Maritime safety analysis in retrospect

Maritime Policy and Management

Volumn 40, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 261-277

  Yang, Z L ^a   Wang, J ^a   Li, K X ^b  

^a LIVERPOOL JOHN MOORES UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b Chung Ang University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MARITIME TRANSPORTATION; ORGANIZATIONAL FRAMEWORK; PIRACY; POLICY APPROACH; POLICY MAKING; RISK ASSESSMENT; TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT; TRANSPORTATION POLICY; TRANSPORTATION SAFETY;

EID: 84878170858     PISSN: 03088839     EISSN: 14645254     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/03088839.2013.782952     Document Type: Review

References (92)

1. AGCS. 2012. Safety and Shipping 1912-2012 from Titanic to Costa Concordia. Allianz Global Corporate & Specialty. Accessed February 1, 2013. http://www.agcs.allianz.com/assets/PDFs/Reports/AGCS_safety_and_shipping_report.pdf (http://www.agcs.allianz.com/assets/PDFs/Reports/AGCS_safety_and_shipping_report.pdf)
2. Bichou, K. 2004. The ISPS Code and the Cost of Port Compliance: An Initial Logistics and Supply Chain Framework for Port Security Assessment and Management. Maritime Economics & Logistics, 6 (4): 322 - 348.
3. Cariou, P., Mejia, M. Q. and Wolff, F. C. 2008. On the Effectiveness of Port State Control Inspections. Transportation Research Part E - Logistics and Transpiration, 44 (3): 491 - 503.
4. Celik, M., Miri-Lavasani, S. and Wang, L. 2010. A Risk-Based Modelling Approach to Enhance Shipping Accident Investigation. Safety Science, 48: 18 - 27.
5. Eleye-Datubo, A. G., Wall, A., Saajedi, A. and Wang, J. 2006. Enabling a Powerful Marine and Offshore Decision-Support Solution through Bayesian Network Technique. Risk Analysis, 26 (3): 695 - 721.
6. El-Ladan, S. B. and Turan, O. 2012. Human Reliability Analysis - Taxonomy and Praxes of Human Entropy Boundary Conditions for Marine and Offshore Applications. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 98: 43 - 54.
7. Elsayed, T. 2009. Fuzzy Inference System for the Risk Assessment of Liquefied Natural Gas Carriers during Loading/Offloading at Terminals. Applied Ocean Research, 31 (3): 179 - 185.
8. European Parliament. 2004. " Regulation (EC) No. 725/2004 on Enhancing Ship and Port Facility Security ". In EU Official Journal Vol. L129, 6 - 91.
9. Federal Government of Canada. 2003. Security and Emergency Preparedness, Ottawa: Marine Transportation Regulations.
10. Federal Government of the US. 2002. Maritime Transportation Security Act. Washington, DC, Accessed May 2009. http://www.tsa.gov/assets/pdf/MTSA.pdf (http://www.tsa.gov/assets/pdf/MTSA.pdf)
11. Fowler, T. G. and Sorgard, E. 2000. Modelling Ship Transportation Risk. Risk Analysis, 20 (2): 225 - 244.
12. Gaonkar, R. S. P., Xie, M., Ng, M. M. and Habibullah, M. S. 2011. Subjective Operational Reliability Assessment of Maritime Transportation System. Expert Systems with Applications, 38 (11): 13835 - 13846.
13. Gerigk, M. 2007. A Model of Performance-Oriented Risk-Based Assessment of Safety of Container Ships. Polish Maritime Research, 1: 53 - 57.
14. Goerlandt, F., Stahlber, K. and Kujala, P. 2012. Influence of Impact Scenario Models on Collision Risk Analysis. Ocean Engineering, 47: 74 - 87.
15. Greenberg, M. D., Chalk, P., Willis, H. H., Khiko, I. and Ortiz, D. S. 2006. Maritime Terrorism: Risk and Liability, Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
16. Guedes Soares, C. 1997. Advances in Safety and Reliability, Oxford: Pergamon.
17. Guedes Soares, C. 1998. Risk and Reliability in Marine Technology, Rotterdam: A.A. Balkema.
18. Guedes Soares, C. and Teixeira, A. P. 2001. Risk Assessment in Maritime Transportation. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 74 (3): 299 - 309.
19. Hanninen, M. and Kujala, P. 2012. Influences of Variables on Ship Collision Probability in a Bayesian Belief Network Model. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 102: 27 - 40.
20. Harati-Mokhtari, A., Wall, A., Brooks, P. and Wang, J. 2007. Automatic Identification System (AIS): Data Reliability and Human Error Implications. Journal of Navigation, 60 (3): 373 - 389.
21. Heij, C., Bijwaard, G. E. and Knapp, S. 2011. Ship Inspection Strategies: Effects on Maritime Safety and Environmental Protection. Transportation Research Part D-Transport and Environment, 16 (1): 42 - 48.
22. Hu, S. P., Fang, Q., Xia, H. B. and Xi, Y. T. 2007. Formal Safety Assessment Based on Relative Risks Model in Ship Navigation. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 92 (3): 369 - 377.
23. Hu, S. P., Li, X. D., Fang, Q. G. and Yang, Z. L. 2008. Use of Bayesian Method for Assessing Vessel Traffic Risks at Sea. International Journal of Information Technology and Decision Making, 7 (4): 627 - 638.
24. IMO. 1997a. " Formal Safety Assessment: Trial Application to High Speed Passenger Catamaran Vessels ". In Final Report DE, 41/INF.7, Submitted by IMO, UK, IMO Sub-Committee on Ship Design and Equipment, 41st Session, London, UK: Agenda Item 5.
25. IMO. November 17 1997b. " Interim Guidelines for the Application of Formal Safety Assessment to the IMO Rule-Making Process ". In IMO/MSC Circular 829 November 17, London
26. IMO. November 17 1998a. " Bulk Carrier Safety, Proposal for a Formal Safety Assessment of Bulk Carriers ". In MSC70/4/Add1, Submitted to the IMO by the UK MCA. November 17, London
27. IMO. November 17 1998b. " Trial Application of Formal Safety Assessment to Dangerous Goods on Passenger/Ro-Ro Vessels ". In MSC69/INF.24, Submitted by IMO November 17, Finland
28. IMO. November 17 2002a. " International Collaborative FSA Study on Bulk Carriers-Step 2 of FSA (Risk Analysis) WP 11-Develop Risk Contribution Tree Components. In MSC 75/INF.22, Submitted by France to IMO, November 17, London: IMO.
29. IMO. 2002b. "International Collaborative FSA Study-FSA Step 3 (Risk Control Options)". MSC 76/INF.8, Submitted to the IMO by UK to IMO, London.
30. IMO. 2008. "Report of the Formal Safety Assessment Experts Group", MSC 85st Session Documents, London, November-December.
31. IMO. 2010a. "Report of the Formal Safety Assessment Experts Group", MSC 87st Session Documents, London, May.
32. IMO. 2010b. "Report of the Formal Safety Assessment Experts Group", MSC 88st Session Documents, London, November-December.
33. IMO. 2011. "Report of the Formal Safety Assessment Experts Group", MSC 89st Session Documents, London, May.
34. IMO. 2012a. "Report of the Formal Safety Assessment Experts Group", MSC 90st session documents, London, May.
35. IMO. 2012b. "Report of the Formal Safety Assessment Experts Group", MSC 91st session documents, London, November.
36. IMO. 2012c. "IMO MSC Meeting Summaries." Accessed January 4, 2012. http://www.imo.org/mediacentre/meetingsummaries/msc/Pages/Default.aspx (http://www.imo.org/mediacentre/meetingsummaries/msc/Pages/Default.aspx)
37. Karahalios, H., Yang, Z. L., Williams, V. and Wang, J. 2011. A Proposed System of Hierarchical Scorecards to Facilitate the Implementation of Maritime Regulations. Safety Science, 49 (3): 450 - 462.
38. Kim, S.W., Wall, A., Wang, J. and Kwon, Y. S. 2006. Fire-Risk Modelling of Machinery Space: An Application of Approximate Reasoning Approach (Fuzzy Averaging Method) in Passenger Ship Engine Room. International Journal of Offshore and Polar Engineering, 16 (1): 48 - 56.
39. King, J. 2005. The Security of Merchant Shipping. Marine Policy, 29 (3): 235 - 245.
40. Klibi, W. and Martel, A. 2012. Modeling Approaches for the Design of Resilient Supply Networks Under Disruptions. International Journal of Production Economics, 135 (2): 882 - 898.
41. Knudsen, O. F. and Hassler, B. 2011. IMO Legislation and Its Implementation Accident Risk, Vessel Deficiencies and National Administrative Practices. Marine Policy, 35 (2): 201 - 207.
42. Kolowrocki, K. and Soszynska, J. 2011. On Safety Analysis of Complex Technical Maritime Transportation Systems. Journal of Risk and Reliability, 225 (3): 345 - 354.
43. Kontovas, C. A. and Psaraftis, H. N. 2009. Formal Safety Assessment: A Critical Review. Marine Technology and SNAME News, 46 (1): 45 - 59.
44. Lee, D., Kim, H., Park, J. H. and Park, J. B. 2003. The Current Status and Future Issues in Human Evacuation from Ships. Safety Science, 41 (10): 861 - 876.
45. Li, K., J. Yin, K. S. Bang, Z. Yang, and J. Wang. 2012. "Bayesian Network with Quantitative Input for Maritime Risk Analysis." Transportmetrica (in press), Accessed January 8, 2012. http:////www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/18128602.2012.675527. (http:////www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/18128602.2012.675527.)
46. Liu, J., Yang, J. B., Wang, J. and Sii, H. S. 2005. Engineering System Safety Analysis and Synthesis Using the Fuzzy Rule-Based Evidential Reasoning Approach. Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 21 (4): 387 - 411.
47. Lloyd's Register. 1910-2010. Casualty Statistics. London: Lloyd's Register of Shipping.
48. Lois, P. 2004. "Cyprus and Mediterranean Cruise Market: A Financial and Economic Appraisal." PhD thesis, Liverpool John Moores University.
49. Loughran, C., Pillay, A., Wang, J., Wall, A. and Ruxton, T. 2003. A Preliminary Study of Fishing Vessel Safety. Journal of Risk Research, 5 (1): 3 - 21.
50. Martins, M. R. and Maturana, M. C. 2010. Human Error Contribution in Collision and Grounding of Oil Tankers. Risk Analysis, 30 (4): 674 - 698.
51. Mensah, T. A. 2003. The Place of the ISPS Code in the Legal International Regime for the Security of International Shipping. WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs, 3 (1): 17 - 30.
52. Merrick, J. R. W. and van Drop, R. 2006. Speaking the Truth in Maritime Risk Assessment. Risk Analysis, 26 (1): 223 - 237.
53. Mikulik, J. and Zajdel, M. 2009. Automatic Risk Control Based on FSA Methodology Adaptation for Safety Assessment in Intelligent Buildings. International Journal of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science, 19 (2): 317 - 326.
54. Montewka, J., Hinz, T., Kujala, P. and Matusiak, J. 2010. Probability Modelling of Vessel Collisions. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 95 (5): 573 - 589.
55. Mullai, A. and Paulsson, U. 2011. A Grounded Theory Model for Analysis of Marine Accidents. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 43 (4): 1590 - 1603.
56. Nwaoha, T. C., Yang, Z. L., Wang, J. and Bonsall, S. 2010a. A New Fuzzy Evidential Reasoning Method for Risk Analysis and Control of a Liquefied Natural Gas Carrier System. Journal of Engineering for the Maritime Environment, 225 (M3): 206 - 225.
57. Nwaoha, T. C., Yang, Z., Wang, J. and Bonsall, S. 2010b. Application of Genetic Algorithm to Risk-Based Maintenance Operations of Liquefied Natural Gas Carrier Systems. Journal of Process Mechanical Engineering, 225 (E1): 40 - 52.
58. OECD. 2003. Security in Maritime Transport: Risk Factors and Economic Impact, Paris: OECD. (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development)
59. Papanikolaou, A. D. 2009. Risk-Based Ship Design - Methods, Tools and Applications, Berlin: Springer.
60. Pate-Cornell, M. E. 1990. Organizational Aspects of Engineering System Safety: The Case of Offshore Platforms. Science, 250 (4985): 1210 - 1217.
61. Pillay, A. and Wang, J. 2003. A Risk Ranking Approach Incorporating Fuzzy Set Theory and Grey Theory. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 79 (1): 61 - 67.
62. Psaraftis, H. N. 2012. Formal Safety Assessment: An Updated Review. Journal of Maritime Science and Technology, 17: 390 - 402.
63. Puisa, R. and Vassalos, D. 2012. Robust Analysis of Cost-Effectiveness in Formal Safety Assessment. Journal of Marine Science and Technology, 17 (3): 370 - 381.
64. Rosqvist, T. and Tuominen, R. 2004. Quantification of Formal Safety Assessment: An Exploratory Study. Safety Science, 42: 99 - 120.
65. Sii, H. S. 2001. "Marine and Offshore Safety Assessment." PhD thesis, Staffordshire University/Liverpool John Moores University.
66. Sii, H. S., Ruxton, T. and Wang, J. 2001. A Fuzzy-Logic-Based Approach to Qualitative Safety Modelling for Marine Systems. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 73 (1): 19 - 34.
67. Stiehl, G. L. 1977. Prospects for Shipping Liquefied Natural Gas. Marine Technology, 14 (4): 351 - 378.
68. Talley, W. K. 2008. Maritime Safety, Security and Piracy, London: LLP.
69. Talley, W. K. and Rule, E. M. 2008. " Piracy in Shipping.". In Maritime Safety, Security and Piracy, Edited by: Talley, W. K. 89 - 101. London: LLP. edited by
70. Trbojevic, V. M. 2002. Risk-Based Methodology for Safety Improvement. Journal of Hazards Materials, 71: 467 - 480.
71. Trucco, P., Cagno, E., Ruggeri, F. and Grande, O. 2008. A Bayesian Belief Network Modelling of Organisational Factors in Risk Analysis: A Case Study in Maritime Transportation. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 93: 823 - 834.
72. Vanem, E., Antao, P., Ostvik, I. and de Comas, F. D. 2008. Analysing the Risk of LNG Carrier Operations. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 83 (9): 1328 - 1344.
73. Vanem, E. and Skjong, R. 2006. Designing for Safety in Passenger Ships Utilizing Advanced Evacuation Analyses - a Risk Based Approach. Safety Science, 44 (2): 111 - 135.
74. Wang, J. 2001. The Current Status and Future Aspects in Formal Ship Safety Assessment. Safety Science, 38: 19 - 30.
75. Wang, J. 2002. A Brief Review of Marine and Offshore Safety Assessment. Marine Technology, 39 (2): 77 - 85.
76. Wang, J. 2006. Maritime Risk Assessment and Its Current Status. Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 22: 3 - 19.
77. Wang, J. and Foinikis, P. 2001. Formal Safety Assessment of Containerships. Marine Policy, 25 (2): 143 - 157.
78. Wang, J., Sii, H. S., Yang, J. B., Pillay, A., Yu, D., Liu, J., Maistralis, E. and Saajedi, A. 2004. Use of Advances in Technology for Maritime Risk Assessment. Risk Analysis, 24 (4): 1041 - 1063.
79. Wang, J., Yang, J. B. and Sen, P. 1996. Multi-Person and Multi-Attribute Design Evaluations Using Evidential Reasoning Based on Subjective Safety and Cost Analyses. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 52 (2): 113 - 128.
80. Willis, H. H. and Ortiz, D. S. 2004. Evaluating the Security of the Global Containerized Supply Chain, Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
81. Wong, M. C. and Yip, T. L. 2012. Maritime Piracy: An Analysis of Attacks and Violence. International Journal of Shipping and Transport Logistics, 4 (4): 306 - 322.
82. Yang, Z. L., Bonsall, S., Wall, A. and Wang, J. 2005. Reliable Container Line Supply Chains - A New Risk Assessment Framework for Improving Safety Performance. Journal of World Maritime University, 4 (1): 105 - 120.
83. Yang, Z. L., Bonsall, S., Wall, A., Wang, J. and Usman, M. 2013. A Fuzzy Bayesian Reasoning Approach to Facilitating the Quantification of CREAM in Maritime Human Reliability Analysis. Ocean Engineering, 58: 293 - 303.
84. Yang, Z. L., Bonsall, S. and Wang, J. 2008. Fuzzy Rule-Based Bayesian Reasoning Approach for Prioritization of Failures in FMEA. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 57 (3): 517 - 528.
85. Yang, Z. L., Bonsall, S. and Wang, J. 2009a. Use of Hybrid Multiple Uncertain Attribute DecisionMaking Techniques in Safety Management. Expert System with Applications, 36 (2): 1569 - 1586.
86. Yang, Z. L., Bonsall, S. and Wang, J. 2009b. Use of Fuzzy Evidential Reasoning in Maritime Security Assessment. Risk Analysis, 29 (1): 95 - 120.
87. Yang, Z. L., Bonsall, S. and Wang, J. 2010. Facilitating Uncertainty Treatment in the Risk Assessment of Container Supply Chains. Journal of Marine Engineering and Technology A, 17: 23 - 36.
88. Yang, Z. L., A. Ug, and J. Wang. 2011. "Incorporating Quantitative Risk Analysis in Port Facility Security Assessment." International Association of Maritime Economics Conference 2011 (IAME2011), Santiago, October 26-28.
89. Yang, Z. L., Ug, A. and Wang, J. September 6-8 2012. " Prioritizing Security Vulnerabilities in Ports ". In International Association of Maritime Economics Conference 2012 (IAME2012) September 6-8, Taipei
90. Yang, Z. L. and Wang, J. 2008. " Ship Formal Safety Assessment.". In Maritime Safety, Security and Piracy, Edited by: Talley, W. K. 31 - 53. London: LLP. edited by
91. Yang, Z. L., and J. Wang. 2010. "Vulnerability Prioritization of Container Supply Chains." International Conference on Korean Port Economics, Incheon, July 1-3.
92. Yeo, G. T., Pak, J. Y. and Yang, Z. L. 2013. Analysis of Dynamic Effects on Seaport Adopting Port Security. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 49: 285-301.