Variation in the strength of male mate choice allows long-term coexistence of sperm-dependent asexuals and their sexual hosts

Evolution

Volumn 64, Issue 10, 2010, Pages 2808-2819

  Mee, Jonathan A ^a   Otto, Sarah P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Evolution of sex; Gynogenesis; Hybridization; Phoxinus eos neogaeus; Sperm dependent asexuals

Indexed keywords

COEXISTENCE; EGG DEVELOPMENT; HYBRIDIZATION; MALE BEHAVIOR; MATE CHOICE; REPRODUCTIVE COST; SEXUAL REPRODUCTION;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; ASEXUAL REPRODUCTION; DECISION MAKING; EVOLUTION; FEMALE; GENETIC VARIABILITY; HYBRIDIZATION; MALE; PHYSIOLOGY; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR; SPERMATOZOON;

ANIMALS; BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; GENETIC VARIATION; HYBRIDIZATION, GENETIC; MALE; REPRODUCTION, ASEXUAL; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; SPERMATOZOA;

PHOXINUS EOS-NEOGAEUS;

EID: 78049313021     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: 15585646     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2010.01047.x     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Abt, G., and H. U. Reyer, 1993. Mate choice and fitness in a hybrid frog- Rana esculenta females prefer Rana lessonae males over their own. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 32:221-228.
2. Agrawal, A. F, 2006. Evolution of sex: why do organisms shuffle their genotypes? Curr. Biol. 16:R696-R704.
3. Angers, B., and I. J. Schlosser, 2007. The origin of Phoxinus eos-neogaeus unisexual hybrids. Mol. Ecol. 16:4562-4571.
4. Balsano, J. S., K. Kucharski, E. J. Randle, E. M. Rasch, and P. J. Monaco, 1981. Reduction of competition between bisexual and unisexual females of Poecilia in northeastern Mexico. Environ. Biol. Fishes 6:39-48.
5. Balsano, J. S., E. J. Randle, E. M. Rasch, and P. J.Monaco, 1985. Reproductive behavior and the maintenance of all-females Poecilia. Environ. Biol. Fishes 12:251-263.
6. Booksmythe, I., T. Detto, and P. R. Y. Backwell, 2008. Female fiddler crabs settle for less: the travel costs of mate choice. Anim. Behav. 76:1775-1781.
7. Crews, D., M. Grassman, and J. Lindzey, 1986. Behavioral facilitation of reproduction in sexual and unisexual whiptail lizards. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 83:9547-9550.
8. Darevsky, I. S., F. D. Danielyan, T. M. Sokolova, and Y. M. Rozanov, 1989. Intraclonal mating in the parthenogenetic lizard species Lacerta unisexualis Darevsky. Pp. 228-235 in R. M. Dawley, and J. P. Bogart, eds. Evolution and ecology of unisexual vertebrates. New York State Museum, Albany, New York.
9. Das, M. K., and J. S. Nelson, 1990. Spawning time and fecundity of Northern redbelly dace, Phoxinus eos, finescale dace, Phoxinus neogaeus, and their hybrids in Upper Pierre Gray Lake, Alberta. Can. Field-Nat. 104:409-413.
10. Dawley, R.M., and J. P. Bogart, eds, 1989. Evolution and ecology of unisexual vertebrates. New York State Education Department, Albany, New York.
11. Dries, L. A, 2003. Peering through the looking glass at a sexual parasite: are Amazon mollies red queens? Evolution 57:1387-1396.
12. Echelle, A. A., T. E. Dowling, C. C. Moritz, and W. M. Brown, 1989. Mitochondrial-DNA diversity and the origin of the Menidia clarkhubbsi complex of unisexual fishes (Atherinidae). Evolution 43:984-993.
13. Engeler, B., and H. U. Reyer, 2001. Choosy females and indiscriminate males: mate choice in mixed populations of sexual and hybridogenetic water frogs (Rana lessonae, Rana esculenta). Behav. Ecol. 12:600-606.
14. Forsgren, E., and C.Magnhagen, 1993. Conflicting demands in sand gobies- predators influence reproductive behavior. Behaviour 126:125-135.
15. Goddard, K. A., R. M. Dawley, and T. E. Dowling, 1989. Origin and genetic relationships of diploid, triploid, and diploid-triploid mosaic biotypes in the Phoxinus eos-neogaeus unisexual complex. Pp. 269-280 in R. M. Dawley, and J. P. Bogart, eds. Evolution and ecology of unisexual vertebrates. New York State Education Department, Albany, New York.
16. Goddard, K. A., O. Megwinoff, L. L. Wessner, and F. Giaimo, 1998. Confirmation of gynogenesis in Phoxinus eos-neogaeus (Pisces: Cyprinidae). J. Hered. 89:151-157.
17. Godin, J. G. J., and S. E. Briggs, 1996. Female mate choice under predation risk in the guppy. Anim. Behav. 51:117-130.
18. Graf, J.-D., andM. P. Pelaz, 1989. Evolutionary genetics of the Rana esculenta complex. Pp. 289-302 in R. M. Dawley, and J. P. Bogart, eds. Evolution and ecology of unisexual vertebrates. New York State Museum, Albany, New York.
19. Gwynne, D. T, 1989. Does copulation increase the risk of predation? Trends Ecol. Evol. 4:54-56.
20. Hellriegel, B., and H. U. Reyer, 2000. Factors influencing the composition of mixed populations of a hemiclonal hybrid and its sexual host. J. Evol. Biol. 13:906-918.
21. Heubel, K. U., D. J. Rankin, and H. Kokko, 2009. How to go extinct by mating too much: population consequences of male mate choice and efficiency in a sexual-asexual species complex. Oikos 118:513-520.
22. Iwasa, Y., and A. Pomiankowski, 1991. The evolution of costly mate preferences. 2. The handicap principle. Evolution 45:1431-1442.
23. Kerr, B., C. Neuhauser, B. J. M. Bohannan, and A. M. Dean, 2006. Local migration promotes competitive restraint in a host-pathogen 'tragedy of the commons'. Nature 442:75-78.
24. Kerr, B.,M.A. Riley, M.W. Feldman, and B. J.M. Bohannan, 2002. Local dispersal promotes biodiversity in a real-life game of rock-paper-scissors. Nature 418:171-174.
25. Kirkpatrick, M, 1982. Sexual selection and the evolution of female choice. Evolution 36:1-12.
26. Kokko, H., K. U. Heubel, and D. J. Rankin, 2008. How populations persist when asexuality requires sex: the spatial dynamics of coping with sperm parasites. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 275:817-825.
27. Magnhagen, C, 1995. Sneaking behavior and nest defense are affected by predation risk in the common goby. Anim. Behav. 50:1123-1128.
28. Magnhagen, C., and K. Vestergaard, 1991. Risk-taking in relation to reproductive investments and future reproductive opportunities-field experiment son nest-guarding common gobies, Pomatoschistus microps. Behav. Ecol. 2:351-359.
29. Mappes, J., R. V. Alatalo, J. Kotiaho, and S. Parri, 1996. Viability costs of condition-dependent sexual male display in a drumming wolf spider. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 263:785-789.
30. Mee, J., and L. Rowe, 2006. A comparison of parasite loads on asexual and sexual Phoxinus (Pisces: Cyprinidae). Can. J. Zool. 84:808-816.
31. Moore, W. S, 1976. Components of fitness in a unisexual fish Poeciliopsis monacha-occidentalis. Evolution 30:564-578.
32. Moore, W. S., and F. E. McKay, 1971. Coexistence in Unisexual Species Complexes of Poeciliopsis (Pisces-Poeciliidae). Ecology 52:791-799.
33. New, J. G, 1962. Hybridization between two cyprinids, Chrosomus eos and Chrosomus neogaeus. Copeia 1962:147-152.
34. Pomiankowski, A., Y. Iwasa, and S. Nee, 1991. The evolution of costly mate preferences 1. Fisher and biased mutation. Evolution 45:1422-1430.
35. Powles, P. M., S. Finucan, M. Vanhaaften, and R. A. Curry, 1992. Preliminary evidence for fractional spawning by the Northern Redbelly Dace, Phoxinus-Eos. Can. Field-Nat. 106:237-240.
36. Rowe, L. 1994. The costs of mating and mate choice in water striders. Anim. Behav. 48:1049-1056.
37. Sakurai, G., and E. Kasuya, 2008. The costs of harassment in the adzuki bean beetle. Anim. Behav. 75:1367-1373.
38. Schley, D., C. P. Doncaster, and T. Sluckin, 2004. Population models of sperm-dependent parthenogenesis. J. Theor. Biol. 229:559-572.
39. Schlupp, I, 2005. The evolutionary ecology of gynogenesis. Annu. Rev. Ecol., Evol. Syst. 36:399-417.
40. Schlupp, I., C. Marler, and M. J. Ryan, 1994. Benefit to Male Sailfin Mollies of Mating with Heterospecific Females. Science 263:373-374.
41. Schlupp, I., I. Nanda,M. Dobler, D. K. Lamatsch, J. T. Epplen, J. Parzefall, M. Schmid, and M. Schartl, 1998. Dispensable and indispensable genes in an ameiotic fish, the Amazon molly Poecilia formosa. Cytogenet. Cell Genet. 80:193-198.
42. Schlupp, I., J. Parzefall, and M. Schartl, 1991. Male mate choice in mixed bisexual unisexual breeding complexes of Poecilia (Teleostei, Poeciliidae). Ethology 88:215-222.
43. Schultz, R. J, 1969. Hybridization, unisexuality and polyploidy in teleost Peociliopsis (Poeciliidae) and other vertebrates. Am. Nat. 103:605-619.
44. Scott,W. B., and E. J. Crossman, 1979. Freshwater fishes of Canada. Minister of Supply and Services Canada, Ottawa.
45. Sinervo, B., and C. M. Lively, 1996. The rock-paper-scissors game and the evolution of alternative male strategies. Nature 380:240-243.
46. Vrijenhoek, R. C, 1979. Factors affecting clonal diversity and coexistence. Am. Zool. 19:787-797.
47. Vrijenhoek, R. C., R. A. Angus, and R. J. Schultz, 1977. Variation and heterozygosity in sexually vs clonally reproducing populations of poeciliopsis. Evolution 31:767-781.
48. Woodhead, A. D., and N. Armstrong, 1985. Aspects of the mating behavior of male mollies (Peocilia spp). J. Fish Biol. 27:593-601.