Dual mechanisms for the cross-sensory spread of attention: How much do learned associations matter?

Cerebral Cortex

Volumn 20, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 109-120

  Fiebelkorn, Ian C ^a,b   Foxe, John J ^a,b   Molholm, Sophie ^a,b  

^a CITY COLLEGE OF NEW YORK   (United States)

^b NATHAN S KLINE INSTITUTE FOR PSYCHIATRIC RESEARCH   (United States)

Author keywords

Auditory; Binding; Electrophysiology; Multisensory; Visual

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; AUDITORY STIMULATION; BRAIN CORTEX; BRAIN REGION; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LEARNING; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEMANTICS; SENSORY ANALYSIS; VISUAL STIMULATION;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; ASSOCIATION; ATTENTION; CEREBRAL CORTEX; EVOKED POTENTIALS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PHOTIC STIMULATION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 72049090681     PISSN: 10473211     EISSN: 14602199     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhp083     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Amedi A, Von KK, Van Atteveldt NM, Beauchamp MS, Naumer MJ. 2005. Functional imaging of human crossmodal identification and object recognition. Exp Brain Res. 166:559-571.
2. Blaser E, Pylyshyn W, Holcombe A. 2000. Tracking an object through feature space. Nature. 408:196-199.
3. Busse L, Roberts KC, Crist RE, Weissman DH, Woldorff MG. 2005. The spread of attention across modalities and space in a multisensory object. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 102:18751-18756.
4. Chelazzi L, Duncan J, Miller EK, Desimone R. 1998. Responses of neurons in inferior temporal cortex during memory-guided visual search. J Neurophysiol. 80:2918-2940.
5. Chelazzi L, Miller EK, Duncan J, Desimone R. 1993. A neural basis for visual search in inferior temporal cortex. Nature. 363:345-347.
6. Crowley KE, Colrain IM. 2004. A review of the evidence for P2 being and independent component process: age, sleep and modality. Clin Neurophysiol. 115:732-744.
7. Desimone R, Duncan J. 1995. Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. Annu Rev Neurosci. 18:193-222.
8. Duncan J. 2006. EPS Mid-Career Award 2004: brain mechanisms of attention. Q J Exp Psychol. 59:2-27.
9. Egly R, Driver J, Rafal RD. 1994. Shifting visual attention between objects and locations: evidence from normal and parietal lesion subjects. J Exp Psychol Gen. 123:161-177.
10. Eimer M, Shroger E. 1998. ERP effects of inter-modal attention and cross-modal links in spatial attention. Psychophysiology. 35:313-337.
11. Greene AJ, Easton RD, LaShell LS. 2001. Visual-auditory events: cross-modal perceptual priming and recognition memory. Conscious Cogn. 10:425-435.
12. Guthrie D, Buchwald JS. 1991. Significance testing of difference potentials. Psychophysiology. 28:240-244.
13. Hansen JC, Hillyard SA. 1980. Endogenous brain potentials associated with selective auditory attention. Electroencephalogr Clin Neuro-physiol. 499:277-290.
14. Hillyard SA, Simpson GV, Woods DL, VanVoorhis S, Munte TF. 1984. Event-related brain potentials and selective attention to different modalities. In: Reinoso-Suarez F, Aimone-Marsan C, editors. Cortical integration. New York: Raven Press. p. 395-413.
15. James TW, Humphrey GK, Gati JS, Servos P, Menon RS, Goodale MA. 2002. Haptic study of three-dimensional objects activates extras-triate visual areas. Neuropsychologia. 40:1706-1714.
16. Kutas M, Hillyard SA. 1980. Reading senseless sentences: brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. Science. 207:203-205.
17. Martinez A, Teder-Salejarvi WA, Hillyard SA. 2007. Spatial attention facilitates selection of illusory objects: evidence from event-related brain potentials. Brain Res. 1139:143-152.
18. Martinez A, Teder-Salejarvi W, Vazquez M, Molholm S, Foxe JJ, Javitt DC, Di Russo F, Worden MS, Hillyard SA. 2006. Objects are highlighted by spatial attention. J Cogn Neurosci. 18:298-310.
19. McCarthy G, Wood CC. 1985. Scalp distributions of event-related potentials: an ambiguity associated with analysis of variance models. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 62:203-208.
20. McDonald JJ, Teder-Salejarvi WA, Di Russo F, Hillyard SA. 2003. Neural substrates of perceptual enhancement by cross-modal spatial attention. J Cogn Neurosci. 15:10-19.
21. McDonald JJ, Teder-Salejarvi WA, Hillyard SA. 2000. Involuntary orienting to sound improves visual perception. Nature. 407:906-908.
22. Melcher D, Vidnyanszky Z. 2006. Subthreshold features of objects: unseen but not unbound. Vision Res. 46:1863-1867.
23. Molholm S, Martinez A, Shpaner M, Foxe JJ. 2007. Object-based attention is multisensory: co-activation of an object's represen-tations in ignored sensory modalities. Euro J Neurosci. 26:499-509.
24. Molholm S, Ritter W, Javitt DC, Foxe JJ. 2004. Multisensory visual-auditory object recognition in humans: a high-density electrical mapping study. Cereb Cortex. 14:452-465.
25. Molholm S, Ritter W, Murray MM, Javitt DC, Schroeder CE, Foxe JJ. 2002. Multisensory auditory-visual interactions during early sensory processing in humans: a high-density electrical mapping study. Cogn Brain Res. 14:115-128.
26. Murray MM, Molholm S, Michel CM, Heslenfeld DJ, Ritter W, Javitt DC, Schroeder CE, Foxe JJ. 2005. Grabbing your ear: rapid auditory-somatosensory multisensory interactions in low-level sensory cortices are not constrained by stimulus alignment. Cereb Cortex. 15(7):963-974.
27. Naatanen R, Gaillard AWK, Mantysalo S. 1978. Early selective-attention effect on evoked potential reinterpreted. Acta Psychol. 42:313-329.
28. O'Craven KM, Downing PE, Kanwisher N. 1999. fMRI evidence for objects as the units of attentional selection. Nature. 401:584-587.
29. Robertson LC. 2003. Binding, spatial attention and perceptual awareness. Nat Rev Neurosci. 4:93-102.
30. Saenz M, Buracas GT, Boynton GM. 2003. Global feature-based attention for motion and color. Vision Res. 43:629-637.
31. Schoenfeld MA, Tempelmann C, Martinez A, Hopf JM, Sattler C, Heinze HJ, Hillyard SA. 2003. Dynamics of feature binding during object-selective attention. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 100: 11806-11811.
32. Serences JT, Yantis S. 2006. Selective visual attention and perceptual coherence. Trends Cogn Sci. 10(1):38-45.
33. Stroop JR. 1935. Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. J Exp Psychol. 18:643-662.
34. Talsma D, Doty TJ, Woldorff MG. 2007. Selective attention and audiovisual integration: is attending to both modalities a prerequisite for early integration? Cereb Cortex. 17:679-690.
35. Talsma D, Kok A. 2001. Nonspatial intermodal selective attention is mediated by sensory brain areas: evidence from event-related potentials. Psychophysiology. 38:736-751.
36. Teder-Salejarvi WA, Munte TF, Franz-Jurgen S, Hillyard SA. 1999. Intramodal and cross-modal spatial attention to auditory and visual stimuli. An event-related brain potential study. Cogn Brain Res. 8:327-343.
37. Treisman A, Gelade G. 1980. A feature-integration theory of attention. Cogn Psychol. 12:97-136.
38. Treue S, Martinez-Trujillo JC. 1996. Feature-based attention influences motion processing gain in macaque visual cortex. Nature. 399:575-579.
39. Van der Burg E, Olivers CNL, Bronkhorst AW, Theeuwes J. 2008. Pip and pop: nonspatial auditory signals improve spatial visual search. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 34(5):1053-1065.
40. Wylie GR, Javitt DC, Foxe JJ. 2003. Task switching: a high-density electrical mapping study. Neuroimage. 20:2322-2342.
41. Wylie GR, Javitt DC, Foxe JJ. 2004. Don't think of a white bear: an investigation of the effects of sequential instructional sets on cortical activity in a task-switching paradigm. Hum Brain Mapp. 21(4):279-297.
42. Wylie GR, Javitt DC, Foxe JJ. 2006. Jumping the gun: is effective preparation contingent upon anticipatory activation in task-relevant neural circuitry. Cereb Cortex. 16(3):394-404.