Internet banking in Jordan: The unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT) perspective

Journal of Systems and Information Technology

Volumn 9, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 78-97

  Abushanab, E ^a   Pearson, J M ^a  

^a YARMOUK UNIVERSITY   (Jordan)

Author keywords

Banking; Consumer behaviour; Internet; Jordan

Indexed keywords

EID: 84992929419     PISSN: 13287265     EISSN: 17588847     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/13287260710817700     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Agarwal, R., Sambamurthy, V. and Stair, R.M. (2000), “Research report: the evolving relationship between general and specific computer self-efficacy – an empirical assessment”, Information Systems Research, Vol. 11 No. 4, pp. 418-30.
2. Al-Gahtani, S.S. (2004), “Computer technology acceptance success factors in Saudi Arabia: an exploratory study”, Journal of Global Information Technology Management, Vol. 7 No. 1, pp. 5-29.
3. Al Sukkar, A. and Hasan, H. (2005), “Toward a model for the acceptance of internet banking in developing countries”, Information Technology for Development, Vol. 11 No. 4, pp. 381-98.
4. Anderson, J.E., Schwager, P.H. and Kerns, R.L. (2006), “The drivers for acceptance of tablet PCs by faculty in a College of Business”, Journal of Information Systems Education, Vol. 17 No. 4, pp. 429-40.
5. Awamleh, R., Evans, J. and Mahate, A. (2003), “Internet banking in emergency markets: the case of Jordan – a note”, Journal of Internet Banking and Commerce, Vol. 8 No. 1, available at: www.arraydev.com/commerce/JIBC/articles.htm (accessed 24 February 2004).
6. Brislin, R. (1976), “Comparative research methodology: cross-cultural studies”, International Journal of Psychology, Vol. 11 No. 3, pp. 215-29.
7. Chau, P. and Hu, P. (2001), “Information technology acceptance by individual professionals: a model comparison approach”, Decision Sciences, Vol. 32 No. 4, pp. 699-719.
8. Chung, W. and Paynter, J. (2002), “An evaluation of internet banking in New Zealand”, Proceedings of the 35th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, p. 10.
9. Compeau, D. and Higgins, C.A. (1995), “Computer self-efficacy: development of a measure and initial test”, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 19 No. 2, pp. 189-211.
10. Davis, F.D. (1989), “Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology”, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 13 No. 3, pp. 319-40.
11. Davis, F.D., Bagozzi, R.P. and Warshaw, P.R. (1989), “User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models”, Management Science, Vol. 35 No. 8, pp. 982-1003.
12. Field, A. (2000), Discovering Statistics, Using SPSS for Windows, Sage Publications Ltd, London.
13. Grandon, E. and Mykytyn, P. (2004), “Theory-base instrumentation to measure the intention to use electronic commerce in small and medium sized business”, Journal of Computer Information Systems, Vol. 44 No. 3, pp. 44-57.
14. Guru, B.K., Shanmugam, B., Alam, N. and Perera, C. (2003), “An evaluation of internet banking sites in Islamic countries”, Journal of Internet banking and Commerce, Vol. 8 No. 2, pp. 1-11, available at: www.arraydev.com/commerce/JIBC/articles.htm (accessed 24 February 2004).
15. Hair, J., Anderson, R., Tatham, R. and Black, W. (1998), Multivariate Data Analysis, Prentice Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, NJ.
16. Harrison, A.W. and Rainer, R.K. (1992), “The influence of individual differences on skill in end-user computing”, Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 9 No. 1, pp. 93-111.
17. Internet World Stats (2007), Internet World Stats, available at: www.internetworldstats.com/index.html (accessed 14 February 2007).
18. Khalfan, A.M. and Alshawaf, A. (2004), “Adoption and implementation problems of e-banking: a study of the managerial perspective of the banking industry in Oman”, Journal of Global Information Technology Management, Vol. 7 No. 1, pp. 47-64.
19. Mathieson, K. (1991), “Predicting user intention: comparing the technology acceptance model with theory of planned behavior”, Information Systems Research, Vol. 2 No. 3, pp. 173-91.
20. Moore, G. and Benbasat, I. (1991), “Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation”, Information Systems Research, Vol. 2 No. 3, pp. 192-222.
21. Orr, B. (2001), “Is internet banking profitable yet?”, ABA Banking Journal, p. 57-58, 69.
22. Pearson, J.M., Crosby, L., Bahmanziari, T. and Conrad, E. (2002), “An empirical investigation into the relationship between orhanozational culture and computer efficacy as moderated by age and gender”, Journal of Computer, Information Systems, Vol. 43 No. 2, pp. 58-70.
23. Riemenschneider, C.K., Hardgrave, B.C. and Davis, F.D. (2002), “Explaining software developer acceptance of the methodologies: a comparison of five theoretical models”, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, Vol. 28 No. 12, pp. 1135-45.
24. Sciglimpaglia, D. and Ely, D. (2002), “Internet banking: a customer-centric perspective”, Proceedings of the 35th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2002, p. 10.
25. Szajna, B. (1996), “Empirical evaluation of the revised technology acceptance model”, Management Science, Vol. 42 No. 1, pp. 85-92.
26. Tan, M. and Teo, T.S. (2000), “Factors influencing the adoption of internet banking”, Journal of the Association of Information Systems, Vol. 1, pp. 1-42.
27. Taylor, S. and Todd, P.A. (1995a), “Assessing IT usage: the role of prior experience”, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 19 No. 3, pp. 561-70.
28. Taylor, S. and Todd, P.A. (1995b), “Decomposition and crossover effects in the theory of planned behavior: a study of consumer adoption intentions”, International Journal of Business in Marketing, Vol. 12, pp. 137-55.
29. Thompson, R.L., Higgins, C.A. and Howell, J.M. (1991), “Personal computing toward a conceptual model of utilization”, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 15 No. 1, pp. 167-87.
30. Venkatesh, V. (2000), “Determinants of perceived ease-of-use: integrating control, intrinsic motivation, and emotion into the technology acceptance model”, Information Systems Research, Vol. 11 No. 4, pp. 342-65.
31. Venkatesh, V. and Davis, F.D. (2000), “A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies”, Management Science, Vol. 46 No. 2, pp. 186-204.
32. Venkatesh, V., Speier, C. and Morris, M.G. (2002), “User acceptance enablers in individual decision making about technology: toward an integrated model”, Decision Sciences, Vol. 33 No. 2, pp. 297-316.
33. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M.G., Davis, G.B. and Davis, F.D. (2003), “User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view”, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 27 No. 3, pp. 425-78.
34. Zinkhan, G.M., Joachimsthaler, E.A. and Kinnear, T.C. (1987), “Individual differences and marketing decision support system usage and satisfaction”, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 24, pp. 208-14.
35. Venkatesh, V. and Morris, M.G. (2000), “Why don't men ever stop to ask for directions? Gender, social influence, and their role in technology acceptance and usage behavior”, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 24 No. 1, pp. 115-39.