The importance of interpersonal relationship factors in decisions regarding authorship

Family Medicine

Volumn 34, Issue 6, 2002, Pages 462-467

  Mainous III, Arch G ^a   Bowman, Marjorie A ^a   Zoller, James S ^a  

^a MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONFLICT; DECISION MAKING; FAMILY MEDICINE; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE MANAGEMENT; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; INTERNET; MALE; PSYCHIATRY; PUBLICATION; WRITING; BIBLIOMETRICS; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MEDICAL RESEARCH; MEDICAL SCHOOL; PRODUCTIVITY; UNITED STATES;

AUTHORSHIP; BIBLIOMETRICS; BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; DATA COLLECTION; DECISION MAKING; EFFICIENCY; FACULTY, MEDICAL; HUMAN; INTERNET; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; UNITED STATES; HUMANS;

EID: 0035992217     PISSN: 07423225     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Authorship: The coin of the realm, the source of complaints
2. Misrepresentation of research citations among medical school faculty applicants
3. Misrepresentation of authorship by applicants to pediatrics training programs
4. Separating authorship responsibility and authorship credit: A proposal for biomedical journals
5. When authorship fails: A proposal to make contributors accountable
6. Prevalence of articles with honorary authors and ghost authors in peer-reviewed medical journals
7. The contributions of authors of multiauthored biomedical research papers
8. Disclosure of researcher contributions: A study of original research articles in the Lancet
9. Multiple authorship: The contribution of senior authors
10. What are the factors determining authorship and the order of the authors' names? A study among authors of Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde (Dutch Journal of Medicine)
11. Authorship is influenced by power and departmental politics
12. Assessment of authorship depends on culture
13. Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals