Manipulating and recognizing virtual objects: Where the action is

Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology

Volumn 55, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 111-120

  James, Karin H ^b   Humphrey, G Keith ^b   Goodale, Melvyn A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; RANDOMIZATION; REACTION TIME; RECOGNITION; VISION; VISUAL ACUITY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; RANDOM ALLOCATION; REACTION TIME; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); VISUAL ACUITY; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 0035376153     PISSN: 11961961     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/h0087358     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Bach-y-Rita, P. (1974). Visual information through the skin - A tactile vision substitution system,. Transitions of the American Academy of Opthalmology and Otolaryngology, 78, 729-739.
2. Biederman, I. (1987). Recognition by components: A theory of human image understanding. Psychological Review, 94, 115-147.
3. Christou, C. G. & Bulthoff, H. H. (1999). View dependence in scene recognition after active learning. Memory & Cognition, 27, 996-1007.
4. Davis, P. J., & Hersch, R. (1981). The mathematical experience. Boston, MA: Birkhauser.
5. Dolezal, H. (1982). Living in a world transformed: Perceptual and performatory adaptation to visual distortion. New York: Academic Press.
6. Edelman, S., & Wienshall, D. (1991). A self-organizing multiple-view representation of three-dimensional objects. Biological Cybernetics, 64, 209-219.
7. Epstein, W., Hughes, B., Schneider, S. L. & Bach-y-Rita, P. (1989). Perceptual learning of spatiotemporal events: Evidence from an unfamiliar modality. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 13, 28-44.
8. Gibson, J. J. (1962). Observations on active touch. Psychological Review, 69, 477-491.
9. Gibson, J. J (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
10. Harman, K. L., Humphrey, G. K., & Goodale, M. A. (1999). Active manual control of object views facilitates visual recognition. Current Biology, 9, 1315-1318.
11. Harries, M. H., Perrett, D. I., & Lavender, A. (1991). Preferential inspection of views of 3-D model heads. Perception, 20, 669-680.
12. Held, R. (1965). Plasticity in sensory-motor systems. Scientific American, 213, 84-94.
13. Held, R., & Freedman, S. J. (1963). Plasticity in human sensorimotor control. Science, 142, 455-462.
14. Held, R., & Hein, A. (1963). Movement-produced stimulation in the development of visually guided behaviour. Journal of Comparative & Physiological Psychology, 56, 872-876.
15. Humphrey, G. K., & Jolicoeur, P. (1993). An examination of the effects of axis foreshortening, monocular depth cues, and visual field on object identification. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 46A, 137-159.
16. Humphrey, G. K., & Khan, S. C. (1992). Recognising novel views of three-dimensional objects. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 46, 170-190.
17. Jolicoeur, P., & Humphrey, G. K. (1998). In V. Walsh & J. Kulikowski (Eds.), Visual constancies; Why things look as they do. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
18. Kellert, S. H. (1994). Space perception in the fourth dimension. Man and World, 27, 161-180.
19. Locher, P., Vos, A., Stappers, P. J., & Overbeeke, K. (2000). A system for investigating 3-D form perception. Acta Psychologia, 104, 17-27.
20. Merleau-Ponty, M. (1962). Phenomenology of perception. London, UK: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
21. Neisser, U. (1976). Cognition and reality: Principles and implications of cognitive psychology. W.H. Freeman & Company.
22. Palmer, S. E., Rosch, E., & Chase, P. (1981). Canonical perspective and the perception for objects. In J. Long & A. Baddeley (Eds.), Attention and performance IX (135-151). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
23. Perrett, D. I., & Harries, M. H. (1988). Characteristic views and the visual inspection of simple faceted and smooth objects: "tetrahedra and potatoes." Perception, 17, 703-720.
24. Perrett, D. I., Harries, M. H., & Looker, S. (1992). Use of preferential inspection to define the viewing sphere and characteristic views of an arbitrary machined tool part. Perception, 21, 497-515.
25. Piaget, J. (1953). The origins of intellegence in the child. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
26. Shepard, R. N., & Cooper, L. (1982). Mental images and their transformations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
27. Shepard, R. N., & Metzler, J. (1971). Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects. Science, 171, 701-703.
28. Simons, D. J., & Wang, R. F. (1998). Perceiving real-world viewpoint changes. Psychological Science, 9, 315-320.
29. Snodgrass, J. G., & Corwin, J. (1988). Pragmatics of measuring recognition memory: Applications to dementia and amnesia. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117, 34-50.
30. Stein, J. F. (1986). Role of the cerebellum in the visual guidance of movement. Nature, 323, 217-221.
31. Tarr, M. J., & Pinker, S. (1989). Mental rotation and orientation-dependence in shape recognition. Cognitive Psychology, 21, 233-282.
32. Tong, F. H., Marlin, S. G., & Frost, B. J. (1995). Cognition map formation in a three-dimensional visual virtual world. Poster presented at the IRIS/PRECARN Workshop, Vancouver, BC.
33. Warrington, E. K., & Taylor, A. M. (1978). Two categorical stages of object recognition. Perception, 7, 695-705.
34. Wexler, M., Kosslyn, S. M., & Berthoz, A. (1998). Motor processes in mental rotation. Cognition, 68, 77-94.
35. Wohlschlager, A., & Wohlschlager, A. (1998). Mental and manual rotation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 397-412.