Cross-Modal Stimulus Conflict: The Behavioral Effects of Stimulus Input Timing in a Visual-Auditory Stroop Task

PLoS ONE

Volumn 8, Issue 4, 2013, Pages

  Donohue, Sarah E ^a,b,c,d   Appelbaum, Lawrence G ^a,b   Park, Christina J ^a,e   Roberts, Kenneth C ^a   Woldorff, Marty G ^a,b,c,d  

^a DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b DUKE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c OTTO VON GUERICKE UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^d LEIBNIZ INSTITUTE FOR NEUROBIOLOGY   (Germany)

^e SMITH COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE; COGNITION; CORTICAL SYNCHRONIZATION; EVOKED AUDITORY RESPONSE; EVOKED VISUAL RESPONSE; FACILITATION; FEMALE; HEARING; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PSYCHOMETRY; RESPONSE TIME; STROOP TEST; VISION; VISUAL INFORMATION; VISUAL STIMULATION; BEHAVIOR; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; REACTION TIME; YOUNG ADULT;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOMETRICS; REACTION TIME; STROOP TEST; VISUAL PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84876913812     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0062802     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Stroop JR, (1935) Studies of Interference in Serial Verbal Reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology-General 18: 643-662.
2. Macleod CM, (1991) Half a century of research on the Stroop effect- An integrative review. Psychological Bulletin 109: 163-203.
3. MacLeod CM, (1998) Training on integrated versus separated Stroop tasks: The progression of interference and facilitation. Memory & Cognition 26: 201-211.
4. Brown TL, Gore CL, Pearson T, (1998) Visual half-field stroop effects with spatial separation of words and color targets. Brain and Language 63: 122-142.
5. Roelofs A, (2005) The visual-auditory color-word Stroop asymmetry and its time course. Memory & Cognition 33: 1325-1336.
6. Shimada H, (1990) Effect of Auditory Presentation of Words on Color Naming- the Intermodal Stroop Effect. Perceptual and Motor Skills 70: 1155-1161.
7. Chen YC, Spence C, (2010) When hearing the bark helps to identify the dog: Semantically-congruent sounds modulate the identification of masked pictures. Cognition 114: 389-404.
8. Chen Y-C, Spence C, (2011) Crossmodal Semantic Priming by Naturalistic Sounds and Spoken Words Enhances Visual Sensitivity. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance 37: 1554-1568.
9. Molholm S, Ritter W, Javitt DC, Foxe JJ, (2004) Multisensory visual-auditory object recognition in humans: A high-density electrical mapping study. Cerebral Cortex 14: 452-465.
10. Yuval-Greenberg S, Deouell LY, (2009) The dog's meow: asymmetrical interaction in cross-modal object recognition. Experimental Brain Research 193: 603-614.
11. West R, Alain C, (1999) Event-related neural activity associated with the Stroop task. Cognitive Brain Research 8: 157-164.
12. Fiebelkorn IC, Foxe JJ, Molholm S, (2010) Dual Mechanisms for the Cross-Sensory Spread of Attention: How Much Do Learned Associations Matter? Cerebral Cortex 20: 109-120.
13. Stuart DM, Carrasco M, (1993) SEMANTIC COMPONENT OF A CROSS-MODAL STROOP-LIKE TASK. American Journal of Psychology 106: 383-405.
14. Bertelson P, Radeau M, (1981) Cross-Modal Bias and Perceptual Fusion with Auditory-Visual Spatial Discordance. Perception & Psychophysics 29: 578-584.
15. Alais D, Burr D, (2004) The ventriloquist effect results from near-optimal bimodal integration. Current Biology 14: 257-262.
16. Sugg MJ, McDonald JE, (1994) Time-course of inihibition in color-response and word-response versions of the Stroop task. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance 20: 647-675.
17. Dyer FN, (1971) The effect of word meaning response: Stroop interference for different preexposures of the word. Psychonomic Science 25: 229-231.
18. Glaser MO, Glaser WR, (1982) Time course analysis of the Stroop phenomenon. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 8: 875-894.
19. Glaser WR, Dungelhoff FJ, (1984) The time course of picture-word interference. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 10: 640-654.
20. Lu CH, Proctor RW, (2001) Influence of irrelevant information on human performance: effects of S-R association strength and relative timing. Q J Exp Psychol A 54: 95-136.
21. Sugg MJ, McDonald JE, (1994) Time course of inhibition in color-response and word-response versions of the Stroop task. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 20: 647-675.
22. Taylor DA, (1977) Time Course of Context Effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 4: 404-426.
23. Appelbaum LG, Meyerhoff KL, Woldorff MG, (2009) Priming and Backward Influences in the Human Brain: Processing Interactions during the Stroop Interference Effect. Cerebral Cortex 19: 2508-2521.
24. Appelbaum LG, Boehler CN, Won R, Davis L, Woldorff MG, (2012) Strategic allocation of attention reduces temporally predictable stimulus conflict. Journal of cognitive neuroscience 24: 1834-1848.
25. Coderre E, Conklin K, van Heuven WJB, (2011) Electrophysiological measures of conflict detection and resolution in the Stroop task. Brain Research 1413: 51-59.
26. Colavita FB, (1974) Human Sensory Dominance. Perception & Psychophysics 16: 409-412.
27. Sinnett S, Soto-Faraco S, Spence C, (2008) The co-occurrence of multisensory competition and facilitation. Acta Psychologica 128: 153-161.
28. Shore DI, Spence C, Klein RM (2001) Visual prior entry. 205-212.
29. Zampini M, Shore DI, Spence C, (2005) Audiovisual prior entry. Neuroscience Letters 381: 217-222.
30. Moore CM, Egeth H, Berglan LR, Luck SJ, (1996) Are attentional dwell times inconsistent with serial visual search? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 3: 360-365.
31. De Gelder B, Bertelson P, (2004) Multisensory integration, perception and ecological validity (vol 7, pg 460, 2003). Trends in Cognitive Sciences 8: 7-7.
32. Doehrmann O, Naumer MJ, (2008) Semantics and the multisensory brain: How meaning modulates processes of audio-visual integration. Brain Research 1242: 136-150.
33. Yuval-Greenberg S, Deouell LY, (2007) What you see is not (always) what you hear: Induced gamma band responses reflect cross-modal interactions in familiar object recognition. Journal of Neuroscience 27: 1090-1096.
34. Beierholm UR, Quartz SR, Shams L (2009) Bayesian priors are encoded independently from likelihoods in human multisensory perception. Journal of Vision 9.
35. Shams L, Kamitani Y, Shimojo S, (2000) Illusions- What you see is what you hear. Nature 408: 788-788.
36. Mondor TA, Amirault KJ, (1998) Effect of same- and different-modality spatial cues on auditory and visual target identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance 24: 745-755.
37. Beauchamp MS, Lee KE, Argall BD, Martin A, (2004) Integration of auditory and visual information about objects in superior temporal sulcus. Neuron 41: 809-823.
38. Gielen S, Schmidt RA, Vandenheuvel PJM, (1983) On the nature of intersensory facilitation of reaction time. Perception & Psychophysics 34: 161-168.
39. Tulving E, Schacter DL, (1990) Priming and human-memory systems Science. 247: 301-306.
40. Tipper SP, (1985) The negative priming effect- inhibitory priming by ignored objects. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section a-Human Experimental Psychology 37: 571-590.
41. Enns JT, Di Lollo V, (2000) What's new in visual masking? Trends in Cognitive Sciences 4: 345-352.
42. Shore DI, Barnes ME, Spence C, (2006) Temporal aspects of the visuotactile congruency effect. Neuroscience Letters 392: 96-100.
43. Shore DI, Simic N, (2005) Integration of visual and tactile stimuli: top-down influences require time. Experimental Brain Research 166: 509-517.
44. Brown TL, (2011) The Relationship Between Stroop Interference and Facilitation Effects: Statistical Artifacts, Baselines, and a Reassessment. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance 37: 85-99.
45. van Veen V, Cohen JD, Botvinick MM, Stenger VA, Carter CS, (2001) Anterior cingulate cortex, conflict monitoring, and levels of processing. Neuroimage 14: 1302-1308.
46. Zysset S, Muller K, Lohmann G, von Cramon DY, (2001) Color-word matching stroop task: Separating interference and response conflict. Neuroimage 13: 29-36.
47. Szucs D, Soltesz F, (2010) Stimulus and response conflict in the color-word Stroop task: A combined electro-myography and event-related potential study. Brain Research 1325: 63-76.
48. van Veen V, Carter CS, (2005) Separating semantic conflict and response conflict in the Stroop task: A functional MRI study. Neuroimage 27: 497-504.
49. Correa A, Sanabria D, Spence C, Tudela P, Lupianez J, (2006) Selective temporal attention enhances the temporal resolution of visual perception: Evidence from a temporal order judgment task. Brain Research 1070: 202-205.
50. Donohue SE, Woldorff MG, Mitroff SR, (2010) Video game players show more precise multisensory temporal processing abilities. Attention Perception & Psychophysics 72: 1120-1129.
51. Schneider KA, Bavelier D (2003) Components of visual prior entry. 333-366.
52. Zampini M, Guest S, Shore DI, (2005) Audio-visual simultaneity judgments. Perception & Psychophysics 67: 531-544.
53. Stein BE, Meredith MA (1993) The Cambridge: MIT Press.
54. van Wassenhove V, Grant KW, Poeppel D, (2007) Temporal window of integration in auditory-visual speech perception. Neuropsychologia 45: 598-607.
55. Spence C, Parise C, (2010) Prior-entry: A review. Consciousness and Cognition 19: 364-379.
56. Vatakis A, Spence C, (2007) Crossmodal binding: Evaluating the "unity assumption" using audiovisual speech stimuli. Perception & Psychophysics 69: 744-756.
57. Vatakis A, Ghazanfar AA, Spence C (2008) Facilitation of multisensory integration by the "unity effect" reveals that speech is special. Journal of Vision 8.
58. Cisek P, (2007) Cortical mechanisms of action selection: the affordance competition hypothesis. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences 362: 1585-1599.