Flores. 1987. Understanding computers and cognition: A new foundation for design. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
28. Wray, K. B. 2002. The epistemic significance of collaborative research. Philosophy of Science 69:150-68.
29. Zhang, Xiaolong, and George W. Furnas. 2005. mCVEs: Using cross-scale collaboration to support user interaction with multiscale structures. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments 14:31-46.