Renal arteries: Isotropic, high-spatial-resolution, unenhanced MR angiography with three-dimensional radial phase contrast

Radiology

Volumn 258, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 254-260

  François, Christopher J ^a   Lum, Darren P ^a   Johnson, Kevin M ^b   Landgraf, Benjamin R ^a,b   Bley, Thorsten A ^a,d   Reeder, Scott B ^a,b,c   Schiebler, Mark L ^a   Grist, Thomas M ^a   Wieben, Oliver ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AND PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^c University of Wisconsin Madison   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER HAMBURG EPPENDORF   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONTRAST MEDIUM;

ADULT; ANATOMY; ARTICLE; ARTIFACT; BLOOD VESSEL DIAMETER; CLINICAL ARTICLE; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RENAL ARTERY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

ANGIOGRAPHY, DIGITAL SUBTRACTION; ARTIFACTS; CONTRAST MEDIA; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RENAL ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 78650629874     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: 15271315     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.10100443     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Hany TF, Debatin JF, Leung DA, Pfammatter T. Evaluation of the aortoiliac and renal arteries: comparison of breath-hold, contrast-enhanced, three-dimensional MR angiography with conventional catheter angiography. Radiology 1997;504(2):357-362.
2. Sadowski EA, Bennett LK, Chan MR, et al. Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis: risk factors and incidence estimation. Radiology 2007;543(1):148-157.
3. Westenberg JJ, van der Geest RJ, Wasser MN, et al. Stenosis quantification from poststenotic signal loss in phase-contrast MRA datasets of flow phantoms and renal arteries. Int J Card Imaging 1999;55(6):483-493.
4. Spuentrup E, Buecker A, Meyer J, Günther RW, Stuber M. Navigator-gated freebreathing 3D balanced FFE projection renal MRA: comparison with contrast-enhanced breath-hold 3D MRA in a swine model. Magn Reson Med 2002;58(4):739-743.
5. Katoh M, Buecker A, Stuber M, Günther RW, Spuentrup E. Free-breathing renal MR angiography with steady-state free-precession (SSFP) and slab-selective spin inversion: initial results. Kidney Int 2004;56(3):1272- 1278.
6. Maki JH, Wilson GJ, Eubank WB, Glickerman DJ, Pipavath S, Hoogeveen RM. Steady-state free precession MRA of the renal arteries: breath-hold and navigator-gated techniques vs. CE-MRA. J Magn Reson Imaging 2007;56(4):966-973.
7. Miyazaki M, Lee VS. Nonenhanced MR angiography. Radiology 2008;548(1):20-43.
8. De Cobelli F, Mellone R, Salvioni M, et al. Renal artery stenosis: value of screening with three-dimensional phase-contrast MR angiography with a phased-array multicoil. Radiology 1996;501(3):697-703.
9. Schoenberg SO, Knopp MV, Bock M, et al. Re nal artery stenosis: grading of hemodynamic changes with cine phase-contrast MR blood flow measurements. Radiology 1997;503(1):45-53.
10. Ebbers T, Wigström L, Bolger AF, Engvall J, Karlsson M. Estimation of relative cardiovascular pressures using time-resolved threedimensional phase contrast MRI. Magn Reson Med 2001;55(5):872-879.
11. Kozerke S, Hasenkam JM, Pedersen EM, Boesiger P. Visualization of flow patterns distal to aortic valve prostheses in humans using a fast approach for cine 3D velocity mapping. J Magn Reson Imaging 2001;53(5):690-698.
12. Markl M, Draney MT, Hope MD, et al. Timeresolved 3-dimensional velocity mapping in the thoracic aorta: visualization of 3-directional blood flow patterns in healthy volunteers and patients. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2004;58(4):459-468.
13. Gu T, Korosec FR, Block WF, et al. PC VIPR: a high-speed 3D phase-contrast method for flow quantification and high-resolution angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005;56(4):743-749.
14. Lum DP, Johnson KM, Paul RK, et al. Transstenotic pressure gradients: measurement in swine-retrospectively ECG-gated 3D phase-contrast MR angiography versus endovascular pressure-sensing guidewires. Radiology 2007;545(3):751-760.
15. Johnson KM, Lum DP, François CJ, et al. Non-contrast enhanced renal MR angiography with PC VIPR [abstr]. In: Proceedings of the Sixteenth Meeting of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. Berkeley, Calif: International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 2008;533.
16. Bass JC, Prince MR, Londy FJ, Chenevert TL. Effect of gadolinium on phase-contrast MR angiography of the renal arteries. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997;568(1):261-266.
17. Johnson KM, Lum DP, Turski PA, Block WF, Mistretta CA, Wieben O. Improved 3D phase contrast MRI with off-resonance corrected dual echo VIPR. Magn Reson Med 2008;50(6):1329-1336.
18. Michaely HJ, Kramer H, Dietrich O, et al. Intraindividual comparison of high-spatialresolution abdominal MR angiography at 1.5 T and 3.0 T: initial experience. Radiology 2007;544(3):907-913.
19. Lum DP, Busse RF, Francois CJ, et al. Increased volume of coverage for abdominal contrast-enhanced MR angiography with two-dimensional autocalibrating parallel imaging: initial experience at 3.0 Tesla. J Magn Reson Imaging 2009;50(5):1093-1100.
20. Spuentrup E, Manning WJ, Börnert P, Kissinger KV, Botnar RM, Stuber M. Renal arteries: navigator-gated balanced fast fieldecho projection MR angiography with aortic spin labeling-initial experience. Radiology 2002;525(2):589-596.
21. Miyazaki M, Sugiura S, Tateishi F, Wada H, Kassai Y, Abe H. Non-contrast-enhanced MR angiography using 3D ECG-synchronized half-Fourier fast spin echo. J Magn Reson Imaging 2000;52(5):776-783.
22. Ståhlberg F, Søndergaard L, Thomsen C, Henriksen O. Quantification of complex flow using MR phase imaging: a study of parameters influencing the phase/velocity relation. Magn Reson Imaging 1992;50(1):13-23.
23. Stalder AF, Russe MF, Frydrychowicz A, Bock J, Hennig J, Markl M. Quantitative 2D and 3D phase contrast MRI: optimized analysis of blood flow and vessel wall parameters. Magn Reson Med 2008;50(5):1218-1231.
24. Bley T A, Johnson KM, Wieben O, et al. Non-invasive assessment of transstenotic pressure gradients utilizing 3D phase contrast MRA: validation against endovascular pressure measurements in a porcine study [abstr]. In: Proceedings of the Seventeenth Meeting of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. Berkeley, Calif: International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 2009;525.
25. ASTRAL Investigators, Wheatley K, Ives N, et al. Revascularization versus medical therapy for renal-artery stenosis. N Engl J Med 2009;561(20):1953-1962.