Molecular evidence for the natural production of homozygous Cupressus sempervirens L. lines by Cupressus dupreziana seed trees

Heredity

Volumn 104, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 185-190

  Nava, J L R ^a   Buonamici, A ^b   Vendramin, G G ^b   Pichot, C ^a  

^a French National Institute for Agriculture   (France)

^b CNR   (Italy)

Author keywords

Androgenesis; Conifer; Dihaploid; SSR; Surrogate mother

Indexed keywords

MICROSATELLITE DNA;

CONIFEROUS TREE; EMBRYONIC DEVELOPMENT; EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY; GENETIC ANALYSIS; GENETIC MARKER; HETEROZYGOSITY; POLLEN; SEEDLING; SURROGATE METHOD;

ARTICLE; CUPRESSUS; DIPLOIDY; FLOWER; GENETICS; PHYSIOLOGY; PLANT SEED; TREE;

CUPRESSUS; DIPLOIDY; GERM CELLS, PLANT; MICROSATELLITE REPEATS; SEEDS; TREES;

CONIFEROPHYTA; CUPRESSUS; CUPRESSUS DUPREZIANA; CUPRESSUS SEMPERVIRENS;

EID: 75549086339     PISSN: 0018067X     EISSN: 13652540     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/hdy.2009.112     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Abdoun F, Beddiaf M (2002). Cupressus dupreziana A. Camus: répartition, dépérissement et régéné ration au Tassili n'Ajjer, Sahara central. C R Biologies 325: 617-627.
2. Assani A, Gupta B, Rajam MV (2006). Haploid production in trees, ornamental and floricultural plants. In: Teixeira da Silva JA (ed). Floriculture, ornamental and plant biotechnology. p 646.
3. Barton NH, Charlesworth B (1998). Why sex and recombination? Science 281: 1986-1990.
4. Bell G (1982). The Masterpiece of Nature: The Evolution and Genetics of Sexuality. University of California Press: Berkeley, California.
5. Bijma P, Arendonk JAM, Bovenhuis B (1997). Breeding value and variance component estimation from data coming containing inbred individuals: application to gynogenetic families in common carp (Cyprinus carpio L.). Genetics 145: 1243-1249.
6. Bueno MA, Pintos B, Prado MJ, Gomez A, Manzanera JA (2004). Androgenesis: a tool for woody plant breeding. In: Pandalai SG (ed). Recent Research Developments in Genetics & Breeding. Vol.1, Part II, pp 365-383.
7. Chani E, Veilleux RE, Boluarte-Medina T (2000). Improved androgenesis of interspecific potato and efficiency of SSR markers to identify homozygous regenerants. Plant Cell Tiss Org Cult 60: 101-112.
8. Charlesworth B, Charlesworth D (1999). The genetic basis of inbreeding depression. Genet Res 74: 329-340.
9. Charlesworth D, Charlesworth B (1987). Inbreeding depression and its evolutionary consequences. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 18: 237-268.
10. Dakin EE, Avise JC (2004). Microsatellite null alleles in parentage analysis. Heredity 93: 504-509.
11. Dugas V (1996). Analyse de la variabilité enzymatique de 5 provenances naturelles et 10 provenances artificielles franc ̧aises de cyprès vert (Cupressus sempervirens L.). Rapport de stage de MST'Chimie et biologie végétales'. Université Claude Bernard-Lyon I.
12. Fei Yu T, Fei D, GuoYing W (2004). Identification of doubled haploid plants from maize gynogenesis by SSR molecular marker. Acta Agriculturae Universitatis Jiangxiensis 26: 859-862.
13. Foroughi-Wehr B, Wenzel G (1993). Andro- and parthenogenesis. In: Hayward MD, Bosemark NO, Romagosa I (eds). Plant Breeding: Principles and prospects. Chapman and Hall: London. pp 261-277.
14. Forster BP, Heberle-Bors E, Kasha KJ, Touraev A (2007). The resurgence of haploids in higher plants. Trends Plant Sci 12: 368-375.
15. Gallais A (1990). Théorie de la Sélection En Amélioration Des Plantes. Masson: Paris.
16. Fu J, Jansen RC (2006). Optimal design and analysis of genetic studies on gene expression. Genetics 172: 1993-1999.
17. Gaussen H, Leroy JF, Ozenda P (1982). Précis de Botanique, Tome II: Végétaux Supérieurs. Masson: Paris.
18. Germana M (2006). Doubled haploid production in fruit crops. Plant Cell Tiss Org Cult 86: 131-146.
19. Hofer M, Gomez A, Aguiriano E, Manzanera JA, Bueno MA (2002). Analysis of simple sequence repeat markers in homozygous lines of apple. Plant Breeding 121: 159-162.
20. Hoffman JI, Amos W (2005). Microsatellite genotyping errors: detection approaches, common sources and consequences for paternal exclusion. Mol Ecol 14: 599-612.
21. Hosp J, de Faria Maraschin S, Touraev A, Boutilier K (2007). Functional genomics of microspore embryogenesis. Euphytica 158: 275-285.
22. Keller LF, Waller DM (2002). Inbreeding effects in wild populations. Trends Ecol Evol 17: 230-241.
23. Komen J, Thorgaard GH (2007). Androgenesis, gynogenesis and the production of clones in fishes: a review. Aquaculture 269: 150-173.
24. McKone MJ, Halpern SL (2003). The evolution of androgenesis. Am Nat 161: 641-656.
25. Picard E, Crambes E, Liu CS, Mihamou-Ziyyat A (1994). Evolution of doubled haploid methods and consequences for plant breeding. Comptes Rendus des Séances de la Société de Biologie et de ses Filiales 188: 109-141.
26. Pichot C, Borrut A, El Maâtaoui M (1998). Unexpected DNA content in the endosperm of Cupressus dupreziana A. Camus seeds and its implications in the reproductive process. Sex Plant Reprod 11: 148-152.
27. Pichot C, El Maâtaoui M (2000). Unreduced diploid nuclei in Cupressus dupreziana A. Camus pollen. Theor Appl Genet 101: 574-579.
28. Pichot C, El Maâtaoui M, Raddi S, Raddi P (2001). Surrogate mother for endangered Cupressus. Nature 412: 39.
29. Pichot C, Liens B, Rivera Nava JL, Bachelier JB, El Maâtaoui M (2008). Cypress surrogate mother produces haploid progeny from alien pollen. Genetics 178: 379-383.
30. R Development Core Team (2006). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, Austria.
31. Sebastiani F, Buonamici A, Fineschi S, Racchi ML, Raddi P, Vendramin GG (2005). Novel polymorphic nuclear microsatellites in Cupressus sempervirens L.Mol Ecol Notes 5: 393-394.
32. Valgimigli MC (2005). Genetic variability in Italian populations of Cupressus sempervirens L. assessed by SSR and RAPD markers. PhD dissertation, Università degli Studi di Verona, Italy.
33. Vanwynsberghe L, De Witte K, Coart E, Keulemans J (2005). Limited application of homozygous genotypes in apple breeding. Plant Breeding 124: 399-403. (Pubitemid 41159606)
34. West SA, Lively CM, Read AF (1999). A pluralistic approach to sex and recombination. J Evol Biol 12: 1003-1012.