What is lacking in current decision aids on cancer screening?

CA Cancer Journal for Clinicians

Volumn 63, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 193-214

  Jimbo, Masahito ^a,d   Rana, Gurpreet K ^a   Hawley, Sarah ^a   Holmes Rovner, Margaret ^b   Kelly Blake, Karen ^b   Nease, Donald E ^c   Ruffin IV, MacK T ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^b MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

decision aid; decision making; mass screening; neoplasms

Indexed keywords

BREAST CANCER; CANCER PATIENT; CANCER RESEARCH; CANCER SCREENING; CLINICAL DECISION MAKING; CLINICAL PRACTICE; COLORECTAL CANCER; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; FEASIBILITY STUDY; HUMAN; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE CANCER; QUESTIONNAIRE; REVIEW; UTERINE CERVIX CANCER;

EID: 84877277470     PISSN: 00079235     EISSN: 15424863     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3322/caac.21180     Document Type: Review

References (117)

1. Stacey D, Bennett CL, Barry MJ, et al. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;(10): CD001431.
2. Moyer VA,; U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for prostate cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med. 2012; 157: 120-134.
3. Wolf AM, Wender RC, Etzioni RB, et al. American Cancer Society Prostate Cancer Advisory Committee. American Cancer Society guideline for the early detection of prostate cancer: update 2010. CA Cancer J Clin. 2010; 60: 70-98.
4. Levin B, Lieberman DA, McFarland B, et al. American Cancer Society Colorectal Cancer Advisory Group; US Multi-Society Task Force; American College of Radiology Colon Cancer Committee. Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: a joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology. CA Cancer J Clin. 2008; 58: 130-160.
5. Whitlock EP, Lin JS, Liles E, Bell TL, Fu R,. Screening for colorectal cancer: a targeted, updated systematic review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2008; 149: 638-658.
6. Nelson HD, Tyne K, Naik A, Bougatsos C, Chan BK, Humphrey L,; U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for breast cancer: an update for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2009; 151: 727-737.
7. Saslow D, Boetes C, Burke W, et al. American Cancer Society Breast Cancer Advisory Group. American Cancer Society guidelines for breast screening with MRI as an adjunct to mammography. CA Cancer J Clin. 2007; 57: 75-89.
8. Saslow D, Solomon D, Lawson HW, et al. ACS-ASCCP-ASCP Cervical Cancer Guideline Committee. American Cancer Society, American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology, and American Society for Clinical Pathology screening guidelines for the prevention and early detection of cervical cancer. CA Cancer J Clin. 2012; 62: 147-172.
9. Frosch DL, Legare F, Fishbein M, Elwyn G,. Adjuncts or adversaries to shared decision-making? Applying the Integrative Model of behavior to the role and design of decision support interventions in healthcare interactions. Implement Sci. 2009; 4: 73.
10. Jordan JL, Ellis SJ, Chambers R,. Defining shared decision making and concordance: are they one and the same? Postgrad Med J. 2002; 78: 383-384.
11. Sepucha K, Ozanne EM,. How to define and measure concordance between patients' preferences and medical treatments: a systematic review of approaches and recommendations for standardization. Patient Educ Couns. 2010; 78: 12-23.
12. Adab P, Marshall T, Rouse A, Randhawa B, Sangha H, Bhangoo N,. Randomised controlled trial of the effect of evidence based information on women's willingness to participate in cervical cancer screening. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2003; 57: 589-593.
13. Park S, Chang S, Chung C,. Effects of a cognition-emotion focused program to increase public participation in Papanicolaou smear screening. Public Health Nurs. 2005; 22: 289-298.
14. Kadison P, Pelletier EM, Mounib EL, Oppedisano P, Poteat HT,. Improved screening for breast cancer associated with a telephone-based risk assessment. Prev Med. 1998; 27: 493-501.
15. Street RL Jr, Van Order A, Bramson R, Manning T,. Preconsultation education promoting breast cancer screening: does the choice of media make a difference? J Cancer Educ. 1998; 13: 152-161.
16. Lawrence VA, Streiner D, Hazuda HP, Naylor R, Levine M, Gafni A,. A cross-cultural consumer-based decision aid for screening mammography. Prev Med. 2000; 30: 200-208.
17. Valdez A, Banerjee K, Fernandez M, Ackerson L,. Impact of a multimedia breast cancer education intervention on use of mammography by low-income Latinas. J Cancer Educ. 2001; 16: 221-224.
18. Rimer BK, Halabi S, Sugg Skinner C, et al. The short-term impact of tailored mammography decision-making interventions. Patient Educ Couns. 2001; 43: 269-285.
19. Rimer BK, Halabi S, Sugg Skinner C, et al. Effects of a mammography decision-making intervention at 12 and 24 months. Am J Prev Med. 2002; 22: 247-257.
20. Lewis CL, Pignone MP, Sheridan SL, Downs SM, Kinsinger LS,. A randomized trial of three videos that differ in the framing of information about mammography in women 40 to 49 years old. J Gen Intern Med. 2003; 18: 875-883.
21. Mathieu E, Barratt A, Davey HM, McGeechan K, Howard K, Houssami N,. Informed choice in mammography screening: a randomized trial of a decision aid for 70-year-old women. Arch Intern Med. 2007; 167: 2039-2046.
22. Vernon SW, del Junco DJ, Tiro JA, et al. Promoting regular mammography screening II. Results from a randomized controlled trial in US women veterans. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008; 100: 347-358.
23. Mathieu E, Barratt AL, McGeechan K, Davey HM, Howard K, Houssami N,. Helping women make choices about mammography screening: an online randomized trial of a decision aid for 40-year-old women. Patient Educ Couns. 2010; 81: 63-72.
24. Lerman C, Biesecker B, Benkendorf JL, et al. Controlled trial of pretest education approaches to enhance informed decision-making for BRCA1 gene testing. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1997; 89: 148-157.
25. Green MJ, Biesecker BB, McInerney AM, Mauger D, Fost N,. An interactive computer program can effectively educate patients about genetic testing for breast cancer susceptibility. Am J Med Genet. 2001; 103: 16-23.
26. Schwartz MD, Benkendorf J, Lerman C, Isaacs C, Ryan-Robertson A, Johnson L,. Impact of educational print materials on knowledge, attitudes, and interest in BRCA1/BRCA2: testing among Ashkenazi Jewish women. Cancer. 2001; 92: 932-940.
27. Green MJ, Peterson SK, Baker MW, et al. Effect of a computer-based decision aid on knowledge, perceptions, and intentions about genetic testing for breast cancer susceptibility: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2004; 292: 442-452.
28. Green MJ, Peterson SK, Baker MW, et al. Use of an educational computer program before genetic counseling for breast cancer susceptibility: effects on duration and content of counseling sessions. Genet Med. 2005; 7: 221-229.
29. Miller SM, Fleisher L, Roussi P, et al. Facilitating informed decision making about breast cancer risk and genetic counseling among women calling the NCI's Cancer Information Service. J Health Commun. 2005; 10 (suppl 1): 119-136.
30. Wang C, Gonzalez R, Milliron KJ, Strecher VJ, Merajver SD,. Genetic counseling for BRCA1/2: a randomized controlled trial of two strategies to facilitate the education and counseling process. Am J Med Genet A. 2005; 134A: 66-73.
31. Wakefield CE, Meiser B, Homewood J, et al. AGenDA Collaborative Group. A randomized controlled trial of a decision aid for women considering genetic testing for breast and ovarian cancer risk. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2008; 107: 289-301.
32. Wakefield CE, Meiser B, Homewood J, et al. Australian GENetic testing Decision Aid Collaborative Group. A randomized trial of a breast/ovarian cancer genetic testing decision aid used as a communication aid during genetic counseling. Psychooncology. 2008; 17: 844-854.
33. Gray SW, O'Grady C, Karp L, et al. Risk information exposure and direct-to-consumer genetic testing for BRCA mutations among women with a personal or family history of breast or ovarian cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2009; 18: 1303-1311.
34. Pignone M, Harris R, Kinsinger L,. Videotape-based decision aid for colon cancer screening. A randomized, controlled trial. Ann Intern Med. 2000; 133: 761-769.
35. Wolf AM, Schorling JB,. Does informed consent alter elderly patients' preferences for colorectal cancer screening? Results of a randomized trial. J Gen Intern Med. 2000; 15: 24-30.
36. Dolan JG, Frisina S,. Randomized controlled trial of a patient decision aid for colorectal cancer screening. Med Decis Making. 2002; 22: 125-139.
37. Zapka JG, Lemon SC, Puleo E, Estabrook B, Luckmann R, Erban S,. Patient education for colon cancer screening: a randomized trial of a video mailed before a physical examination. Ann Intern Med. 2004; 141: 683-692.
38. Jerant A, Kravitz RL, Rooney M, Amerson S, Kreuter M, Franks P,. Effects of a tailored interactive multimedia computer program on determinants of colorectal cancer screening: a randomized controlled pilot study in physician offices. Patient Educ Couns. 2007; 66: 67-74.
39. Myers RE, Sifri R, Hyslop T, et al. A randomized controlled trial of the impact of targeted and tailored interventions on colorectal cancer screening. Cancer. 2007; 110: 2083-2091.
40. Ruffin MT 4th, Fetters MD, Jimbo M,. Preference-based electronic decision aid to promote colorectal cancer screening: results of a randomized controlled trial. Prev Med. 2007; 45: 267-273.
41. Griffith JM, Lewis CL, Brenner AR, Pignone MP,. The effect of offering different numbers of colorectal cancer screening test options in a decision aid: a pilot randomized trial. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2008; 8: 4.
42. Griffith JM, Fichter M, Fowler FJ, Lewis C, Pignone MP,. Should a colon cancer screening decision aid include the option of no testing? A comparative trial of two decision aids. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2008; 8: 10.
43. Katsumura Y, Yasunaga H, Imamura T, Ohe K, Oyama H,. Relationship between risk information on total colonoscopy and patient preferences for colorectal cancer screening options: analysis using the analytic hierarchy process. BMC Health Serv Res. 2008; 8: 106.
44. Lewis CL, Brenner AT, Griffith JM, Pignone MP,. The uptake and effect of a mailed multi-modal colon cancer screening intervention: a pilot controlled trial. Implement Sci. 2008; 3: 32.
45. Trevena LJ, Irwig L, Barratt A,. Randomized trial of a self-administered decision aid for colorectal cancer screening. J Med Screen. 2008; 15: 76-82.
46. Makoul G, Cameron KA, Baker DW, Francis L, Scholtens D, Wolf MS,. A multimedia patient education program on colorectal cancer screening increases knowledge and willingness to consider screening among Hispanic/Latino patients. Patient Educ Couns. 2009; 76: 220-226.
47. Manne SL, Coups EJ, Markowitz A, et al. A randomized trial of generic versus tailored interventions to increase colorectal cancer screening among intermediate risk siblings. Ann Behav Med. 2009; 37: 207-217.
48. Lewis CL, Golin CE, DeLeon C, et al. A targeted decision aid for the elderly to decide whether to undergo colorectal cancer screening: development and results of an uncontrolled trial. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2010; 10: 54.
49. Smith SK, Trevena L, Simpson JM, Barratt A, Nutbeam D, McCaffery KJ,. A decision aid to support informed choices about bowel cancer screening among adults with low education: randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2010; 341: c5370.
50. Miller DP Jr, Spangler JG, Case LD, Goff DC Jr, Singh S, Pignone MP,. Effectiveness of a web-based colorectal cancer screening patient decision aid: a randomized controlled trial in a mixed-literacy population. Am J Prev Med. 2011; 40: 608-615.
51. Pignone M, Winquist A, Schild LA, et al. Effectiveness of a patient and practice-level colorectal cancer screening intervention in health plan members: the CHOICE trial. Cancer. 2011; 117: 3352-3362.
52. Schroy PC 3rd, Emmons K, Peters E, et al. The impact of a novel computer-based decision aid on shared decision making for colorectal cancer screening: a randomized trial. Med Decis Making. 2011; 31: 93-107.
53. Steckelberg A, Hulfenhaus C, Haastert B, Muehlhauser I,. Effect of evidence based risk information on "informed choice" in colorectal cancer screening: randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2011; 342: d3193.
54. Vernon SW, Bartholomew LK, McQueen A, et al. A randomized controlled trial of a tailored interactive computer-delivered intervention to promote colorectal cancer screening: sometimes more is just the same. Ann Behav Med. 2011; 41: 284-299.
55. Flood AB, Wennberg JE, Nease RF Jr, Fowler FJ Jr, Ding J, Hynes LM,. The importance of patient preference in the decision to screen for prostate cancer. Prostate Patient Outcomes Research Team. J Gen Intern Med. 1996; 11: 342-349.
56. Wolf AM, Nasser JF, Wolf AM, Schorling JB,. The impact of informed consent on patient interest in prostate-specific antigen screening. Arch Intern Med. 1996; 156: 1333-1336.
57. Wolf AM, Schorling JB,. Preferences of elderly men for prostate-specific antigen screening and the impact of informed consent. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 1998; 53: M195-M200.
58. Myers RE, Chodak GW, Wolf TA, et al. Adherence by African American men to prostate cancer education and early detection. Cancer. 1999; 86: 88-104.
59. Schapira MM, Van Ruiswyk J,. The effect of an illustrated pamphlet decision-aid on the use of prostate cancer screening tests. J Fam Pract. 2000; 49: 418-424.
60. Frosch DL, Kaplan RM, Felitti V,. Evaluation of two methods to facilitate shared decision making for men considering the prostate-specific antigen test. J Gen Intern Med. 2001; 16: 391-398.
61. Wilt TJ, Paul J, Murdoch M, Nelson D, Nugent S, Rubins HB,. Educating men about prostate cancer screening. A randomized trial of a mailed pamphlet. Eff Clin Pract. 2001; 4: 112-120.
62. Volk RJ, Cass AR, Spann SJ,. A randomized controlled trial of shared decision making for prostate cancer screening. Arch Fam Med. 1999; 8: 333-340.
63. Volk RJ, Spann SJ, Cass AR, Hawley ST,. Patient education for informed decision making about prostate cancer screening: a randomized controlled trial with 1-year follow-up. Ann Fam Med. 2003; 1: 22-28.
64. Frosch DL, Kaplan RM, Felitti VJ,. A randomized controlled trial comparing internet and video to facilitate patient education for men considering the prostate specific antigen test. J Gen Intern Med. 2003; 18: 781-787.
65. Gattellari M, Ward JE,. Does evidence-based information about screening for prostate cancer enhance consumer decision-making? A randomised controlled trial. J Med Screen. 2003; 10: 27-39.
66. Ruthman JL, Ferrans CE,. Efficacy of a video for teaching patients about prostate cancer screening and treatment. Am J Health Promot. 2004; 18: 292-295.
67. Sheridan SL, Felix K, Pignone MP, Lewis CL,. Information needs of men regarding prostate cancer screening and the effect of a brief decision aid. Patient Educ Couns. 2004; 54: 345-351.
68. Gattellari M, Ward JE,. A community-based randomised controlled trial of three different educational resources for men about prostate cancer screening. Patient Educ Couns. 2005; 57: 168-182.
69. Myers RE, Daskalakis C, Cocroft J, et al. Preparing African-American men in community primary care practices to decide whether or not to have prostate cancer screening. J Natl Med Assoc. 2005; 97: 1143-1154.
70. Partin MR, Nelson D, Radosevich D, et al. Randomized trial examining the effect of two prostate cancer screening educational interventions on patient knowledge, preferences, and behaviors. J Gen Intern Med. 2004; 19: 835-842.
71. Partin MR, Nelson D, Flood AB, Friedemann-Sanchez G, Wilt TJ,. Who uses decision aids? Subgroup analyses from a randomized controlled effectiveness trial of two prostate cancer screening decision support interventions. Health Expect. 2006; 9: 285-295.
72. Watson E, Hewitson P, Brett J, et al. Informed decision making and prostate specific antigen (PSA) testing for prostate cancer: a randomized controlled trial exploring the impact of a brief patient decision aid on men's knowledge, attitudes and intention to be tested. Patient Educ Couns. 2006; 63: 367-379.
73. Kripalani S, Sharma J, Justice E, et al. Low-literacy interventions to promote discussion of prostate cancer: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Prev Med. 2007; 33: 83-90.
74. Krist AH, Woolf SH, Johnson RE, Kerns JW,. Patient education on prostate cancer screening and involvement in decision making. Ann Fam Med. 2007; 5: 112-119.
75. Ellison GL, Weinrich SP, Lou M, Xu H, Powell IJ, Baquet CR,. A randomized trial comparing web-based decision aids on prostate cancer knowledge for African-American men. J Natl Med Assoc. 2008; 100: 1139-1145.
76. Ilic D, Egberts K, McKenzie JE, Risgridger G, Green S,. Informing men about prostate cancer screening: a randomized controlled trial of patient education materials. J Gen Intern Med. 2008; 23: 466-471.
77. Stephens RL, Xu Y, Volk RJ, et al. Influence of a patient decision aid on decisional conflict related to PSA testing: a structural equation model. Health Psychol. 2008; 27: 711-721.
78. Volk RJ, Jibaja-Weiss ML, Hawley ST, et al. Entertainment education for prostate cancer screening: a randomized trial among primary care patients with low health literacy. Patient Educ Couns. 2008; 73: 482-489.
79. Weinrich SP, Seger RE, Rao GS, et al. A decision aid for teaching limitations of prostate cancer screening. J Natl Black Nurses Assoc. 2008; 19: 1-11.
80. Frosch DL, Bhatnagar V, Tally S, Hamori CJ, Kaplan RM,. Internet patient decision support: a randomized controlled trial comparing alternative approaches for men considering prostate cancer screening. Arch Intern Med. 2008; 168: 363-369.
81. Bhatnagar V, Frosch DL, Tally SR, Hamori CJ, Lenert L, Kaplan RM,. Evaluation of an internet-based disease trajectory decision tool for prostate cancer screening. Value Health. 2009; 12: 101-108.
82. Allen JD, Mohllajee AP, Shelton RC, Drake BF, Mars DR,. A computer-tailored intervention to promote informed decision making for prostate cancer screening among African American men. Am J Mens Health. 2009; 3: 340-351.
83. Allen JD, Othus MK, Hart A Jr, et al. A randomized trial of a computer-tailored decision aid to improve prostate cancer screening decisions: results from the take the wheel trial. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2010; 19: 2172-2186.
84. Joseph-Williams N, Evans R, Edwards A, et al. Supporting informed decision making online in 20 minutes: an observational web-log study of a PSA test decision aid. J Med Internet Res. 2010; 12: e15.
85. Rubel SK, Miller JW, Stephens RL, et al. Testing the effects of a decision aid for prostate cancer screening. J Health Commun. 2010; 15: 307-321.
86. van Vugt HA, Roobol MJ, Venderbos LD, et al. Informed decision making on PSA testing for the detection of prostate cancer: an evaluation of a leaflet with risk indicator. Eur J Cancer. 2010; 46: 669-677.
87. Capik C, Gozum S,. The effect of web-assisted education and reminders on health belief, level of knowledge and early diagnosis behaviors regarding prostate cancer screening. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2012; 16: 71-77.
88. Frosch DL, Legare F, Mangione CM,. Using decision aids in community-based primary care: a theory-driven evaluation with ethnically diverse patients. Patient Educ Couns. 2008; 73: 490-496.
89. Brackett C, Kearing S, Cochran N, Tosteson AN, Blair Brooks W,. Strategies for distributing cancer screening decision aids in primary care. Patient Educ Couns. 2010; 78: 166-168.
90. Krist AH, Woolf SH, Rothermich SF, et al. Interactive preventive health record to enhance delivery of recommended care: a randomized trial. Ann Fam Med. 2012; 10: 312-319.
91. Edwards A, Elwyn G,. The potential benefits of decision aids in clinical medicine. JAMA. 1999; 282: 779-780.
92. Barry MJ,. Health decision aids to facilitate shared decision making in office practice. Ann Intern Med. 2002; 136: 127-135.
93. Durand MA, Stiel M, Boivon J, Elwyn G,. Where is the theory? Evaluating the theoretical frameworks described in decision support technologies. Patient Educ Couns. 2008; 71: 125-135.
94. Feldman-Stewart D, Tong C, Siemens R, et al. The impact of explicit values clarification exercises in a patient decision aid emerges after the decision is actually made: evidence from a randomized controlled trial. Med Decis Making. 2012; 32: 616-626.
95. Bekker HL,. Decision aids and uptake of screening. BMJ. 2010; 341: c5407.
96. Jimbo M, Nease DE Jr, Ruffin MT 4th, Rana GK,. Information technology and cancer prevention. CA Cancer J Clin. 2006; 56: 26-36; quiz 48-49.
97. O'Connor AM,. Validation of a decisional conflict scale. Med Decis Making. 1995; 15: 25-30.
98. Sepucha KR, Fowler FJ Jr, Mulley AG Jr,. Policy support for patient-centered care: the need for measurable improvements in decision quality. Health Aff (Millwood). 2004;(suppl variation): VAR54-VAR62.
99. Gordon NP, Hiatt RA, Lampert DI,. Concordance of self-reported data and medical record audit for six cancer screening procedures. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1993; 85: 566-570.
100. McGovern PG, Lurie N, Margolis KL, Slater JS,. Accuracy of self-report of mammography and Pap smear in a low-income urban population. Am J Prev Med. 1998; 14: 201-208.
101. Sheeran P,. Intention-behavior relations: a conceptual and empirical review. Eur Rev Soc Psychol. 2002; 12: 1-36.
102. O'Connor AM, Llewellyn-Thomas HA, Flood AB,. Modifying unwarranted variations in health care: shared decision making using patient decision aids. Health Aff (Millwood). 2004;(suppl variation): VAR63-VAR72.
103. Legare F, Ratte S, Stacey D, et al. Interventions for improving the adoption of shared decision making by healthcare professionals. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;(5): CD006732.
104. Wunderlich T, Cooper G, Divine G, et al. Inconsistencies in patient perceptions and observer ratings of shared decision making: the case of colorectal cancer screening. Patient Educ Couns. 2010; 80: 358-363.
105. Elwyn G, Edwards A, Wensing M, Hood K, Atwell C, Grol R,. Shared decision making: developing the OPTION scale for measuring patient involvement. Qual Saf Health Care. 2003; 12: 93-99.
106. Guimond P, Bunn H, O'Connor AM, et al. Validation of a tool to assess health practitioners' decision support and communication skills. Patient Educ Couns. 2003; 50: 235-245.
107. Braddock CH 3rd, Edwards KA, Hasenberg NM, Laidley TL, Levinson W,. Informed decision making in outpatient practice: time to get back to basics. JAMA. 1999; 282: 2313-2320.
108. McQueen A, Bartholomew LK, Greisinger AJ, et al. Behind closed doors: physician-patient discussions about colorectal cancer screening. J Gen Intern Med. 2009; 24: 1228-1235.
109. Hill L, Mueller MR, Roussos S, et al. Opportunities for the use of decision aids in primary care. Fam Med. 2009; 41: 350-355.
110. Carney PA, Dietrich AJ, Keller A, Landgraf J, O'Connor GT,. Tools, teamwork, and tenacity: an office system for cancer prevention. J Fam Pract. 1992; 35: 388-394.
111. Carpiano RM, Flocke SA, Frank SH, Stange KC,. Tools, teamwork, and tenacity: an examination of family practice office system influences on preventive service delivery. Prev Med. 2003; 36: 131-140.
112. Miller WL, Crabtree BF, McDaniel R, Stange KC,. Understanding change in primary care practice using complexity theory. J Fam Pract. 1998; 46: 369-376.
113. Miller WL, McDaniel RR Jr, Crabtree BF, Stange KC,. Practice jazz: understanding variation in family practices using complexity science. J Fam Pract. 2001; 50: 872-878.
114. Arterburn D, Wellman R, Westbrook E, et al. Introducing decision aids at Group Health was linked to sharply lower hip and knee surgery rates and costs. Health Aff (Millwood). 2012; 31: 2094-2104.
115. Elwyn G, O'Connor A, Stacey D, et al. International Patient Decision Aids Standards (IPDAS) Collaboration. Developing a quality criteria framework for patient decision aids: online international Delphi consensus process. BMJ. 2006; 333: 417.
116. Stacey D, Samant R, Bennett C,. Decision making in oncology: a review of patient decision aids to support patient participation. CA Cancer J Clin. 2008; 58: 293-304.
117. O'Connor AM, Bennett C, Stacey D, et al. Do patient decision aids meet effectiveness criteria of the international patient decision aid standards collaboration? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Med Decis Making. 2007; 27: 554-574.