Evaluation of the alcoholic fermentation kinetics of enzymatic hydrolysates from sugarcane bagasse (Saccharum officinarum L.)

Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology

Volumn 88, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 1049-1057

  De Andrade, Rafael Ramos ^a   Cândida Rabelo, Sarita ^a,b   Maugeri Filho, Francisco ^a   Maciel Filho, Rubens ^a   Carvalho da Costa, Aline ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMPINAS   (Brazil)

^b BRAZILIAN CENTER FOR RESEARCH IN ENERGY AND MATERIALS CNPEM   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Alcoholic fermentation; Bagasse hydrolysates; Bioethanol; Kinetics; Modeling; Sugarcane molasses

Indexed keywords

ALCOHOLIC FERMENTATION; EFFICIENT PRODUCTION; ENZYMATIC HYDROLYSATES; ETHANOL FERMENTATION; KINETICS OF FERMENTATION; LIGNOCELLULOSIC BIOMASS; SACCHARUM OFFICINARUM; SUGARCANE MOLASSES;

BAGASSE; BIOETHANOL; DETOXIFICATION; ENZYME KINETICS; ETHANOL; KINETIC PARAMETERS; MODELS; YEAST;

FERMENTATION;

ACETIC ACID; BAGASSE; MOLASSES;

ALCOHOL PRODUCTION; ARTICLE; DETOXIFICATION; ENZYME KINETICS; EVALUATION; FERMENTATION; HYDROLYSIS; KINETICS; NONHUMAN; REDUCTION; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SUGARCANE;

SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHARUM OFFICINARUM;

EID: 84877922212     PISSN: 02682575     EISSN: 10974660     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jctb.3937     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Heer D and Sauer U, Identification of furfural as a key toxin in lignocellulosic hydrolysates and evolution of a tolerant yeast strain. Microbiol Biotechnol 1:497-506 (2008).
2. Palmqvist E, Almeida JS and Hahn-Hägerdal B, Influence of furfural on anaerobic glycolytic kinetics of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in batch culture. Biotechnol Bioeng 62:447-454 (1999).
3. Almeida JRM, Modig T, Petersson A, Hähn-Hägerdal B, Lidén G and Gorwa-Grauslund MF, Increased tolerance and conversion of inhibitors in lignocellulosic hydrolysates by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 82:340-349 (2007).
4. Mussatto SI and Roberto IC, Alternatives for detoxification of diluted-acid lignocellulosic hydrolyzates for use in fermentative processes:a review. Bioresource Technol 93:1-10 (2004).
5. Zautsen RRM, Maugeri-Filho F, Vaz-Rossell CE, Straathof AJJ, van der Wielen LAM and de Bont JAM, Liquid-liquid extraction of fermentation inhibiting compounds in lignocellulose hydrolysate. Biotechnol Bioeng 102:1354-1360 (2009).
6. Olsson L and Hahn-Hägerdal B, Fermentation of lignocellulosic hydrolysates for ethanol production. Enzym Microbiol Technol 18:312-331 (1996).
7. Pampulha ME and Loureiro V, Interaction of the effects of acetic acid and ethanol on inhibition of fermentation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biotechnol Lett 11:269-274 (1989).
8. Delgenes JP, Moletta R and Navarro JM, Effects of lignocellulose degradation products on ethanol fermentations of glucose and xylose by Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Zymomonas mobilis, Pichia stipitis, and Candida shehatae. Enzyme Microbiol Technol 19:220-225 (1996).
9. Taherzadeh MJ, Gustafsson L, Niklasson C and Lidén G, Physiological effects of 5-hydroxymethylfurfural on Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 53:701-708 (2000).
10. Petersson A, Almeida J, Modig T, Karhumaa K, Hahn-Hägerdal B, Gorwa-Grauslund M and Lidén G, A 5-hydroxymethyl furfural reducing enzyme encoded by the Saccharomyces cerevisiae ADH6 gene conveys HMF tolerance. Yeast 23:455-464 (2006).
11. Nichols NN, Sharma LN, Mowery RA, Chambliss CK, van Walsum GP, Dien BS and Iten LB, Fungal metabolism of fermentation inhibitors present in corn stover dilute acid hydrolysate. Enzyme Microbiol Technol 42:624-630 (2008).
12. Narendranath NV, Thomas KC and Ingledew WM, Effects of acetic acid and lactic acid on the growth of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in a minimal medium. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 26:171-177 (2001).
13. Maiorella B, Blanch HW and Wilke CR, By-product inhibition effects on ethanolic fermentation by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biotechnol Bioeng 25:103-121 (1983).
14. de Andrade R, Ccopa Rivera E, Costa A, Atala D, Filho F and Filho R, Estimation of temperature dependent parameters of a batch alcoholic fermentation process. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 137-140:753-763 (2007).
15. Rabelo S, Filho R and Costa A, A comparison between lime and alkaline hydrogen peroxide pretreatments of sugarcane bagasse for ethanol production. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 144:87-100 (2008).
16. Rabelo SC, Amezquita Fonseca NA, Andrade RR, Maciel Filho R and Costa AC, Ethanol production from enzymatic hydrolysis of sugarcane bagasse pretreated with lime and alkaline hydrogen peroxide. Biomass Bioenergy 35:2600-2607 (2011).
17. Rabelo SC, Carrere H, Maciel Filho R and Costa AC, Production of bioethanol, methane and heat from sugarcane bagasse in a biorefinery concept. Bioresource Technol 102:7887-7895 (2011).
18. Ghose TK, Measurement of cellulase activities. Pure Appl Chem 59: (1987).
19. Wood TM and Bhat KM, Methods for measuring cellulase activities, in Methods Enzymology. Academic Press, pp. 81-112 (1988).
20. Yu J and Stahl H, Microbial utilization and biopolyester synthesis of bagasse hydrolysates. Bioresource Technol 99:8042-8048 (2008).
21. Ding W-W, Wu Y-T, Tang X-Y, Yuan L and Xiao Z-Y, Continuous ethanol fermentation in a closed-circulating system using an immobilized cell coupled with PDMS membrane pervaporation. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 86:82-87 (2010).
22. Andrade R, Rivera E, Atala D, Filho R, Filho F and Costa A, Study of kinetic parameters in a mechanistic model for bioethanol production through a screening technique and optimization. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng 32:673-680 (2009).
23. Atala D, Costa A, Maciel R and Maugeri F, Kinetics of ethanol fermentation with high biomass concentration considering the effect of temperature. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 91-93:353-365 (2001).
24. Andrade RR, Procedimento para o desenvolvimento de um modelo matemático robusto para o processo de fermentação alcoólica, in Faculdade de Engenharia Química. Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas-SP (2007).
25. Andrade RR, Rivera EC, Atala DIP, Maugeri Filho F, Maciel Filho R and Costa AC, Development of extractive processes and robust mathematical model for bioethanol production, in Bioethanol: Production, Benefits and Economics, ed by Erbaum JB. Nova Sci Publ Inc, New York, pp. 74-92 (2009).
26. Ramos MT and Madeira-Lopes A, Effects of acetic acid on the temperature profile of ethanol tolerance Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biotechnol Lett 12:229-234 (1990).
27. Levine AS and Fellers CR, Action of acetic acid on food spoilage microorganisms. J Bacteriol 39:499-515 (1940).
28. Helle S, Cameron D, Lam J, White B and Duff S, Effect of inhibitory compounds found in biomass hydrolysates on growth and xylose fermentation by a genetically engineered strain of S. cerevisiae. Enzyme Microbiol Technol 33:786-792 (2003).
29. da Cunha-Pereira F, Hickert LR, Sehnem NT, de Souza-Cruz PB, Rosa CA and Ayub MAZ, Conversion of sugars present in rice hull hydrolysates into ethanol by Spathaspora arborariae, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, and their co-fermentations. Bioresource Technol 102:4218-4225 (2012).
30. Dorta C, Oliva-Neto P, de -Abreu-Neto MS, Nicolau-Junior N and Nagashima AI, Synergism among lactic acid, sulfite, pH and ethanol in alcoholic fermentation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae (PE-2 and M-26). World J Microbiol Biotechnol 22:177-182 (2006).
31. Sanchez OJ and Cardona CA, Trends in biotechnological production of fuel ethanol from different feedstocks. Bioresource Technol 99:5270-5295 (2008).
32. Claassen PAM, van Lier JB, Lopez Contreras AM, van Niel EWJ, Sijtsma L, Stams AJM, de Vries SS and Weusthuis RA, Utilisation of biomass for the supply of energy carriers. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 52:741-755 (1999).
33. Ortiz-Muñiz B, Carvajal-Zarrabal O, Torrestiana-Sanchez B and Aguilar-Uscanga MG, Kinetic study on ethanol production using Saccharomyces cerevisiae ITV-01 yeast isolated from sugar cane molasses. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 85:1361-1367.
34. Singh A and Bishnoi NR, Enzymatic hydrolysis optimization of microwave alkali pretreated wheat straw and ethanol production by yeast. Bioresource Technol 108:94-101 (2011).