Factors affecting the adoption of healthcare information technology

EXCLI Journal

Volumn 12, Issue , 2013, Pages 413-436

  Phichitchaisopa, Nisakorn ^a   Naenna, Thanakorn ^a  

^a MAHIDOL UNIVERSITY   (Thailand)

Author keywords

Healthcare information technology; Technology acceptance; Unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT)

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EDUCATION; EFFORT EXPECTANCY; ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD; EMOTION; EXPECTATION; FACILITATION; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH SERVICE; HUMAN; MALE; MEDICAL INFORMATICS; MOTIVATION; PERFORMANCE EXPECTANCY; POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; SOCIAL ASPECT; STRUCTURED QUESTIONNAIRE; THAILAND;

EID: 84877934531     PISSN: None     EISSN: 16112156     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. AbuShanab E, Pearson JM. Internet banking in Jordan: The unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT) perspective. J Sys Info Tech 2007;9:78-97.
2. Al-Gahtani SS, King M. Attitudes, satisfaction and usage: factors contributing to each in the acceptance of information technology. Behav Inform Technol 1999;18: 277- 97.
3. Aggelidis VP, Chatzoglou PD. Using a modified technology acceptance model in hospitals. Int J Med Info 2009;78:115-26.
4. Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organiz Behav Hum Dec Proc 1991;50: 179-211.
5. Ammenwerth E, Gräber S, Herrmann G, Bürkle T, König J. Evaluation of health information systems - problems and challenges. Int J Med Info 2003;71:125-35.
6. Bandura A, Adams NE. Analysis of selfefficacy theory of behavioral change. Cogn Ther Res 1997;1:287-310.
7. Bates DW. Using information technology to reduce rates of medication errors in hospitals. BMJ 2000;320:788-91.
8. Burtonjones A, Hubona G. The mediation of external variables in the technology acceptance model. Info Manage 2006; 43:706-17.
9. Calman N, Kitson K, Hauser D. Using information technology to improve health quality and safety in community health centers. Prog Commun Health Partnersh 2007;1:83-8.
10. Chang I-C, Hwang H-G, Hung W-F, Li Y-C. Physicians' acceptance of pharmacokinetics-based clinical decision support systems. Expert Syst Appl 2007;33:296-303.
11. Chen CC, Wu J, Crandall RE. Obstacles to the adoption of radio frequency identification technology in the emergency rooms of hospitals. Int J Elec Healthc 2007;3:193- 207.
12. Chismar WG, Wiley-Patton S. Test of the technology acceptance model for the internet in pediatrics. Proc AMIA Symp 2002; 155-9.
13. Compeau DR, Higgins CA. Computer selfefficacy: development of a measure and initial test. MIS Quart 1995a;19:189-211.
14. Compeau DR, Higgins CA. Application of social cognitive theory to training for computer skills. Info Sys Res 1995b; 6:118-43.
15. Compeau D, Higgins CA, Huff S. Social cognitive theory and individual reactions to computing technology: a longitudinal study. MIS Quart 1999;23: 145-58.
16. Davis FD. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quart 1989;13: 319-40.
17. Davis FD, Bagozzi RP, Warshaw PR. User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Management Sci 1989;35:982-1003.
18. Davis F, Bagozzi R, Warshaw P. Extrinsic and intrinsic motivation to use computers in the workplace. J Appl Soc Psychol 1992; 22:1111-32.
19. Davis N. Health information technology. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders/Elsevier, 2007.
20. DeLone WH, McLean ER. The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: a ten-year update. J Manage Info Sys 2003;19:9-30.
21. Falk RF, Miller NB. A primer for soft modeling. Akron, OH: University of Akron Press, 1992.
22. Fishbein M, Ajzen I. Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1975.
23. Fisher JA, Monahan T. Tracking the social dimensions of RFID systems in hospitals. Int J Med Info 2008;77:176-83.
24. Hair JF, Anderson RE, Tatham R, Black WC. Multivariate data analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1998.
25. Hanson CW. Healthcare informatics. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2006.
26. Harrison DA, Mykytyn PP, Riemenschneider CK. Executive decisions about adoption of information technology in small business: theory and empirical tests. Info Sys Res 1997;8:171-95.
27. Holden RJ. Physicians beliefs about using EMR and CPOE: in pursuit of a contextualized understanding of health IT use behavior. Int J Med Info 2010;79:71-80. Janz BD, Hennington A. Information systems and healthcare XVI: physician adoption of electronic medical records: applying the UTAUT model in a healthcare context. Comm Assoc Inform Syst2007;19(1). http://aisel.aisnet.org/cais/vol19/iss1/5
28. Jöreskog KG, Sörbom D. LISREL 8 user's reference guide. SSI 1996.
29. Kakoli B, Soumava B. User acceptance of information technology across cultures. Southwest Decision Sciences Institute, 2008.
30. Kijsanayotin B, Pannarunothai S, Speedie SM. Factors influencing health information technology adoption in Thailand's community health centers: Applying the UTAUT model. Int J Med Info 2009;78:404-16.
31. Lean OK, Zailani S, Ramayah T, Fernando Y. Factors influencing intention to use e-government services among citizens in Malaysia. Int J Info Manage 2009;29:458-75.
32. Lee WI, Chao PJ. The research of information technology acceptance model of electronic patient record system in health care industry's employees-an example of central and southern Taiwan. J Health Manage 2004;5:243-69.
33. Li N, Kirkup G. Gender and cultural differences in internet use: A study of China and the UK. Comput Educ 2007;48:301-317.
34. Lu Y-C, Xiao Y, Sears A, Jacko JA. A review and a framework of handheld computer adoption in healthcare. Int J Med Info 2005;74:409-22.
35. Mathieson K. Predicting user intentions: comparing the technology acceptance model with the theory of planned behavior. Info Sys Res 1991;2:173-91.
36. McDonald CJ, Overhage JM, Barnes M, Schadow G, Blevins L, Dexter PR et al. The Indiana network for patient care: a working local health information infrastructure. Health Affairs 2005;24:1214-20.
37. Menachemi N, Shin DY, Ford EW, Yu F. Environmental factors and health information technology management strategy. Health Care Manage Rev 2011;36:275-85.
38. Moore GC, Benbasat I. Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation. Info Sys Res 1991;2:192-222.
39. Naidu A. Factors affecting patient satisfaction and healthcare quality. Int J Health C Qual Assur 2009; 22:366-81.
40. nd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall Press, 2008.
41. nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1978.
42. Oshlyansky L, Cairns P, Thimbleby H. Validating the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT) tool crossculturally. In: Proceeding BCS-HCI '07. Proceedings of the 21st British HCI Group Annual Conference on People and Computers: HCI. but not as we know it - Vol. 2 (pp 83-6). Swinton, UK: British Computer Society, 2007.
43. Pai F-Y, Huang K-I. Applying the technology acceptance model to the introduction of healthcare information systems. Technol Forecast Soc 2011;78:650-60.
44. Rouibah K, Hamdy HI, Al-Enezi MZ. Effect of management support, training, and user involvement on system usage and satisfaction in Kuwait. Ind Manage Data Sys 2009;109:338-56.
45. Schreuder HWR, Verheijen RHM. Robotic surgery. BJOG 2009;116:198-213.
46. Spetz J, Maiuro LS. Measuring levels of technology in hospitals. Q Rev Econ Financ 2004;44:430-47.
47. Taner T, Antony J. Comparing public and private hospital care service quality in Turkey. Leadersh Health Serv 2006;19:1-10.
48. Taylor S, Todd PA. Understanding information technology usage: a test of competing models. Info Sys Res 1995a;6:144-76.
49. Taylor S, Todd PA. Assessing IT usage: the role of prior experience. MIS Quart 1995b;19:561-70.
50. Thompson RL, Higgins CA, Howell JM. Personal computing: toward a conceptual model of utilization. MIS Quart 1991; 15:125-43.
51. Triandis H. Interpersonal behavior. Monterey, CA: Brooke/Cole, 1977.
52. Van Bemmel J, Musen M. Handbook of medical informatics. New York: Springer, 1997.
53. Vazquezsalceda J, Padget J, Cortes U, Lopeznavidad A, Caballero F. Formalizing an electronic institution for the distribution of human tissues. Artif Intell Med 2003;27: 233-58.
54. Venkatesh V, Morris MG,Davis GB, Davis FD. User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Quart 2003;27:425-478.
55. Wu J-H, Wang S-C, Lin L-M. Mobile computing acceptance factors in the healthcare industry: A structural equation model. Int J Med Info 2007;76:66-77.
56. Wu J-H, Shen W-S, Lin L-M, Greenes RA, Bates DW. Testing the technology acceptance model for evaluating healthcare professionals' intention to use an adverse event reporting system. Int J Qual Health C 2008;20:123-9.
57. Yi MY, Jackson JD, Park JS, Probst JC. Understanding information technology acceptance by individual professionals: toward an integrative view. Info Manage 2006;43:350-63.
58. Yu P, Li H, Gagnon M-P. Health IT acceptance factors in long-term care facilities: a cross-sectional survey. Int J Med Info 2009;78:219-29.
59. Zhou T, Lu Y, Wang B. Integrating TTF and UTAUT to explain mobile banking user adoption. Comput Hum Behav 2010;26: 760-7.