Rapid freehand MR-guided percutaneous needle interventions: An image-based approach to improve workflow and feasibility

Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Volumn 37, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 1202-1212

  Rothgang, Eva ^a,b   Gilson, Wesley D ^b,c   Wacker, Frank ^c,d   Hornegger, Joachim ^a   Lorenz, Christine H ^b,c   Weiss, Clifford R ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ERLANGEN NUREMBERG   (Germany)

^b SIEMENS CORPORATE RESEARCH   (United States)

^c JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d HANNOVER MEDICAL SCHOOL   (Germany)

Author keywords

interventional MRI; MR guided interventions; MR guided therapy; percutaneous interventions

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; ECHOGRAPHY; IN VITRO STUDY; IN VIVO STUDY; INTERVENTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; KIDNEY BIOPSY; NONHUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SCANNER; PERCUTANEOUS BIOPSY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPINAL CORD BIOPSY; SWINE; WORKFLOW;

ABLATION TECHNIQUES; ALGORITHMS; ANIMALS; BIOPSY, NEEDLE; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGE-GUIDED BIOPSY; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; INJECTIONS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, INTERVENTIONAL; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SOFTWARE; SWINE; WORKFLOW;

EID: 84876493027     PISSN: 10531807     EISSN: 15222586     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.23894     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Tatli S, Morrison PR, Tuncali K, Silverman SG,. Interventional MRI for oncologic applications. Tech Vasc Interv Radiol 2007; 10: 159-170.
2. Mueller P, Stark D, Simeone J, et al. MR-guided aspiration biopsy: needle design and clinical trials. Radiology 1986; 161: 605-609.
3. Lewin JS, Nour SG, Duerk JL,. Magnetic resonance image-guided biopsy and aspiration. Top Magn Reson Imaging 2000; 11: 173-183.
4. Sakarya ME, Unal O, Ozbay B, et al. MR fluoroscopy-guided transthoracic fine-needle aspiration biopsy: feasibility. Radiology 2003; 228: 589-592.
5. Silverman SG, Collick BD, Figueira MR, et al. Interactive MR-guided biopsy in an open-configuration MR imaging system. Radiology 1995; 197: 175-181.
6. Ojala R, Sequeiros RB, Klemola R, Vahala E, Jyrkinen L, Tervonen O,. MR-guided bone biopsy: preliminary report of a new guiding method. J Magn Reson Imaging 2002; 15: 82-86.
7. Beyersdorff D, Winkel A, Hamm B, Lenk S, Loening SA, Taupitz M,. MR Imaging-guided prostate biopsy with a closed MR unit at 1.5 T: initial results. Radiology 2005; 234: 576-581.
8. Zangos S, Eichler K, Wetter A, et al. MR-guided biopsies of lesions in the retroperitoneal space: technique and results. Eur Radiol 2006; 16: 307-312.
9. Wacker FK, Vogt S, Khamene A, et al. An augmented reality system for MR image-guided needle biopsy: initial results in a swine model. Radiology 2006; 238: 497-504.
10. Stattaus J, Maderwald S, Forsting M, Barkhausen J, Ladd ME,. MR-guided core biopsy with MR fluoroscopy using a short, wide-bore 1.5-Tesla scanner: feasibility and initial results. J Magn Reson Imaging 2008; 27: 1181-1187.
11. Weiss CR, Nour SG, Lewin JS,. MR-guided biopsy: a review of current techniques and applications. J Magn Reson Imaging 2008; 27: 311-325.
12. Das CJ, Goenka AH, Srivastava DN,. MR-guided abdominal biopsy using a 1.5-Tesla closed system: a feasibility study. Abdom Imaging 2010; 35: 218-223.
13. Kühn JP, Langner S, Hegenscheid K, et al. Magnetic resonance-guided upper abdominal biopsies in a high-field wide-bore 3-T MRI system: feasibility, handling, and needle artefacts. Eur Radiol 2010; 20: 2414-2421.
14. Fischbach F, Bunke J, Thormann M, et al. MR-guided freehand biopsy of liver lesions with fast continuous imaging using a 1.0-T open MRI scanner: experience in 50 patients. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2011; 34: 188-192.
15. Zangos S, Melzer A, Eichler K, et al. MR-compatible assistance system for biopsy in a high-field-strength system: initial results in patients with suspicious prostate lesions. Radiology 2011; 259: 903-910.
16. Hoffmann R, Thomas C, Rempp H, et al. Performing MR-guided biopsies in clinical routine: factors that influence accuracy and procedure time. Eur Radiol 2012; 22: 663-671.
17. Boll DT, Merkle EM, Lewin JS,. Low-flow vascular malformations: MR-guided percutaneous sclerotherapy in qualitative and quantitative assessment of therapy and outcome. Radiology 2004; 233: 376-384.
18. Sequeiros RB, Ojala RO, Klemola R, Vaara TJ, Jyrkinen L, Tervonen OA,. MRI-guided periradicular nerve root infiltration therapy in low-field (0.23-T) MRI system using optical instrument tracking. Eur Radiol 2002; 12: 1331-1337.
19. Fritz J, Henes JC, Thomas C, et al. Diagnostic and interventional MRI of the sacroiliac joints using a 1.5-T open-bore magnet: a one-stop-shopping approach. Am J Roentgenol 2008; 191: 1717-1724.
20. Fritz J, Thomas C, Clasen S, Claussen CD, Lewin JS, Pereira PL,. Freehand real-time MRI guided lumbar spinal injection procedures at 1.5 T: feasibility, accuracy, and safety. Am J Roentgenol 2009; 193: W161-W167.
21. Streitparth F, Walter T, Wonneberger U, et al. Image-guided spinal injection procedures in open high-field MRI with vertical field orientation: feasibility and technical features. Eur Radiol 2010; 20: 395-403.
22. Nour SG, Goldberg SN, Wacker FK, et al. MR monitoring of NaCl-enhanced radiofrequency ablations: observations on low-and high-field-strength MR images with pathologic correlation. Radiology 2010; 254: 449-459.
23. Morrison PR, Silverman SG, Tuncali K, Tatli S,. MRI-guided cryotherapy. J Magn Reson Imaging 2008; 27: 410-420.
24. Ricke J, Thormann M, Ludewig M, et al. MR-guided liver tumor ablation employing open high-field 1.0 T MRI for image-guided brachytherapy. Eur Radiol 2010; 20: 1985-1993.
25. Wacker FK, Cholewa D, Roggan A, Schilling A, Waldschmidt J, Wolf KJ,. Vascular lesions in children: percutaneous MR imaging-guided interstitial Nd: YAG laser therapy-preliminary experience. Radiology 1998; 208: 789-794.
26. Christoforou E, Akbudak E, Ozcan A, Karanikolas M, Tsekos NV,. Performance of interventions with manipulator-driven real-time MR guidance: implementation and initial in vitro tests. Magn Reson Imaging 2007; 25: 69-77.
27. Fischer GS, Deguet A, Csoma C, et al. MRI image overlay: application to arthrography needle insertion. Comput Aided Surg 2007; 12: 2-14.
28. Moche M, Trampel R, Kahn T, Busse H,. Navigation concepts for MR image-guided interventions. J Magn Reson Imaging 2008; 27: 276-291.
29. Busse H, Garnov N, Thörmer G, et al. Flexible add-on solution for MR image-guided interventions in a closed-bore scanner environment. Magn Reson Med 2010; 64: 922-928.
30. Genant JW, Vandevenne JE, Bergman AG, et al. Interventional musculoskeletal procedures performed by using MR imaging guidance with a vertically open MR unit: assessment of techniques and applicability. Radiology 2002; 223: 127-136.
31. Stattaus J, Maderwald S, Baba HA, et al. MR-guided liver biopsy within a short, wide-bore 1.5 Tesla MR system. Eur Radiol 2008; 18: 2865-2873.
32. Moche M, Zajonz D, Kahn T, Busse H,. MRI-guided procedures in various regions of the body using a robotic assistance system in a closed-bore scanner: preliminary clinical experience and limitations. J Magn Reson Imaging 2010; 31: 964-974.
33. Lewin JS, Duerk JL, Jain VR, Petersilge CA, Chao CP, Haaga JR,. Needle localization in MR-guided biopsy and aspiration: effects of field strength, sequence design, and magnetic field orientation. Am J Roentgenol 1996; 166: 1337-1345.
34. Lorenz CH, Kirchberg KJ, Zuehlsdorff S, et al. Interactive FrontEnd (IFE): A platform for graphical MR scanner control and scan automation. In: Proc 13th Annual Meeting ISMRM, Miami; 2005 (abstract 2170).
35. Yutzy, S, Duerk, J,. Pulse sequences and system interfaces for interventional and real-time MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 2008; 27: 267-275.
36. Pan L, Barbot J, Shea S, et al. An integrated system for catheter tracking and visualization in MR-guided cardiovascular interventions. In: Proc 19th Annual Meeting ISMRM, Montréal; 2011 (abstract 195).
37. Griswold, M, Jakob, P, Heidemann, R, et al. Generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions (GRAPPA). Magn Reson Med 2002; 47: 1202-1210.