Evolutionary and ecological implications of sexual parasitism

Trends in Ecology and Evolution

Volumn 28, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 297-306

  Lehtonen, Jussi ^a   Schmidt, Daniel J ^b   Heubel, Katja ^c   Kokko, Hanna ^a  

^a AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DEGRADATION; EVOLUTION; EVOLUTIONARY THEORY; GENOMICS; HOST-PARASITE INTERACTION; PARASITISM; SEXUAL REPRODUCTION;

ANIMAL; ECOSYSTEM; EVOLUTION; GENETICS; HYBRIDIZATION; PHYSIOLOGY; REPRODUCTION; REVIEW;

ANIMALS; BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; ECOSYSTEM; HYBRIDIZATION, GENETIC; REPRODUCTION;

EID: 84876696791     PISSN: 01695347     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2012.12.006     Document Type: Review

References (100)

1. Hubbs C.L., Hubbs L.C. Apparent parthenogenesis in nature, in a form of fish of hybrid origin. Science 1932, 76:628-630.
2. D'Souza T.G., Michiels N.K. Sex in parthenogenetic planarians: phylogenetic relic or evolutionary resurrection?. Lost Sex 2009, 377-397. Springer. I. Schön (Ed.).
3. Grebelnyi S.D. Unisexual reproduction: either maternal or paternal inheritance. Russ. J. Dev. Biol. 2009, 40:145-149.
4. Lamatsch D.K., Stöck M. Sperm-dependent parthenogenesis and hybridogenesis in teleost fish. Lost Sex 2009, 399-432. Springer. I. Schön (Ed.).
5. Vorburger C., et al. Masked damage: mutational load in hemiclonal water frogs. Lost Sex 2009, 433-446. Springer. I. Schön (Ed.).
6. Pigneur L.M., et al. Androgenesis: a review through the study of the selfish shellfish Corbicula spp. Heredity 2012, 108:581-591.
7. Hedtke S.M., et al. All-male asexuality: origin and maintenance of androgenesis in the asian clam Corbicula. Evolution 2008, 62:1119-1136.
8. Schlupp I., Riesch R. Evolution of unisexual reproduction. Ecology and Evolution of Poeciliid Fishes 2011, 50-58. University of Chicago Press. J.P. Evans (Ed.).
9. Nava J.L.R., et al. Molecular evidence for the natural production of homozygous Cupressus sempervirens L. lines by Cupressus dupreziana seed trees. Heredity 2010, 104:185-190.
10. Pichot C., et al. Surrogate mother for endangered Cupressus. Nature 2001, 412:39.
11. McKone M.J., Halpern S.L. The evolution of androgenesis. Am. Nat. 2003, 161:641-656.
12. Schlupp I. Mate choice and the Amazon molly: how sexuality and unisexuality can coexist. J. Hered. 2010, 101:S55-S61.
13. Schlupp I. Behavior of fishes in the sexual/unisexual mating system of the Amazon molly (Poecilia formosa). Advances in the Study of Behavior 2009, Vol. 39:153-183. Elsevier.
14. Mogensen H.L. The hows and whys of cytoplasmic inheritance in seed plants. Am. J. Bot. 1996, 83:383-404.
15. Maynard Smith J. The Evolution of Sex 1978, Cambridge University Press.
16. Lehtonen J., et al. The many costs of sex. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2012, 27:172-178.
17. Meirmans S., et al. The costs of sex: facing real-world complexities. Q. Rev. Biol. 2012, 87:19-40.
18. Burt A., Trivers R. Genes in Conflict: The Biology of Selfish Genetic Elements 2006, Belknap Press.
19. Kiester A.R., et al. Population dynamics of species with gynogenetic sibling species. Theor. Popul. Biol. 1981, 19:358-369.
20. Kokko H., Heubel K.U. Prudent males, group adaptation, and the tragedy of the commons. Oikos 2011, 120:641-656.
21. Beukeboom L.W., Vrijenhoek R.C. Evolutionary genetics and ecology of sperm-dependent parthenogenesis. J. Evol. Biol. 1998, 11:755-782.
22. Bengtsson B.O. Asex and evolution: a very large-scale overview. Lost Sex 2009, 1-19. Springer. I. Schön (Ed.).
23. Hartfield M., Keightley P.D. Current hypotheses for the evolution of sex and recombination. Integr. Zool. 2012, 7:192-209.
24. Stöck M., et al. Monophyletic origin of multiple clonal lineages in an asexual fish (Poecilia formosa). Mol. Ecol. 2010, 19:5204-5215.
25. Lynch M., et al. The mutational meltdown in asexual populations. J. Hered. 1993, 84:339-344.
26. Schlupp I. The evolutionary ecology of gynogenesis. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 2005, 36:399-417.
27. Bullini L. Origin and evolution of animal hybrid species. Trends Ecol. Evol. 1994, 9:422-426.
28. Choleva L., et al. Synthesis of clonality and polyploidy in vertebrate animals by hybridization between two sexual species. Evolution 2012, 66:2191-2203.
29. Wirtz P. Mother species-father species: unidirectional hybridization in animals with female choice. Anim. Behav. 1999, 58:1-12.
30. Engeler B., Reyer H.U. Choosy females and indiscriminate males: mate choice in mixed populations of sexual and hybridogenetic water frogs (Rana lessonae, Rana esculenta). Behav. Ecol. 2001, 12:600-606.
31. Lima N.R.W., et al. Evolution of sexual mimicry in sperm-dependent all-female forms of Poeciliopsis (Pisces: Poeciliidae). J. Evol. Biol. 1996, 9:185-203.
32. Dries L.A. Peering through the looking glass at a sexual parasite: are Amazon mollies red queens?. Evolution 2003, 57:1387-1396.
33. Abbott R., et al. Hybridization and speciation. J. Evol. Biol. 2013, 26:229-246.
34. Scali V. Metasexual stick insects: model pathways to losing sex and bringing it back. Lost Sex 2009, 317-345. Springer. I. Schön (Ed.).
35. Hedtke S.M., et al. Rare gene capture in predominantly androgenetic species. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2011, 108:9520-9524.
36. Houki S., et al. Origin and possible role of males in hermaphroditic androgenetic Corbicula clams. Zool. Sci. 2011, 28:526-531.
37. Choleva L., et al. Making it on their own: sperm-dependent hybrid fishes (Cobitis) switch the sexual hosts and expand beyond the ranges of their original sperm donors. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci. 2008, 363:2911-2919.
38. Abbott J.K. Intra-locus sexual conflict and sexually antagonistic genetic variation in hermaphroditic animals. Proc. R. Soc. B. 2011, 278:161-169.
39. Engelstädter J. Constraints on the evolution of asexual reproduction. Bioessays 2008, 30:1138-1150.
40. Hamilton W.D. Extraordinary sex ratios. Science 1967, 156:477.
41. Jaenike J. Sex chromosome meiotic drive. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 2001, 32:25-49.
42. Engelstädter J., Hurst G.D.D. The ecology and evolution of microbes that manipulate host reproduction. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 2009, 40:127-149.
43. Tinti F., Scali V. Androgenetics and triploids from an interacting parthenogenetic hybrid and its ancestors in stick insects. Evolution 1996, 50:1251-1258.
44. Mantovani B., Scali V. Hybridogenesis and androgenesis in the stick-insect Bacillus rossius-grandii benazzii (Insecta, Phasmatodea). Evolution 1992, 46:783-796.
45. Fournier D., et al. Clonal reproduction by males and females in the little fire ant. Nature 2005, 435:1230-1234.
46. Kobayashi K., et al. Clonal reproduction by males of the ant Vollenhovia emeryi (Wheeler). Entomol. Sci. 2008, 11:167-172.
47. Pearcy M., et al. Sib mating without inbreeding in the longhorn crazy ant. Proc. R. Soc. B 2011, 278:2677-2681.
48. Schmidt D.J., et al. Cytonuclear evidence for hybridogenetic reproduction in natural populations of the Australian carp gudgeon (Hypseleotris: Eleotridae). Mol. Ecol. 2011, 20:3367-3380.
49. Hellriegel B., Reyer H.U. Factors influencing the composition of mixed populations of a hemiclonal hybrid and its sexual host. J. Evol. Biol. 2000, 13:906-918.
50. Som C., et al. The effect of assortative mating on the coexistence of a hybridogenetic waterfrog and its sexual host. Am. Nat. 2000, 156:34-46.
51. Edward D.A., Chapman T. The evolution and significance of male mate choice. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2011, 26:647-654.
52. Schmeller D.S., et al. Male adaptive stupidity: male mating pattern in hybridogenetic frogs. Evol. Ecol. Res. 2005, 7:1039-1050.
53. Schlupp I., et al. Benefit to male sailfin mollies of mating with heterospecific females. Science 1994, 263:373-374.
54. Jennions M., Kokko H. Sexual selection. Evolutionary Behavioral Ecology 2010, 343-364. Oxford University Press. D.F. Westneat, C.W. Fox (Eds.).
55. Mee J.A., Otto S.P. Variation in the strength of male mate choice allows long-term coexistence of sperm-dependent asexuals and their sexual hosts. Evolution 2010, 64:2808-2819.
56. Kokko H., et al. How populations persist when asexuality requires sex: the spatial dynamics of coping with sperm parasites. Proc. R. Soc. B 2008, 275:817-825.
57. Heubel K.U., et al. How to go extinct by mating too much: population consequences of male mate choice and efficiency in a sexual-asexual species complex. Oikos 2009, 118:513-520.
58. Schlupp I., et al. Male mate choice in mixed bisexual unisexual breeding complexes of Poecilia (Teleostei, Poeciliidae). Ethology 1991, 88:215-222.
59. Lampert K.P. Clonal reproduction in freshwater fish: mechanisms, systematic overview, genetic and ecological consequences. Fundam. Appl. Limnol. 2009, 174:245-260.
60. Charlesworth B., Charlesworth D. Rapid fixation of deleterious alleles can be caused by Muller's ratchet. Genet. Res. 1997, 70:63-73.
61. Muller H.J. The relation of recombination to mutational advance. Mutat. Res. 1964, 1:2-9.
62. Schwander T., Crespi B.J. Twigs on the tree of life? Neutral and selective models for integrating macroevolutionary patterns with microevolutionary processes in the analysis of asexuality. Mol. Ecol. 2009, 18:28-42.
63. Janko K., et al. Do clones degenerate over time? Explaining the genetic variability of asexuals through population genetic models. Biol. Direct 2011, 6:17.
64. Neiman M., Schwander T. Using parthenogenetic lineages to identify advantages of sex. Evol. Biol. 2011, 38:115-123.
65. Neiman M., et al. What can asexual lineage age tell us about the maintenance of sex?. Year in Evolutionary Biology 2009, 2009:185-200. Wiley-Blackwell.
66. Loewe L., Lamatsch D.K. Quantifying the threat of extinction from Muller's ratchet in the diploid Amazon molly (Poecilia formosa). BMC Evol. Biol. 2008, 8:88.
67. Lampert K.P., Schartl M. A little bit is better than nothing: the incomplete parthenogenesis of salamanders, frogs and fish. BMC Biol. 2010, 8:78.
68. D'Souza T.G., Michiels N.K. The costs and benefits of occasional sex: theoretical predictions and a case study. J. Hered. 2010, 101:S34-S41.
69. Charney N.D. Relating hybrid advantage and genome replacement in unisexual salamanders. Evolution 2012, 66:1387-1397.
70. Mee J.A., Taylor E.B. The cybrid invasion: widespread postglacial dispersal by Phoxinus (Pisces: Cyprinidae) cytoplasmic hybrids. Can. J. Zool. 2012, 90:577-584.
71. D'Souza T.G., et al. Occasional sex in an 'asexual' polyploid hermaphrodite. Proc. Biol. Soc. 2004, 271:1001-1007.
72. Christiansen D.G., Reyer H.U. From clonal to sexual hybrids: genetic recombination via triploids in all-hybrid populations of water frogs. Evolution 2009, 63:1754-1768.
73. Neaves W.B., Baumann P. Unisexual reproduction among vertebrates. Trends Genet. 2011, 27:81-88.
74. Milani L., et al. Reticulate evolution in stick insects: the case of Clonopsis (Insecta Phasmida). BMC Evol. Biol. 2010, 10:258.
75. Schartl M., Meierjohann S. Oncogenetics. Ecology and Evolution of Poeciliid Fishes 2011, 285-300. University of Chicago Press. J.P. Evans (Ed.).
76. Schultz M.E., Schultz R.J. Differences in response to a chemical carcinogen within species and clones of the livebearing fish, Poeciliopsis. Carcinogenesis 1988, 9:1029-1032.
77. Schartl A., et al. Susceptibility to the development of pigment cell tumors in a clone of the Amazon molly, Poecilia formosa, introduced through a microchromosome. Cancer Res. 1997, 57:2993-3000.
78. Schlupp I., et al. Equal fecundity in asexual and sexual mollies (Poecilia). Environ. Biol. Fish. 2010, 88:201-206.
79. D'Souza T.G., Michiels N.K. Correlations between sex rate estimates and fitness across predominantly parthenogenetic flatworm populations. J. Evol. Biol. 2008, 21:276-286.
80. Lamatsch D.K., et al. Unusual triploid males in a microchromosome-carrying clone of the Amazon molly, Poecilia formosa. Cytogenet. Cell Genet. 2000, 91:148-156.
81. Leniaud L., et al. Social hybridogenesis in the clonal ant Cataglyphis hispanica. Curr. Biol. 2012, 22:1188-1193.
82. Schwander T., Keller L. Evolution: sociality as a driver of unorthodox reproduction. Curr. Biol. 2012, 22:R525-R527.
83. Pichot C., et al. Cypress surrogate mother produces haploid progeny from alien pollen. Genetics 2008, 178:379-383.
84. Lamatsch D.K., et al. Diploid Amazon mollies (Poecilia formosa) show a higher fitness than triploids in clonal competition experiments. Evol. Ecol. 2009, 23:687-697.
85. Lampert K.P., et al. A tetraploid Amazon molly, Poecilia formosa. J. Hered. 2008, 99:223-226.
86. Pongratz N., et al. Allozyme variability in sexual and parthenogenetic freshwater planarians: evidence for polyphyletic origin of parthenogenetic lineages through hybridization with coexisting sexuals. Heredity 1998, 81:38-47.
87. Carmona J.A., et al. Hybridogenetic reproduction and maternal ancestry of polyploid Iberian fish: the Tropidophoxinellus alburnoides complex. Genetics 1997, 146:983-993.
88. Cunha C., et al. The evolutionary history of the allopolyploid Squalius alburnoides (Cyprinidae) complex in the northern Iberian Peninsula. Heredity 2011, 106:100-112.
89. Matos I., et al. Evidence for hermaphroditism in the Squalius alburnoides allopolyploid fish complex. Sex. Dev. 2010, 4:170-175.
90. Alves M.J., et al. The genetics of maintenance of an all-male lineage in the Squalius alburnoides complex. J. Fish Biol. 2002, 60:649-662.
91. Collares-Pereira M.J., Coelho M.M. Reconfirming the hybrid origin and generic status of the Iberian cyprinid complex Squalius alburnoides. J. Fish Biol. 2010, 76:707-715.
92. Graf J-D., Polls Pelaz M. Evolutionary genetics of the Rana esculenta complex. Evolution and Ecology of Unisexual Vertebrates 1989, 289-302. New York State Museum. R.M. Dawley, J.B. Bogart (Eds.).
93. Weinzierl R.P., et al. Reduced male allocation in the parthenogenetic hermaphrodite Dugesia polychroa. Evolution 1998, 52:109-115.
94. Weinzierl R.P., et al. High fecundity and low fertility in parthenogenetic planarians. Invert. Biol. 1999, 118:87-94.
95. Simon J.C., et al. Phylogenetic relationships between parthenogens and their sexual relatives: the possible routes to parthenogenesis in animals. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 2003, 79:151-163.
96. Rankin D.J., Lopez-Sepulcre A. Can adaptation lead to extinction?. Oikos 2005, 111:616-619.
97. Schurko A.M., et al. Signs of sex: what we know and how we know it. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2009, 24:208-217.
98. Hedtke S.M., Hillis D.M. The potential role of androgenesis in cytoplasmic-nuclear phylogenetic discordance. Syst. Biol. 2011, 60:87-109.
99. Abbott J.K., Morrow E.H. Obtaining snapshots of genetic variation using hemiclonal analysis. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2011, 26:359-368.
100. Morishima K., et al. Meiotic hybridogenesis in triploid Misgurnus loach derived from a clonal lineage. Heredity 2008, 100:581-586.