Maritime risk assessment and its current status

Quality and Reliability Engineering International

Volumn 22, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 3-19

  Wang, Jin ^a  

^a LIVERPOOL JOHN MOORES UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Decision making; Formal safety assessment; Offshore installations; Safety case; Ships

Indexed keywords

ACCIDENTS; MARINE ENGINEERING; QUALITY CONTROL; SHIPS;

FORMAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT; OFFSHORE INSTALLATIONS; SAFETY CASE;

RISK ASSESSMENT;

EID: 32644443043     PISSN: 07488017     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/qre.744     Document Type: Review

References (68)

1. Wang J, Trbojevic V. Design for Safety of Large Marine and Offshore Engineering Products. Institute of Marine Engineering, Science and Technology: London, 2006.
2. Department of Energy. The public inquiry into the Piper Alpha disaster. Cullen Report, Department of Energy, London, 1990.
3. House of Lords. Safety aspects of ship design and technology. 2nd Report, HL Paper 30-I, Select Committee on Science and Technology, London, February 1992.
4. Wang J. A brief review of marine and offshore safety assessment. Marine Technology 2002; 39(2):77-85.
5. Strutt J. Overview of major accidents offshore. Proceedings of the International Workshop on Safety Analysis and Techniques Required for Formal Safety Assessments in the Shipping and Offshore Industries, London, 16-18 December 1992. Institute of Marine Engineering, Science and Technology: London, 1992; paper 12.
6. Lloyd's casualty report. Lloyd's List 1991; (24 August).
7. Statoil. Press Release, Statoil, Norway, 15 October 1991.
8. SINTEF The sinking of the Sleipner A offshore platform. http://www.ima.umn.edu/~arnold/disasters/sleipner.html [1 December 2004].
9. Von Flatern R. World awaits Roncador disaster report. Offshore Engineer 2001; (April):12-13.
10. Videiro PM, Gyranka C, Nunes GC, Melo AP. The accident of the P-36 platform: The rupture of the emergency drainage tank. Proceedings of OMAE'02, 21st International Conference on Offshore and Arctic Engineering, Oslo, Norway, 23-28 June 2002. American Society of Mechanical Engineers: New York, 2002.
11. U.K. Department of Transport. MV Herald of Free Enterprise - fatal accident investigation. Sheen Report, Report of Court No. 8074. HMSO: London, 1987.
12. ABS. Prestige casualty - information update no. 5. ABS Press Release, American Bureau of Shipping, Houston, TX, 3 December 2002.
13. Prada A, Vazquez MX. Effectos economicos, sociais e ambientais da marea negra do 'Prestige'. Proceedings of Seminario Cientifico International, Santiago, 7-8 March 2003. Consella Da Cultura Galega: Santiago, Spain, 2003.
14. HSE. The Health and Safety at Work Act 1974. HMSO: London, 1991.
15. HSC. The Offshore Installations (Safety Case) Regulations 1992. HSE Books: Sudbury, U.K., 1992.
16. Wang J, Kieran O. Offshore safety assessment and safety based decision making - the current status and future aspects. Journal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering 2000; 122(2):63-69.
17. HSC. Offshore Installations (Prevention of Fire and Explosion, and Emergency Response) on Regulations 1995 (2nd edn). HSE Books: Sudbury, U.K., 1997.
18. Wang J. Offshore safety case approach and formal safety assessment of ships. Journal of Safety Research 2002; 33(1):81-115.
19. HSC. A Guide to the Offshore Installations and Pipeline Works (Management and Administration) Regulations 1995. HSE Books: Sudbury, U.K., 1995.
20. HSC. A Guide to the Pipelines Safety Regulations 1996. HSE Books: Sudbury, U.K., 1996.
21. HSC. The Offshore Installations and Wells (Design and Construction, etc.) Regulations 1996. HSE Books: Sudbury, U.K., 1996.
22. HSC. A Guide to the Installation Verification and Miscellaneous Aspects of Amendments by the Offshore Installations and Wells (Design and Construction, etc.) Regulations 1996 to the Offshore Installations (Safety Case) Regulations 1992. HSE Books: Sudbury, U.K., 1996.
23. HSC. A Guide to the Integrity, Workplace Environment and Miscellaneous Aspects of the Offshore Installations and Wells (Design and Construction, etc.) Regulations 1996. HSE Books: Sudbury, U.K., 1996.
24. UKOOA. Industry Guidelines on a Framework for Risk Related Decision Making. U.K. Offshore Operators Association: Aberdeen, U.K., 1999.
25. Bea RG. Risk assessment and management of offshore structures. Journal of U.K. Safety and Reliability Society 23(1):1-13.
26. Godfrey D, Curole M, Miller G. Six years of experience incorporating human factors engineering into offshore facilities design. Proceedings International Workshop on Human Factors in Offshore Operations Bea RG, Holdsworth RD, Smith C (eds.). American Bureau of Shipping: Houston, TX, 1996.
27. ABS. The application of ergonomics to marine systems. Guidance Notes, American Bureau of Shipping, Houston, TX, 1998.
28. International Standards Organization (ISO). Ergonomics principles in the design of work systems, ISO 6385, 1998.
29. Sekimizu K. Current work at IMO on formal safety assessment. Proceedings of Marine Risk Assessment: A Better Way to Manage Your Business. The Institute of Marine Engineers: London, 1997.
30. Marine Safety Agency. Formal Safety Assessment MSC 66/14, submitted by the U.K. to the IMO Maritime Safety Committee, Southampton, U.K., 1993.
31. IMO. Formal safety assessment trial application to high speed passenger vessels. MSC 68/14/2, submitted by the U.K. to the FSA Working Group, London, U.K., 27 May 1997.
32. IMO. Bulk carrier safety, proposal for a formal safety assessment of bulk carriers. MSC 70/4/Add1, submitted to the IMO by the U.K. MCA, September 1998.
33. IMO. Interim guidelines for the application of formal safety assessment to the IMO rule-making process. IMO/MSC Circular 829, IMO, London, U.K., 17 November 1997.
34. IMO. Guidelines for Formal Safety Assessment (FSA) for use in the IMO rule-making process. MSC/Circular 1023, MEPC/Circular 392, IMO, London, U.K., 5 April 2002.
35. Wang J. Current status of future aspects of formal safety assessment of ships. Safety Science 2001; 38:19-30.
36. Card J, Haugland BK, Pomeroy V. Developing the next generation of classification rules for oil tankers. Proceedings of the International Conference on Design and Operation of Double Hull Tankers. The Royal Institution of Naval Architects: London, 2004.
37. HSC. Safety in Docks - Docks Regulations 1988 and Guidance. Approved Code of Practice. HSE Books: Sudbury, U.K., 1988.
38. DETR. Review of the Pilotage Act 1987. HMSO: London, 1998.
39. DETR. Port Marine Safety Code. HMSO: London, 2000.
40. Kuo C. Managing Ship Safety. LLP: London, 1998.
41. Spouse J. Risk criteria for use in ship safety assessment. Proceedings of Marine Risk Assessment: A Better Way to Manage Your Business. The Institute of Marine Engineers: London, 1997.
42. Moan T, Berge S (eds.). Ship and offshore structures. Proceeding of the 13th International Ship and Offshore Structures Congress, Trondheim, Norway, 8-22 August 1997. Elsevier: Oxford, 1997.
43. Norwegian Petroleum Directorate. Guidelines for Safety Evaluation of Platform Conception Design. NPD: Norway, 1981.
44. IMO. International collaborative FSA study on bulk carriers - Step 2 of FSA (risk analysis) WP 11 - Develop risk contribution tree components. MSC 75/INF.22, submitted by France to IMO, IMO, London, U.K., 12 March 2002.
45. IMO. International Collaborative FSA study - FSA step 3 (Risk Control Options). MSC 76/INF.8, submitted to the IMO by U.K., IMO, London, U.K., 23 September 2002.
46. IMO. Trial application of FSA to the dangerous goods on passenger/RO-RO vessels. MSC 69/INF.24, submitted by Finland IMO, IMO, London, U.K., 1998.
47. Loughran C, Pillay A, Wang J, Wall AD, Ruxton T. A preliminary study of fishing vessel safety. Journal of Risk Research 2003; 5(1):3-21.
48. Pillay A. Formal safety assessment of fishing vessels. PhD Thesis, School of Engineering, Liverpool John Moores University, 2001.
49. Sii HS. Marine and offshore safety assessment. PhD Thesis, Staffordshire University/Liverpool John Moores University, 2001.
50. Lois P. Cyprus and Mediterranean cruise market: A financial and economic appraisal. PhD Thesis, School of Engineering, Liverpool John Moores University, 2004.
51. Lois P, Wang J, Wall AD, Ruxton T. Formal safety assessment of cruise ships. Tourism Management 2004; 25(1):93-109.
52. Trbojevic VM. Risk based methodology for safety improvements in ports. Journal of Hazardous Materials 2002; 71:467-480.
53. Wang J, Foinikis P. Formal safety assessment of containerships. Marine Policy 2001; 25:143-157.
54. Yang Z, Bonsall S, Wall A, Wang J. Reliable container line supply chains - a new risk assessment framework for improving safety performance. Journal of World Maritime University 2005; 4(1):105-120.
55. Sii HS, Ruxton T, Wang J. A synthesis using fuzzy set theory and Dempster-Shafer based approach to compromise decision making with multiple attribute applied to risk control options selection. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part E, IMechE Journal of Process Mechanical Engineering 2001; 212:251-261.
56. Sii HS, Ruxton T, Wang J. A fuzzy-logic-based approach to qualitative safety modelling for marine systems. Engineering Reliability and System Safety 2001; 73(1): 19-34.
57. Sii HS, Wang J. A design-decision support framework for evaluation of design options/proposals using a composite structure methodology based on approximate reasoning approach and evidential reasoning method. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part E, IMechE Journal of Process Mechanical Engineering 2003; 217:59-76.
58. Sii HS, Wang J, Eleye-Datubo A, Liu J, Yang JB. Safety assessment of FPSO turret-mooring system using approximate reasoning and evidential reasoning. Marine Technology 2005; 42(2):88-102.
59. Wang J, Sii HS, Yang JB, Pillay A, Maistralis E, Saajedi A. Use of advanced technology in marine risk assessment. Risk Analysis 2004; 24(4):1011-1033.
60. Wang J, Yang JB, Sen P. Safety analysis and synthesis using fuzzy sets and evidential reasoning. Reliability Engineering and System Safety 1996; 47(2):103-118.
61. Wang J, Yang JB, Sen P. Multi-person and multi-attribute design evaluations using evidential reasoning based on subjective safety cost analysis. Reliability Engineering and System Safety 1996; 52(2):113-129.
62. Wang J. Formal safety analysis methods and their application to the design process. PhD Thesis, Engineering Design Centre, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, 1994.
63. Wang J, Yang JB, Sen P, Ruxton T. Safety based design and maintenance optimisation of large marine engineering systems. Applied Ocean Research 1996; 18(1):13-27.
64. Faber MH, Kroon IB, Kragh E, Bayly D, Decosemaeker P. Risk assessment of decommissioning options using Bayesian networks. Journal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering 2002; 124(4):231-238.
65. Friis-Hansen A. Bayesian networks as a decision support tool in marine applications. PhD Thesis, Department of Naval Architecture and Offshore Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, Denmark, 2000.
66. Bea RG. Performance shaping factors in reliability analysis of design of offshore structures. Journal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering 2000; 122(3):163-172.
67. Bea RG. Human and organizational factors in reliability assessment and management of offshore structures. Risk Analysis 2002; 22(1):29-45.
68. Wang J, Ruxton T. A design for safety methodology of large engineering systems. Journal of Engineering Design 1998; 9(2):159-170.