Continuous ethanol fermentation in a closed-circulating system using an immobilized cell coupled with PDMS membrane pervaporation

Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology

Volumn 86, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 82-87

  Ding, Wen Wu ^a   Wu, Yun Tao ^a   Tang, Xiao Yu ^a   Yuan, Lin ^a   Xiao, Ze Yi ^a  

^a SICHUAN UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Bioreactors; Fermentation; Immobilization; Kinetics; Membranes; Pervaporation

Indexed keywords

CARBON BALANCE; CARBON RECOVERY; CELL DENSITY; CLEANER PRODUCTION; COMPOSITE PDMS MEMBRANES; CONTINUOUS FERMENTATION; ETHANOL CONCENTRATIONS; ETHANOL FERMENTATION; ETHANOL PRODUCTIVITY; FERMENTATION SYSTEMS; FERMENTORS; FREE CELLS; IMMOBILIZATION; IMMOBILIZED CELLS; MEMBRANE PERVAPORATION; PDMS MEMBRANE; PRODUCT FORMATION; TOTAL FLUX;

BIOREACTORS; CELL CULTURE; EVAPORATION; FERMENTATION; GLUCOSE; MEMBRANES; MICROCHANNELS; PACKED BEDS; PERVAPORATION; PRODUCTIVITY;

ETHANOL;

ALCOHOL; SILICONE DERIVATIVE;

ARTICLE; BROTH DILUTION; CARBON BALANCE; CELL DENSITY; CELL MEMBRANE; CONTINUOUS FERMENTATION; GLUCOSE UTILIZATION; IMMOBILIZED CELL; NONHUMAN; PERVAPORATION; TRANSPORT KINETICS;

EID: 78650064359     PISSN: 02682575     EISSN: 10974660     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jctb.2514     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Krishnan MS, Taylor F, Davison BH, et al, Economic analysis of fuel ethanol production from corn starch using fluidized-bed bioreactor. Bioresource Technol 75: 99-105 (2000).
2. O'Brien DJ and Roth LH, Ethanol production by continuous fermentation-pervaporation: a preliminary economic analysis. J Membr Sci 166: 105-111 (2000).
3. Nguyen VD, Kosuge H, Auresenia J, et al, Effect of vacuum pressure on ethanol fermentation. J Appl Sci 9: 3020-3026 (2009).
4. Schmidt SL, Myers MD, Kelley SS, et al, Evaluation of PTMSP membranes in achieving enhanced ethanol removal from fermentations by pervaporation. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 63: 469-481 (1997).
5. Shojaosadati SA, Sanaei HR and Fatemi SM, The use of biomass and stillage recycle in conventional ethanol fermentation. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 67: 362-366 (1996).
6. Sanromfán A, Roca E and Núñez MJ, A pulsing device for packed-bed bioreactors: II. Application to alcoholic fermentation. Bioprocess Eng 10: 75-81 (1994).
7. Rota E and Flares J, Ethanolic fermentation by immobilized Saccharomyces cerevisiae in a semipilot pulsing packed-bed bioreactor. Enzyme Microbiol Technol 19: 132-139 (1996).
8. Göksungur Y and Zorlu N, Production of ethanol from beet molasses by Ca-alginate immobilized yeast cells in a packed-bed bioreactor. Turk J Biol 25: 265-275 (2001).
9. Roukas T, Continuous ethanol production from carob pod extract by immobilized Saccharomyces cerevisiae in a packed-bed reactor. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 59: 387-393 (1994).
10. Nigam JN, Continuous ethanol production from pineapple cannery waste using immobilized yeast cells. J Biotechnol 80: 189-193 (2000).
11. 3+. Biotechnol Technol 9: 815-820 (1995).
12. Wendhausen R, Fregonesi A, Moran PJS, et al, Continuous fermentation of sugar cane syrup using immobilized yeast cells. J Biosci Bioeng 91: 48-52 (2001).
13. Najafour G., Younesi H, Ismail KSK, et al, Ethanol fermentation in an immobilized cell reactor using Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Bioresource Technol 92: 251-260 (2004).
14. Cysewski GR and Wilke CR, Rapid ethanol fermentations using vacuum and cell recycle. Biotechnol Bioeng 19: 1125-1143 (1977).
15. Aires Barros MR, Cabral JMS and Novais JM, Production of ethanol by immobilized Saccharomyces Bayanus in an extractive fermentation system. Biotechnol Bioeng 29: 1097-1104 (1987).
16. Shbtai Y, Chaimovitz A and Freeman A, Continuous ethanol production by immobilized yeast reactor coupled with membrane pervaporation unit. Biotechnol Bioeng 38: 869-876 (1991).
17. Groot WJ, Kraayenbrink MR and Waldram RH, Ethanol production in an integrated process of fermentation and ethanol recovery by pervaporation. Bioprocess Eng 8: 99-111 (1992).
18. O'Brien DJ and Craig Jr JC, Ethanol production in a continuous fermentation/membrane pervaporation system. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 44: 699-704 (1996).
19. Ikegami T, Yanagishita H and Kitamoto D, Production of highly concentrated ethanol in a coupled fermentation/pervaporation process using silicalitemembranes. Biotechnol Techniques 11: 921-924 (1997).
20. Wu Y, Xiao ZY, Huang WX, et al, Mass transfer in pervaporation of active fermentation broth with a composite PDMS membrane. Sep Purif Technol 42: 47-53 (2005).
21. Shi Er, Huang WX and Xiao ZY, Influence of binding interface between active and support layers in composite PDMS membranes on permeation performance. J Appl Polym Sci 104: 2468-2477 (2007).
22. Birol G, Doruker P, Kirdar B, et al, Mathematical description of ethanol fermentation by immobilized saccharomyces cerevisiae. Process Biochem 33: 763-771 (1998).
23. Tyagi RD and Ghose TK, Studies on Immobilized saccharomyces cerevisiae. Analysis of continuous rapid ethanol fermentation in immobilized cell reactor. Biotechnol Bioeng 24: 781-795 (1982).
24. Tzeng JW, Fan LS, Gan YR, et al, Ethanol fermentation using immobilized cells in a multistage fluidized bed bioreactor. Biotechnol Bioeng 38: 1253-1258 (1991).
25. Godia F, Casas C and Sola C, Mathematical modelization of a packed-bed reactor performance with immobilized yeast for ethanol fermentation. Biotechnol Bioeng 24: 781-795 (1982).
26. Ching CB, Teo WK and Chu KH, Performance analysis of an immobilized yeast packed-bed reactor for ethanol fermentation. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 47: 345-355 (1990).
27. Zhong YH, Xiao ZY, Huang WX, et al, Mass transfer kinetics of pervaporation in an MBR with composite silicone rubber membrane for continuous ethanol fermentation. J SiChuan University (Engineering Science Edition) 35: 49-53 (2003). (in Chinese).
28. Andrew JD and Donald ES, Examination of substrate and product inhibition kinetics on the production of ethanol by suspended and immobilized cell reactor. Biotechnol Bioeng 29: 639-645 (1987).