Velocity measurements in the middle cerebral arteries of healthy volunteers using 3D radial phase-contrast HYPRFlow: Comparison with transcranial doppler sonography and 2D phase-contrast MR imaging

American Journal of Neuroradiology

Volumn 32, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 54-59

  Chang, W ^a,d   Landgraf, B ^b   Johnson, K M ^a,c   Kecskemeti, S ^a   Wu, Y ^a   Velikina, J ^a   Rowley, H ^b   Wieben, O ^a   Mistretta, C ^a,b,c   Turski, P ^b  

^a Departments of Medical Physics   (United States)

^b Radiology   (United States)

^c University of Wisconsin Madison   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AND PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; DOPPLER ECHOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; MIDDLE CEREBRAL ARTERY; NEUROIMAGING; NORMAL HUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TWO DIMENSIONAL PHASE CONTRAST NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; VELOCITY;

ADULT; BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; CEREBROVASCULAR CIRCULATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MALE; MIDDLE CEREBRAL ARTERY; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, DOPPLER, TRANSCRANIAL;

EID: 78651496022     PISSN: 01956108     EISSN: 1936959X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A2240     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Lotz J, Doker R, Noeske R, et al. In vitro validation of phase-contrast flow measurements at 3 T in comparison to 1.5 T: Precision, accuracy, and signalto- noise ratios. J Magn Reson Imaging 2005;21:604-10
2. Korosec F, Turski P. Velocity and volume flow rate measurements using phase contrast magnetic resonance imaging. International Journal of Neuroradiology 1997;3: 293-318
3. Baledent O, Fin L, Khuoy L, et al. Brain hydrodynamics study by phasecontrast magnetic resonance imaging and transcranial color Doppler. J Magn Reson Imaging 2006;24:995-1004
4. Yamashita S, Isoda H, Hirano M, et al. Visualization of hemodynamics in intracranial arteries using time-resolved three-dimensional phase-contrast MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 2007;25:473-78
5. Markl M, Hennig J. Phase contrast MRI with improved temporal resolution by view sharing: K-space related velocity mapping properties. J Magn Reson Imaging 2001;19:669-76
6. Sodickson DK, Manning WJ. Simultaneous acquisition of spatial harmonics (SMASH): Fast imaging with radiofrequency coil arrays. Magn Reson Med 1997;38:591-603
7. Griswold MA, Jakob PM, Heidemann RM, et al. Generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions (GRAPPA). Magn Reson Med 2002;47:1202-10
8. Hope TA, Hope MD, Purcell DD, et al. Evaluation of intracranial stenoses and aneurysms with accelerated 4D flow. J Magn Reson Imaging 2010;28:41-46. Epub 2009 Jul 3
9. Wu Y, Chang W, Johnson K, et al. Fast whole brain 4D contrast enhanced MR angiography with velocity encoding using undersampled radial acquisition and highly constrained projection reconstruction: Image quality assessment in volunteer subjects. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 2010 Nov 24. [Epub ahead of print]
10. Peters DC, Korosec FR, Grist TM, et al. Undersampled projection reconstruction applied to MR angiography. Magn Reson Med 2000;43:91-101
11. Mistretta CA. Undersampled radial MR acquisition and highly constrained back projection (HYPR) reconstruction: Potential medical imaging applications in the post-Nyquist era. J Magn Reson Imaging 2009;29:501-16
12. Velikina JV, Johnson KM, Wu Y, et al. PC HYPR flow: A technique for rapid imaging of contrast dynamics. J Magn Reson Imaging 2010;31:447-56
13. Johnson K, Lum D, Turski P, et al. Improved 3D phase contrast MRI with off-resonance corrected dual echo VIPR. Magn Reson Med 2008;60:1329-36
14. Mistretta CA, Wieben O, Velikina J, et al. Highly constrained backprojection for time-resolved MRI. Magn Reson Med 2006;55:30-40
15. Gu T, Korosec FR, Block WF, et al. PC VIPR: A high-speed 3D phase-contrast method for flow quantification and high-resolution angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005;26:743-49
16. Moftakhar R, Aagaard-Kienitz B, Johnson K, et al. Noninvasive measurement of intra-aneurysmal pressure and flow pattern using phase contrast with vastly undersampled isotropic projection imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007;28:1710-14
17. Turk AS, Johnson, KM, Lum D, et al. Physiologic and anatomic assessment of a canine carotid artery stenosis model utilizing phase contrast with vastly undersampled isotropic projection imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007; 28:111-15
18. Brodsky EK, Lu A, Thornton FJ, et al. Using multiple half-echoes to improve sampling efficiency and fat suppression in time-resolved MRA. In: Proceedings of the 11th Annual Meeting of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. July 10-16, 2003:74
19. Nett E, Johnson K, Francois C, et al. Analysis platform for hemodynamic function in congenital heart disease. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2009;11(suppl 1):P212
20. Wetzel S, Meckel S, Frydrychowicz, A., et al. In vivo assessment and visualization of intracranial arterial hemodynamics with flow-sensitized 4D MR imaging at 3T. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2004;28:433-38
21. Lotz J, Meier C, Leppert A, et al. Cardiovascular flow measurement with phasecontrastMRimaging: Basic facts and implementation. Radiographics 2002;22: 651-71
22. Oktar SO, Yücel C, Karaosmanoglu D, et al. Blood-flow volume quantification in internal carotid and vertebral arteries: Comparison of 3 different ultrasound techniques with phase-contrast MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006;27:363-69
23. Stadlbauer A, van der Riet W, Globits S, et al. Accelerated phase-contrast MR imaging: Comparison of k-t BLAST with SENSE and Doppler ultrasound for velocity and flow measurements in the aorta. J Magn Reson Imaging 2009; 29:817-24
24. Seitz J, Strotzer M, Wild T, et al. Quantification of blood flow in the carotid arteries: Comparison of Doppler ultrasound and three different phasecontrast magnetic resonance imaging sequences. Invest Radiol 2001;36:642-47
25. Malek A, Alper S, Izumo S. Hemodynamic shear stress and its role in atherosclerosis. JAMA 1999;282:2035-42
26. Cunningham K, Gotlieb A. The role of shear stress in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis. Lab Invest 2005;85:9-23
27. Hoi Y, Meng H, Woodward SH, et al. Effects of arterial geometry on aneurysm growth: Three-dimensional computational fluid dynamics study. J Neurosurg 2004;101:676-81
28. Stalder AF, Russe MF, Frydrychowicz A, et al. Quantitative 2D and 3D phase contrast MRI: Optimized analysis of blood flow and vessel wall parameters. Magn Reson Med 2008;60:1218-31
29. Chang W, Wentland A, Johnson K, et al. Calculation of wall shear stress in the middle cerebral arteries of healthy volunteers using PC-VIPR, a fast wholebrain undersampled 3D-radial PC-MRA technique. In: Proceedings of the 18th Annual Meeting of the International Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Stockholm, Sweden; May 1-7, 2010
30. Johnson K, Markl M. Improved SNR in phase contrast velocimetry with fivepoint balanced flow encoding. Magn Reson Med 2010;63:349-55
31. WoodN, Weston S, Kilner P, et al. CombinedMRimaging andCFDsimulation of flow in thehumandescending aorta. J Magn Reson Imaging 2001;13:699-713
32. van Zijl P. 32-channel coil boosts 3.0T neuroimaging at Kennedy Krieger. Field Strength 2009;9:14-18