Relationship between risk information on total colonoscopy and patient preferences for colorectal cancer screening options: Analysis using the Analytic Hierarchy Process

BMC Health Services Research

Volumn 8, Issue , 2008, Pages

  Katsumura, Yuichi ^a   Yasunaga, Hideo ^a   Imamura, Tomoaki ^b   Ohe, Kazuhiko ^a   Oyama, Hiroshi ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

^b NARA MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CANCER SCREENING; CLINICAL TRIAL; COLON HEMORRHAGE; COLON PERFORATION; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL CANCER; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE COST; HUMAN; JAPAN; MALE; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; NORMAL HUMAN; OCCULT BLOOD TEST; PATIENT ATTITUDE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RECTUM HEMORRHAGE; RISK BENEFIT ANALYSIS; COLORECTAL TUMOR; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DECISION MAKING; ECONOMICS; MASS SCREENING; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PRIMARY PREVENTION; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; QUESTIONNAIRE; RISK; RISK ASSESSMENT; STATISTICAL MODEL; STATISTICS;

ADULT; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMANS; LOGISTIC MODELS; MALE; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PRIMARY PREVENTION; QUESTIONNAIRES; RISK; RISK ASSESSMENT;

EID: 44849108327     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14726963     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-8-106     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Statistics and Information Department, Minister's Secretariat, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Vital Statistics. Tokyo 2007 (in Japanese)
2. Patient priorities in colorectal cancer screening decisions. J Dolan, Health Expect 2005 8 4 334 344 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2005.00348.x 16266421
3. Screening preferences for colorectal cancer: a patient demographic study. R Sheikh S Kapre O Calof C Ward A Raina, South Med J 2004 97 3 224 230 10.1097/01.SMJ.0000078619.39604.3D 15043327
4. A survey of individual preference for colorectal cancer screening technique. R Nelson A Schwartz, BMC Cancer 2004 4 76 15533242 10.1186/1471-2407-4-76
5. Attitudes toward colorectal cancer screening tests. B Ling M Moskowitz D Wachs B Pearson P Schroy, J Gen Intern Med 2001 16 12 822 830 11903761 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.10337.x
6. Patient preferences for colon cancer screening. M Pignone D Bucholtz R Harris, J Gen Intern Med 1999 14 7 432 437 10417601 10.1046/j.1525-1497.1999. 00018.x
7. The analytic hierarchy process: scenarios, priorities and cost/benefits for the Sudan Transport Plan. TL Saaty, Operational Research '81. Proceedings of the Ninth IFORS International Conference: 1981; Hamburg, West Germany. North-Holland 1981 161 175
8. The patient's dilemma: prostate cancer treatment choices. H Patel S Mirsadraee M Emberton, J Urol 2003 169 3 828 833 10.1097/01.ju.0000052056.27609. 8a 12576794
9. Opportunistic preventive services delivery. Are time limitations and patient satisfaction barriers? K Stange S Flocke M Goodwin, J Fam Pract 1998 46 5 419 424 9598000
10. Characteristics of physicians with participatory decision-making styles. S Kaplan S Greenfield B Gandek W Rogers JJ Ware, Ann Intern Med 1996 124 5 497 504 8602709
11. A novel computer based expert decision making model for prostate cancer disease management. M Richman E Forman Y Bayazit D Einstein M Resnick M Stovsky, J Urol 2005 174 6 2310 2318 10.1097/01.ju.0000181829.07078.22 16280831
12. Diagnostic strategies in the management of acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding: patient and physician preferences. J Dolan D Bordley H Miller, J Gen Intern Med 1993 8 10 525 529 10.1007/BF02599632 8271083
13. Application of analytic hierarchy process for measuring and comparing the global performance of intensive care units. S Hariharan P Dey D Chen H Moseley A Kumar, J Crit Care 2005 20 2 117 124 discussion 124-115 10.1016/j.jcrc.2005. 04.002 16139151
14. Reduction in risk of mortality from colorectal cancer by fecal occult blood screening with immunochemical hemagglutination test. A case-control study. H Saito Y Soma J Koeda T Wada H Kawaguchi T Sobue T Aisawa Y Yoshida, Int J Cancer 1995 61 465 469 10.1002/ijc.2910610406 7759151
15. Protection by endoscopy against death from colorectal cancer. A case-control study among veterans. A Müller A Sonnenberg, Arch Intern Med 1995 155 16 1741 1748 10.1001/archinte.155.16.1741 7654107
16. Problem in the screening of colorectal cancers. H Takahashi T Toyoda T Tamura H Ogawa F Shiraishi N Hiratsuka S Hiratsuka H Hiratsuka, J Colon Exam 2004 21 1 25 29 (in Japanese).
17. Evaluation of an immunochemical fecal occult blood test by reversed passive hemagglutination compared with Hemoccult II screening for colorectal cancer. T Iwase, Fecal occult blood tests: Current issues and new tests San Joe: Smith Kline Diagnostics Inc, Young GP, Saito H, 1992 90 95
18. Colonoscopic evaluation of immunochemical fecal occult blood test for detection of colorectal neoplasia. H Nakama M Yamamoto N Kamijo T Li N Wei A Fattah B Zhang, Hepatogastroenterology 1999 46 25 228 231 10228797
19. Relative sensitivity of colonoscopy and barium enema for detection of colorectal cancer in clinical practice. D Rex E Rahmani J Haseman G Lemmel S Kaster J Buckley, Gastroenterology 1997 112 1 17 23 10.1016/S0016-5085(97)70213- 0 8978337
20. Sensitivity of double contrast barium enema and colonoscopy for the detection of colorectal neoplasms. GA Smith PJ O'Dwyer, Surg Endosc 2001 15 7 649 652 10.1007/s004640000372 11591961
21. Development of guideline for colorectal cancer mass screening. T Sofue T Hamashima H Saito T Shimada K Matsuda H Nishida, Gan To Kagaku Ryoho 2005 32 901 915 (in Japanese). 15997489
22. Complications of colonoscopy in an integrated health care delivery system. T Levin W Zhao C Conell L Seeff D Manninen J Shapiro J Schulman, Ann Intern Med 2006 145 12 880 886 17179057
23. A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. TL Saaty, Journal of Mathematical Psychology 1977 15 3 234 281 10.1016/0022-2496(77)90033- 5
24. Comparison between multiple-choice and analytic hierarchy process: measuring human perception. J Sato, International Transactions in Operational Research 2004 11 1 77 86 10.1111/j.1475-3995.2004.00441.x
25. Medical tests: women's reported and preferred decision-making roles and preferences for information on benefits, side-effects and false results. H Davey A Barratt E Davey P Butow S Redman N Houssami G Salkeld, Health Expect 2002 5 4 330 340 10.1046/j.1369-6513.2002.00194.x 12460222
26. Videotape-Based Decision Aid for Colon Cancer Screening: A Randomized, Controlled Trial. M Pignone R Harris L Kinsinger, Ann Intern Med 2000 133 10 761 769 11085838
27. Randomized controlled trial of a patient decision aid for colorectal cancer screening. J Dolan S Frisina, Med Decis Making 2002 22 2 125 139 10.1177/02729890222063017 11958495