Detecting and punishing unconscious bias

Journal of Legal Studies

Volumn 42, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 83-110

  Tetlock, Philip E ^a   Mitchell, Gregory ^b   Jason Anastasopoulos, L ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA SCHOOL OF LAW   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84877798899     PISSN: 00472530     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1086/668403     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Ames S.L., Jerry L. Grennard, Carolien Thush, Steve Sussman, Reinout W. Wiers, and Alan W. Stacy. 2007. Comparison of Indirect Assessments of Association as Predictors of Marijuana Use among At-Risk Adolescents. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology 15:204-18.
2. Ayres, Ian. 2001. Pervasive Prejudice? Unconventional Evidence of Race and Gender Discrimination. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
3. Bagenstos, Samuel R. 2007. Implicit Bias, "Science, " and Antidiscrimination Law. Harvard Law and Policy Review 1:477-93.
4. Bennett, Mark W. 2010. Unraveling the Gordian Knot of Implicit Bias in Jury Selection: The Problems of Judge-Dominated Voir Dire, the Failed Promise of Batson, and Proposed Solutions. Harvard Law and Policy Review 4:149-71.
5. Brown, Teneille, and Emily Murphy. 2010. Through a Scanner Darkly: Functional Neuroimaging as Evidence of Criminal Defendant's Past Mental States. Stanford Law Review 62:1119-1208.
6. Cameron, A. Colin, and Pravin K. Trivedi. 2005. Microeconometrics: Methods and Applications. New York: Cambridge University Press.
7. Cameron, C. Daryl, B. Keith Payne, and Joshua Knobe. 2010. Do Theories of Implicit Race Bias Change Moral Judgments? Social Justice Research 23: 272-89.
8. Green, Donald P. 2009. Regression Adjustments to Experimental Data: Do David Freedman's Concerns Apply to Political Science? Unpublished manuscript. Yale University, Institution for Social and Policy Studies, New Haven, Conn.
9. Greenwald, Anthony G, Debbie E. McGhee, and Jordan L. K. Schwartz. 1998. Measuring Individual Differences in Implicit Cognition: The Implicit Association Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 6:1464-80.
10. Harcourt, Bernard. 1999. The Collapse of the Harm Principle. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 90:109-94.
11. Kahan, Dan M., Hank Jenkins-Smith, and Donald Braman. 2011. Cultural Cognition of Scientific Consensus. Journal of Risk Research 14:147-74.
12. Kang, Jerry. 2010. Implicit Bias and Pushback from the Left. St. Louis University Law Review 54:1139-49. Kang, Jerry, Mark Bennett, Devon Carbado, Pam Casey, Nilanjana Dasgupta, David Faigman, Rachel Godsil, Anthony Greenwald, Justin Levinson, and Jen-nifer Mnookin. 2012. Implicit Bias in the Courtroom. UCLA Law Review 59: 1124-86.
13. Katzenstein, Gary. 1996. The Debate on Structured Debate: Toward a Unified Theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 66:316-32.
14. Kinder, Donald R. 1998. Opinion and Action in the Realm of Politics. Pp. 778-867 in vol. 1 of The Handbook of Social Psychology, edited by Daniel T. Gilbert, Susan T. Fiske, and Gardner Lindzey. 4th ed. Boston: McGraw-Hill.
15. Kunda, Ziva. 1990. The Case for Motivated Reasoning. Psychological Bulletin 108:480-98.
16. Lane, Kristin A., Jerry Kang, and Mahzarin R. Banaji. 2007. Implicit Social Cognition and Law. Annual Review of Law and Social Science 3:427-51.
17. MacCoun, Robert, and Susannah Paletz. 2009. Citizens' Perceptions of Ideological Bias in Research on Public Policy Controversies. Political Psychology 30: 43-65.
18. McClosky, Herbert, and Dennis Chong. 1985. Similarities and Differences between Left-Wing and Right-Wing Radicals. British Journal of Political Science 15: 329-63.
19. Mill, John Stuart. [1859] 1978. On Liberty. Indianapolis: Hackett.
20. Mitchell, Gregory, and Philip E. Tetlock. 2009. Facts Do Matter: A Reply to Bagenstos. Hofstra Law Review 37:737-61.
21. Molesworth, Brett R. C., and Betty Chang. 2009. Predicting Pilots' Risk-Taking Behavior through an Implicit Association Test. Human Factors 51:845-57.
22. Morse, Stephen J. 1999. Neither Desert nor Disease. Legal Theory 5:265-309.
23. Nemeth, Charlan, Keith Brown, and John Rogers. 2001. Devil's Advocate versus Authentic Dissent: Stimulating Quantity and Quality. European Journal of Social Psychology 31:707-21.
24. Nock, Matthew K., and Mahzarin R. Banaji. 2007a. Assessment of Self-Injurious Thoughts Using a Behavioral Test. American Journal of Psychiatry 164: 820-23.
25. Nock, Matthew K., and Mahzarin R. Banaji. 2007b. Prediction of Suicide Ideation and Attempts among Adolescents Using a Brief Performance-Based Test. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 75:707-15.
26. Ostafin, Brian D., G. Alan Marlatt, and Anthony G. Greenwald. 2008. Drinking without Thinking: An Implicit Measure of Alcohol Motivation Predicts Failure to Control Alcohol Use. Behaviour Research and Therapy 46:1210-19.
27. Perkins, Andrew, Mark Forehand, Anthony Greenwald, and Dominika Maison. 2008. Measuring the Nonconscious: Implicit Social Cognition in Consumer Behavior. Pp. 461-75 in Handbook of Consumer Psychology, edited by Curtis P. Haugtvedt, Paul M. Herr, and Frank R. Kardes. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
28. Pielke, Roger A., Jr. 2007. The Honest Broker: Making Sense of Science in Policy and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
29. Potier, Beth. 2004. Making Case for Concept of "Implicit Prejudice": Extending the Legal Definition of Discrimination. Harvard University Gazette, December 16. http://www.news.harvard.edu/gazette/2004/12.16/09-prejudice.html.
30. Preacher, Kristopher J., and Andrew F. Hayes. 2004. SPSS and SAS Procedures for Estimating Indirect Effects in Simple Mediation Models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers 36:717-31.
31. Rokeach, Milton. 1973. The Nature of Human Values. New York: Free Press.
32. Sartori, Giuseppe, Sara Agosta, Cristina Zogmaister, Santo Davide Ferrara, and Umberto Castiello. 2008. How to Accurately Assess Autobiographical Events. Psychological Science 19:781-88.
33. Schwartz, Shalom H. 1992. Universals in the Content and Structure of Values. Pp. 1-65 in vol. 25 of Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, edited by Mark P. Zanna. New York: Academic Press.
34. Shen, Francis X., and Owen D. Jones. 2011. Brain Scans as Evidence: Truths, Proofs, Lies, and Lessons. Mercer Law Review 62:861-83.
35. Shrout, Patrick E., and Niall Bolger. 2002. Mediation in Experimental and Nonexperimental Studies: New Procedures and Recommendations. Psychological Methods 7:422-45.
36. Sniderman, Paul M., and Philip E. Tetlock. 1986. Symbolic Racism: Problems of Motive Attribution in Political Analysis. Journal of Social Issues 42:129-50. Snowden, Robert J., Nicola S. Gray, Jennifer Smith, Mark Morris, and Malcolm J.
37. Snowden, Robert J., Nicola S. Gray, Jennifer Smith, Mark Morris, and Malcolm J. Macculloch. 2004. Implicit Affective Associations to Violence in Psychopathic Murderers. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology 15:620-41.
38. Steffens, Melanie Caroline, Elena Yundina, and Markus Panning. 2008. Automatic Associations with "Erotic" in Child Sexual Offenders: Identifying Those in Danger of Reoffence. Sexual Offender Treatment 3:1-9.
39. Tetlock, Philip E. 1984. Content and Structure in Political Belief Systems. Pp. 107-28 in Foreign Policy Decision Making: Perception, Cognition, and Artificial Intelligence, edited by Donald A. Sylvan and Steve Chan. Boulder, Colo.:Westview Press.
40. Tetlock, Philip E. 1986. A Value Pluralism Model of Ideological Reasoning. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 50:819-27.
41. Tetlock, Philip E. 2002. Social-Functionalist Frameworks for Judgment and Choice: The Intuitive Politician, Theologian, and Prosecutor. Psychological Review 109: 451-72.
42. Tetlock, Philip E. 2005. Expert Political Judgment: How Good Is It? How Can We Know? Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
43. Tetlock, Philip E., and Gregory Mitchell. 2009. Implicit Bias and Accountability Systems: What Must Organizations Do to Prevent Discrimination? Pp. 3-38 in vol. 29 of Research in Organizational Behavior, edited by Barry M. Staw and Arthur Brief. New York: Elsevier.
44. Tetlock, Philip E., William T. Self, and Ramadhar Singh. 2010. The Punitiveness Paradox: When Is External Pressure Exculpatory-and When a Signal Just to Spread Blame? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 46:388-95.
45. Tetlock, Philip E., Penny Visser, Ramadhar Singh, Mark Polifroni, Sara Beth Elson, Philip Mazzocco, and Philip Rescober. 2007. People as Intuitive Prosecutors: The Impact of Social Control Motives on Attributions of Responsibility. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 43:195-209.
46. Thush, Carolien, and Reinout W. Wiers. 2007. Explicit and Implicit Alcohol-Related Cognitions and the Prediction of Future Drinking in Adolescents. Addictive Behaviors 32:1367-83.
47. Venkatranum, Vinod, John A. Clithero, Gavan J. Fitzsimmons, and Scott A. Huettel. 2012. New Scanner Data for Brand Marketers: How Neuroscience Can Help Better Understand Differences in Brand Preferences. Journal of Consumer Psychology 22:143-53.
48. Zhao, Xinshu, John G. Lynch, and Qimei Chen. 2010. Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and Truths about Mediation Analysis. Journal of Consumer Research 37:197-206.