Magnetic resonance-guided upper abdominal biopsies in a high-field wide-bore 3-T MRI system: Feasibility, handling, and needle artefacts

European Radiology

Volumn 20, Issue 10, 2010, Pages 2414-2421

  Kühn, Jens Peter ^a   Langner, Sönke ^a   Hegenscheid, Katrin ^a   Evert, Matthias ^a   Kickhefel, Antje ^b   Hosten, Norbert ^a   Puls, Ralf ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GREIFSWALD   (Germany)

^b SIEMENS AG   (Germany)

Author keywords

3 T MRI; Biopsy; Liver biopsy; MRI artefact; MRI intervention

Indexed keywords

ABDOMINAL TUMOR; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FOLLOW UP; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; NEEDLE BIOPSY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

ADULT; AGED; ARTIFACTS; BIOPSY, NEEDLE; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; FEMALE; HUMANS; KIDNEY; LIVER; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASMS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SPLEEN;

EID: 77957865483     PISSN: 09387994     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-010-1809-4     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. R Chojniak RK Isberner LM Viana LS Yu AA Aita FA Soares 2006 Computed tomography guided needle biopsy: experience from 1, 300 procedures Sao Paulo Med J 124 10 14 10.1590/S1516-31802006000100003 16612456
2. TJ Welch PF Sheedy CD Johnson CM Johnson DH Stephens 1989 CT-guided biopsy: prospective analysis of 1, 000 procedures Radiology 171 493 496 1:STN:280:DyaL1M3gt1Oisg%3D%3D 2704815
3. G Adam A Bücker C Nolte-Ernsting J Tacke RW Günther 1999 Interventional MR imaging: percutaneous abdominal and skeletal biopsies and drainages of the abdomen Eur Radiol 9 1471 1478 1:STN:280:DyaK1Mvlslahug%3D%3D 10.1007/s003300050873 10525854
4. S Zangos D Kiefl K Eichler K Engelmann M Heller C Herzog MG Mack V Jacobi TJ Vogl 2003 MR-guided biopsies of undetermined liver lesions: technique and results Rofo 175 688 694 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3s3it1arsA%3D%3D 12743864
5. R Hammerstingl A Huppertz J Breuer T Balzer A Blakeborough R Carter LC Fusté G Heinz-Peer W Judmaier M Laniado RM Manfredi DG Mathieu D Müller K Mortelè P Reimer MF Reiser PJ Robinson K Shamsi M Strotzer M Taupitz B Tombach G Valeri BE van Beers TJ Vogl 2008 Diagnostic efficacy of gadoxetic acid (Primovist)-enhanced MRI and spiral CT for a therapeutic strategy: comparison with intraoperative and histopathologic findings in focal liver lesions Eur Radiol 18 457 467 10.1007/s00330-007-0716-9 18058107 (Pubitemid 351248177)
6. HJ Langen H Kugel S Grewe A Gindele P Landwehr R Fischbach 2000 MR-guided biopsy using respiratory-triggered high-resolution T2-weighted sequences AJR Am J Roentgenol 174 834 836 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c7mtlGksg%3D%3D 10701635
7. AJ Schmidt ST Kee DY Sze BL Daniel MK Razavi CP Semba MD Dake 1999 Diagnostic yield of MR-guided liver biopsies compared with CT- and US-guided liver biopsies J Vasc Interv Radiol 10 1323 1329 1:STN:280: DC%2BD3c%2FkvFensw%3D%3D 10.1016/S1051-0443(99)70238-1 10584646
8. SG Silverman BD Collick MR Figueira R Khorasani DF Adams RW Newman GP Topulos FA Jolesz 1995 Interactive MR-guided biopsy in an open-configuration MR imaging system Radiology 197 175 181 1:STN:280:DyaK28%2FitlWnsA%3D%3D 7568819
9. CW König J Trübenbach J Fritz UM Lauer CD Claussen PL Pereira 2004 Contrast enhanced MR-guided biopsy of hepatocellular carcinoma Abdom Imaging 29 71 76 10.1007/s00261-003-0060-8 15160756
10. PR Mueller DD Stark JF Simeone S Saini RJ Butch RR Edelman J Wittenberg JT Ferrucci 1986 MR-guided aspiration biopsy: needle design and clinical trials Radiology 161 605 609 1:STN:280:DyaL2s%2FmvVentw%3D%3D 3786706
11. AE Mahfouz A Rahmouni C Zylbersztejn D Mathieu 1996 MR-guided biopsy using ultrafast T1- and T2-weighted reordered turbo fast low-angle shot sequences: feasibility and preliminary clinical applications AJR Am J Roentgenol 167 167 169 1:STN:280:DyaK283lvVKruw%3D%3D 8659364
12. PR Mueller SG Silverman G Tung JA Brink G Cardenosa S Saini BH Forman PF Hahn 1989 New universal precaution aspiration tray Radiology 173 278 279 1:STN:280:DyaL1MzoslKltA%3D%3D 2781020
13. S Akimoto H Mori T Fujii K Furuya 2009 Optimal scan timing for Gd-EOB-DTPA enhanced liver dynamic MR imaging Nippon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi 65 626 630 19498252
14. JF Cardella CW Bakal RE Bertino DR Burke A Drooz Z Haskal CA Lewis PC Malloy SG Meranze SB Oglevie D Sacks RB Towbin 2003 Quality improvement guidelines for image-guided percutaneous biopsy in adults (Appendix A) J Vasc Interv Radiol 14 227 230 10.1016/S1051-0443(07)61268-8
15. No authors listed. Obesity: preventing and managing the global epidemic (2000) Report of a WHO consultation. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser 894:1-253
16. L Yao SD Nelson LL Seeger JJ Eckardt FR Eilber 1999 Primary musculoskeletal neoplasms: effectiveness of core-needle biopsy Radiology 212 682 686 1:STN:280:DyaK1MvgslKksg%3D%3D 10478232
17. SC Yu CT Liew WY Lau TW Leung C Metreweli 2001 US-guided percutaneous biopsy of small hepatic lesions Radiology 218 195 199 1:STN:280: DC%2BD3M7ovVKjsw%3D%3D 11152801
18. WD Middleton SK Hiskes SA Teefey LD Boucher 1997 Small (1.5 cm or less) liver metastases: US-guided biopsy Radiology 205 729 732 1:STN:280: DyaK1c%2FlsFantA%3D%3D 9393528
19. SC Eberhardt PH Choi AM Bach SA Funt HE Felderman LE Hann 2003 Utility of sonography for small hepatic lesions found on computed tomography in patients with cancer J Ultrasound Med 22 335 343 12693617
20. J Stattaus H Kuehl S Ladd T Schroeder G Antoch HA Baba J Barkhausen M Forsting 2007 CT-guided biopsy of small liver lesions: visibility, artifacts, and corresponding diagnostic accuracy Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 30 928 935 10.1007/s00270-007-9023-8 17546404 (Pubitemid 47497840)
21. P Haage W Piroth G Staatz G Adam RW Günther 1999 CT-guided percutaneous biopsies for the classification of focal liver lesions: a comparison between 14 G and 18 G puncture biopsy needles Rofo 171 44 48 1:STN:280:DyaK1MzptlOksg%3D%3D 10464504
22. BI Choi JK Han JM Cho DS Choi MC Han HS Lee CY Kim 1995 Characterization of focal hepatic tumors. Value of two-phase scanning with spiral computed tomography Cancer 76 2434 2442 1:STN:280:DyaK283itlejsQ%3D%3D 10.1002/1097-0142(19951215)76:12<2434::AID-CNCR2820761206>3.0.CO;2-G 8625068
23. H Honda H Onitsuka Y Kanazawa T Matsumata T Hayashi K Kaneko T Fukuya Y Tateshi E Adachi K Masuda 1995 MR imaging of hepatocellular carcinoma. Correlation of metal content and signal intensity Acta Radiol 36 163 167 1:STN:280:DyaK2M3is1WnsA%3D%3D 7710797
24. S Zangos C Müller F Mayer NN Naguib NE Nour-Eldin ML Hansmann C Herzog RM Hammerstingl A Thalhammer M Mack TJ Vogl K Eichler 2010 Retrospective 5-year analysis of MR-guided biopsies in a low-field MR system Rofo 181 658 663
25. HJ Langen H Kugel P Landwehr 2002 MR-guided core biopsies using a closed 1.0 T imager. First clinical results Eur J Radiol 41 19 25 10.1016/S0720- 048X(01)00361-8 11750148 (Pubitemid 34002986)
26. E Salomonowitz 2001 MR imaging-guided biopsy and therapeutic intervention in a closed-configuration magnet: single-center series of 361 punctures AJR Am J Roentgenol 177 159 163 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MzlslentQ%3D%3D 11418418
27. J Stattaus S Maderwald HA Baba G Gerken J Barkhausen M Forsting ME Ladd 2008 MR-guided liver biopsy within a short, wide-bore 1.5 Tesla MR system Eur Radiol 18 2865 2873 10.1007/s00330-008-1088-5 18641994
28. ME Ladd P Erhart JF Debatin BJ Romanowski P Boesiger GC McKinnon 1996 Biopsy needle susceptibility artifacts Magn Reson Med 36 646 651 1:STN:280:DyaK2s%2Fkslejsw%3D%3D 10.1002/mrm.1910360423 8892221
29. K Butts JM Pauly BL Daniel S Kee AM Norbash 1999 Management of biopsy needle artifacts: techniques for RF-refocused MRI J Magn Reson Imaging 9 586 595 1:STN:280:DyaK1M3kslCkuw%3D%3D 10.1002/(SICI)1522-2586(199904)9:4<586::AID- JMRI13>3.0.CO;2-X 10232519 (Pubitemid 29194299)
30. CR Weiss SG Nour JS Lewin 2008 MR-guided biopsy: a review of current techniques and applications J Magn Reson Imaging 27 311 325 10.1002/jmri.21270 18219685 (Pubitemid 351222537)
31. BM Müller-Bierl P Martirosian H Graf A Boss C König PL Pereira F Schick 2008 Biopsy needle tips with markers-MR compatible needles for high-precision needle tip positioning Med Phys 35 2273 2278 10.1118/1.2919082 18649458 (Pubitemid 351748633)
32. H Liu AJ Martin CL Truwit 1998 Interventional MRI at high-field (1.5 T): needle artifacts J Magn Reson Imaging 8 214 219 1:STN:280:DyaK1c7lvF2iuw%3D%3D 10.1002/jmri.1880080136 9500283 (Pubitemid 28099581)
33. HB Gehl C Frahm 1998 MRI-controlled biopsies Radiologe 38 194 199 1:STN:280:DyaK1c3jvVyntw%3D%3D 10.1007/s001170050342 9577864 (Pubitemid 28157045)
34. S Arbogast-Ravier A Gangi P Choquet B Brunot A Constantinesco 1995 An in vitro study at low field for MR guidance of a biopsy needle Magn Reson Imaging 13 321 324 1:STN:280:DyaK2M3lslOntA%3D%3D 10.1016/0730-725X(94)00103-A 7739374
35. WA Hall W Galicich T Bergman CL Truwit 2006 3-Tesla intraoperative MR imaging for neurosurgery J Neurooncol 77 297 303 10.1007/s11060-005-9046-4 16314945 (Pubitemid 44404398)