Only One? The Default Interventionist Perspective as a Unimodel-Commentary on Evans & Stanovich (2013)

Perspectives on Psychological Science

Volumn 8, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 242-247

  Kruglanski, Arie W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84877155197     PISSN: 17456916     EISSN: 17456924     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1745691613483477     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Chaiken S.,Liberman A.,Eagly A. H.Unintended thought. Uleman J. S.Bargh J. A., ed. New York, NY: Guilford Press; 1989:212-252.
2. Epstein S.Integration of the cognitive and the psychodynamic unconscious.American Psychologist. 1994;49:709-724.
3. Evans J. St. B. T. Proceedings of the 28th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society; 2006Vancouver, Canada; 2006.
4. Evans J. St. B. T.,Stanovich K. E.Dual-process theories of higher cognition: Advancing the debate.Perspectives in Psychological Science. 2013;8:223-241.
5. Frenkel-Brunswick E.Intolerance of ambiguity as an emotional and perceptual personality variable.Journal of Personality. 1949;18:108-143.
6. Gigerenzer G.Surrogates for theory.APS Observer. 2009;22 (2): 21.
7. Greene J.,Nystrom L. E.,Engell A. D.,Darley J. M.,Cohen J. D.The neural basis of cognitive conflict and control in moral judgment.Neuron. 2004;44:389-400.
8. Higgins E. T.Social psychology: A handbook of basic processes. Higgins E. T.Kruglanski A. W., ed. New York. NY: Guilford Press; 1996:133-168.
9. Holyoak K. J.,Koh K.,Nisbett R. E.A theory of conditioned reasoning: Inductive learning within rule-based hierarchies.Psychological Review. 1989;96:315-340.
10. Kahneman D.A perspective on judgment and choice: Mapping.American Psychologist. 2003;58:697-720.
11. Kahneman D.Thinking, fast and slow. New York, NY: McMillan; 2011:.
12. Keren G.,Schul Y.Two is not always better than one: A critical evaluation of two-system theories.Perspectives on Psychological Science. 2009;4:533-550.
13. Kruglanski A. W.The psychology of closed mindedness. New York, NY: Psychology Press; 2004:.
14. Kruglanski A. W.,Belanger J.,Chen X.,Kopetz C.,Pierro A.,Mannetti L.The energetics of motivated cognition: A force field analysis.Psychological Review. 2012;119:1-20.
15. Kruglanski A. W.,Gigerenzer G.Intuitive and deliberate judgments are based on common principles.Psychological Review. 2011;118:97-109.
16. Kruglanski A. W.,Pierro A.,Mannetti L.,DeGrada E.Groups as epistemic providers: Need for closure and the unfolding of group-centrism.Psychological Review. 2006;113:84-100.
17. Kruglanski A. W.,Pierro A.,Mannetti L.,Erb H.-P.,Chun W. Y.Advances in experimental social psychology. Zanna M. P., ed. New York, NY: Academic Press; 2007:255-303.
18. Kruglanski A. W.,Webster D. M.Motivated closing of the mind: "Seizing" and "freezing.".Psychological Review. 1996;103:263-283.
19. Lieberman M. D.Fundamentals of social neuroscience. Harmon-Jones E.Winkleman P., ed. New York, NY: Guilford Press; 2007:290-315.
20. Lieberman M. D.In two minds: Dual processes and beyond. Evans J. St. B. T.Frankish K., ed. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press; 2009:293-316.
21. Lindquist K. A.,Wager T. D.,Kober H.,Bliss-Moreau E.,Barrett L. F.The brain basis of emotion: A meta-analytic review.Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 2011;173:1-86.
22. McClure S. M.,Laibson D. I.,Loewenstein G.,Cohen J. D.Separate neural systems value immediate and delayed monetary rewards.Science. 2004;306:503-507.
23. Nisbett R. E.,Fong G. T.,Lehman D. R.,Cheng P. W.Teaching reasoning.Science. 1987;238:625-631.
24. Osman M.An evaluation of dual-process theories of reasoning.Psychological Bulletin and Review. 2004;11:988-1010.
25. Pessoa L.On the relationship between emotion and cognition.Nature Reviews Neuroscience. 2008;9:148-158.
26. Sedlmeier P.Improving statistical reasoning: Theoretical models and practical implications. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum; 1999:.
27. Shackman A. J.,Salomons T. V.,Slagter H. A.,Fox A. S.,Winter J. J.,Davidson R. J.The integration of negative affect, pain and cognitive control in the cingulate cortex.Nature Reviews Neuroscience. 2011;12:154-167.
28. Sloman S. A.The empirical case for two systems of reasoning.Psychological Bulletin. 1996;119:3-22.
29. Stanovich K. E.,West R. F.Individual differences in rational thought.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 1998;127:161-188.