Scientific authorship in the age of collaborative research

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A

Volumn 37, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 505-514

  Wray, K Brad ^a  

^a STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT OSWEGO   (United States)

Author keywords

Authorship; Collaborative research; Multi authored articles; Plural subject; Responsibility; Reward system

Indexed keywords

EID: 33747862663     PISSN: 00393681     EISSN: 18792510     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.shpsa.2005.07.011     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Beaver D.d.B. Reflections on scientific collaboration (and its study): Past, present, and future. Scientometrics 52 3 (2001) 365-377
2. Beaver D.d.B. Does collaborative research have greater epistemic authority?. Scientometrics 60 3 (2004) 399-408
3. Beaver D.d.B., and Rosen R. Studies in scientific collaboration: Part III. Professionalization and the natural history of modern scientific co-authorship. Scientometrics 1 (1979) 231-245
4. Biagioli, M. (1999). Aporias of scientific authorship: Credit and responsibility in contemporary biomedicine. In idem (Ed.), The science studies reader (pp. 253-279). New York: Routledge.
5. Biagioli M. Rights or rewards?: Changing frameworks of scientific authorship. In: Biagioli M., and Galison P. (Eds). Scientific authorship: Property in science (2003), Routledge, New York 253-279
6. Brannigan A. The social basis of scientific discovery (1981), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
7. Cronin B. Hyperauthorship: A postmodern perversion or evidence of a structural shift in scholarly communication practices. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 52 7 (2002) 558-569
8. Cronin B., Shaw D., and La Barre K. A cast of thousands: Co-authorship and sub-authorship collaboration in the 20th century as manifested in the scholarly literature in psychology and philosophy. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 54 9 (2003) 855-871
9. Cronin B., Shaw D., and La Barre K. Visible, less visible, and invisible work: Patterns of collaboration in 20th century chemistry. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 55 2 (2004) 160-168
10. Duhem P. Some reflections on the subject of experimental physics. In: Ariew R., and Barker P. (Eds). Essays in the history and philosophy of science (1996), Hackett Publishing Company, Indianapolis 77-111 (First published 1894)
11. Frank Fox M. Gender, environmental milieu, and productivity in science. In: Zuckerman H., Cole J., and Bruer J. (Eds). The outer circle (1991), W.W. Norton and Company, New York 188-204
12. Galison P. The collective author. In: Biagioli M., and Galison P. (Eds). Scientific authorship: Credit and intellectual property in science (2003), Routledge, New York 327-355
13. Giere R.N. Distributed cognition in epistemic cultures. Philosophy of Science 69 (2002) 637-644
14. Gilbert M. On social facts (1992), Princeton University Press, Princeton (First published 1989)
15. Gilbert, M. (2000). The idea of collective guilt. In idem, Sociality and responsibility: New essays in plural subject theory (pp. 141-153). Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.
16. Hardwig J. Epistemic dependence. The Journal of Philosophy 82 (1985) 335-349
17. Healy D. Shaping the intimate: Influences on the experience of everyday nerves. Social Studies of Science 34 2 (2004) 219-245
18. Heilbron J.L. Creativity and big science. Physics Today November (1992) 42-47
19. Hull D.L. Science as a process (1988), University of Chicago Press, Chicago
20. Latour B., and Woolgar S. Laboratory life: The construction of scientific facts. 2nd ed. (1986), Princeton University Press, Princeton (First published 1979)
21. Lynch M. Ghost writing and other matters. Social Studies of Science 34 2 (2004) 147-148
22. Merton R.K. The ambivalence of scientists. In: Merton R.K., and Storer N.W. (Eds). Sociology of science: Theoretical and empirical investigations (1973), University of Chicago Press, Chicago 381-412
23. Price D.J.d.S. Little science, big science . . . and beyond (1986), Columbia University Press, New York
24. Shapin S. A social history of truth (1994), University of Chicago Press, Chicago
25. Sismondo S. Pharmaceutical maneuvers. Social Studies of Science 34 2 (2004) 149-159
26. Thagard P. How scientists explain disease (1999), Princeton University Press, Princeton
27. Wilcox L.J. Authorship: The coin of the realm, the source of complaints. Journal of the American Medical Association 280 (1998) 216-217
28. Wray K.B. The epistemic significance of collaborative research. Philosophy of Science 69 (2002) 150-168
29. Zuckerman H. Scientific elite: Nobel laureates in the United States (1996), Transaction, New Brunswick
30. Zuckerman H., and Merton R.K. Institutionalized patterns of evaluation in science. In: Merton R.K., and Storer N.W. (Eds). Sociology of science: Theoretical and empirical investigations (1973), University of Chicago Press, Chicago 460-496