Transstenotic pressure gradients: Measurement in swine - Retrospectively ECG-gated 3D phase-contrast MR angiography versus endovascular pressure-sensing guidewires

Radiology

Volumn 245, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 751-760

  Lum, Darren P ^a   Johnson, Kevin M ^a   Paul, Russell K ^a   Turk, Aquilla S ^a   Consigny, Daniel W ^a   Grinde, Julie R ^a   Mistretta, Charles A ^a   Grist, Thomas M ^a  

^a University of Wisconsin Health   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GADODIAMIDE; GADOLINIUM; HEPARIN; IOHEXOL;

ANGIOGRAPHY; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ARTERY OCCLUSION; ARTICLE; BLOOD VESSEL DIAMETER; CATHETER; COMMON CAROTID ARTERY; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; DISEASE SEVERITY; ELECTROCARDIOGRAM; FLUOROSCOPY; ILIAC ARTERY; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; NONHUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PHASE CONTRAST MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; PHASE CONTRAST WITH VASTLY UNDERSAMPLED ISOTROPIC PROJECTION RECONSTRUCTION MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; PRESSURE MEASUREMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RENAL ARTERY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SWINE; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; THROMBOSIS; VASCULAR DISEASE;

ANIMALS; ARTERIAL OCCLUSIVE DISEASES; CAROTID STENOSIS; CONSTRICTION, PATHOLOGIC; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; ILIAC ARTERY; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; PRESSURE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SWINE;

EID: 36248995983     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2453061946     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Mustert BR, Williams DM, Prince MR. In vitro model of arterial stenosis: correlation of MR signal dephasing and trans-stenotic pressure gradients. Magn Reson Imaging 1998;16:301-310.
2. Prince MR, Schoenberg SO, Ward JS, Londy FJ, Wakefield TW, Stanley JC. Hemodynamically significant atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis: MR angiographic features. Radiology 1997;205:128-136.
3. Wasser MN, Westenberg J, van der Hulst VP, et al. Hemodynamic significance of renal artery stenosis: digital subtraction angiography versus systolically gated three-dimensional phase-contrast MR angiography. Radiology 1997;202:333-338.
4. Udoff KJ, Barth KH, Harrington DP, Kaufman SL, White RI. Hemodynamic significance of iliac artery stenosis: pressure measurements during angiography. Radiology 1979;132:289-293.
5. Martin LG, Rundback JH, Sacks D, et al. Quality improvement guidelines for angiography, angioplasty, and stent placement in the diagnosis and treatment of renal artery stenosis in adults. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2002;13:1069-1083.
6. Tetteroo E, van Engelen AD, Spithoven JH, Tielbeek AV, van der Graaf Y, Mali WP. Stent placement after iliac angioplasty: comparison of hemodynamic and angiographic criteria. Dutch Iliac Stent Trial Study Group. Radiology 1996;201:155-159.
7. Tyszka JM, Laidlaw DH, Asa JW, Silverman JM. Three-dimensional, time-resolved (4D) relative pressure mapping using magnetic resonance imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 2000; 12:321-329.
8. Gu T, Korosec FR, Block WF, et al. PC VIPR: a high-speed 3D phase-contrast method for flow quantification and high-resolution angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005;26:743-749.
9. Ota H, Takase K, Rikimaru H, et al. Quantitative vascular measurements in arterial occlusive disease. RadioGraphics 2003;25: 1141-1158.
10. Barger AV, Block WF, Toropov Y, Grist TM, Mistretta CA. Time-resolved contrast-enhanced imaging with isotropic resolution and broad coverage using an undersampled 3D projection trajectory. Magn Reson Med 2002;48:297-305.
11. Yang GZ, Kilner PJ, Wood NB, Underwood SR, Firmin DN. Computation of flow pressure fields from magnetic resonance velocity mapping. Magn Reson Med 1996; 36:520-526.
12. Nasiraei-Moghaddam A, Behrens G, Fatourace N, Agarwal R, Choi ET, Amini AA. Factors affecting the accuracy of pressure measurements in vascular stenoses from phase-contrast MRI. Magn Reson Med 2004;52:300-309.
13. Thompson RB, McVeigh ER. Fast measurement of intracardiac pressure differences with 2D breath-hold phase-contrast MRI. Magn Reson Med 2003;49:1056-1066.
14. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986;1:307-310.
15. Gross CM, Kramer J, Weingartner O, et al. Determination of renal arterial stenosis severity: comparison of pressure gradient and vessel diameter. Radiology 2001; 220:751-756.
16. Colyer WR Jr, Cooper CJ, Burket MW, Thomas WJ. Utility of a 0.014″ pressure-sensing guidewire to assess renal artery translesional systolic pressure gradients. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2003;59:372-377.
17. Jones NJ, Bates ER, Chetcuti SJ, Lederman RJ, Grossman PM. Usefulness of translesional pressure gradient and pharmacological provocation for the assessment of intermediate renal artery disease. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2006;68:429-434.
18. Subramanian R, White CJ, Rosenfield K, et al. Renal fractional flow reserve: a hemodynamic evaluation of moderate renal artery stenoses. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2005;64:480-486.
19. van Jaarsveld BC, Pieterman H, van Dijk LC, et al. Inter-observer variability in the angiographic assessment of renal artery stenosis. DRASTIC study group. Dutch Renal Artery Stenosis Intervention Cooperative. J Hypertens 1999;17:1731-1736.
20. Barr JD, Connors JJ 3rd, Sacks D, et al. Quality improvement guidelines for the performance of cervical carotid angioplasty and stent placement. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2003;24:2020-2034.
21. Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators. N Engl J Med 1991;325:445-453.
22. Grant EG, Benson CB, Moneta GL, et al. Carotid artery stenosis: gray-scale and Doppler US diagnosis - Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound Consensus Conference. Radiology 2003;229:340-346.
23. Johnson KM, Gu T, Mistretta CA. 4D pressure mapping with time-resolved PC VIPR [abstr]. In: Proceedings of the Thirteenth Meeting of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. Berkeley, Calif: International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 2005; 135.
24. Turk AS, Johnson KM, Lum D, et al. Physiologic and anatomic assessment of a canine carotid artery stenosis model utilizing phase contrast with vastly undersampled isotropic projection imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007;28:111-115.
25. Mohiaddin RH, Yang GZ, Kilner PJ. Visualization of flow by vector analysis of multidirectional cine MR velocity mapping. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1994;18:383-392.
26. Wigstrom L, Sjoqvist L, Wranne B. Temporally resolved 3D phase-contrast imaging. Magn Reson Med 1996;36:800-803.
27. Bogren HG, Buonocore MH. 4D magnetic resonance velocity mapping of blood flow patterns in the aorta in young vs. elderly normal subjects. J Magn Reson Imaging 1999;10:861-869.
28. Kozerke S, Hasenkam JM, Pederscn EM, Boesiger P. Visualization of flow patterns distal to aortic valve prostheses in humans using a last approach for cine 3D velocity mapping. J Magn Reson Imaging 2001;13: 690-698.
29. Markl M, Chan FP, Alley MT, et al. Time-resolved three-dimensional phase-contrast MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 2003;17:499-506.
30. Wigstrom L, Ebbers T, Fyrenius A, et al. Particle trace visualization of intracardiac flow using time-resolved 3D phase contrast MRI. Magn Reson Med 1999;41:793-799.
31. Fyrenius A, Wigstrom L, Ebbers T, Karlsson M, Engvall J, Bolger AF. Three dimensional flow in the human left atrium. Heart 2001;86: 448-455.
32. Ebbers T, Wigstrom L, Bolger AF, Engvall J, Karlsson M. Estimation of relative cardiovascular pressures using time-resolved three-dimensional phase contrast MRI. Magn Reson Med 2001;45:872-879.
33. Markl M, Draney MT, Hope MD, et al. Time-resolved 3-dimensional velocity mapping in the thoracic aorta: visualization of 3-directional blood flow patterns in healthy volunteers and patients. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2004;28:459-468.
34. Wentland AL, Korosec FR, Vigen KK, Wieben O, Fine JP, Grist TM. Cine flow measurements using phase contrast with undersampled projections: in vitro validation and preliminary results in vivo. J Magn Reson Imaging 2006;24:945-951.
35. Peters DC, Korosec FR, Grist TM, et al. Undersampled projection reconstruction applied to MR angiography. Magn Reson Med 2000;43:91-101.
36. Vigen KK, Peters DC, Grist TM, Block WF, Mistretta CA. Undersampled projection-reconstruction imaging for time-resolved contrast-enhanced imaging. Magn Reson Med 2000;43:170-176.
37. Mistretta CA, Wieben O, Velikina J, et al. Highly constrained backprojection for time-resolved MRI. Magn Reson Med 2006;55:30-40.
38. Samsonov AA, Block WF, Arunachalam A, Field AS. Advances in locally constrained k-space-bascd parallel MRI. Magn Reson Med 2000;55:431-438.
39. Welch EB, Rossman PJ, Felmlee JP, Manduca A. Self-navigated motion correction using moments of spatial projections in radial MRI. Magn Reson Med 2004;52: 337-345.
40. Ringgaard S, Oyre SA, Pedersen EM. Arterial MR imaging phase-contrast flow measurement: improvements with varying velocity sensitivity during cardiac cycle. Radiology 2004;232:289-294.
41. Buonocore MH. Blood flow measurement using variable velocity encoding in the RR interval. Magn Reson Med 1993;29:790-795.
42. Swan JS, Grist TM, Weber DM, Sproat IA, Wojtowycz MM. MR angiography of the pelvis with variable velocity encoding and a phased-array coil. Radiology 1994;190: 363-369.
43. Lee AT, Pike GB, Pelc NJ. Three-point phase-contrast velocity measurements with increased velocity-to-noise ratio. Magn Reson Med 1995;33:122-126.
44. Lamothe MJ, Rutt BK. Multistep phase difference phase contrast imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 1997;7:838-842.