MR-guided freehand biopsy of liver lesions with fast continuous imaging using a 1.0-T open MRI scanner: Experience in 50 patients

CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology

Volumn 34, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 188-192

  Fischbach, Frank ^a   Bunke, Jürgen ^b   Thormann, Markus ^a   Gaffke, Gunnar ^a   Jungnickel, Kerstin ^a   Smink, Jouke ^b   Ricke, Jens ^a  

^a OTTO VON GUERICKE UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b PHILIPS HEALTHCARE   (United States)

Author keywords

1 Tesla; Freehand intervention; Interventional radiology; Liver biopsy; Needle artefact; Open MRI

Indexed keywords

GADOXETIC ACID;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BILE DUCT CARCINOMA; BILOMA; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FEMALE; HEMATOMA; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; LIVER BIOPSY; LIVER CELL CARCINOMA; LIVER FOCAL NODULAR HYPERPLASIA; LIVER HEMANGIOMA; LIVER METASTASIS; LIVER TUMOR; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SCANNER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TUMOR VOLUME;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BIOPSY, NEEDLE; CONTRAST MEDIA; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FEMALE; GADOLINIUM DTPA; HUMANS; LIVER DISEASES; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, INTERVENTIONAL; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PUNCTURES; SOFTWARE; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 79251597863     PISSN: 01741551     EISSN: 1432086X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00270-010-9836-8     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. J Kettenbach M Blum K El-Rabadi, et al. 2005 Percutaneous liver biopsy Übers über verschied Verfahr Radiol 45 44 54 1:STN:280: DC%2BD2M%2FjsFejuw%3D%3D
2. AJ Schmidt ST Kee DY Sze, et al. 1999 Diagnostic yield of MR-guided liver biopsies compared with CT- and US-guided liver biopsies J Vasc Interv Radiol 10 1323 1329 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c%2FkvFensw%3D%3D 10.1016/S1051-0443(99)70238-1 10584646
3. J Stattaus H Kuehl EA Hauth, et al. 2007 Liver biopsy under guidance of multislice computed tomography: comparison of 16G and 18G biopsy needles Radiologe 47 430 438 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2szgt1KqtQ%3D%3D 10.1007/s00117-005-1336-5 16440187
4. J Stattaus H Kuehl S Ladd, et al. 2007 CT-guided biopsy of small liver lesions: visibility, artefacts, and corresponding diagnostic accuracy Cardiovasc Interv Radiol 30 928 935 10.1007/s00270-007-9023-8
5. JH Oliver III RL Baron 1996 Helical biphasic contrast-enhanced CT of the liver: technique, indications, interpretation, and pitfalls Radiology 201 1 14 8816509
6. DS Lu H Lee K Farahani, et al. 1997 Biopsy of hepatic dome lesions: semi-real-time coronal MR guidance technique AJR Am J Roentgenol 168 737 739 1:STN:280:DyaK2s3htVCmsQ%3D%3D 9057526
7. J Stattaus S Maderwald M Forsting, et al. 2008 MR-guided core biopsy with MR fluoroscopy using a short, wide-bore 1.5 Tesla scanner: feasibility and initial results J Magn Reson Imaging 27 1181 1187 10.1002/jmri.21075 18425833
8. Streitparth F, Walter T, Wonneberger U et al.(2009) Image-guided spinal injection procedures in open high-field MRI with vertical field orientation: Feasibility and technical features. Eur Radiol [Epub ahead of print]
9. B Hamm T Staks A Muhler, et al. 1995 Phase I clinical evaluation of Gd-EOB-DTPA as a hepatobiliary MR contrast agent: safety, pharmacokinetics, and MR imaging Radiology 195 785 792 1:STN:280:DyaK2M3ntlGrsg%3D%3D 7754011
10. A Huppertz T Balzer A Blakeborough, et al. 2004 Improved detection of focal liver lesions at MR imaging: multicenter comparison of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR images with intraoperative findings Radiology 230 266 275 10.1148/radiol.2301020269 14695400
11. P Reimer EJ Rummeny K Shamsi, et al. 1996 Phase II clinical evaluation of Gd-EOB-DTPA: dose, safety aspects, and pulse sequence Radiology 199 177 183 1:STN:280:DyaK283gtFyqug%3D%3D 8633143
12. PR Mueller DD Stark JF Simeone, et al. 1986 MR-guided aspiration biopsy: needle design and clinical trials Radiology 161 605 609 1:STN:280: DyaL2s%2FmvVentw%3D%3D 3786706
13. M Moche R Trampel T Kahn, et al. 2008 Navigation concepts for MR image-guided interventions J Magn Reson Imaging 27 276 291 10.1002/jmri.21262 18219682
14. MK Hatfield RA Beres SS Sane, et al. 2008 Percutaneous imaging-guided solid organ core needle biopsy: coaxial versus noncoaxial method AJR Am J Roentgenol 190 413 417 10.2214/AJR.07.2676 18212227
15. JS Lewin JL Duerk VR Jain, et al. 1996 Needle localization in MR-guided biopsy and aspiration: effects of field strength, sequence design, and magnetic field orientation AJR Am J Roentgenol 166 1337 1345 1:STN:280: DyaK283it1Kquw%3D%3D 8633445
16. C Frahm HB Gehl UH Melchert, et al. 1996 Visualization of magnetic resonance-compatible needles at 1.5 and 0.2 Tesla Cardiovasc Interv Radiol 19 335 340 1:STN:280:DyaK28zns1Cmug%3D%3D 10.1007/BF02570186
17. SG Nour JS Lewin 2005 Percutaneous biopsy from blinded to MR guided: an update on current techniques and applications Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 13 441 464 10.1016/j.mric.2005.04.009 16084412
18. CR Weiss SG Nour JS Lewin 2008 MR-guided biopsy: a review of current techniques and applications J Magn Reson Imaging 27 311 325 10.1002/jmri.21270 18219685
19. S Zangos D Kiefl K Eichler, et al. 2003 MR-guided biopsies of undetermined liver lesions: technique and results Rofo 175 688 694 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3s3it1arsA%3D%3D 12743864
20. HJ Langen H Kugel M Ortmann, et al. 2001 Functional capacity of MRI-compatible biopsy needles in comparison with ferromagnetic biopsy needles. In vitro studies Rofo 173 658 662 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MvmvVSrsw%3D%3D 11512240