Diurnal and seasonal variations in stomatal conductance of rice at elevated atmospheric CO2 under fully open-air conditions

Plant, Cell and Environment

Volumn 33, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 322-331

  Shimono, Hiroyuki ^a   Okada, Masumi ^a   Inoue, Meguru ^a   Nakamura, Hirofumi ^a   Kobayashi, Kazuhiko ^b   Hasegawa, Toshihiro ^c  

^a NATIONAL AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH CENTER FOR TOHOKU REGION   (Japan)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

^c NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR AGRO ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES   (Japan)

Author keywords

Atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration; Ball berry model; Climate change; Free air CO2 enrichment (FACE); Genotypes; Leaf water potential; Photosynthesis; Rice; Stomatal conductance; Water use efficiency

Indexed keywords

CARBON DIOXIDE; WATER;

CARBON DIOXIDE; CLIMATE CHANGE; CULTIVAR; DIURNAL VARIATION; GENOTYPE; GROWING SEASON; RICE; SEASONAL VARIATION; STOMATAL CONDUCTANCE; WATER USE EFFICIENCY;

ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CIRCADIAN RHYTHM; EVAPOTRANSPIRATION; PHOTOSYNTHESIS; PHYSIOLOGY; PLANT STOMA; RICE; SEASON; TEMPERATURE;

CARBON DIOXIDE; CIRCADIAN RHYTHM; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; ORYZA SATIVA; PHOTOSYNTHESIS; PLANT STOMATA; PLANT TRANSPIRATION; SEASONS; TEMPERATURE; WATER;

EID: 77949351844     PISSN: 01407791     EISSN: 13653040     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2009.02057.x     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Ainsworth AE. Rice production in a changing climate: a meta-analysis of responses to elevated carbon dioxide and elevated ozone concentration. Global Change Biology 2008, 14:1642-1650.
2. Ainsworth EA, Rogers A. The response of photosynthesis and stomatal conductance to rising [CO2]: mechanisms and environmental interactions. Plant, Cell & Environment 2007, 30:258-270.
3. Baker JT, Allen LH, Boote KJ, Jones P, Jones JW. Rice photosynthesis and evapotranspiration in subambient, ambient, and superambient carbon dioxide concentrations. Agronomy Journal 1990, 82:834-840.
4. Baker J, Hartwell Allen L, Boote K, Pickering N. Rice responses to drought under carbon dioxide enrichment. 2. Photosynthesis and evapotranspiration. Global Change Biology 1997, 3:129-138.
5. Ball JT, Woodrow IE, Berry JA. A model predicting stomatal conductance and its contribution to the control of photosynthesis under different environmental conditions. Progress in Photosynthesis Research 1987, 221-224. Biggens I, In, ed., pp., Nijhoff, Dordrecht, the Netherlands
6. Bernacchi CJ, Leakey ADB, Heady LE. Hourly and seasonal variation in photosynthesis and stomatal conductance of soybean grown at future CO2 and ozone concentrations for 3 years under fully open-air field conditions. Plant, Cell & Environment 2006, 29:2077-2090.
7. Bounoua L, Collatz GJ, Tucker CJ. Interactions between vegetation and climate: radiative and physiological effects of doubled atmospheric CO2. Journal of Climate 1999, 12:309-324.
8. Bunce J. Carbon dioxide effects on stomatal responses to the environment and water use by crops under field conditions. Oecologia 2004, 140:1-10.
9. De Costa WAJM, Weerakoon WMW, Abeywardena RMI, Herath HMLK. Response of photosynthesis and water relations of rice (Oryza sativa) to elevated atmospheric carbon dioxide in the subhumid zone of Sri Lanka. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 2003, 189:71-82.
10. Furuya A, Itoh R, Ishii R. Mechanisms of different response of leaf photosynthesis in African rice (Oryza glaberrima Steud.) and rice (Oryza sativa L.) to low leaf water potential. Japanese Journal of Crop Science 1994, 63:625-631.
11. Garcia RL, Long SP, Wall GW, Osborne CP, Kimball BA, Nie BA, Nie GY, Pinter PJJ, Lamorte RL, Wechsung F. Photosynthesis and conductance of spring-wheat leaves: field response to continuous free-air atmospheric CO2 enrichment. Plant, Cell & Environment 1998, 21:659-669.
12. Gedney N, Cox PM, Betts RA, Boucher O, Huntingford C, Stott PA. Detection of a direct carbon dioxide effect in continental river runoff records. Nature 2006, 439:835-838.
13. Gutschick VP, Simonneau T. Modelling stomatal conductance of field-grown sunflower under varying soil water content and leaf environment: comparison of three models of stomatal response to leaf environment and coupling with an abscisic acid-based model of stomatal response to soil drying. Plant, Cell & Environment 2002, 25:1423-1434.
14. Homma K, Nakagawa H, Horie T, Ohnishi H, Kim H-Y, Ohnishi M. Energy budget and transpiration characteristics of rice grown under elevated CO2 and high temperature conditions as determined by remotely sensed canopy temperature. Japanese Journal of Crop Science 1999, 68:137-145. in Japanese with English abstract
15. Imai K, Murata Y. Effect of carbon dioxide concentration on growth and dry matter production of crop plants. I. Effects on leaf area, dry matter, tillering, dry matter distribution ratio, and transpiration. Proceedings of the Crop Science Society of Japan 1976, 45:598-606.
16. Summary for policy makers. Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change 2007, 1-18. Solomon SQin DManning MChen ZJMarquis MAveryt KBTignor MMiller HL. IPCC, In, eds, pp., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
17. Rice Almanac: Source Book for the Most Important Economic Activity on Earth 2002, IRRI, 3rd, edn., CABI Publishing, Oxon, UK
18. Kim HY, Lieffering M, Kobayashi K, Okada M, Miura SHU. Seasonal changes in the effects of elevated CO2 on rice at three levels of nitrogen supply: a free air CO2 enrichment (FACE) experiment. Global Change Biology 2003, 9:826-837.
19. Kimball BA, Kobayashi K, Bindi M. Responses of agricultural crops to free-air CO2 enrichment. Advances in Agronomy 2002, 77:293-368.
20. Leakey ADB, Bernacchi CJ, Ort DR, Long SP. Long-term growth of soybean at elevated [CO2] does not cause acclimation of stomatal conductance under fully open-air conditions. Plant, Cell & Environment 2006a, 29:1794-1800.
21. Leakey ADB, Uribelarrea M, Ainsworth EA, Naidu SL, Rogers A, Ort DR, Long SP. Photosynthesis, productivity, and yield of maize are not affected by open-air elevation of CO2 concentration in the absence of drought. Plant Physiology 2006b, 140:779-790.
22. Long SP, Ainsworth EA, Leakey ADB, Nosberger J, Ort DR. Food for thought: lower-than-expected crop yield stimulation with rising CO2 concentrations. Science 2006, 312:1918-1921.
23. Mead R, Curnow RN, Hasted AM. Statistical Methods in Agriculture and Experimental Biology 2003, Chapman & HALL/CRC, Boca Raton, FL, USA
24. Pritchard SG, Amthor JS. Crops and Environmental Change 2005, Food Production Press, New York, NY, USA
25. Shimono H, Okada M, Yamakawa Y, Nakamura H, Kobayashi K, Hasegawa T. Rice yield enhancement by elevated CO2 is reduced in cool weather. Global Change Biology 2008, 14:276-284.
26. Shimono H, Okada M, Yamakawa Y, Nakamura H, Kobayashi K, Hasegawa T. Genotypic variation in rice yield enhancement by elevated CO2 relates to growth before heading, and not to maturity group. Journal of Experimental Botany 2009, 60:523-532.
27. The 2006 World Population Prospects. The 2008 Revision Population Database 2009, http://esa.un.org/unpp/, UN, United Nations, New York, NY, USA, WWW document]. URL [Last accessed on 20 November 2009]
28. Yoshimoto M, Oue H, Kobayashi K. Energy balance and water use efficiency of rice canopies under free-air CO2 enrichment. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 2005, 133:226-246.
29. Yu Q, Zhang Y, Liu Y, Shi P. Simulation of the stomatal conductance of winter wheat in response to light, temperature and CO2 changes. Annals of Botany 2004, 93:435-441.