Active manual control of object views facilitates visual recognition

Current Biology

Volumn 9, Issue 22, 1999, Pages 1315-1318

  Harman, Karin L ^a   Humphrey, G Keith ^a   Goodale, Melvyn A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0033581950     PISSN: 09609822     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0960-9822(00)80053-6     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Held R, Hein A: Movement-produced stimulation in the development of visually guided behaviour. J Comp Physiol Psychol 1963, 56:872-876.
2. Held R, Freedman SJ: Plasticity in human sensorimotor control. Science 1963, 142:455-462.
3. Simons DJ, Wang RF: Perceiving real-world viewpoint changes. Psychol Sci 1998, 9:315-320.
4. Perrett DI, Harries MH: Characteristic views and the visual inspection of simple faceted and smooth objects: 'tetrahedra and potatoes'. Percep 1989, 17:703-720.
5. Perret DI, Harries MH, Looker S: Use of preferential inspection to define the viewing sphere and characteristic views of an arbitrary machined tool part. Percep 1992, 21:497-515.
6. Harries MH, Perrett DI, Lavender A: Preferential inspection of views of 3-D model heads. Percep 1991, 20:669-680.
7. Biederman I: Recognition-by-components: A theory of human image understanding. Psychol Rev 1989, 94:115-147.
8. Humphrey GK, Goodale MA, Jakobson LS, Servos P: The role of surface information in object recognition: Studies of a visual form agnosic and normal subjects. Percep 1994, 23:1457-1481.
9. Humphrey GK, Khan SC: Recognizing novel views of 3D objects. Can J Psychol 1991, 46:170-190.
10. Harman KL, Humphrey GK: Encoding 'regular' and 'random' sequences of views of novel 3D objects. Percep 1999, 28:601-616.
11. Humphrey GK, Jolicoeur P: An examination of the effects of axis foreshortening, monocular depth cues and visual field on object identification. Quart J Exp Psychol 1993, A 46:137-159.