Individual differences among users: Implications for the design of 3D medical visualizations

User Centered Design for Medical Visualization

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 1-24

  Keehner, Madeleine ^a   Khooshabeh, Peter ^b   Hegarty, Mary ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF DUNDEE   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84877257518     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-59904-777-5.ch001     Document Type: Chapter

References (72)

1. Ballard, D. H., Hayhoe, M. M., Pook, P. K., & Rao, R. P. N. (1997). Deictic codes for the embodiment of cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 20, 723-742.
2. Betrancourt, M. (2005). The animation and interactivity principles in multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning (pp. 287-296). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
3. Beyer, H., & Holtzblatt, K. (1997). Contextual Design: A Customer-Centered Approach to Systems Designs: Morgan Kaufman.
4. Card, S. K., MacKinlay, J. D., & Shneiderman, B. (1999). Readings in information visualization: Using vision to think. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann.
5. Carroll, J. (1993). Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor-analytic studies. New York: Cambridge University Press.
6. Christou, C. G., & Bülthoff, H. H. (1999). View dependence in scene recognition after active learning. Memory & Cognition, 27, 996-1007.
7. Cohen, C. A, & Hegarty, M. (in press). Individual differences in use of an external visualization to perform an internal visualization task. Applied Cognitive Psychology.
8. Collen, M. F. (1995). A history of medical informatics in the United States, 1950 to 1990. Indianapolis, IN: American Medical Informatics Association.
9. De Dombal, F. T. (1996). Medical informatics: The essentials. Oxford, Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann.
10. Eliot, J., & Smith, I. M. (1983). An international directory of spatial tests. Windsor, Berks: Nfer-Nelson.
11. Feldman, A., & Acredolo, L. P. (1979). The effect of active versus passive exploration on memory for spatial location in children. Child Development, 50, 698-704.
12. Flavell, J. H., Green, F. L., Flavell, E. R., Harris, P. L., & Astington, J. W. (1995). Young children's knowledge about thinking. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 60(1), 1-113.
13. Florance, V. & Masys, D. (2002). Next generation IAIMS: Binding knowledge to effective action. Report Number N01-LM-9-3523.Washington, DC: Association of American Medical Colleges.
14. Florance, V. & Moller, M. T. (2002). Better Health 2010: A report by the AAMC's better_health 2010 Advisory Board. Washington, DC: Association of American Medical Colleges.
15. Foreman, N., Sandamas, G., and Newson, D. (2004). Distance underestimation in virtual space is sensitive to gender but not activity-passivity or mode of interaction. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 7(4), 451-457.
16. Garg, A. X., Norman, G., & Sperotable, L. (2001). How medical students learn spatial anatomy. The Lancet, 357, 363-364.
17. Garg, A. X., Norman, G. R., Spero, L., & Maheshwari, P. (1999). Do virtual computer models hinder anatomy learning? Academic Medicine, 74(10), S87-S89.
18. Gordin, D. N., & Pea, R. D. (1995). Prospects for scientific visualization as an educational technology. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4, 249-279.
19. Gray, W. D., & Fu, W.-T. (2004). Soft constraints in interactive behavior: The case of ignoring perfect knowledge in-the-world for imperfect knowledge in-the-head. Cognitive Science, 28(3), 359-382.
20. Gray, W. D., Sims, C. R., Fu, W.-T., & Schoelles, M. J. (2006). The soft constraints hypothesis: A rational analysis approach to resource allocation for interactive behavior. Psychological Review, 113(3) 461-482.
21. Harman, K. L., Humphrey, G. K., & Goodale, M. A. (1999). Active manual control of object views facilitates visual recognition. Current Biology, 9, 1315-1318.
22. Hegarty, M. (2004). Commentary: Dynamic visualizations and learning: Getting to the difficult questions. Learning and Instruction, 14, 343-351.
23. Hegarty, M., Keehner, M., Cohen, C., Montello, D. R. & Lippa, Y. (2007). The role of spatial cognition in medicine: Applications for selecting and training professionals. In G. Allen (Ed.) Applied Spatial Cognition (pp. 285-315). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
24. Hegarty, M. & Waller, D. (2005). Individual differences in spatial abilities. In P. Shah & A. Miyake (Eds.). The Cambridge Handbook of Visuospatial Thinking (pp. 121-169). New York: Cambridge University Press.
25. Heer, J., & Khooshabeh, P. (2004, May 25-28). Seeing the Invisible. Paper presented at the Association for Computing Machinery Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces Conference, Lecce, Italy.
26. Hollan, J., Hutchins, E., & Kirsh, D. (2000). Distributed cognition: Toward a new foundation for human-computer interaction research. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 7(2), 174-196.
27. Hollnagel, E., & Woods, D. (2005). Joint Cognitive Systems: Foundations of Cognitive Systems Engineering. Boca Rotan: CRC Press - Taylor and Francis.
28. Hsi, S., Linn, M. C., & Bell, J. E. (1997). The role of spatial reasoning in engineering and the design of spatial instruction. Journal of Engineering Education, April, 151-158.
29. Huk, T. (2006). Who benefits from learning with 3D models? The case of spatial ability. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 22, 392-404.
30. Hutchins, E. L., Hollan, J. D., & Norman, D. A. (1985). Direct manipulation interfaces. Human-Computer Interaction, 1, 311-338.
31. Huttenlocher, J. (1962). Effects of manipulation of attributes on efficiency of concept formation. Psychological Reports, 10, 503-509.
32. James, K. H., Humphrey, G. K., & Goodale, M. A. (2001). Manipulating and recognizing virtual objects: Where the action is. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55, 111-120.
33. James, K. H., Humphrey, G. K., Vilis, T., Corrie, B., Baddour, R., & Goodale, M. A. (2002). "Active" and "passive" learning of three-dimensional object structure within an immersive virtual reality environment. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 34, 383-390.
34. Jones, A. (2003). Grand Research Challenges in Information Systems Final Report. Warrenton, Virginia: Computing Research Associates (CRA).
35. Kali, Y., & Orion, N. (1996). Spatial abilities of high school students in the perception of geologic structures. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33, 369-391.
36. Keehner, M., Hegarty, M., Cohen, C., Khooshabeh, P., and Montello, D. R. (in press). Spatial reasoning with interactive computer visualizations: The role of individual differences in distributed cognition. Cognitive Science.
37. Khooshabeh, P. (2004). Learning Spatial Relationships: Ethnography and Experiment of an Echographic Training Simulation. Unpublished Undergraduate Honors Thesis, Primary Reader: Professor Richard Ivry. Secondary Reader: Professor Frank Tendick, University of California, Berkeley.
38. Khooshabeh, P. (2006). Quality of Information: Mental Representations and Small Scale Space. Unpublished Masters Thesis, University of California, Santa Barbara.
39. Kirsh, D. (1997). Interactivity and multimedia interfaces. Instructional Science, 25, 79-96.
40. Kirsh, D. (2005). Metacognition, distributed cognition and visual design. In P. Gardinfors & P. Johansson (Eds). Cognition, Education, and Communication Technology (pp. 147-180). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
41. Kirsh, D. & Maglio, P. (1994). On distinguishing epistemic from pragmatic action. Cognitive Science, 18(4), 513-549.
42. Krygier, J., Reeves, C., Cupp, J., & DiBiase, D. (1997). Multimedia in geographic education: Design, implementation, and evaluation. Retrieved March 16, 2006, http://horizon.unc.edu/projects/monograph/CD/Science_Mathematics/Krygier.asp
43. Kuhn, D., & Ho, V. (1980). Self-directed activity and cognitive development. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 1, 119-133.
44. Lohman, D. F. (1988). Spatial abilities as traits, processes and knowledge. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Advances in the psychology of human intelligence (Vol. 4, pp. 181-248). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
45. Lowe, R. K. (1999). Extracting information from an animation during complex visual learning. European Journal of Psychology of Education. 14, 225-244.
46. Lowe, R. K. (2004). Interrogation of a dynamic visualization during learning. Learning and Instruction, 14, 257-274.
47. Lowe, R.K. (in press). Learning from animation: where to look, when to look. In R.K.Lowe and W. Schnotz (Eds.) Learning from animation: Research and implications for design. New York: Cambridge University Press.
48. Marchak, F. M., & Marchak, L. C. (1991). Interactive versus passive dynamics and the exploratory analysis of multivariate data. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 23, 296-300.
49. Marchak, F. M., & Zulager, D. D. (1992). The effectiveness of dynamic graphics in revealing structure in multivariate data. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 24, 253-257.
50. Melanson, B., Kelso, J., & Bowman, D. (2002). Effects of active exploration and passive observation on spatial learning in a CAVE. Retrieved October 2005, from http://eprints.cs.vt.edu/archive/00000602/
51. Norman, D. A. (1990). Cognitive artifacts. La Jolla, CA: Dept. of Cognitive Science, University of California, San Diego.
52. Orion, N., Ben-Chaim, D., & Kali, Y. (1997). Relationship between earth-science education and spatial visualization. Journal of Geoscience Education, 45, 129-132.
53. Peruch, P., Vercher, J.L., & Gauthier, G. M. (1995). Acquisition of spatial knowledge through visual exploration of simulated environments. Ecological Psychology, 7(1), 1-20.
54. Philbeck, J. W., Klatzky, R. L., Behrmann, M., Loomis, J. M., & Goodridge, J. (2001). Active control of locomotion facilitates nonvisual navigation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 141-153.
55. Richardson, B. L., Wuillemin, D. B., & MacKintosh, G. J. (1981). Can passive touch be better than active touch? A comparison of active and passive tactile maze learning. British Journal of Psychology, 72, 353-362.
56. Rieber, L. P., Tzeng, S-C., & Tribble, K. (2004). Discovery learning, representation, and explanation within a computer-based simulation: Finding the right mix. Learning and Instruction, 14, 307-323.
57. Rochford, K. (1985). Spatial learning disabilities and underachievement among university anatomy students. Medical Education, 19, 13-26.
58. Russell-Gebbett, J. (1985). Skills and strategies: Pupils' approaches to three-dimensional problems in biology. Journal of Biological Education, 19, 293-298.
59. Schwan, S. & Riempp, R. (2004). The cognitive benefits of interactive videos: learning to tie nautical knots. Learning and Instruction, 14, 293-305.
60. Schwartz, D. L. & Holton, D. L. (2000). Tool use and the effect of action on the imagination. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 26, 1655-1665.
61. Shneiderman, B. (1983). Direct manipulation: A step beyond programming languages. Computer, 16(8), 57-69.
62. van Bemmel, J. H., & Musen, M. A. (Eds.) (1997). Handbook of medical informatics. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer-Verlag.
63. Wang, H.-C., Li, T.-Y., & Chang, C.-Y. (2006). A web-based tutoring system with styles-matching strategy for spatial geometric transformation. Interacting with Computers, 18(3), 331-355.
64. Wang, R.X.-F., & Simons, D.J. (1999). Active and passive scene recognition across views. Cognition, 70, 191-210.
65. Wexler, M., Kosslyn, S. M. & Berthoz, A. (1998). Motor processes in mental rotation. Cognition, 68, 77-94.
66. Wilson, M. (2002). Six views of embodied cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 9, 625-636.
67. Wilson, P. N. (1999). Active exploration of a virtual environment does not promote orientation or memory for objects. Environment and Behavior, 31, 752-763.
68. Wilson, P. N., Foreman, N., Gillett, R., & Stanton, D. (1997). Active versus passive processing of spatial information in a computer simulated environment. Ecological Psychology, 9, 207-222.
69. Wohlschlager, A., & Wohlschlager, A. (1998). Mental and manual rotation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 397-412.
70. Zelkowitz, M. V., Wallace, D.R. (1998). Experimental models for validating technology. IEEE Computer, 31(5), 23-31.
71. Zhang, J. & Norman, D.A. (1994). Representations in distributed cognitive tasks. Cognitive Science, 18, 87-122.
72. Zumbach, J., Reimann, P., & Koch, S. (2001). Influence of passive versus active information access to hypertextual information resources on cognitive and emotional parameters. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 25(3), 301-318.