Just undercompensation: The idiosyncratic premium in eminent domain

Columbia Law Review

Volumn 113, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 593-656

  Lee, Brian Angelo ^a  

^a BROOKLYN LAW SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84877620464     PISSN: 00101958     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (88)

1. Alexander, Gregory S., The Social-Obligation Norm in American Property Law, 94 Cornell L. Rev. 745 (2009).
2. Alexander, Gregory S., et al., A Statement of Progressive Property, 94 Cornell L. Rev. 743 (2009).
3. Am. Jur. 2d Adjoining Landowners vol. 1 (2005).
4. Am. Jur. 2d Nuisances vol. 58 (2012).
5. Bagenstos, Samuel R., & Margo Schlanger, Hedonic Damages, Hedonic Adaptation, and Disability, 60 Vand. L. Rev. 745 (2007).
6. Battle for Brooklyn (Rumur 2011).
7. Bell, Abraham & Gideon Parchomovsky, The Hidden Function of Takings Compensation, 96 Va. L. Rev. 1673 (2010).
8. Bell, Abraham & Gideon Parchomovsky, Taking Compensation Private, 59 Stan. L. Rev. 871 (2007).
9. Berger, Lawrence, The Public Use Requirement in Eminent Domain, 57 Or. L. Rev. 203 (1978).
10. Berliner, Dana, Castle Coalition, Public Power, Private Gain (2003), available at http://castlecoalition.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=312&Itemid=130
11. Blume, Lawrence & Daniel L. Rubinfeld, Compensation for Takings: An Economic Analysis, 72 Calif. L. Rev. 569 (1984).
12. Brooklyn Matters (Building History Productions 2007).
13. Bursdal, Nathan, Note, Just Compensation and the Seller's Paradox, 20 BYU J. Pub. L. 79 (2005).
14. Chang, Yun-chien, Economic Value or Fair Market Value: What Form of Takings Compensation Is Efficient?, 20 Supreme Ct. Econ. Rev. (forthcoming 2012), available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=1477670.
15. Chordia, Tarun, Richard Roll & Avanidhar Subrahmanyam, Liquidity and Market Efficiency, 87 J. Fin. Econ. 249 (2008).
16. Claeys, Eric R., Virtue and Rights in American Property Law, 94 Cornell L. Rev. 889 (2009).
17. Cohen, Charles E., The Abstruse Science: Kelo, Lochner, and Representation Reinforcement in the Public Use Debate, 46 Duq. L. Rev. 375 (2008).
18. Cooter, Robert & Thomas Ulen, Law and Economics (5th ed. 2007).
19. Copland, James R., Tragic Solutions: The 9/11 Victim Compensation Fund, Historical Antecedents, and Lessons for Tort Reform (Jan. 13, 2005) (unpublished working paper).
20. Cosson, Steven, In the Footprint: The Battle over Atlantic Yards (2010) (unpublished play).
21. Cranor, Carl, Toward a Theory of Respect for Persons, 12 Am. Phil. Q. 309 (1975).
22. Dana, David A. & Thomas W. Merrill, Property: Takings (2002).
23. Darwall, Stephen L., Two Kinds of Respect, 88 Ethics 36 (1977).
24. Davidson, Nestor M., Property and Relative Status, 107 Mich. L. Rev. 757 (2009).
25. Dick, Philip K., We Can Remember It for You Wholesale (1966), reprinted in 2 The Collected Stories of Philip K. Dick 35 (1995).
26. Dixon, Lloyd & Rachel Kaganoff Stern, Compensation for Losses from the 9/11 Attacks (2004).
27. Ellickson, Robert C., Alternatives to Zoning: Covenants, Nuisance Rules, and Fines as Land Use Controls, 40 U. Chi. L. Rev. 681 (1973).
28. Epstein, Richard A., Takings: Private Property and the Power of Eminent Domain (1985).
29. Fama, Eugene, Efficient Capital Markets: A Review of Theory and Empirical Work, 25 J. Fin. 383 (1970).
30. Fannie Mae, National Housing Survey: July-September 2010 Quarterly Wave 69 (2010).
31. Fannie Mae, National Housing Survey: Third Quarter, 2011 (2011).
32. Farber, Daniel A., What (If Anything) Can Economics Say About Equity?, 101 Mich. L. Rev. 1791 (2003) (book review).
33. Fee, John, Eminent Domain and the Sanctity of Home, 81 Notre Dame L. Rev. 783 (2006).
34. Fennell, Lee Anne, Taking Eminent Domain Apart, 2004 Mich. St. L. Rev. 957.
35. Fischel, William A., The Political Economy of Public Use in Poletown: How Federal Grants Encourage Excessive Use of Eminent Domain, 2004 Mich. St. L. Rev. 929.
36. Foster, Sheila R. & Daniel Bonilla, Symposium, The Social Function of Property: A Comparative Perspective, Introduction, 80 Fordham L. Rev. 1003 (2011).
37. Franck, Thomas M., Fairness in International Law and Institutions (1995).
38. Gan, Li & Qi Li, Efficiency of Thin and Thick Markets (Nat'l Bureau of Econ. Research Working Paper No. 10815, 2004), available at http://www.nber.org/papers/w10815
39. Garnett, Nicole Stelle, The Neglected Political Economy of Eminent Domain, 105 Mich. L. Rev. 101 (2006).
40. Garnett, Nicole Stelle, The Public-Use Question as a Takings Problem, 71 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 934 (2003).
41. Goldberg, John C.P. & Benjamin C. Zipursky, Torts (2010).
42. Harman, Gilbert, Moral Philosophy Meets Social Psychology: Virtue Ethics and the Fundamental Attribution Error, 99 Proc. Aristotelian Soc'y 315 (1999).
43. Heller, Michael & Rick Hills, Land Assembly Districts, 121 Harv. L. Rev. 1465 (2008).
44. Henry, Leslie Meltzer, The Jurisprudence of Dignity, 160 U. Pa. L. Rev. 169 (2011).
45. Jolls, Christine, Cass R. Sunstein & Richard Thaler, A Behavioral Approach to Law and Economics, 50 Stan. L. Rev. 1471 (1998).
46. Keating, Gregory C., The Priority of Respect over Repair, 18 Legal Theory 293 (2012).
47. Kelly, Daniel B., Pretextual Takings: Of Private Developers, Local Governments, and Impermissible Favoritism, 17 Supreme Ct. Econ. Rev. 173 (2009).
48. Kelly, Daniel B., The Public Use Requirement in Eminent Domain Law: A Rationale Based on Secret Purchases and Private Influence, 92 Cornell L. Rev. 1 (2006).
49. Knetsch, Jack L. & Thomas E. Borcherding, Expropriation of Private Property and the Basis for Compensation, 29 U. Toronto L.J. 237 (1979).
50. Krier, James E. & Christopher Serkin, Public Ruses, 2004 Mich. St. L. Rev. 859.
51. Larmore, Charles, The Moral Basis of Political Liberalism, 96 J. Phil. 599 (1999).
52. Levmore, Saul, Self-Assessed Valuation Systems for Tort and Other Law, 68 Va. L. Rev. 771 (1982).
53. Malkiel, Burton G., A Random Walk Down Wall Street: The Time-Tested Strategy for Successful Investing (10th ed. 2011).
54. Markell, David L., Tom Tyler & Sarah F. Brosnan, What Has Love Got to Do with It?: Sentimental Attachments and Legal Decision-Making, 57 Vill. L. Rev. 209 (2012).
55. Merrill, Thomas W., The Economics of Public Use, 72 Cornell L. Rev. 61 (1986).
56. Merrill, Thomas W. & Henry E. Smith, Property: Principles and Policies (2007).
57. Mitchell, Thomas W., Stephen Malpezzi & Richard K. Green, Forced Sale Risk: Class, Race, and the Double Discount, 37 Fla. St. U. L. Rev. 589 (2010).
58. Norell, Leif, Is the Market Value a Fair and Objective Measure for Determining Compensation for Compulsory Acquisition of Land?, 2008 Land Reform 19, available at ftp://ftp.fao.org/docrep/fao/011/i0470t/i0470t02.pdf
59. Nozick, Robert, Anarchy, State, and Utopia (1974).
60. Obrinsky, Mark, Research Notes: The High Cost of Short-Term Homeownership, Nat'l Multi Housing Council (Dec. 1, 1997), http://www.nmhc.org/Newsletter.cfm?ItemNumber=54687.
61. Penner, J.E., Nuisance and the Character of the Neighbourhood, 5 J. Envtl. L. 1 (1993).
62. Peñalver, Eduardo M., Land Virtues, 94 Cornell L. Rev. 821 (2009).
63. Pettit, Philip, Consequentialism and Respect for Persons, 100 Ethics 116 (1989).
64. Pritchett, Wendell E., The Public Menace of Blight: Urban Renewal and the Private Uses of Eminent Domain, 21 Yale L. & Pol'y Rev. 1 (2003).
65. Radin, Margaret Jane, Contested Commodities (1996).
66. Radin, Margaret Jane, The Liberal Conception of Property: Cross Currents in the Jurisprudence of Takings, 88 Colum. L. Rev. 1667 (1988).
67. Radin, Margaret Jane, Market-Inalienability, 100 Harv. L. Rev. 1849 (1987).
68. Radin, Margaret Jane, Property and Personhood, 34 Stan. L. Rev. 957 (1982).
69. Rao, Neomi, Three Concepts of Dignity in Constitutional Law, 86 Notre Dame L. Rev. 183 (2011).
70. Reilly, Rick, An Unfair Fight, Sports Illustrated, Aug. 13, 2007, at 88, available at http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/vault/article/magazine/MAG1107877/index.htm
71. Restatement (Second) of Torts (1979).
72. Restatement (Second) of Torts (1965).
73. Sackman, Julius L., et al., Nichols on Eminent Domain vols. 1, 4 (3d ed. 2012).
74. Sen, Amartya, Commodities and Capabilities (1985).
75. Shavell, Steven, Foundations of Economic Analysis of Law (2004).
76. Silbaugh, Katharine, Commodification and Women's Household Labor, 9 Yale J.L. & Feminism 81 (1997).
77. Singer, Joseph William, Property (3d ed. 2010).
78. Special Issue, Property and Obligation, 94 Cornell L. Rev. 743 (2009).
79. Symposium, The Social Function of Property: A Comparative Perspective, 80 Fordham L. Rev. 1003 (2011).
80. Thaler, Richard H. & Sendhil Mullainathan, Behavioral Economics, in The Concise Encyclopedia of Economics 34 (David R. Henderson ed., 2008).
81. Thompson, Jr., Barton H., Judicial Takings, 76 Va. L. Rev. 1449 (1990).
82. Todd, M.J., The Application of Solatium Payments in the Assessment of Public Works Compensation (2009) (unpublished Master of Property Studies dissertation, Lincoln University, N.Z.), available at http://researcharchive.lincoln.ac.nz/dspace/bitstream/10182/1481/13/todd_mpropstuds.pdf.
83. Treanor, William Michael, The Armstrong Principle, the Narratives of Takings, and Compensation Statutes, 38 Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 1151 (1997).
84. Tyler, Tom R., Why People Obey the Law (2006).
85. U.S. Gov't Accountability Office, GAO-07-28, Eminent Domain: Information About Its Uses and Effect on Property Owners and Communities Is Limited (2006), available at http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d0728.pdf
86. Will, George F., Op-Ed., In N.Y., Government's Eminent Arrogance, Wash. Post, Jan. 3, 2010, at A15.
87. Wyman, Katrina M., Should Property Scholars Embrace Virtue Ethics? A Skeptical Comment, 94 Cornell L. Rev. 991 (2009).
88. Wyman, Katrina Miriam, The Measure of Just Compensation, 41 U.C. Davis L. Rev. 239 (2007).