Informed choice in mammography screening: A randomized trial of a decision aid for 70-year-old women

Archives of Internal Medicine

Volumn 167, Issue 19, 2007, Pages 2039-2046

  Mathieu, Erin ^a   Barratt, Alexandra ^a   Davey, Heather M ^a   McGeechan, Kevin ^a   Howard, Kirsten ^a   Houssami, Nehmat ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; AUSTRALIA; BREAST CANCER; CANCER RISK; CANCER SCREENING; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAMMOGRAPHY; MEDICAL INFORMATION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL;

AGED; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; DECISION SUPPORT TECHNIQUES; FEMALE; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HUMANS; MAMMOGRAPHY; NEW SOUTH WALES; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PATIENT EDUCATION AS TOPIC; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PATIENT SATISFACTION;

EID: 35649028916     PISSN: 00039926     EISSN: 15383679     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1001/archinte.167.19.2039     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Barratt A, Howard K, Irwig L, Salked G, Houssami N. Model of outcomes of screening mammography: information to support informed choices. BMJ. 2005;330(7497):936-938.
2. Screening for breast cancer; 2002. United States Preventive Services Task Force Web site. http://www.ahrq.gov/clinic/uspstf/uspsbrca.htm. Accessed November 23, 2006.
3. UK National Screening Committee's policy positions. UK National Screening Committee Web site. http://www.nsc.nhs.uk/pdfs/ policy_position_chart_july06%5B1%5D.pdf. Accessed November 23, 2006.
4. Organised breast cancer screening programs in Canada, 2001. Public Health Agency of Canada Web site. http://www.phac-aspc.gc.ca/publicat/obcsp-podcs98/ obcspe_e.html#tab1. Accessed November 23, 2006.
5. BreastScreen Australia: about the program. Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing Web site. http://www.breastscreen.info.au/ internet/screening/publishing.nsf/Content/breastscreen-1lp. Accessed November 23, 2006.
6. Seeking patients' consent: the ethical considerations. General Medical Council Web site. http://www.gmc-uk.org/guidance/current/library/consent.asp. Accessed November 23, 2006.
7. General guidelines for medical pracititioneers on providing information to patients, 2004. National Health and Medical Research Council Web site. http://www.nhmrc.gov.au/publications/synopses/e57syn.htm. Accessed July 31, 2007.
8. Elmore JG, Armstrong K, Lehman C, Fletcher S. Screening for breast cancer. JAMA. 2005;293(10):1245-1256.
9. Barratt AL, Irwig LM, Glasziou PP, Salkeld GP, Houssami N. Benefits, harms and costs of screening mammography in women 70 years and over: a systematic review. Med J Aust. 2002;176(6):266-271.
10. Thornton H, Edwards A, Baum M. Women need better information about routine mammography. BMJ. 2003;327(7406):101-103.
11. Jepson RG, Forbes CA, Sowden AJ, Lewis RA. Increasing informed uptake and non-uptake of screening: evidence from a systematic review. Health Expect. 2001;4(2):116-126.
12. Goyder E, Barratt A, Irwig LM. Telling people about screening programmes and screening test results: how can we do it better? J Med Screen. 2000;7(3):123-126.
13. Jørgensen KJ, Gøtzsche PC. Content of invitations for publicly funded screening mammography. BMJ. 2006;332(7540):538-541.
14. Croft E, Barratt A, Butow P. Information about tests for breast cancer: what are we telling people? J Fam Pract. 2002;51(10):858-860.
15. Jones S. A review of the consistency of breast cancer screening pamphlets produced by health authorities in Australia. Health Educ. 2003;103(3):166-176.
16. Raffle AE. Information about screening: is it to achieve high uptake or to ensure informed choice? Health Expect. 2001;4(2):92-98.
17. Barratt A, Trevena L, Davey HM, McCaffery K. Use of decision aids to support informed choices about screening. BMJ. 2004;329(7464):507-510.
18. O'Connor AM, Rostom A, Fiset V, et al. Decision aids for patients facing health treatment or screening decisions: systematic review. BMJ. 1999;319(7212):731-734.
19. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. BreastScreen Australia Monitoring Report, 2000-2001. Canberra, Australia: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare; 2003:55.
20. O'Connor AM, Tugwell P, Wells G, Elmslie T, Jolly E, Hollingworth G. A decision aid for women considering hormone therapy after menopause: decision support framework and evaluation. Patient Educ Couns. 1998;33(3):267-279.
21. Glasziou PP. Meta-analysis adjusting for compliance: the example of screening for breast cancer. J Clin Epidemiol. 1992;45(11):1251-1256.
22. Mathieu E, Barratt A, Howard K, et al. Should I continue having mammograms to screen for breast cancer? a pilot study of a decision aid for women aged 70. Paper presented at Third International Shared Decision Making Conference; June 16, 2005; Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
23. O'Connor AM. Validation of a decisional conflict scale. Med Decis Making. 1995;15(1):25-30.
24. Marteau TM, Dormandy E, Michie S. A measure of informed choice. Health Expect. 2001;4(2):99-108.
25. Decisional Conflict Scale. Ottawa Health Decision Centre Web site. http://decisionaid.ohri.ca/docs/Eval_Meas/User_Manuals/UM_DecConflict2006.pdf. Accessed November 23, 2006.
26. Marteau TM, Bekker H. The development of a six-item short-form of the state scale of the Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI). Br J Clin Psychol. 1992;31:301-306.
27. Sutton S, Bickler G, Sancho-Aldridge J, Saidi G. Prospective study of predictors of attendance for breast screening in inner London. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1994;48(1):65-73.
28. Dormandy E, Michie S, Hooper C, Marteau T. Informed choice in antenatal Down syndrome screening: a cluster-randomised trial of combined versus separate visit testing. Patient Educ Couns. 2006;61(1):56-64.
29. Gail MH, Brinton L, Byar D, et al. Projecting individual probabilities of developing breast cancer for white females who are being examined annually. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1989;81(24):1879-1886.
30. Meiser B, Butow P, Friedlander M, et al. Intention to undergo prophylactic bilateral mastectomy in women at increased risk of developing hereditary breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2000;18(11):2250-2257.
31. Ware JE, Sherbourne C. The MOS 36 item short-form health survey (SF-36), I: conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992;30(6):473-480.
32. Raffle AE. Informed participation in screening is essential. BMJ. 1997;314(7096):1762-1763.
33. Trevena L, Irwig L, Barratt A. Impact of privacy legislation on the number and characteristics of people who are recruited for research: a randomised trial. J Med Ethics. 2006;32(8):473-477.
34. Coulter A. Paternalism or partnership? patients have grown up-and there's no going back. BMJ. 1999;319(7212):719-720.