Repeatability and Internal Consistency of Abdominal 2D and 4D Phase Contrast MR Flow Measurements

Academic Radiology

Volumn 20, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 699-704

  Wentland, Andrew L ^a   Grist, Thomas M ^a   Wieben, Oliver ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AND PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

4D PC MRI; Flow; Phase contrast; Repeatability; Reproducibility

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; FEMALE; FLOW MEASUREMENT; FOUR DIMENSIONAL PHASE CONTRAST MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HUMAN; INTERNAL CONSISTENCY; MALE; MEASUREMENT REPEATABILITY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SCANNER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RENAL ARTERY; TWO DIMENSIONAL PHASE CONTRAST MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING;

ADULT; ALGORITHMS; AORTA; BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; CARDIAC-GATED IMAGING TECHNIQUES; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MALE; RENAL ARTERY; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84877597471     PISSN: 10766332     EISSN: 18784046     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2012.12.019     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Markl M., Kilner P.J., Ebbers T. Comprehensive 4D velocity mapping of the heart and great vessels by cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2011, 13:7.
2. Gu T., Korosec F.R., Block W.F., et al. PC VIPR: a high-speed 3D phase-contrast method for flow quantification and high-resolution angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005, 26:743-749.
3. Nett E.J., Johnson K.M., Frydrychowicz A., et al. Four-dimensional phase contrast MRI with accelerated dual velocity encoding. J Magn Reson Imaging 2012, 35:1462-1471.
4. Carlsson M., Toger J., Kanski M., et al. Quantification and visualization of cardiovascular 4D velocity mapping accelerated with parallel imaging or k-t BLAST: head to head comparison and validation at 1.5 T and 3 T. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2011, 13:55.
5. Eriksson J., Carlhall C.J., Dyverfeldt P., et al. Semi-automatic quantification of 4D left ventricular blood flow. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2010, 12:9.
6. Uribe S., Beerbaum P., Sorensen T.S., et al. Four-dimensional (4D) flow of the whole heart and great vessels using real-time respiratory self-gating. Magn Reson Med 2009, 62:984-992.
7. Markl M., Chan F.P., Alley M.T., et al. Time-resolved three-dimensional phase-contrast MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 2003, 17:499-506.
8. Hollnagel D.I., Summers P.E., Kollias S.S., et al. Laser Doppler velocimetry (LDV) and 3D phase-contrast magnetic resonance angiography (PC-MRA) velocity measurements: validation in an anatomically accurate cerebral artery aneurysm model with steady flow. J Magn Reson Imaging 2007, 26:1493-1505.
9. Chang W., Landgraf B., Johnson K.M., et al. Velocity measurements in the middle cerebral arteries of healthy volunteers using 3D radial phase-contrast HYPRFlow: comparison with transcranial Doppler sonography and 2D phase-contrast MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011, 32:54-59.
10. Lum D.P., Johnson K.M., Paul R.K., et al. Transstenotic pressure gradients: measurement in swine-retrospectively ECG-gated 3D phase-contrast MR angiography versus endovascular pressure-sensing guidewires. Radiology 2007, 245:751-760.
11. Francois C.J., Lum D.P., Johnson K.M., et al. Renal arteries: isotropic, high-spatial-resolution, unenhanced MR angiography with three-dimensional radial phase contrast. Radiology 2011, 258:254-260.
12. Bley T.A., Johnson K.M., Francois C.J., et al. Noninvasive assessment of transstenotic pressure gradients in porcine renal artery stenoses by using vastly undersampled phase-contrast MR angiography. Radiology 2011, 261:266-273.
13. Markl M., Harloff A., Bley T.A., et al. Time-resolved 3D MR velocity mapping at 3T: improved navigator-gated assessment of vascular anatomy and blood flow. J Magn Reson Imaging 2007, 25:824-831.
14. Johnson K.M., Markl M. Improved SNR in phase contrast velocimetry with five-point balanced flow encoding. Magn Reson Med 2010, 63:349-355.
15. Johnson K.M., Lum D.P., Turski P.A., et al. Improved 3D phase contrast MRI with off-resonance corrected dual echo VIPR. Magn Reson Med 2008, 60:1329-1336.
16. Liu J., Redmond M.J., Brodsky E.K., et al. Generation and visualization of four-dimensional MR angiography data using an undersampled 3-D projection trajectory. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2006, 25:148-157.
17. Bland J.M., Altman D.G. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986, 1:307-310.
18. Bax L., Bakker C.J., Klein W.M., et al. Renal blood flow measurements with use of phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging: normal values and reproducibility. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2005, 16:807-814.
19. Stalder A.F., Russe M.F., Frydrychowicz A., et al. Quantitative 2D and 3D phase contrast MRI: optimized analysis of blood flow and vessel wall parameters. Magn Reson Med 2008, 60:1218-1231.