Effect of evidence based risk information on "informed choice" in colorectal cancer screening: Randomised controlled trial

BMJ

Volumn 342, Issue 7810, 2011, Pages

  Steckelberg, Anke ^a   Hülfenhaus, Christian ^a   Haastert, Burkhard ^b   Mühlhauser, Ingrid ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HAMBURG   (Germany)

^b MediStatistica ^*  (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER SCREENING; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL CANCER; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST; EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE; FEMALE; HEALTH INSURANCE; HUMAN; INFORMED CONSENT; KNOWLEDGE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; OCCULT BLOOD; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RISK BENEFIT ANALYSIS; CLINICAL TRIAL; COLORECTAL TUMOR; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; DECISION MAKING; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED;

AGED; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; FEMALE; HUMANS; INFORMED CONSENT; MALE; MIDDLE AGED;

EID: 79958740357     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17561833     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.d3193     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Eggen D, Stein R. Mammograms and politics: task force stirs up a tempest. Washington Post. 18 November 2009.
2. Gøtzsche PC ,Hartling OJ, Nielsen M, Brodersen J, Jørgensen KJ. Breast screening: the facts-or maybe not. BMJ 2009;338:b86.
3. Felix Burda Foundation. Campaign 2010. www.felix-burda-stiftung.de/ kampagne-2011/index.php.
4. Bekker HL. Decision aids and uptake of screening. BMJ 2010;341:c5407.
5. Steckelberg A, Berger B, Köpke S, Heesen C, Mühlhauser I. [Criteria for evidence-based patient information] [German]. Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich 2005;99:343-51.
6. Steckelberg A, Balgenorth A, Mühlhauser I. [Analysis of German language consumer information brochures on screening for colorectal cancer] [German]. Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich 2001;95:535-8.
7. General Medical Council. Protecting patients, guiding doctors. Seeking patients' consent: the ethical considerations. 1999. www.gmc-uk.org/Seeking- patients-consent-The-ethical-considerations.pdf-25417085.pdf
8. General Medical Council. Consent guidance: patients and doctors making decisions together. 2008. www.gmc-uk.org/guidance/ethical-guidance/consent- guidance-index.asp.
9. Jørgensen KJ, Gøtzsche PC. Content of invitations to publicly funded screening mammography. BMJ 2006;332:538-41. (Pubitemid 44364373)
10. Gigerenzer G,Mata J, Frank R. Public knowledge of benefits of breast and prostate cancer screening in Europe. J Natl Cancer Inst 2009;101:1216-20.
11. UK Medical Research Council. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: new guidance. 2008. www.mrc.ac.uk/Utilities/Documentrecord/index. htm?d=MRC004871.
12. Bunge M, Mühlhauser I, Steckelberg A. What constitutes evidence-based patient information? Overview of discussed criteria. Patient Educ Couns 2010;78:316-28.
13. Steckelberg A, Kasper J, Redegeld M, Mühlhauser I. Risk information - barrier to informed choice? A focus group study. Soz Praventivmed 2004;49:375-80. (Pubitemid 40208053)
14. Steckelberg A, Kasper J, Mühlhauser I. Selective information seeking: can consumers' avoidance of evidence-based information on colorectal cancer screening be explained by the theory of cognitive dissonance? Ger Med Sci 2007;5:Doc05.
15. Federal Joint Committee. Richtlinien des Bundesausschusses der Ärzte und Krankenkassen über die Früherkennung von Krebserkrankungen (Krebsfrüherkennungs-Richtlinien) [German]. Dtsch Ärztebl 2003;11:518-21.
16. Marteau T, Dormandy E, Michi S.Ameasure of informed choice. Health Expect 2001;4:99-108.
17. Steckelberg A. [Evidence-based information for patients and consumers using colorectal cancer as an example: suggestions for improving informed decision making] [German]. University of Hamburg, 2005.
18. German Federal Statistical Office. Homepage. 2010. www.destatis.de.
19. Fox R. Informed choice in screening programmes: do leaflets help? A critical literature review. J Public Health 2006;28:309-17. (Pubitemid 44863319)
20. Krist AH, Woolf SH, Johnson RE, Kerns JW. Patient education on prostate cancer screening and involvement in decision making. Ann Fam Med 2007;5:112-9. (Pubitemid 46513479)
21. Mathieu E, Barratt A, Davey HM McGeechan K, Howard K, Houssami N. Informed choice in mammography screening: a randomized trial of a decision aid for 70-year-old women. Arch Intern Med 2007;22:2039-46. (Pubitemid 350036702)
22. Trevena LJ, Barratt A, Irwig L. Randomized trial of a self-administered decision aid for colorectal cancer screening. J Med Screen 2008;15:76-82.
23. Marteau TM, Mann E, Prevost AT, Vasconcelos JC, Kellar I, Sanderson S, et al. Impact of an informed choice invitation on uptake of screening for diabetes in primary care (DICISION): randomised trial. BMJ 2010;340:c2138.
24. Smith SK, Trevena L, Simpson JM, Barratt A, Nutbeam D, McCaffery KJ. A decision aid to support informed choices about bowel cancer screening among adults with low education: randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2010;341:c5370.
25. Dalton CB. Decision aids and screening: editorial was amoral. BMJ 2010;341:c6648.
26. Hudson B. Decision aids and screening: information v promotion. BMJ 2010;341:c6650.
27. Klaus K, Mühlhauser I, for the German Network of Evidence-based Medicine. [Criteria for the development of patient information on cancer screening] [German]. 2008 (available at www.ebm-netzwerk.de/netzwerkarbeit/ images/stelungnahme-dnebm-080630.pdf).